Environmental sustainability in Turkey: an environmental Kuznets curve estimation for ecological footprint

References

• Acharyya J. 2009. Fdi, growth and the environment: evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. J Econ Dev. 34:43–58. doi:10.35866/caujed.2009.34.1.003.
   Google Scholar
• Akbostanci E, GI T, Türüt-Aşik S. 2007. Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey’s exports. Environ Dev Econ. 12:297–322. doi:10.1017/S1355770X06003512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbostanci E, Türüt-Aşik S, Tunç GI. 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy. 37:861–867. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA. 2019. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Tot Environ. 685:702–709. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altıntaş H, Kassouri Y. 2020. Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecol Indic. 113:106187. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apergis N, Ozturk I. 2015. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indi. 52:16–22. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aşici AA, Acar S. 2015. Does income growth relocate ecological footprint? Ecol Indic. 61:707–714. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek J. 2016. A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy. 91:22–27. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagliani M, Bravo G, Dalmazzone S. 2008. A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecol Econ. 65:650–661. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM. 2019. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26:23010–23026. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelmus P. 2008. Quantitative Eco-nomics: how sustainable are our economies? China: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü. 2016. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 54:838–845. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölük G, Mert M. 2015. The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 52:587–595. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A. 2013. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic. 24:518–533. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown LR, Durbin J, Evans MJ. 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J Royal Stat Soc. 37:149–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut U. 2019. Testing environmental Kuznets curve for the USA under a regime shift: the role of renewable energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26:14562–14569. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04835-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulut U, Muratoglu G. 2018. Renewable energy in Turkey: great potential, low but increasing utilization, and an empirical analysis on renewable energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy. 123:240–250. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caviglia-Harris JL, Chambers D, Kahn JR. 2009. Taking the “U” out of Kuznets. A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecol Econ. 68:1149–1159. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey 2020. Electronic data delivery system. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Çetin M, Ecevit E. 2017. The impact of financial development on carbon emissions under the structural breaks: empirical evidence from Turkish economy. Int J Econ Perspect. 11:64–78.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG. 2018. The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:36589–36603. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3526-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 2003. Trade and the environment: theory and evidence. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R. 2000. The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ. 32:341–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai D, Liu H, Wu J. 2018. Urbanization, energy use, and CO2 emissions: A provincial-level analysis of China. Energy Sources Part B Econ Plan Policy. 13:205–210. doi:10.1080/15567249.2011.637543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish HST, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW. 2019. Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc. 47:101516. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish UR, Khan SUD. 2020. Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc. 54:101996. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destek MA, Sarkodie SA. 2019. Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Tot Environ. 650:2483–2489. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destek MA, Sinha A. 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod. 242:118537. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E. 2018. Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:29387–29396. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econom. 49:1057–1072. doi:10.2307/1912517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinda S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol Econ. 49:431–455. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK. 2019. Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ. 30:1065–1086. doi:10.1177/0958305X19834279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, Isik C. 2020. The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Tot Environ. 723:138063. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertugrul HM, Cetin M, Seker F, Dogan E. 2016. The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol Indic. 67:543–555. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing B, Moore D, Goldfinger SH, Oursler A, Reed A, Wackernagel M. 2010. Ecological footprint atlas 2010. [accessed 2020 Apr 10]. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/images/uploads/Ecological_Footprint_Atlas_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Footprint Network 2020. Open data platform. [accessed 2020 Apr 12]. http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/.
   Google Scholar
• Gökmenoğlu K, Taspinar N. 2016. The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev. 25:706–723. doi:10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gozgor G, Can M. 2016. Export product diversification and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 23:21594–21603. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7403-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Work Pap. 3914.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ. 110:353–377. doi:10.2307/2118443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney T. 2019. Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26:389–397. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1595214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney T, Kantar K. 2020. Biomass energy consumption and sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 1–6. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1753124
   Google Scholar
• Halicioglu F. 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy. 37:1156–1164. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Liu YM. 2015. Has the development of FDI and foreign trade contributed to China’s CO2 emissions? An empirical study with provincial panel data. Nat Hazards. 76:1079–1091. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1534-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Richard P. 2010. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecol Econ. 69:1083–1093. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency 2020. Data and statistics. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=Total%20primary%20energy%20supply%20(TPES)%20by%20source.
   Google Scholar
• Işik C, Kasımatı E, Ongan S. 2017. Analyzing the causalities between economic growth, financial development, international trade, tourism expenditure and/on the CO2 emissions in Greece. Energy Sources Part B Econ Plan Policy. 12:665–673. doi:10.1080/15567249.2016.1263251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Işık C, Ongan S, Özdemir D. 2019. Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: an application of heterogeneous panel estimation method. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26:10846–10853. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04514-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalil A, Feridun M. 2011. The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Econ. 33:284–291. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasoy A, Akçay S. 2019. Effects of renewable energy consumption and trade on environmental pollution: the Turkish case. Manag Environ Qual Int J. 30:437–455. doi:10.1108/MEQ-04-2018-0081.
