Embedding sustainability into bank strategy: implications for sustainable development goals reporting

References

• Abid MF, Shamim A, Khan Z, Khan I. 2022. Value creation or value destruction: conceptualizing the experiential nature of value-in-use. J Consum Behav. 21(3):583–601. doi:10.1002/cb.2033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar S, Khan T, Khan PA. 2020. Examine the key drivers affecting bottom line: a panel estimation study of Indian commercial bank. J Crit Rev. 7(9):2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ali SEA, Rizvi SSH, Lai FW, Rao FA, Jan AA. 2021. Predicting delinquency on Mortgage loans: an exhaustive parametric comparison of machine learning techniques. J Ind Eng Manag. 12(1): 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Allen C, Metternicht G, Wiedmann T. 2016. National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environ Sci Policy. 66:199–207. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amran A, Fauzi H, Purwanto Y, Darus F, Yusoff H, Zain MM, Naim DMA, Nejati M. 2017. Social responsibility disclosure in Islamic banks: a comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia. J Financ Report Account. 15(1):99–115. doi:10.1108/JFRA-01-2015-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi M, Acciaro M, Walker TR, Magnan GM, Adams M. 2019. Corporate sustainability in Canadian and US maritime ports. J Clean Prod. 220:386–397. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi M, Adams M, Walker TR, Magnan G. 2018. How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships. Int J Sustain Dev. 25(8):672–682. doi:10.1080/13504509.2018.1471628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekaroo D, Callychurn DS, Hurreeram DK. 2019. Developing a sustainability index for Mauritian manufacturing companies. Ecol Indic. 96:250–257. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubicz ME, Barbosa-Póvoa APFD, Carvalho A. 2021. Social sustainability management in the apparel supply chains. J Clean Prod. 280:124214. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Rogers DS. 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 38(5):360–387. doi:10.1108/09600030810882816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantziaras A, Dedoulis E, Grougiou V, Leventis S. 2020. The impact of religiosity and corruption on CSR reporting: the case of US banks. J Bus Res. 109:362–374. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1998. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environ Qual Manag. 8(1):37–51. doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca LM, Domingues JP, Dima AM. 2020. Mapping the sustainable development goals relationships. Sustainability. 12(8):3359. doi:10.3390/su12083359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca L, Silva V, Sá JC, Lima V, Santos G, Silva R. 2022. B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development? Corp Soc Responsib. 29(3):496–508. doi:10.1002/csr.2214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangi F, Meles A, D’Angelo E, Daniele LM. 2019. Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corp Soc Responsib Environ. 26(3):529–547. doi:10.1002/csr.1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Shaw M, Majumdar A. 2021. Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: a systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. J Clean Prod. 279:123075. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grais W, Pellegrini M. 2006. Corporate governance and Shariah compliance in institutions offering Islamic financial services. Vol. 4054. World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• GRI. 2020. Consolidated Set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards. May .
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie J, Parker LD. 1989. Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Account Bus Res. 19(76):343–352. doi:10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863.
   Google Scholar
• Haji AA, Ghazali NAM. 2013. The quality and determinants of voluntary disclosures in annual reports of Shari’ah compliant companies in Malaysia. Humanomics. 29(1):24–42. doi:10.1108/08288661311299303.
   Google Scholar
• Hamad S, Lai FW, Jan AA. 2020. Using integrated reporting to disclose the value-based intermediation information: evidence from Islamic banking industry. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 29(10s):1085–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Hamad S, Lai FW, Shad MK, Konečná Z, Goni FA, Chofreh AG, Klemeš JJ. 2022. Corporate governance code and voluntary disclosure of integrated reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Sustain Dev:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Abid MF, Shamim A, Ting DH, Toha MA. 2023. Videogames-as-a-service: how does in-game value co-creation enhance premium gaming co-creation experience for players? J Retail Consum Serv. 70:103128. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Ting DH, Mazhar M. 2022. Driving consumer value co-creation and purchase intention by social media advertising value. Front Psychol. 13:800206. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H-U-Z K. 2010. The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. Int J Law Manag Humanities. 52(2):82–109.
   Google Scholar
• IFSB. 2020. Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report. July .
   Google Scholar
• Jan AA, Hanif MW, Hafeez S. 2022. Factors affecting the acceptance of mobile marketing: role of ethics and permission-based marketing. City Uni Res J. 12(1): 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Jan AA, Lai FW, Draz MU, Tahir M, Ali SEA, Zahid M, Shad MK. 2021a. Integrating sustainability practices into Islamic corporate governance for sustainable firm performance: from the lens of agency and stakeholder theories. Qual Quant:1–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jan AA, Lai FW, Tahir M. 2021b. Developing an Islamic Corporate Governance framework to examine sustainability performance in Islamic Banks and Financial Institutions. J Clean Prod. 315:128099. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan AA, Tahir M, Lai FW, Jan A, Mehreen M, Hamad S. 2019. Bankruptcy profile of the Islamic banking industry: evidence from Pakistan. Bus Mana Strat. 10(2):265–284. doi:10.5296/bms.v10i2.15900.
   Google Scholar
• Joung CB, Carrell J, Sarkar P, Feng SC. 2013. Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol Indic. 24:148–157. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusoh W, Ibrahim U. 2015. Corporate social responsibility of Islamic banks: Malaysian practitioners perspective. In Book of proceedings, Istanbul-Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Jusoh W, Ibrahim U. 2020. Corporate social responsibility of Islamic banks: Malaysian practitioners’ outlook. J Islam Account Bus Res. 11(4):889–904. doi:10.1108/JIABR-03-2017-0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminioti E, Kottaridi C, Economidou C. 2022. Bioeconomy and corporate GRI reporting: a case study analysis. Circ Econ Sustainability. 2(1):383–399. doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00114-0.
   Google Scholar
• Khan PA, Johl SK, Akhtar S. 2021b. Firm sustainable development goals and firm financial performance through the lens of green innovation practices and reporting: a proactive approach. J Risk Financ Manag. 14(12):605. doi:10.3390/jrfm14120605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan PA, Johl SK, Akhtar S. 2022. Vinculum of sustainable development goal practices and firms’ financial performance: a moderation role of green innovation. J Risk Financ Manag. 15(3):96. doi:10.3390/jrfm15030096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan PA, Johl SK, Johl SK. 2021a. Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm. Bus Strategy Environ. 30(7):2922–2936. doi:10.1002/bse.2779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan PA, Johl SK, Ntim CG. 2019. Nexus of comprehensive green innovation, environmental management system-14001-2015 and firm performance. Cogent Bus Manag. 6(1):1691833. doi:10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan H-U-Z, Mohobbot AM, Fatima JJCO. 2014. Determinants and recent development of sustainability reporting of banks in developing countries: the case of Bangladesh. Corp Ownersh Control. 11(4):505–520. doi:10.22495/cocv11i4c6p1
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A. 2022. Modelling the importance of social responsibility standards (ISO 26000: 2010) practices adoption in freight transport industry. J Clean Prod. 367:132861. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao PC, Shih YN, Wu CL, Zhang X-L, Wang Y. 2018. Does corporate social performance pay back quickly? A longitudinal content analysis on international contractors. J Clean Prod. 170:1328–1337. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liute A, De Giacomo MR. 2022. The environmental performance of UK‐based B Corp companies: an analysis based on the triple bottom line approach. Bus Strategy Environ. 31(3):810–827. doi:10.1002/bse.2919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Liang M, Zhang C, Rong D, Guan H, Mazeikaite K, Streimikis J. 2021. Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corp Soc Responsib Environ. 28(2):686–703. doi:10.1002/csr.2081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhar M, Ting DH, Abbasi AZ, Nadeem MA, Abbasi HA. 2022. Gauging customers’ negative disconfirmation in online post-purchase behaviour: the moderating role of service recovery. Cogent Bus Manag. 9(1):2072186. doi:10.1080/23311975.2022.2072186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhar M, Ting DH, Hussain A, Nadeem MA, Ali MA, Tariq U. 2021. The role of service recovery in post-purchase consumer behavior during COVID-19: a Malaysian Perspective. Front Psychol. 12:786603. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino E, Manzaneque-Lizano M, Sanchez-Araque J. 2020. Sustainability and corporate governance: transparency and excessive directors’ remuneration in listed companies during the global financial crisis. Sustainability. 12(1):158. doi:10.3390/su12010158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meutia I, Febrianti D 2017. Islamic social reporting in Islamic banking: stakeholders theory perspective. In SHS Web of conferences (Vol. 34), Sarawak Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Milne MJ, Patten DMJA. 2002. Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Account Audit Account J. 15(3):372–405. doi:10.1108/09513570210435889.
   Google Scholar
• Moerman L, Van Der Laan S. 2005. Social reporting in the tobacco industry: all smoke and mirrors? Account Audit Account J. 18(3):374–389. doi:10.1108/09513570510600747.
   Google Scholar
• Moldan B, Janoušková S, Hák T. 2012. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol Indic. 17:4–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldavska A, Welo T. 2019. A Holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation. J Manuf Syst. 50:53–68. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nations U. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaou IE, Tsalis TA. 2020. What does corporate strong sustainability actually mean in the real market world? A response to Bjørn and Røpke. J Clean Prod. 247:119149. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawumi TO, Chan DW. 2018. A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. J Clean Prod. 183:231–250. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmentola A, Petrillo A, Tutore I, De Felice F. 2022. Is blockchain able to enhance environmental sustainability? A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Bus Strategy Environ. 31(1):194–217. doi:10.1002/bse.2882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroso CB, Tate WL, da Silva AL, Ribeiro Carpinetti LC. 2021. Supplier development adoption: a conceptual model for triple bottom line (TBL) outcomes. J Clean Prod. 314:127886. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman HU, Zahid M, Asif M, Ullah Z. 2020. Sustainability key performance indicators in Islamic banking sectors of Malaysia and Pakistan: a scale based evidence. J Islam Bus Manag. 10(1):64-78.
   Google Scholar
• Rosati F, Faria LG. 2019a. Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: the relationship with institutional factors. J Clean Prod. 215:1312–1326. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati F, Faria LG. 2019b. Business contribution to the sustainable development agenda: organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting. Corp Soc Responsib Environ. 26(3):588–597. doi:10.1002/csr.1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardianou E, Stauropoulou A, Evangelinos K, Nikolaou I. 2021. A materiality analysis framework to assess sustainable development goals of banking sector through sustainability reports. Sustain Prod Consum. 27:1775–1793. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt AB. 2022. Optimal ESG portfolios: an example for the dow jones index. J Sustain Finance. 12(2):529–535. doi:10.1080/20430795.2020.1783180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shad MK, Lai FW, Fatt CL, Klemeš JJ, Bokhari A. 2019. Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: a conceptual framework. J Clean Prod. 208:415–425. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SQA, Lai FW, Shad MK, Jan AA. 2022. Developing a green governance framework for the performance enhancement of the oil and gas industry. Sustainability. 14(7):3735. doi:10.3390/su14073735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SQA, Lai FW, Shad MK, Konečná Z, Goni FA, Chofreh AG, Klemeš JJ. 2021. The inclusion of intellectual capital into the green board committee to enhance firm performance. Sustainability. 13(19):10849. doi:10.3390/su131910849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad K, Shah SQA, Lai FW, Jan AA, Shah SA, Shad MK. 2022. Exploring the nexus of corporate governance and intellectual capital efficiency: from the lens of profitability. Qual Quantity:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Siddique J, Shamim A, Nawaz M, Faye I, Rehman M. 2021. Co-creation or co-destruction: a perspective of online customer engagement valence. Front Psychol. 11:591753. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobhani FA, Zainuddin Y, Amran A. 2011. Religion as an emerging institutional factor behind sustainability disclosure practices in Bangladesh: the case of an Islamic bank. World J Soc Sci. 1(1):69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Summit E 1992. Agenda 21: the United Nations programme of action from Rio. United Nations: New York (NY), USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir M, Jan AA, Shah SQA, Alam MB, Afridi MA, Tariq YB, Bashir MF. 2020. Foreign inflows and economic growth in Pakistan: some new insights. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud. 13(3):97–113. doi:10.1108/JCEFTS-01-2020-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsalis TA, Malamateniou KE, Koulouriotis D, Nikolaou IE. 2020. New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: united Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corp Soc Responsib Environ. 27(4):1617–1629. doi:10.1002/csr.1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vildåsen SS. 2018. Corporate sustainability in practice: an exploratory study of the sustainable development goals (SDG s). Bus Strategy Dev. 1(4):256–264. doi:10.1002/bsd2.35.
   Google Scholar
• WCED. 1987. World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future. 17(1):1–91.
   Google Scholar
• Yiu L, Saner R. 2017. Business diplomacy in implementing the global 2030 development agenda: core competencies needed at the corporate and managerial level. In Business Diplo. 18:33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Zaid MA, Wang M, Adib M, Sahyouni A, T. F. Abuhijleh S. 2020. Boardroom nationality and gender diversity: implications for corporate sustainability performance. J Clean Prod. 251:119652. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar