On the shadow economy-environmental sustainability nexus in Africa: the (ir)relevance of financial development

References

• Adams S, Klobodu EK, Apio A. 2018. Renewable and non-renewable energy, regime type and economic growth. Renewable Energy. 125:755–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adekunle IA. 2021. On the search for environmental sustainability in Africa: the role of governance. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(12):14607–14620. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11432-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Umar M, Khan Z, Muhammad S. 2020. The dynamic impact on natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resour Policy. 69:101817. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S. 2020b. Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc. 55:102064. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajide FM. 2021. Shadow economy in Africa: how relevant is financial inclusion? J. Financial Regul. Compliance. 29(3):297–316. doi:10.1108/JFRC-10-2020-0095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajide, FM. 2022. Economic complexity and entrepreneurship: insights from Africa. International Journal of Development Issues. DOI 10.1108/IJDI-03-2022-0047
   Google Scholar
• Ajide FM, Dada JT. 2022. The impact of ICT on shadow economy in West Africa. Int Soc Sci J. doi:10.1111/issj.12337
   Google Scholar
• Ajide FM, Dada JT, Olowookere JK. 2022. Shadow economy and foreign direct investment in Nigerian manufacturing industry. Int J Econ. Bus. Res. 23(2):156. doi:10.1504/IJEBR.2021.10035378.
   Google Scholar
• Ajide FM, Osinubi T, Dada JT. 2021. Economic globalization, entrepreneurship, and inclusive growth in Africa. J. Econ. Integr. 36(4):689–717. doi:10.11130/jei.2021.36.4.689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinlo T, Dada JT. 2021. The moderating effect of foreign direct investment on environmental degradation-poverty reduction nexus: evidence from sub-Sharan African Countries, Environment. Dev. Sustain. 23(11):15764–15784. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01315-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinlo T, Dada JT. 2022. Information technology, real sector and economic growth in sub- Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional dependence approach. Qual Quant. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01308-2
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mulali U, Sab CN 2012. The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the Sub Saharan African countries. Energy. 39(1):180–186. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA. 2019. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ. 685:702–709. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluko OA, Ibrahim M. 2020. On the macroeconomic determinants of financial institutions development in sub-Saharan Africa. International Review of Economics. 67(1):69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarado R, Tillaguango B, Murshed M, Ochoa-Moreno S, Rehman A, Isrik C, Alvarodo-Espejo J. 2022. Impact of the informal economy on the ecological footprint: the role of urban concentration and globalization. Econ Anal Policy. 75:750–767. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2022.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloch A, Shah SZ, Rasheed S, Rasheed B. 2021. The impact of shadow economy on environmental degradation: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Geo J. doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10354-6
   Google Scholar
• Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z. 2019. The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26(6):6199–6208. 10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH, Feng Q, Kao C. 2012. A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. J Econom. 170(1):164–177. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello A, Abimbola O. 2010. Does the level of economic growth influence environmental quality in Nigeria: a test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. Pak J Life Soc Sci. 7(4):325–329. doi:10.3923/pjssci.2010.325.329.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas AK, Farzanegan MR, Thum M. 2012. Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: theory and evidence. Ecol Econ. 75:114–125. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn K, Bose N, Capasso S 2012. Tax evasion, the underground economy and financial development. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 83(2):243–253. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch TS, Pagan AR. 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud. 47(1):239–253. doi:10.2307/2297111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso S, Jappelli T. 2013. Financial development and the underground economy. J Dev Econ. 101:167–178. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero R. 2000. Informal transport in the developing world. UN-HABITAT.
   Google Scholar
• Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z. 2017. The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 76:138–154. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Hao Y, Li J, Song X. 2018. The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: theory and empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.206
   Google Scholar
• Chu LK, Hoang DP. 2022. The shadow economy-environmental quality nexus in OECD countries: empirical evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20410-y
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT. 2022. On the asymmetric effect of exchange rate on growth: evidence from Africa. Econ J Emerg. Mark. 14(1):15–28. doi:10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Adeiza A, Noor AI, Arnaut M. 2022b. Financial development and ecological footprint in Malaysia: the role of institutions. Manag. Environ. Qual 33(4):913–937. doi:10.1108/MEQ-10-2021-0251.
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Adeiza A, Noor AI, Marina A. 2022a. Investigating the link between economic growth, financial development, urbanization, natural resources, human capital, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from Nigeria. J Bioeconomics. 24(2):153–179. doi:10.1007/s10818-021-09323-x.
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Ajide FM. 2021. The moderating role of institutional quality in shadow economy- pollution nexus in Nigeria. Manag. Environ. Qual.: Int J. 32(3):506–523. doi:10.1108/MEQ-10-2020-0238.
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Ajide FM, Adeiza A. 2021b. Shadow economy and environmental pollution in West African countries: the role of institutions. Glob. J. Emerg. Mark. Econ. 097491012110490. doi:10.1177/09749101211049038
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Ajide FM, Sharimakin A. 2021a. Shadow economy, institutions and environmental pollution: insights from Africa. World Rev. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev 18(2):153–171. doi:10.1108/WJSTSD-12-2020-0105.
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Akinlo T. 2021. Foreign direct investment and poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa: does environmental degradation matter? Future Business J. 7(21). doi:10.1186/s43093-021-00068-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dada JT, Olaniyi CO, Ajide FM, Adeiza A, Marina A. 2022c. Informal economy and ecological footprint: the Case of Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20919-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dar JA, Asif M 2017. Is financial development good for carbon mitigation in India? A regime shift-based cointegration analysis. Carbon Management. 8(5–6):435–443. doi:10.1080/17583004.2017.1396841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar JA, Asif M. 2018. Does financial development improve environmental quality in Turkey? An application of endogenous structural breaks based cointegration approach. Manag. Environ. Qual.: Int J. 29(2):368–384. doi:10.1108/MEQ-02-2017-0021.
   Google Scholar
• Denny RCH, Marquart-Pyatt S. 2018. Environmental sustainability in Africa. What drives the Ecological Footprint over time? Sociol. Dev 7(1):119–144. doi:10.1525/sod.2018.4.1.119.
   Google Scholar
• Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E. 2018. Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(29):29387–29396. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C. 2012. Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model. 29(4):1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgin C, Mazhar U. 2013. Environmental regulation, pollution and the informal economy. SBP Res. Bull. 9:62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin C, Oztunali O. 2014. Institutions, informal economy, and economic development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 50(4):145–62. 10.2753/REE1540-496X500409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren MB, Katircioglu S, Gokmenoglu KK. 2022. The moderating role of informal economy on financial development induced EKC hypothesis in Turkey. Energy Environ. 1–24. doi:10.1177/0958305X211070775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakher HA. 2019. Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26(10):10276–10291. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04452-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel JA, Romer D. 1999. Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev 89(3):279–399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel J, Rose A. 2002. An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. The quarterly journal of economics. 117(2):437–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli A, Iha K, Pires SM, Mancini MS, Alves A, Zokai G, Wackernagel M, Murthy A, Wackernagel M. 2020. Assessing the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: critical results for environmental awareness and local management. Cities. 96:102442. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godil DI, Sharif A, Agha H, Jermsittiparsert K 2020. The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(19):24190–24200. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08619-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godil DI, Sharif A, Rafique S, Jermsittiparsert K 2020. The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(32):40109–40120. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09937-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Krueger AB 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 3914, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (MA), 1–57, doi: 10.3386/w3914.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh, CM 2020. Shadow economy and air pollution in developing Asia: what is the role of fiscal policy?. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 22(3), 357–381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahiem DM, Hanafy SA. 2020. Dynamic linkages amongst EFPs, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis. Manag. Environ. Qual.: Int J. 31(6):1549–1568. doi:10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0029.
   Google Scholar
• Ihrig J, Moe KS. 2004. Lurking in the shadows: the informal sector and government policy. Journal of Development Economics. 73(2):541–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamoglu H. 2018. Is the informal economic activity a determinant of environmental quality?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 25(29):29078–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalil A, Feridun M. 2011. The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Economics. 33(2):284–291. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley D, Douglas KM 2014. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS one. 9(2):e89177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katircioglu ST. 2014. International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: The case of Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 36:180–187. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MTI, Yaseen MR, Ali Q. 2019. Nexus between financial development, tourism, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: a continent-wise analysis. Energy Economics. 83:293–310. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köksal C, Işik M, Katircioğlu S. 2020. The role of shadow economies in ecological footprint quality: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(12):13457–13466. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-07956-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti L, Puertas R. 2020. Analysis of the efficiency of African countries through their ecological footprint and biocapacity. Sci. Total Environ. 722:137504. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina L, Schneider F. 2019. Shedding light on the shadow economy: A global database and the interaction with the official one. Available at SSRN 3502028.
   Google Scholar
• Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Adediran A, Sharma G, Shah M, Adeleye N. 2019. Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded. Environ Sci Pollut. 26(26):27168–27179. Control Ser. 1e12. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05924-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer E. 2002. Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of peace research. 39(2):139–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkengfack H, Kaffo Fotio H, Totouom A. 2020. How does the shadow economy affect environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from heterogeneous panel estimations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2(4):1635–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pang J, Li N, Mu H, Zhang M. 2020. Empirical analysis of the interplay between shadow economy and pollution: with panel data across the provinces of China. Journal of Cleaner Production.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=572504
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T. 2008. A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section Independence. Econom J. 11(1):105–127. doi:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rjoub H, Odugbesan JA, Adebayo TS, Wong WK. 2021. Sustainability of the moderating Role of financial development in the determinants of environmental degradation: evidence from Turkey. Sustainability. 13(4):1844. doi:10.3390/su13041844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehrawat M, Giri AK, Mohapatra G. 2015. The impact of financial development, economic growth and energy consumption on environmental degradation: Evidence from India. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 26(5):666–682. doi:10.1108/MEQ-05-2014-0063.
   Google Scholar
• Şenhaz Z, Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S 2021 Dynamic effects of shadow economy and environmental pollution on the energy stock prices: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research .28(7):8520–8529. 10.1007/s11356-020-11226-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Sakiru AS, Haider M, Mohamed A. 2013. Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model. 35:145–152. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Su ZW, Malik MY, Umar M, Khan Z, Khan M. 2021. Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China. Sci Total Environ. 755:142538. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shobande OA, Ogbeifun L. 2022. The criticality of financial development and energy consumption for environmental sustainability in OECD countries: evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Dev World Ecol. 29(2):153–163. doi:10.1080/13504509.2021.1934179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shujah-ur-Rahman S.U.R., Chen S, Saud, S., Bano, S., Haseeb, A.et al 2019. The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:24733–24247 24 10.1007/s11356-019-05714-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub S 2005. Informal sector: The credit market channel. J Dev Econ. 78(2):299–321. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirydzenka K 2016. Introducing a new broad-based index of financial development. IMF Working Paper WP/16/5
   Google Scholar
• Swain RB, Kambhampati US, Karimu A. 2020. Regulation, governance and the role of the informal sector in influencing environmental quality. Ecol. Econ. 173:106649. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC. 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy. 37(1):246–253. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J. 2017. EFP and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Indic. 77:166–175. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. 2014. Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience (2014 human development report). New York: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved 2016 Sept 20http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Usman M, Hammar N. 2021. Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific economic cooperation countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(12):15519–15536. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman M, Kousar R, Makhdum MSA. 2020. The role of financial development, tourism, and energy utilization in environmental deficit: evidence from 20 highest emitting economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(34):42980–42995. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10197-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo XV, Zaman K. 2020. Relationship between energy demand, financial development, and carbon emissions in a panel of 101 countries: “go the extra mile” for sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollution Res. 27(18):23356–23363. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08933-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackernagel M, Rees W. 1996. Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. British Columbia: New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund J. 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 69(6):709–748. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. World development report 2015. Mind, society, and behavior. Washington (DC): World Bank. Retrieved 2021 Sept 20 (http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA. 2019. The Impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resour Policy. 63:101428. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YJ. 2011. The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy. 39(4):2197–2203. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar