Mapping key features and dimensions of the inclusive city: A systematic bibliometric analysis and literature study

References

• Glaeser E 2013. Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier (an excerpt)(translated by Innа Kushnareva) [J]. Journal of Economic Sociology. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2013-4-75-94.
   Google Scholar
• ADB (ASIAN DEVELOPMENTBANK). Access to Justice for the Urban Poor; towards inclusive cities [R]. 2011. 978-92-9092-044-1.
   Google Scholar
• Affleck A, Mellor M. 2006. Community development finance: a neo-market solution to social exclusion? [J]. J Soc Policy. 35(2):303–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405009542.
   Google Scholar
• Agyemang FSK, Morrison N. 2018. Recognising the barriers to securing affordable housing through the land use planning system in Sub-Saharan Africa: a perspective from Ghana [J]. Urban Stud. 55(12):2640–2659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017724092.
   Google Scholar
• Aksnes DW, Sivertsen G. 2019. A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of scopus and web of science [J]. J Data Inf Sci. 4(1):1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Aktan B, Peker S, Bellalah M. 2020. What Ward’s clustering method tells about the four largest emerging equity markets? [J]. Int J Entrepreneurship Small Business. 39(1/2):64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2020.104232.
   Google Scholar
• Albuquerque CMP. 2018. Cities really smart and inclusive: Possibilities and limits for social inclusion and participation[M]. In: Cristina Maria Pinto Albuquerque, editor. E-Planning and collaboration: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global/Hershey; p. 1426–1445.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew C, Legacy C. 2013. The role of partnerships in creating inclusive cities [M]. In: Carolyn Whitzman, Crystal Legacy, Caroline Andrew, Fran Klodawsky, Margaret Shaw, and Kalpana Viswanath, editor(s). Building inclusive cities: Women’s safety and the right to the city. London, UK: Taylor and Francis Hoboken; p. 90-102.
   Google Scholar
• Attia S, Shafik Z, Ibrahim A. 2018. New cities and community extensions in Egypt and the middle east: visions and challenges [M]. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• A-v ANTTIROIKO, De Jong M. 2020. The inclusive city: the theory and practice of creating urban prosperity for all [M]. Springer Nature/Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bharne V, Khandekar S. 2019. Affordable housing: Inclusive cities [M]. Bharne V, Khandekar S, 编. New York, USA: ORO Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Billi M, Mascareño A, Edwards J. 2021. Governing sustainability or sustainable governance? Semantic constellations on the sustainability-governance intersection in academic literature [J]. J Clean Prod. 279:123523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123523
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell T. 2019. Inclusiveness in urban theory and urban-centred international development policy [J]. J Reg City Plann. 30(2):89. doi:https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2019.30.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen B. 2006. Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability [J]. Technol Soc. 28(1–2):63–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Dahiya B, Das A. 2020. New Urban Agenda in Asia-Pacific: governance for sustainable and inclusive cities [M]. New Urban Agenda in Asia-Pacific. Singapore: Springer; p. 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong M, Joss S, D等 SCHRAVEN. 2015. Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization [J]. J Clean Prod. 109:25–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Google Scholar
• De LABARRAX. 2000. Fear of epidemics: the engine of urban planning [J]. Plann Pract Res. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713691875
   Google Scholar
• De Souza BRIGGSX, Pendall R, Rubin V. 2015. Inclusive Economic Growth in America’s Cities: what’s the Playbook and the Score?[M]. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• De Vita GE, Oppido S. 2016. Inclusive Cities for Intercultural Communities. European Experiences [J]. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 223:134–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.333
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey N, Bramley G, S等 POWER. 2011. The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability[J]. Sustainable Dev. 19(5):289–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
   Google Scholar
• Ding X, Zhong W, Shearmur RG等. 2015. An inclusive model for assessing the sustainability of cities in developing countries - Trinity of Cities’ Sustainability from Spatial, Logical and Time Dimensions (TCS-SLTD) [J]. J Clean Prod. 109:62–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.140
   Google Scholar
• Dionisio MR, Kingham S, K等 BANWELL. 2016. Geospatial tools for Community Engagement in the Christchurch Rebuild, New Zealand [J]. Sustainable Cities Soc. 27:233–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Donohue JC. 1973. Understanding scientific literatures: A bibliometric approach. [J]. ERIC. 1973. Cambridge, USA
   Google Scholar
• Dyer M, Gleeson D, Grey T. 2017. Framework for collaborative urbanism [M]. New York, USA: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_2
   Google Scholar
• Espino NA. 2015. Building the Inclusive City: theory and Practice for Confronting Urban Segregation [J]. London and New York: Crc Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks J, Hespanhol L, C等 PARKER. 2018. Blending pop-up urbanism and participatory technologies: challenges and opportunities for inclusive city making [J]. City, Culture Soc. 12:44–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Gorgul E, Luo L, R等 RIVERAC. 2017. Fostering a More 《Cultured》 City through Inclusion: metrics for Sense of Belonging for Migrants in Chinese Urban Areas [C]. Procedia engineering. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd; p. 511-516.
   Google Scholar
• Guo D, Chen H, R等 LONG. 2017. A co-word analysis of organizational constraints for maintaining sustainability [J]. Sustainability. 9(10):1928. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S. 2010. Toward recognitive justice: Emerging trends and challenges in transnational migration and lifelong learning [J]. Int J Lifelong Educ. 29(2):149–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02601371003616533.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta J, Pfeffer K, H等 VERREST. 2015. Geographies of urban governance: Advanced theories, methods and practices [M]. Geographies of Urban governance: Advanced theories, methods and practices. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21272-2
   Google Scholar
• Gupta J, Vegelin C. 2016. Sustainable development goals and inclusive development [J]. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ. 16(3):433–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton R. 2015. Leading the inclusive city: place-based innovation for a bounded planet [M]. Leading the inclusive city: Place-Based innovation for a Bounded Planet. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• He L, Agard B, Trépanier M. 2020. A classification of public transit users with smart card data based on time series distance metrics and a hierarchical clustering method [J]. Transportmetrica A: Transp Sci. 16(1):56–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1479722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrle P, U-j WALTHER. 2005. Socially inclusive cities: emerging concepts and practice [M]. Berlin, Germany: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hu W, Wang R. 2019. Which Chinese cities are more inclusive and why? [J]. Cities. 86:51–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.010
   Google Scholar
• Ianchovichina E, Lundström S Inclusive growth analytics: Framework and application [J]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Iii UN-HABITAT. Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-1_inclusive-cities [R]. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development. 2017. Quito, Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Jetoo S. 2019. Stakeholder engagement for inclusive climate governance: The case of the city of Turku [J]. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11(21):6080. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216080.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer N. 2002. Citizenship, affiliation and exclusion: Perspectives from the South [J]. IDS Bull. 33(2):1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00021.x.
   Google Scholar
• Keen M, Ride A. 2019. Trading places: inclusive cities and market vending in the Pacific Islands [J]. Asia Pac Viewp. 60(3):239–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12227.
   Google Scholar
• Kharel S. 2017. Rural womens’ access to community finance [J]. Nepalese J Dev Rural Stud. 14(1–2):112–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/njdrs.v14i1-2.19654.
   Google Scholar
• Khulaidah EZ, Irsalinda N. 2020. FCM using squared euclidean distance for e-commerce classification in Indonesia [C]//. J Phys Conf Ser:12071, Vol. 1613. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Sietchiping R, Kinyanjui M. 2020. Developing National Urban policies ways forward to green and smart cities: ways forward to green and smart cities [M]. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Landau LB. 2007. Discrimination and development? Immigration, urbanisation and sustainable livelihoods in Johannesburg [J]. Dev South Afr. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350601165876
   Google Scholar
• Laquian AA, Hanley LM. 2007. The inclusive city: infrastructure and public services for the urban poor in Asia [M]. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Xu J, Zheng M. 2018. Green governance: New perspective from open innovation [J]. Sustainability (Switzerland). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113845
   Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Li Y, Ma Z. 2018. Exploring the interactive development between population urbanization and land urbanization: Evidence from Chongqing, China (1998-2016) [J]. Sustainability (Switzerland). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061741
   Google Scholar
• Liu CY, Hu FZY, Jeong J. 2019. Towards inclusive urban development? New knowledge/creative economy and wage inequality in major Chinese cities [J]. Cities. Vol.105, 102385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liu Z. 2019. Knowledge engineering research topic mining based on co-word analysis. [C]. SEKE. Pittsburgh, USA: KSI Research Inc; p. 650-777.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, De, Li F等 JONGM. 2020. Towards developing a new model for inclusive cities in China-The case of Xiong’an New Area[J]. Sustainability (Switzerland). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156195
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Tan Y, Chai Y. 2020. Neighbourhood-scale public spaces, inter-group attitudes and migrant integration in Beijing, China[J]. Urban Stud. 57(12):2491–2509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019879376.
   Google Scholar
• Ma W, Schraven D, M等 DEBRUIJNE. 2019. Tracing the origins of place branding research: a bibliometric study of concepts in use (1980-2018)[J]. Sustainability (Switzerland). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11112999
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevia D, Lathia S. 2019. Women’s safety and public spaces: Lessons from the sabarmati riverfront, india[J]. Urban Plann. 4(2):154–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli L, Battisti A, Matzarakis A. 2015. Multicriteria analysis model for urban open space renovation: an application for Rome [J]. Sustainable Cities Soc. 14:e10–e20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Milligan NV, Nieuwenhuijsen ER, Grawi CL. 2014. Using a participatory action strategic approach to enhance accessibility and participation in arts and cultural events: results of four focus groups [J]. Disabil Health J. 7(1):105–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy A, Dahlhaus P, Thompson H Historic urban landscapes and visualising Ballarat: citizen participation for sustainable urban planning and design [C]//. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2016, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh F, Legendre P. 2014. Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? [J]. J Classif. 31(3):274–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z.
   Google Scholar
• Ö ÖZ, Eder M. 2018. ‘Problem Spaces’ and struggles over the right to the city: challenges of living differentially in a gentrifying istanbul neighborhood [J]. Int J Urban Reg Res. 44(3):484–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12656.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Making cities work for all: dataand actions for inclusive growth [M]. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264263260-en.
   Google Scholar
• Omotola JS. 2008. Political globalization and citizenship: new sources of security threats in Africa [J]. J Afr Law. 52(2):268–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855308000120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paola DR, Rosenthal-sabroux C. 2014. Smart city how to create public and economic value with high technology in urban space [M]. In: Renata Paola Dameri,  and Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, editor(s). Smart city how to create public and economic value with high technology in Urban Space. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paskaleva KA. 2011. The smart city: a nexus for open innovation? [J]. Intell Build Int. 3(3):153–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2011.586672.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-delhoyo R, Andújar-montoya MD, H等 MORA. Citizen participation in urban planning-management processes assessing urban accessibility in smart cities [C]. SMARTGREENS 2018a- Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, Funchal, Madeira-Portugal. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5220/0006704202060213.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-delhoyo R, García-mayor C, H等 MORA. 2017. Improving urban accessibility: a methodology for urban dynamics analysis in smart, sustainable and inclusive cities [J]. Int J Sustainable Dev Plann. 12(3):357–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-357-367.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-delhoyo R, García-mayor C, H等 -MORA-MORA. Making smart and accessible cities: an urban model based on the design of intelligent environments [C] SMARTGREENS 2016- Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, Rome, Italy. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5220/0005798100630070.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-delhoyo R, Mora H, Paredes JF. 2018b. Using social network data to improve planning and design of smart cities [C]. WIT Transactions Built Environ. doi:https://doi.org/10.2495/UG180161
   Google Scholar
• Pineda VS. 2020. Building the inclusive city: Governance, access, and the urban transformation of Dubai[M]. London, UK: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Pokhrel N. 2019. Transforming kolkata: a partnership for a more sustainable, inclusive, and resilient city [M]. Asian Dev Bank. doi:https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS189628-2
   Google Scholar
• Rebernik N, Goličnik Marušić B, A等 BAHILLO. 2019. A 4-dimensional model and combined methodological approach to inclusive Urban planning and design for ALL [J]. Sustainable Cities Soc. 44:195–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahub JE, Gottsbacher M, De Boer J. 2018. Social theories of urban violence in the global south: Towards safe and inclusive cities [M]. In: Jennifer Erin Salahub, Markus Gottsbacher, and John de Boer, editor(s). Social theories of urban violence in the global south: towards safe and inclusive cities. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salahub JE, Gottsbacher M, J等 DEBOER. 2019. In: Jennifer Erin Salahub, Markus Gottsbacher, John de Boer, and Mayssam D. Zaaroura, editor(s). Reducing urban violence in the global south: Towards safe and inclusive cities [M]. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sands P, Peel J. 2012. Principles of international environmental law [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers A, Van Heumen L 2014. The inclusive city through the lens of quality of life [M]. Quality of life and intellectual disability: knowledge application to other social and educational challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Schraven D, Joss S, De Jong M. 2021. Past, present, future: engagement with sustainable urban development through 35 city labels in the scientific literature 1990–2019 [J/OL]. J Clean Prod. 292:125924. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262100144X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singru RN, Lindfield MR. 2017. Enabling inclusive cities: Tool kit for inclusive Urban development [R]. Mandaluyong: Asian Dev Bank. doi:https://doi.org/10.22617/TIM157428
   Google Scholar
• Song J, Zhang H, Dong W. 2016. A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization [J]. Scientometrics. 107(3):1111–1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg F, Lindfield MR. 2011. Inclusive Cities [M]. Steinberg F, M R LINDFIELD, 编. Philippines: Asian Development Bank
   Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Xu H, Zhang X. 2016. Sustainable urbanization in China: a comprehensive literature review [J]. Cities. 55:82–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Turok I, Scheba A. 2019. ‘Right to the city’ and the New Urban Agenda: learning from the right to housing [J]. Territory Polit Governance. 7(4):494–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1499549.
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS. 2015. United Nations transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. [S]. New York, USA: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS CENTRE FOR HUMAN SETTLEMENTS. 2001. The state of the world’s cities, 2001 [M]. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-HABITAT.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. 2014. Visualizing bibliometric networks [M]. Measuring scholarly impact. New York, USA: Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
   Google Scholar
• Venkateswar S, Bandyopadhyay S. 2016. Globalisation and the challenges of development in contemporary India (Dynamics of Asian Development) [M]. Venkateswar S, Bandyopadhyay S, 编. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vijaya V, Sharma S, Batra N Comparative study of single linkage, complete linkage, and ward method of agglomerative clustering [C]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing: Trends, Prespectives and Prospects, COMITCon 2019, Faridabad, India. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862232.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanath K. 2013. Gender inclusive cities programme: implementing change for women’s safety [M]. Building inclusive cities: Women’s safety and the right to the city. London, UK: Taylor and Francis Hoboken. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203100691
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li B. 2018. Governance and Finance: Availability of community and social development infrastructures in Rural China [J]. Asia Pac Policy Stud. 5(1):4–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.216.
   Google Scholar
• Wang XD, Liu JJ, Sheng FS. 2014. Analysis of hotspots in the field of domestic knowledge discovery based on co-word analysis method [J]. Cybern Inf Technol. 14(5):145–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2014-0051.
   Google Scholar
• Westendorff D. 2004. In: David Westendorff editor. From unsustainable to inclusive cities [M]. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Whitzman C, Legacy C, C等 ANDREW. 2013. Building inclusive cities: women’s safety and the right to the city [M]. In: Carolyn Whitzman, Crystal Legacy, Caroline Andrew, Fran Klodawsky, Margaret Shaw, and Kalpana Viswanath Editor(s), Building inclusive cities: Women’s safety and the right to the city. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WORLD BANK GROUP. World: Inclusive cities approach paper [R]. 2015. World bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Xu J, Y等 ZHANG. 2020. Study on sustainable urbanization literature based on web of science, scopus, and China national knowledge infrastructure: a scientometric analysis in cite space [J]. J Clean Prod. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121537
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Ma F. 2007. On paradigm of research knowledge management: a bibliometric analysis [J]. J Manage Sci China. 6:65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Leydesdorff L. 2016. The normalization of occurrence and Co-occurrence matrices in bibliometrics using Cosine similarities and O Chiai coefficients. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 67(11):2805–2814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuberi D, Taylor AJ. 2017. (Re) generating inclusive cities: Poverty and planning in Urban North America [M]. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• 佚名. New Urban Agenda[Z/OL] (2017). [Accessed 2021 Feb 16] http://habitat3.org.
   Google Scholar