References
- The 17 Goals, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. [ accessed 2021 Dec 13]. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
- Abdel-Basset M, Gamal A, Chakrabortty RK, Ryan M. 2021. Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainability evaluation of bioenergy production technologies: a case study. J Clean Prod. 290:125805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125805.
- Atanassov KT. 1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 20(1):87–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.
- Atanassov KT. 1999. In: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications, 35. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Heidelberg: Physica, Heidelberg; p. 1–137.
- Atanassov KT. 2000. Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 110(2):267–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00112-8.
- Ayyildiz E, Taskin Gumus A. 2020. A novel spherical fuzzy AHP-integrated spherical WASPAS methodology for petrol station location selection problem: a real case study for İstanbul. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(29):36109–36120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09640-0.
- Badri Ahmadi H, Hashemi Petrudi SH, Wang X. 2017. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 90(9–12):2413–2427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9518-z.
- Chen CH. 2019. A new multi-criteria assessment model combining GRA techniques with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based TOPSIS method for sustainable building materials supplier selection. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11(8):2265. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082265.
- Costa I, Massard G, Agarwal A. 2010. Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. J Clean Prod. 18(8):815–822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.019.
- Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Gastaldi M, Koh SL, Rosa P. 2017. A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: a sustainability index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 78:401–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.077.
- Di Tomasso MR, Schweitzer SO. 2013. Industrial policy in America: breaking the Taboo. Chelthenham (Northampton): Edward Elgar Publisher.
- Diba S, Xie N. 2019. Sustainable supplier selection for satrec vitalait milk company in Senegal using the novel grey relational analysis method. Grey Systems: Theory and Application. 9(3):262–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-01-2019-0003.
- Ewing B, Reed A, Galli A, Kitzes J, Wackernagel M. 2010. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts. 2010 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
- Garibaldi JM, Jaroszewski M, Musikasuwan S. 2008. Nonstationary fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 16(4):1072–1086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.917308.
- Grigoroudis E, Kouikoglou VS, Phillis YA. 2021. SAFE 2019: updates and new sustainability findings worldwide. Ecol Indic. 121:107072. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107072.
- Ikram M, Ferasso M, Sroufe R, Zhang Q. 2021a. Assessing green technology indicators for cleaner production and sustainable investments in a developing country context. J Clean Prod. 322:129090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129090.
- Ikram M, Zhang Q, Sroufe R, Ferasso M. 2021b. Contribution of certification bodies and sustainability standards to sustainable development goals: an integrated grey systems approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 28:326–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.019.
- Ju-Long D. 1982. Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett. 1(5):288–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X.
- Kannan D, Moazzeni S, Mostafayi DS, Afrasiabi A. 2021. A hybrid approach based on MCDM methods and Monte Carlo simulation for sustainable evaluation of potential solar sites in east of Iran. J Clean Prod. 279:122368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122368.
- Khalid AM, Sharma S, Dubey AK. 2021. Concerns of developing countries and the sustainable development goals: case for India. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 28(4):303–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1795744.
- Kieu PT, Nguyen VT, Nguyen VT, Ho TP. 2021. A spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (SF-AHP) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) algorithm in distribution center location selection: a case study in agricultural supply chain. Axioms. 10(2):53. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020053.
- Kutlu Gündoǧdu F, Kahraman C. 2019. Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 36(1):337–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401.
- Kutlu Gündoğdu F, Kahraman C. 2020. A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Computing. 24(6):4607–4621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w.
- Le TT, Ikram M. 2022. Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? evidence from the SME sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 29:588–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008.
- Leal Filho W, Tripathi SK, Jbsod AG, Giné-Garriga R, Orlovic Lovren V, Willats J. 2019. Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 26(2):179–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674.
- Li C, Xu C, Li X. 2020. A multi-criteria decision-making framework for site selection of distributed PV power stations along high-speed railway. J Clean Prod. 277:124086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124086.
- Lo HW, Hsu CC, Chen BC, Liou JJH. 2021. Building a grey-based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm site selection. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 43:100935. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100935.
- Luzzati T, Gucciardi G. 2015. A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: an illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU Countries. Ecological Economics. 113:25–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.018.
- Marti L, Puertas R. 2020. Assessment of sustainability using a synthetic index. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 84:106375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106375.
- Mohandes SR, Zhang X. 2021. Developing a holistic occupational health and safety risk assessment model: an application to a case of sustainable construction project. J Clean Prod. 291:125934. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125934.
- Nabeeh NA, Abdel-Basset M, Soliman G. 2021. A model for evaluating green credit rating and its impact on sustainability performance. J Clean Prod. 280:124299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124299.
- Neofytou H, Nikas A, Doukas H. 2020. Sustainable energy transition readiness: a multicriteria assessment index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 131:109988. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109988.
- Otay I, Kahraman C, Öztayşi B, Onar SÇ 2020. A novel single-valued spherical fuzzy AHP-WASPAS methodology. In: Developments of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Computation and Robotics: Proceedings of the 14th International FLINS Conference (FLINS 2020); Cologne, Germany. p. 190–198.
- Peng X, Tang X, Chen Y, Zhang JH. 2021. Ranking the healthcare resource factors for public satisfaction with health system in China—based on the grey relational analysis models. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(3):995. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030995.
- Phillis YA, Grigoroudis E, Kouikoglou VS. 2011. Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries. Ecological Economics. 70(3):542–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.037.
- Phillis YA, Kouikoglou VS, Verdugo C. 2017. Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 64:254–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002.
- Rama M, González-García S, Andrade E, Moreira MT, Feijoo G. 2020. Assessing the sustainability dimension at local scale: case study of Spanish cities. Ecol Indic. 117:106687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106687.
- Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York (USA): McGraw-Hill.
- Santana NB, Aparecida Do Nascimento Rebelatto D, Ae P, EB M. 2014. Sustainable development in the BRICS countries: an efficiency analysis by data envelopment. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 21(3):259–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.900831.
- Šoja SJ, Anokić A, Jelić DB, Maletić R. 2016. Ranking EU countries according to their level of success in achieving the objectives of the sustainable development strategy. Sustainability. 8(4):306. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040306.
- Sueyoshi T, Wang DD. 2020. Rank dynamics and club convergence of sustainable development for countries around the world. J Clean Prod. 250:119480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119480.
- Sustainable Development Report 2021 - Sustainable Development Report. [ accessed 2021 Dec 13]. https://sdgindex.org/reports/sustainable-development-report-2021
- Torra V. 2010. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 25(6):529–539.
- Ulbrych M. 2020. Progress in achieving sustainable industrial development – the case of the Czech Republic and Poland. Comparative Economic Research Central and Eastern Europe. 23(4):109–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.30.
- Ulucak R, Bilgili F. 2018. A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod. 188:144–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191.
- Wang DD. 2019. Performance assessment of major global cities by DEA and malmquist index analysis. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 77:101365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101365.
- Wang TK, Zhang Q, Chong HY, Wang X. 2017. Integrated supplier selection framework in a resilient construction supply chain: an approach via analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey relational analysis (GRA). Sustainability. 9(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050720.
- Witulski N, Dias JG. 2020. The sustainable society index: its reliability and validity. Ecol Indic. 114:106190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106190.
- Wu D, Yang Z, Wang N, Li C, Yang Y. 2018a. An integrated multi-criteria decision making model and AHP weighting uncertainty analysis for sustainability assessment of coal-fired power units. Sustainability. 10(6):1700. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061700.
- Wu -H-H. 2002. A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Qual Eng. 15(2):209–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120015853.
- Wu Y, Zhu Q, Zhu B. 2018b. Decoupling analysis of world economic growth and CO2 emissions: a study comparing developed and developing countries. J Clean Prod. 190:94–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.139.
- Yadegaridehkordi E, Hourmand M, Nilashi M, Alsolami E, Samad S, Mahmoud M, Alarood AA, Zainol A, Majeed HD, Shuib L. 2020. Assessment of sustainability indicators for green building manufacturing using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. J Clean Prod. 277:122905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122905.
- Yang CC, Ou SL, Hsu LC. 2019. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating companies’ green credit rating. Sustainability. 11(6):1506. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061506.
- Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8(3):338–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
- Zadeh LA. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci (Ny). 8(3):199–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5.
- Zhang W, Zhang X, Liu F, Huang Y, Xie Y. 2020. Evaluation of the urban low-Carbon sustainable development capability based on the TOPSIS-BP neural network and grey relational analysis. Complexity, 2020. 2020.
- Zhao W, Schroeder P. 2010. Sustainable consumption and production: trends, challenges and options for the Asia-pacific region. Nat Resour Forum. 34(1):4–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2010.01275.x.