   Google Scholar
• Katircioğlu ST, Taşpinar N. 2017. Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 68:572–586. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzes J, Wackernagel M. 2009. Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecol Indic. 9:812–817. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A. 2018. The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:790–804. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0468-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köksal C, Işik M, Katircioğlu S. 2020. The role of shadow economies in ecological footprint quality: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27:13457–13466. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-07956-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznets S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev. 45:1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econom. 54:159–178. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Bahrens WW III. 1972. Limits to growth. [accessed 2020 Apr 1]. http://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scan-version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mert M, Bölük G. 2016. Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 23:21669–21681. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan PK. 2005. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ. 37:1979–1990. doi:10.1080/00036840500278103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASA 2018a. Climate change: how do we know? [accessed 2018 Jul 1]. https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/.
   Google Scholar
• NASA 2018b. How climate is changing? [accessed 2018 Jul 1]. https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2012. Green growth and developing countries. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/green-development/greengrowthanddevelopingcountries-consultationdraft.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ozatac N, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N. 2017. Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24:16690–16701. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9317-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan B. 2013. The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy. 62:1138–1147. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan B, Apergis N, Shahbaz M. 2018. A revisit of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey: new evidence from bootstrap rolling window causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:32381–32394. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3165-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk I, Acaravci A. 2013. The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ. 36:262–267. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata UK. 2018a. The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy. 160:1115–1123. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata UK. 2018b. Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod. 187:770–779. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH, Shin Y 1999. An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom S, editor. Econometrics and econometric theory in the 20th century: the Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 371–413.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. 2001. Bounds testing approach to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom. 16:289–326. doi:10.1002/jae.616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips PC, Perron P. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 75:335–346. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources 2014. National renewable energy action plan for Turkey. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. https://www.ebrd.com/news/2015/ebrd-supports-turkeys-shift-to-renewable-energy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Saikkonen P. 1991. Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Econom Theory. 7:1–21. doi:10.1017/S0266466600004217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkodie SA, Strezov V. 2019a. A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci Tot Environ. 649:128–145. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkodie SA, Strezov V. 2019b. Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Tot Environ. 646:862–871. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M. 2015. The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 52:347–356. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O. 2015. Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ. 51:275–287. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Q, Wang X, Zhou Q, Balogh L. 2019. Pollution haven hypothesis revisited: a comparison of the BRICS and MINT countries based on VECM approach. J Clean Prod. 227:724–738. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J. 2006. A simultaneous estimation of environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from China. China Econ Rev. 17:383–394. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2006.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi A. 2003. The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ. 44:29–42. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00223-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern DI. 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32:1419–1439. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Watson MW. 1993. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econom. 61:783–820. doi:10.2307/2951763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su ECY, Chen YT. 2018. Policy or income to affect the generation of medical wastes: an application of environmental Kuznets curve by using Taiwan as an example. J Clean Prod. 188:489–496. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Fang C. 2018. Water use trend analysis: A non-parametric method for the environmental Kuznets curve detection. J Clean Prod. 172:497–507. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute 2020. Main statistics. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist.
   Google Scholar
• Tutulmaz O. 2015. Environmental Kuznets Curve time series application for Turkey: why controversial results exist for similar models? Renew Sustain Energy Revi. 50:73–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucak R, Apergis N. 2018. Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environ Sci Policy. 80:21–27. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucak R, Bilgili F. 2018. A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod. 188:144–157. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations 2014. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: our Common Future. [accessed 2020 Apr 1]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Usman O, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA. 2020. Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: evidence from the US. Renew Energy. 150:266–277. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzar U, Eyuboglu K. 2019. The nexus between income inequality and CO2 emissions in Turkey. J Clean Prod. 227:149–157. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackernagel M, Silverstein J. 2000. Big things first: focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ. 32:391–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank 2020. World bank open data. [accessed 2020 Apr 15]. https://data.worldbank.org/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2018. 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. [accessed 2018 Jun 30]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz NÇ. 2014. CO2 Emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources Part B Econ Plan Policy. 9:229–235. doi:10.1080/15567249.2011.567222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T. 2003. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ. 46:351–365. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zhou X. 2016. Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 58:943–951. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J. 2019. Environmental regulation: lessons for developing economies in Asia. ADBI Work Pap Ser, 980.
   Google Scholar
• Zivot E, Andrews DWK. 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat. 10:251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmami M, Ben-Salha O. 2020. An empirical analysis of the determinants of CO2 emissions in‎ GCC countries. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 1-12. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1715508.
   Google Scholar