Can clean energy adoption and international trade contribute to the achievement of India’s 2070 carbon neutrality agenda? Evidence using quantile ARDL measures

References

• Abokyi E, Appiah-Konadu P, Tangato KF, Abokyi F. 2021. Electricity consumption and carbon dioxide emissions: the role of trade openness and manufacturing sub-sector output in Ghana. Energy Climate Change. 2:100026. doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100026.
   Google Scholar
• Agboola PO, Hossain M, Gyamfi BA, Bekun FV. 2022. Environmental consequences of foreign direct investment influx and conventional energy consumption: evidence from dynamic ARDL simulation for Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(35):53584–53597. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19656-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali U, Li Y, Yanez Morales VP, Hussain B. 2021. Dynamics of international trade, technology innovation and environmental sustainability: evidence from Asia by accounting for cross-sectional dependence. journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 64(10):1864–1885. doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1846507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allard A, Takman J, Uddin GS, Ahmed A. 2018. The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(6):5848–5861. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0907-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alola AA, Donve UT. 2021. Environmental implication of coal and oil energy utilization in Turkey: is the EKC hypothesis related to energy? Manag Environ Qual. 32(3):543–559. doi:10.1108/MEQ-10-2020-0220.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson FNG. 2018. International trade and carbon emissions: the role of Chinese institutional and policy reforms. J Environ Manag. 205:29–39. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari MA. 2022. Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: a comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 168:112867. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apergis N, Payne JE. 2011. On the causal dynamics between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Energy Sys. 2(3):299–312. doi:10.1007/s12667-011-0037-6.
   Google Scholar
• Awan A, Kocoglu M, Banday TP, Tarazkar MH. 2022. Revisiting global energy efficiency and CO2 emission nexus: fresh evidence from the panel quantile regression model. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(31):47502–47515. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19101-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay A, Rej S. 2021. Can nuclear energy fuel an environmentally sustainable economic growth? Revisiting the EKC hypothesis for India. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(44):63065–63086. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15220-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S. 2017a. Renewable energy consumption and agriculture: evidence for cointegration and Granger causality for Tunisian economy. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 24(2):149–158. doi:10.1080/13504509.2016.1196467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S. 2017b. The role of renewable energy and agriculture in reducing CO 2 emissions: evidence for North Africa countries. Ecol Indic. 74:295–301. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzie M, Persson Å. 2019. Governing borderless climate risks: moving beyond the territorial framing of adaptation. Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ. 19:369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya M, Churchill SA, Paramati SR. 2017. The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy. 111:157–167. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü. 2016. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 54:838–845. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broock W A, Scheinkman J A, Dechert W D and LeBaron B. (1996). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews, 15(3), 197–235. 10.1080/07474939608800353
   Google Scholar
• Bulut U. 2017. The impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(18):15416–15426. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9175-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charfeddine L, Kahia M. 2019. Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renew Energy. 139:198–213. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho J Seo, Kim T and Shin Y. (2015). Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework. Journal of Econometrics, 188(1), 281–300. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Ozcan B, Ulucak R. 2021. An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses. Nucl Engin Technol. 53(6):2056–2065. doi:10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M, Boamah KB, Ampon-Wireko S, Dogbe CSK. 2021. Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. J Clean Prod. 281:125143. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du K, Yu Y, Li J. 2020. Does international trade promote CO2 emission performance? An empirical analysis based on a partially linear functional-coefficient panel data model. Energy Econ. 92:104983. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givens JE, Huang X, Jorgenson AK. 2019. Ecologically unequal exchange: a theory of global environmental injustice. Sociol Compass. 13(5):e12693. doi:10.1111/soc4.12693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly J Econ. 110(2):353–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain M, Islam M, Sujan M, Khan H, Tuhin M, Bekun FV. 2022a. Towards a clean production by exploring the nexus between agricultural ecosystem and environmental degradation using novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(35):3768–53784. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19565-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain M, Rej S, Hossain MR, Bandyopadhyay A, Tama RAZ, Ullah A. 2022c. Energy mix with technological innovation to abate carbon emission: fresh evidence from Mexico applying wavelet tools and spectral causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22555-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain ME, Rej S, Saha SM, Onwe JC, Nwulu N, Bekun FV, Taha A. 2022b. Can energy efficiency help in achieving carbon-neutrality pledges? A developing country perspective using dynamic ARDL simulations. Sustainability. 14(13):7537. doi:10.3390/su14137537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalal MJE, Khan MA, Hossain ME, Yedla S, Alam GM. 2021. Does climate change stimulate household vulnerability and income diversity? Evidence from southern coastal region of Bangladesh. Heliyon. 7(9):e07990. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Q, Khattak SI, Rahman ZU. 2021. Measuring the simultaneous effects of electricity consumption and production on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e) in China: new evidence from an EKC-based assessment. Energy. 229:120616. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasman A, Duman YS. 2015. CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model. 44:97–103. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katircioglu S. 2017. Investigating the role of oil prices in the conventional EKC model: evidence from Turkey. Asian Econ Financ Rev. 7(5):498–508. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr/2017.7.5/102.5.498.508.
   Google Scholar
• Katircioğlu S. 2014. Testing the tourism-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Singapore. Econ Model. 41:383–391. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.05.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Murshed M, Ozturk I, Khudoykulov K. 2022. The roles of energy efficiency improvement, renewable electricity production, and financial inclusion in stimulating environmental sustainability in the Next Eleven countries. Renew Energy. 193:1164–1176. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc S, Bulus GC. 2020. Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(23):29043–29054. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09172-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massagony A. 2022. Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis valid on CO2 emissions in Indonesia? Int J Environ Stud. doi:10.1080/00207233.2022.2029097
   Google Scholar
• Murshed M, Ali SR, Banerjee S. 2021. Consumption of liquefied petroleum gas and the EKC hypothesis in South Asia: evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel data with structural breaks. Energy Ecol Environ. 6(4):353–377. doi:10.1007/s40974-020-00185-z.
   Google Scholar
• Murshed M, Khan U, Khan AM, Ozturk I. 2022. Can energy productivity gains harness the carbon dioxide-inhibiting agenda of the Next 11 countries? Implications for achieving sustainable development. Sustain Dev. doi:10.1002/sd.2393
   Google Scholar
• Ozatac N, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N. 2017. Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(20):16690–16701. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9317-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özokcu S, Özdemir Ö. 2017. Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 72:639–647. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal D, Mitra SK. 2017. The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: growth and pollution at crossroad. J Polic Model. 39(2):371–385. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA. 2018. The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(30):30708–30719. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3108-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata UK, Dam MM, Kaya F. 2022. How effective are renewable energy, tourism, trade openness, and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions? An EKC analysis for ASEAN countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-23160-z
   Google Scholar
• Rana R, Sharma M. 2019. Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India. J Int Trade Econ Dev. 28(3):348–364. doi:10.1080/09638199.2018.1542451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rej S, Nag B. 2022. Investigating the role of capital formation to achieve carbon neutrality in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(40):60472–60490. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20109-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X. 2014. International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev. 28:123–134. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robalino-López A, Mena-Nieto A, García-Ramos JE. 2014. System dynamics modeling for renewable energy and CO2 emissions: a case study of Ecuador. Energy for Sustain Dev. 20:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2014.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj J, Schleussner C-F. 2019. Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level. Environ Res Lett. 14(11):114039. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab4928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidi K, Omri A. 2020. The impact of renewable energy on carbon emissions and economic growth in 15 major renewable energy-consuming countries. Environ Res. 186:109567. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiei S, Salim RA. 2014. Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Polic. 66:547–556. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafik N. 1994. Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Econ Pap. 46(Supplement_1):757–774. doi:10.1093/oep/46.Supplement_1.757.
   Google Scholar
• Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S. 1992. Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence. New York: World Bank Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M. 2013. The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Polic. 61:1452–1459. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M. 2014. Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. In: Sickles, R., Horrace, W. (eds) Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui K. 2018. David Ricardo’s comparative advantage and developing countries: myth and reality. Int Crit Thought. 8(3):426–452. doi:10.1080/21598282.2018.1506264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Adnan Hye QM. 2013. The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 18:519–527. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uche E, Das N, Bera P. 2022. Re-examining the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for India via the multiple threshold NARDL procedure. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22912-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J. 2017. Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions. Evidence from ten Newly Industrialized Countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(21):17616–17625. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9392-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoundi Z. 2017. CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 72:1067–1075. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar