Antecedents of environmental value creation: an analysis with ecopreneurs in a developing country

References

• Ajzen I. 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. 26(9):113–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antolin-Lopez R, Martinez-Del-Rio J, Cespedes-Lorente JJ. 2019. Environmental entrepreneurship as a multi-component and dynamic construct: Duality of goals, environmental agency, and environmental value creation. Business Ethics: A Eur Rev. 28:407–422. doi:10.1111/beer.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arend RJ. 2020. Social entrepreneurship as ‘doing good’ by mitigating opposition better. J Soc Entr. 1-21. doi:10.1080/19420676.2020.1826562.
   Google Scholar
• Axsen J, Kurani KS. 2013. Developing sustainability-oriented values: insights from households in a trial of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Glob Environ Change. 23(1):70–80. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojica AM, Jiménez JMR, Nava JAR, Fuentes-Fuentes MM. 2018. Bricolage and growth in social entrepreneurship organisations. Entr Reg Dev. 30(3–4):362–389. doi:10.1080/08985626.2017.1413768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos ML, Moraes GHSM, Spatti AC. 2021. Do university ecosystems impact student’s entrepreneurial behavior? BAR - Braz Adm Rev. 18(2):1–30. doi:10.1590/1807-7692bar2021200079.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo E, Reyes T, Baumgartner RJ. 2021. Towards territorial product-service systems – a framework linking resources, networks and value creation. Sustain Prod Consum. 28:1297–1313. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Fitzgerald A, Shwom R. 2005. Environmental values. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 30(1):335–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domenico M, Haugh H, Tracey P. 2010. Social bricolage – theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entr Theory Pract. 34(4):681–703. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck B, Silvestre BS. 2018. Enhancing socio-ecological value creation through sustainable innovation 2.0 – moving away from maximizing financial value capture. J Clean Product. 171:593–1604. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraj-Andrés E, Martínez-Salinas E. 2007. Impact of environmental knowledge on ecological behavior. J Inter Consum Mark. 19(3):73–102. doi:10.1300/J046v19n03_05.
   Google Scholar
• Gasbarro F, Rizzi F, Frey M. 2018. Sustainable institutional entrepreneurship in practice: insights from SMEs in the clean energy sector in Tuscany (Italy). Inter J Entr Behav Res. 24(2):476–498. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0259.
   Google Scholar
• Gast J, Gundolf K, Cesinger B. 2017. Doing business in a green way: a systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. J Clean Product. 147:44–56. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrila SG, Ancillo ADL. 2022. Entrepreneurship, innovation, digitization and digital transformation toward a sustainable growth within the pandemic environment. Inter J Entr Beh Res. 28(1):45–66. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-05-2021-0395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghouse SM, Durrah O, McElwee G. 2021. Rural women entrepreneurs in Oman – problems and opportunities. Inter J Entr Behav Res. 27(7):1674–1695. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-03-2021-0209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs D. 2006. Sustainability entrepreneurs, ecopreneurs and the development of a sustainable economy. Green Manag Inter. 55(55):63–78. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2006.au.00007.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs LM. 2010. A beautiful soaking rain – environmental value and water beyond eurocentrism. Environ Plan D. 28(2):363–378. doi:10.1068/d9207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb D, Vigoda-Gadot E, Haim A. 2013. Encouraging ecological behaviors among students by using the ecological footprint as an educational tool – a quasi-experimental design in a public high school in the city of Haifa. Environ Educ Res. 19(6):844–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori P, Holzmann P, Wdowiak MA. 2021. For the sake of nature – identity work and meaningful experiences in environmental entrepreneurship. J Bus Res. 122:488–501. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan AA, Essers C, van Riel ACR. 2020. The adoption of ecopreneurship practices in Indonesian craft SMEs – value-based motivations and intersections of identities. Inter J Entr Behav Res. 27(3):730–752. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan AA, van Riel ACR, Essers C. 2021. What drives ecopreneurship in women and men? A structured literature review. J Clean Produc. 280:124336–124348. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2022. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hakovirta M, Denuwara N. 2020. How COVID-19 redefines the concept of sustainability. Sustain. 12(9):3727–3731. doi:10.3390/su12093727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan HMK. 2020. Intention towards social entrepreneurship of university students in an emerging economy – the influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurship education. On Horiz. 28(3):133–151. doi:10.1108/OTH-04-2020-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hechavarría DM, Terjesen SA, Ingram AE, Renko M, Justo R, Elam A. 2017. Taking care of business: the impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs’ blended value creation goals. Small Bus Econ. 48(1):225–257. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9747-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockerts K. 2017. Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entr Theory Pract. 41(1):105–130. doi:10.1111/etap.12171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente [Governo do Estado de São Paulo]. 2020. Projeto Conexão Mata Atlântica. [acessed 2022 May 10th]. https://www.infraestruturameioambiente.sp.gov.br/conexao/
   Google Scholar
• Instituto BioSistêmico [IBS]. 2018. Projeto Conexão Mata Atlântica. [acessed 06 Nov. 2020]. https://www.biosistemico.org.br/projeto/cma/
   Google Scholar
• Isaak R. 2002. The making of the ecopreneur. Green Manag Inter. 38(38):81–91. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00009.
   Google Scholar
• Jayashankar P, van Auken H, Ashta A. 2018. What motivates ecopreneurs in the United States to create value? Strateg Change. 27(6):509–521. doi:10.1002/jsc.2235.
   Google Scholar
• Kaida N, Kaida K. 2019. Positive associations of optimism-pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being – a longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior. Qual Life Res. 28(12):323–3332. doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02273-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood J, Walton S. 2010. What motivates ecopreneurs to start businesses? Inter J Entr Behav Res. 16(3):204–228. doi:10.1108/13552551011042799.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckertz A, Berger ESC, Gaudig A. 2019. Responding to the greatest challenges? Value creation in ecological startups. J Clean Product. 230:1138–1147. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite AE, Castro R, Jabbour CJC, Batalha MO, Govindan K. 2014. Agricultural production and sustainable development in a Brazilian region: motivations and barriers to adopting sustainable and ecologically friendly practices. Inter J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 21(5):422–429. doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.956677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnanen L. 2002. An insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship. Green Manag Inter. 38(38):71–80. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00008.
   Google Scholar
• Mair J, Noboa E. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: how intentions to create a social venture are formed. In: Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K (eds) Social entrepreneurship. London (UK): Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230625655_8
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz E, Goldberg LR, Ashton MC, Lee K. 2012. Profiling the pro-environmental individual – a personality perspective. J Personal. 80(1):81–111. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações [MCTI]. 2021. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. [accessed 22 May 2022]. https://conexaomataatlantica.mctic.gov.br/cma/portal/#
   Google Scholar
• Moraes GHSM, Fischer BB, Guerrero M, Rocah AKL, Schaeffer PR. 2021. An inquiry into the linkages between university ecosystem and students? Entrepreneurial intention and self-efficacy. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2021:1–12. doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1969262.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz P. 2017. A cognitive map of sustainable decision-making in entrepreneurship - a configurational approach. Inter J Entr Behav Res. 24(3):787–813. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-03-2017-0110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou EI, Ierapetritis D, Tsagarakis KP. 2011. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. Inter J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 18(1):1–16. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.543565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oonk C, Gulikers J, Brok PD, Mulder M. 2022. Stimulating boundary crossing learning in a multi-stakeholder learning environment for sustainable development. Inter J Sustain High Education. 23(8):21–40. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Linde C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. J of Econ Perspect. 9(4):97–118. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2011. Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harv Bus Rev. 89(1–2):46–52, 54, 56–61 passim.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ragin CC. 1987. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley (CA): University of CA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasoolimanesh SM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Olya H. 2021. The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches – partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Inter J Contemp Hosp Manag. 33(5):1571–1592. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2020-1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala P, Albareda L, Bocken N. 2021. Value creation and appropriation in economic, social, and environmental domains – recognizing and resolving the institutionalized asymmetries. J Clean Product. 290:125796. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Fernández A, Izar-De-La-Fuente I, Escalante N, Azpiazu L. 2021. Perceived social support for a sustainable adolescence: a theoretical model of its sources and types. Sustain. 13(10):5657. doi:10.3390/su13105657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-García M, Guijarro-García M, Carrilero-Castillo A. 2019. An overview of ecopreneurship, eco-innovation, and the ecological sector. Sustain. 11(10):2909–2925. doi:10.3390/su11102909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini C. 2017. Ecopreneurship and ecopreneurs – limits, trends and characteristics. Sustain. 9(4):492–504. doi:10.3390/su9040492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JS, Leite CCC, Viana JCC, Santos AR, Fernandes MM, Abreu VS, Nascimento TP, Santos LS, Fernandes MRM, Silva GF. 2018. Delimitation of ecological corridors in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Ecol Indic. 88:414–424. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos AR, Araújo EF, Barros QS, Fernandes MM, Fernandes MRM, Moreira TR, Souza KB, Silva EF, Silva JPM, Santos JS. 2020. Fuzzy concept applied in determining potential forest fragments for deployment of a network of ecological corridors in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Ecol Indic. 115:106423. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer K, Corner PD, Kearins K. 2015. Social, environmental and sustainable entrepreneurship research. Organ & Environ. 28(4):394–413. doi:10.1177/1086026615621111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S. 2002. A framework for ecopreneurship – leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Green Manag Inter. 38(38):45–58. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00006.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen EG. 2012. Business cases for sustainability – the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. Inter J Innov Sustain Dev. 6(2):95–119. doi:10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944.
   Google Scholar
• Schaper M. 2002. The essence of ecopreneurship. Green Manag Inter. 38(38):26–30. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00004.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Patzelt H. 2011. The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship – studying entrepreneurial action linking what is to be sustained with what is to be developed. Entr Theory Pract. 35(1):137–163. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadaki M, Sinner J, Chan KMA. 2017. Making sense of environmental values – a typology of concepts. Ecol Soc. 22(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations [UN]. 2020. The sustainable development goals report 2020. [acessed 2022 Feb 03]. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Usman S, Masood F, Khan MA, Khan NR. 2021. Impact of empathy, perceived social impact, social worth and social network on the social entrepreneurial intention in socio-economic projects. J Entr Emerg Econ. 14(1):65–92.
   Google Scholar
• Wu W, Wang H, Wei C, Zheng C. 2020. Sharing achievement and social entrepreneurial intention. Manag Decis. 59(11):2737–2754. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2019-0667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar