565
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Business models towards SDGs: the barriers for operationalizing Product-Service System (PSS) in Brazil

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 350-359 | Received 18 Aug 2020, Accepted 10 Sep 2020, Published online: 22 Sep 2020

References

  • Akbar P , Hoffmann S. 2019. Creating value in product service systems through sharing. J Bus Res. (January):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.008.
  • Amiri M , Hashemi-Tabatabaei M , Ghahremanloo M , Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M , Zavadskas EK , Banaitis A . 2020. A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 1–18. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1793424.
  • Annarelli A , Battistella C , Nonino F . 2016. Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review. J Clean Prod. 139:1011–1032. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.061.
  • Annarelli A , Battistella C , Nonino F . 2020. Competitive advantage implication of different Product Service System business models: consequences of ‘not-replicable’ capabilities. J Clean Prod. 247:119121. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119121.
  • Ayala NF , Gerstlberger W , Frank AG . 2019. Managing servitization in product companies: the moderating role of service suppliers. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 39(1):43–74. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-08-2017-0484.
  • Baines TS , Lightfoot HW , Evans S , Neely A , Greenough R , Peppard J , Roy R , Shehab E , Braganza A , Tiwari A , et al. 2007. State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 221(10):1543–1552. doi:10.1243/09544054JEM858.
  • Bali Swain R , Yang-Wallentin F . 2020. Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 27(2):96–106. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1692316.
  • Beuren FH , Gomes Ferreira MG , Cauchick Miguel PA . 2013. Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. J Clean Prod. 47:222–231. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.028.
  • Beuren FH , Sousa-Zomer TT , Cauchick-Miguel PA . 2017. Proposal of a framework for product-service systems characterization. Production. 27:1–12. doi:10.1590/0103-6513.20170052.
  • Boons F , Lüdeke-Freund F . 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod. 45:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.
  • Boucher X , Brissaud D , Shimomura Y . 2016. Design of sustainable product service systems and their value creation chains. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 15:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.09.005.
  • Bradley P , Parry G , O’Regan N . 2020. A framework to explore the functioning and sustainability of business models. Sustain Prod Consum. 21:57–77. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2019.10.007.
  • Catulli M , Cook M , Potter S . 2017. Consuming use orientated product service systems: A consumer culture theory perspective. J Clean Prod. 141:1186–1193. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.187.
  • Cegarra-Navarro JG , Papa A , Garcia-Perez A , Fiano F . 2019. An open-minded strategy towards eco-innovation: A key to sustainable growth in a global enterprise. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 148(August):119727. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119727.
  • Chiu M-C , Tsai C-H . 2020. Design a personalised product service system utilising a multi-agent system. Adv Eng Inf. 43(101):101036. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101036.
  • Chofreh AG , Goni FA , Klemeš JJ . 2018. Evaluation of a framework for sustainable enterprise resource planning systems implementation. J Clean Prod. 190:778–786. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.182.
  • Corrêa HL . 2018. Servitization meets sustainability. Futur Stud Res J. 10(2). doi:10.24023.
  • Cusumano MA , Kahl SJ , Suarez FF . 2015. Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strateg Manag J. 36(4):559–575. doi:10.1002/smj.2235.
  • D’Agostin A , de Medeiros JF , Vidor G , Zulpo M , Moretto CF . 2020. Drivers and barriers for the adoption of use-oriented product-service systems: A study with young consumers in medium and small cities. Sustain Prod Consum. 21:92–103. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2019.11.002.
  • de Carvalho JPA , Ribeiro NP , da Rocha Franco C , Catapan A , Borsato M . 2020. A product-service-system proposal for municipalities in developing countries with tight budget to convert the organic waste in energy to eliminate dumps. Waste Manag. 106:99–109. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.022.
  • de Oliveira MG , de Mendes Sousa GH , de Albuquerque AA , Rozenfeld H . 2018. Lessons learned from a successful industrial product service system business model: emphasis on financial aspects. J Bus Ind Mark. 33(3):365–376. doi:10.1108/JBIM-07-2016-0147.
  • Franciosi C , Voisin A , Miranda S , Riemma S , Iung B . 2020. Measuring maintenance impacts on sustainability of manufacturing industries: from a systematic literature review to a framework proposal. J Clean Prod. 260:121065. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121065.
  • Homrich AS , Theodoro DS , de Carvalho MM . 2017. PSS creating business for sustainability: the Brazilian olive oil case in mantiqueira community. Procedia CIRP. 64:405–410. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.110.
  • Hwang C-L , Yoon K . 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9.
  • Jesus Pacheco DA , Ten Caten CS , Jung CF , Sassanelli C , Terzi S . 2019. Overcoming barriers towards sustainable Product-Service Systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: state of the art and a novel decision matrix. J Clean Prod. 222:903–921. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.152.
  • Lermen FH , Ribeiro JLD , Echeveste ME , Milani Martins VL , Tinoco MAC . 2020. Sustainable offers for drying and storage of grains: identifying perceived value for Brazilian farmers. J Stored Prod Res. 87:101579. doi:10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101579.
  • Lima Junior FR , Carpinetti LCR . 2015. Uma comparação entre os métodos TOPSIS e Fuzzy-TOPSIS no apoio à tomada de decisão multicritério para seleção de fornecedores. Gestão Produção. 22(1):17–34. doi:10.1590/0104-530X1190.
  • Malhotra NK . 2012. Pesquisa de marketing. Uma orientação aplicada. 6th ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  • Martins VWB , Rampasso IS , Siltori PFS , Cazeri GT , Quelhas OLG . 2020. Contributions from the Brazilian industrial sector to sustainable development. J Clean Prod. 272:122762. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122762.
  • Mont O , Dalhammar C , Jacobsson N . 2006. A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing. J Clean Prod. 14(17):1509–1518. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.024.
  • Mont OK . 2002. Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J Clean Prod. 10(3):237–245. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652601000397
  • Omer A , Elagib NA , Zhuguo M , Saleem F , Mohammed A . 2020. Water scarcity in the Yellow River Basin under future climate change and human activities. Sci Total Environ. 749:141446. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141446.
  • Ordonez-Ponce E , Khare A . 2020. GRI 300 as a measurement tool for the United Nations sustainable development goals: assessing the impact of car makers on sustainability. J Environ Plan Manag. 1–29. doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1746906.
  • Park H , Yoon J . 2015. A chance discovery-based approach for new product-service system (PSS) concepts. Serv Bus. 9(1):115e135. doi:10.1007/s11628-013-0222-x.
  • Pereira VR , Kreye ME , de Carvalho MM . 2019. Customer-pulled and provider-pushed pathways for product-service system. J Manuf Technol Manag. 30(4):729–747. doi:10.1108/JMTM-07-2018-0209.
  • Pezzotta G , Sala R , Pirola F , Campos AR , Margarito A , Correia AT , Fotia S , Mourtzis D 2016. Definition of a PSS engineering environment: from the theoretical methodology to the platform implementation. Proc Summer Sch Fr Turco; Sep 13–15; Naples, Italy; p. 97–101.
  • Reigado CR , Fernandes SDC , Saavedra YMB , Ometto AR , da Costa JMH . 2017. A circular economy toolkit as an alternative to improve the application of PSS methodologies. Procedia CIRP. 64:37–42. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.034.
  • Shete PC , Ansari ZN , Kant R . 2020. A Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach and its application to evaluate the enablers of sustainable supply chain innovation. Sustain Prod Consum. 23:77–93. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.05.001.
  • Singh RK , Gupta A , Kumar A , Khan TA . 2016. Ranking of barriers for effective maintenance by using TOPSIS approach. J Qual Maint Eng. 22(1):18–34. doi:10.1108/JQME-02-2015-0009.
  • Sousa TT , Miguel PAC . 2015. Product-service systems as a promising approach to sustainability: exploring the sustainable aspects of a PSS in Brazil. Procedia CIRP. 30:138–143. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.025.
  • Sousa-Zomer TT , Miguel PAC . 2016. Exploring the critical factors for sustainable product-service systems implementation and diffusion in developing countries: an analysis of two PSS cases in Brazil. Procedia CIRP. 47:454–459. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.061.
  • Teles F , Gomes Magri RT , Cooper Ordoñez RE , Anholon R , Lacerda Costa S , Santa-Eulalia LA . 2018. Sustainability measurement of product-service systems: brazilian case studies about electric car-sharing. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 25(8):721–728. doi:10.1080/13504509.2018.1488771.
  • Tukker A . 2015. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy - a review. J Clean Prod. 97:76–91. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049.
  • UN . 2015. Sustainable development goals (SDGs); [accessed 2019 May 1]. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
  • UN . 2019. Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. p. 21. [accessed 2019 Jun 4]. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global Indicator Framework after 2019 refinement_Eng.pdf.
  • Vezzoli C , Ceschin F , Diehl JC , Kohtala C . 2015. New design challenges to widely implement sustainable product-service systems. J Clean Prod. 97:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.061.
  • Weking J , Brosig C , Böhm M , Hein A , Kremar H 2018. Business model innovation strategies for product service systems – an explorative study. EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ECIS). Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2018); Portsmouth,UK.
  • Yang M , Evans S . 2019. Product-service system business model archetypes and sustainability. J Clean Prod. 220:1156–1166. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.067.
  • Yoon KP , Kim WK . 2017. The behavioral TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl. 89:266–272. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.045.
  • Zeeuw van der Laan A , Aurisicchio M . 2020. A framework to use product-service systems as plans to produce closed-loop resource flows. J Clean Prod. 252:119733. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119733.
  • Zhang Y , Sun J , Yang Z , Wang Y . 2020. Critical success factors of green innovation: technology, organization and environment readiness. J Clean Prod. 264:121701. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.