Prioritising sustainable supply chain management practices by their impact on multiple interacting barriers

References

• Afshar A, Mariño MA, Saadatpour M, Afshar A. 2011. Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag. 25(2):545–563. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9713-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahi P, Searcy C. 2013. A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 52:329–341. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello G, Enea M, Galante G, La Scalia G. 2009. Clean agent selection approached by fuzzy TOPSIS decision-making method. Fire Technol. 45(4):405–418. doi:10.1007/s10694-008-0059-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhavan P, Barak S, Maghsoudlou H, Antuchevičienė J. 2015. FQSPM-SWOT for strategic alliance planning and partner selection: case study in a holding car manufacturer company. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 21(2):165–185. doi:10.3846/20294913.2014.965240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Zaabi S, Al Dhaheri N, Diabat A. 2013. Analysis of interaction between the barriers for the implementation of sustainable supply chain management. Internation. J Adv Manuf Technol. 68(1–4):895–905. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-4951-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri MP. 2010. Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl. 37(9):6218–6224. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antucheviciene J, Zakarevicius A, Zavadskas EK. 2011. Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods. Informatica. 22(3):319–338. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2011.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby A, Leat M, Hudson-Smith M, Wilding R. 2012. Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Manag Internation J. 17(5):497–516. doi:10.1108/13598541211258573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson W. 2002. Team turns costs of wastes into profits. Elibrary.Ru. 131(8):22–24. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=4460321
   Google Scholar
• Aydogan EK. 2011. Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl. 38(4):3992–3998. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baležentis T, Zeng S. 2013. Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: an extension of the MULTIMOORA method. Expert Syst Appl. 40(2):543–550. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak S, Dahooei JH. 2018. A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation. J Air Transp Manag. 73:134–149. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoǧlu A, Kaplanoglu V, Durmuşoglu ZDU, Şahin C. 2013. Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Syst Appl. 40(3):899–907. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman RE, Zadeh LA. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag Sci. 17(4):B-141–B-164. doi:10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beske P, Land A, Seuring S. 2014a. Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: a critical analysis of the literature. Internation J Prod Econ. 152:131–143. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beske P, Seuring S, Stefan Schaltegger, Prof Roger Burr D. 2014b. Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag Internation J. 19(3):322–331. doi:10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström M, Jönsson AM, Lockie S, Mol AP, Oosterveer P. 2015. Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities. J Clean Prod. 107:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK. 2012. Robustness of MULTIMOORA: a method for multi-objective optimization. Informatica. 23(1):1–25. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2012.346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Liane Easton P, Crum M. 2011. Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. Internation J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 41(1):46–62. doi:10.1108/09600031111101420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Rogers DS. 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 38(5):360–387. doi:10.1108/09600030810882816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang B, Chang C-W, Wu C-H. 2011. Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst Appl. 38(3):1850–1858. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closs DJ, Speier C, Meacham N. 2011. Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: the role of supply chain management. J Acad Mark Sci. 39(1):101–116. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0207-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahooie JH, Zavadskas EK, Firoozfar H, Vanaki A, Mohammadi N, Brauers WKM. 2019. An improved fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria decision making based on objective weighting method (CCSD) and its application to technological forecasting method selection. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 79:114–128. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalalah D, Al-Tahat M, Bataineh K. 2012. Mutually dependent multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Inform Eng. 4(2):195–216. doi:10.1007/s12543-012-0111-3.
   Google Scholar
• Dalalah D, Hayajneh M, Batieha F. 2011. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert Syst Appl. 38(7):8384–8391. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmonico D, Jabbour CJC, Pereira SCF, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Renwic DWS, Thomé AMT. 2018. Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resour Conserv Recycl. 134:70–79. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Xiong J, Fu P 2007. Airline safety evaluation based on fuzzy TOPSIS. Paper presented at: PAISI 2007. Pacific-Asia Workshop on Intelligence and Security Informatics; April 11 –12;Chengdu, China.
   Google Scholar
• Ding H, Zhao Q, An Z, Tang O. 2016. Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps. Internation J Prod Econ. 181:191–207. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endut N, Morley J, Tien P-L. 2018. The changing transmission mechanism of US monetary policy. Empir Econ. 54(3):959–987. doi:10.1007/s00181-017-1240-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H. 2015. Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Internation J Prod Econ. 162:101–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favardin P, Lepelley D, Serais J. 2002. Borda rule, Copeland method and strategic manipulation. Rev Econ Design. 7(2):213–228. doi:10.1007/s100580200073.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira FAF, Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė I. 2019. Toward a sustainable supply chain for social credit: learning by experience using single-valued neutrosophic sets and fuzzy cognitive maps. Ann Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-019-03194-2
   Google Scholar
• Genovese A, Acquaye AA, Figueroa A, Koh SL. 2017. Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications. Omega. 66:344–357. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gölcük İ, Baykasoğlu A. 2016. An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Expert Syst Appl. 46:346–366. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P. 2010. Sustainable supply chain management and inter‐organizational resources: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 17(4):230–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold S, Trautrims A, Trodd Z. 2015. Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag Internation J. 20(5):485–494. doi:10.1108/SCM-02-2015-0046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golicic SL, Smith CD. 2013. A meta‐analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. J Supply Chain Manag. 49(2):78–95. doi:10.1111/jscm.12006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Azevedo SG, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V. 2014a. Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. J Clean Prod. 85:212–225. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN. 2014b. Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ. 147(PARTB):555–568. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.018.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Soleimani H. 2017. A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a journal of cleaner production focus. J Clean Prod. 142:371–384. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N, Rahman S. 2015. Green supply chain collaboration and incentives: current trends and future directions. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 74:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart SL, Milstein MB. 2003. Creating sustainable value. Acad Manag Perspect. 17(2):56–67. doi:10.5465/ame.2003.10025194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassini E, Surti C, Searcy C. 2012. A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Internation J Prod Econ. 140(1):69–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Acad Manag J. 42(1):87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Zhang Y, Ding M. 2018. Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. J Clean Prod. 172:3508–3519. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu Y-L, Lee C-H, Kreng VB. 2010. The application of Fuzzy Delphi method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Expert Syst Appl. 37(1):419–425. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang C, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. New York: Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa A, Amagasa M, Shiga T, Tomizawa G, Tatsuta R, Mieno H. 1993. The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 55(3):241–253. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia P, Mahdiraji HA, Govindan K, Meidutė I. 2013. Leadership selection in an unlimited three-echelon supply chain. J Bus Econ Manag. 14(3):616–637. doi:10.3846/16111699.2012.761648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones P, Hillier D, Comfort D 2011 Shopping for tomorrow: promoting sustainable consumption within food stores Br Food J. 113Issue 7, pp. 935–948). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/00070701111148441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J. 2016. A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res. 50(3):25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusi-Sarpong S, Bai C, Sarkis J, Wang X. 2015. Green supply chain practices evaluation in the mining industry using a joint rough sets and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Resour Policy. 46:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusi-Sarpong S, Bai C, Sarkis J, Wang X. 2016. Green supply chain practices and performance in Ghana’s mining industry: a comparative evaluation based on DEMATEL and AHP. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model. 8(4):320. doi:10.1504/ijbpscm.2016.081290.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Pan S-Y, Kim H, Linn JH, Chiang P-C. 2015. Building green supply chains in eco-industrial parks towards a green economy: barriers and strategies. J Environ Manag. 162:158–170. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V. 2007. Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J Oper Manag. 25(6):1075–1082. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, H-K Z, Li Z-B, Liu S-F. 2017. Decision process in MCDM with large number of criteria and heterogeneous risk preferences. Oper Res Perspect. 4:106–112. doi:10.1016/j.orp.2017.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Liu P, Liu SF, Zhou XZ, Zhang T. 2015. A study of decision process in MCDM problems with large number of criteria. Internation. Trans Operl Res. 22(2):237–264. doi:10.1111/itor.12102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorek S, Fuchs D. 2013. Strong sustainable consumption governance – precondition for a degrowth path? J. Clean Prod. 38:36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorek S, Spangenberg JH. 2014. Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy - Beyond green growth and green economies. J Clean Prod. 63:33–44. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra S, Mangla SK, Xu L, Diabat A. 2016. Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain. Internation J Prod Econ. 181:342–349. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangla SK, Govindan K, Luthra S. 2017. Prioritizing the barriers to achieve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chains using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. J Clean Prod. 151:509–525. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall D, McCarthy L, Heavey C, McGrath P. 2015. Environmental and social supply chain management sustainability practices: construct development and measurement. Prod Plan Control. 26(8):673–690. doi:10.1080/09537287.2014.963726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathivathanan D, Kannan D, Haq AN. 2018. Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: a multi-stakeholder view. Resour Conserv Recycl. 128:284–305. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mela K, Tiainen T, Heinisuo M. 2012. Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design. Adv Eng Inform. 26(4):716–726. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Datta PP. 2014. Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: an exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. Internation J Prod Res. 52(7):2085–2107. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.849014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moktadir MA, Ali SM, Rajesh R, Paul SK. 2018. Modeling the interrelationships among barriers to sustainable supply chain management in leather industry. J Clean Prod. 181:631–651. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi-Nasab SH, Sotoudeh-Anvari A. 2017. A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Mater Des. 121:237–253. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movahedipour M, Zeng J, Yang M, Wu X. 2017. An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing sustainable supply chain management: an empirical study. Manag Decis. 55(8):1824–1850. doi:10.1108/MD-12-2016-0898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan AE, Sridharan R, Ram Kumar P. 2018. Analyzing the interactions among barriers of sustainable supply chain management practices: a case study. J Manuf Technol Manag. 30(6):937–971. doi:10.1108/JMTM-06-2017-0114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorderhaven NG. 1995. Strategic decision making. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Oelze N. 2017. Sustainable supply chain management implementation – enablers and barriers in the textile industry. Sustain. 9(8):1435. doi:10.3390/su9081435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önüt S, Kara SS, Işik E. 2009. Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Syst Appl. 36(2 Part 2):3887–3895. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res. 156(2):445–455. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oster CV, Strong JS, Zorn CK. 2013. Analyzing aviation safety: problems, challenges, opportunities. Res Transp Econ. 43(1):148–164. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagell M, Gobeli D. 2009. How plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Prod Oper Manag. 18(3):278–299. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01050.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagell M, Shevchenko A. 2014. Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. J Supply Chain Manag. 50(1):44–55. doi:10.1111/jscm.12037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou EI, Hatwágner MF, Buruzs A, Kóczy LT. 2017. A concept reduction approach for fuzzy cognitive map models in decision making and management. Neurocomput. 232:16–33. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil SK, Kant R. 2014. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of knowledge management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Syst Appl. 41(2):679–693. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerol J-C, Barba-Romero S. 2012. Multicriterion decision in management: principles and practice Vol. 25. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Qian W. 2012. Environmental management accounting and supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 20(1):186–187. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.023.
   Google Scholar
• Raut R, Gardas BB, Narkhede B. 2019. Ranking the barriers of sustainable textile and apparel supply chains: an interpretive structural modelling methodology. Benchmarking Int J. 26(2):371–394. doi:10.1108/BIJ-12-2017-0340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszkowska E, Kacprzak D. 2016. The fuzzy SAW and fuzzy TOPSIS procedures based on ordered fuzzy numbers. Inform Sci. 369:564–584. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL 2003. Rank, normalization and idealization in the analytic hierarchy process. Paper presented at: ISAHP 2003. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process; Aug 7 –9;Bali, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Sadi-Nezhad S, Damghani KK. 2010. Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance. Appl Soft Comput J. 10(4):1028–1039. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajjad A, Eweje G, Tappin D. 2015. Sustainable supply chain management: motivators and barriers. Bus Strategy Environ. 24(7):643–655. doi:10.1002/bse.1898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuring S, Müller M. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 16(15):1699–1710. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Gollnick V, Li Y, Stumpf E. 2014. Intelligent multicriteria decision support system for systems design. J Aircr. 51(1):216–225. doi:10.2514/1.C032296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkabadi AM, Pourjavad E, Mayorga RV. 2018. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach to improve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chain. Sustain Prod Consum. 16:99–109. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2018.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng ML, Chiu ASF, Tan RR, Siriban-Manalang AB. 2013. Sustainable consumption and production for Asia: sustainability through green design and practice. J Clean Prod. 40:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J, Kosareva N. 2015. A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection. Internation. J Comput Commun Control. 10(6):113–128. doi:10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unilever P 2012. Unilever sustainable living plan: progress report 2011. London: Unilever.
   Google Scholar
• Varmazyar M, Dehghanbaghi M, Afkhami M. 2016. A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Eval Program Plan. 58:125–140. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavrek R, Kotulic R, Adamisin P, Sira E, Vozarova IK. 2017. Effectiveness of use of MCDM methods in the terms of local self-government. editor. Advances in applied economic research. Berlin:Springer;279–288.
   Google Scholar
• Veleva V, Ellenbecker M. 2001. Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J Clean Prod. 9(6):519–549. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00010-5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Zhu Z, Wang Y. 2016a. A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Inform Sci. 345:27–45. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y-M, Luo Y. 2010a. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model. 51(1–2):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Subramanian N, Gunasekaran A, Abdulrahman MD, Liu C. 2015. Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: chinese auto-parts suppliers’ perspective. Int J Prod Econ. 170:219–233. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Mathiyazhagan K, Xu L, Diabat A. 2016b. A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyze the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. J Clean Prod. 117:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Pagell M. 2011. Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. J Oper Manag. 29(6):577–590. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang MG 2013. Developing a focal firm’s sustainable supply chain framework: drivers, orientation, practices and performance outcomes [dissertation]. Toledo (OH): University of Toledo.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Musa A, Dauda M, El-Berishy NM, Cang S. 2014. A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. Internation J Prod Econ. 147:531–543. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control. 8(3):338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J, Hajiagha SHR, Hashemi SS. 2014. Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF). Appl Soft Comput. 24:1013–1021. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 16(2):159–172. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeydan M, Çolpan C. 2009. A new decision support system for performance measurement using combined fuzzy TOPSIS/DEA approach. Internation J Prod Res. 47(15):4327–4349. doi:10.1080/00207540802662870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar