Sustainable development implications of human wildlife conflict: an analysis of subsistence farmers in Bhutan

References

• Adger WN. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change. 16(3):268–281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal B 2018. Gender equality, food security and the sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34: 26–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CC, Denich M, Warchold A, Kropp JP, Pradhan P. 2021. A systems model of SDG target influence on the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Sustainability Sci. 17:1–14. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01040-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ango T, Börjeson L, Senbeta F. 2017. Crop raiding by wild mammals in Ethiopia: impacts on the livelihoods of smallholders in an agriculture–forest mosaic landscape. Oryx. 51(3):527–537. doi:10.1017/S0030605316000028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus I. 2017. Heatwaves hit poor nations hardest. Green Left Weekly. (1131):13. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.733839383792884
   Google Scholar
• Aryal JP, Mottaleb KA, Rahut DB. 2019. Untangling gender differentiated food security gaps in Bhutan: an application of exogenous switching treatment regression. Rev Dev Econ. 232:782–802. doi:10.1111/rode.12566.
   Google Scholar
• Baca M, Läderach P, Haggar J, Schroth G, Ovalle O. 2014. An integrated framework for assessing vulnerability to climate change and developing adaptation strategies for coffee growing families in mesoamerica. PLoS one. 9(2):e88463. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua M, Bhagwat SA, Jadhav S. 2013. The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol Conserv. 157:309–316. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet NJ, Blythe J, Tyler S, Ban NC. 2019. Communities and change in the anthropocene: understanding social-ecological vulnerability and planning adaptations to multiple interacting exposures. Regional environmental change, 16(4):907–926. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0839-5
   Google Scholar
• Bhalla P, Coghlan A, Bhattacharya P. 2016. Homestays’ contribution to community-based ecotourism in the Himalayan region of India. Tour Recreat Res. 41(2):213–228. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2016.1178474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia S, Athreya V, Grenyer R, Macdonald DW. 2013. Understanding the role of representations of human-leopard conflict in Mumbai through media-content analysis. Conserv Biol. 27(3):588–594. doi:10.1111/cobi.12037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai BR, Wright W, Morgan D, Cook S, Baral HS. 2019. Managing human-tiger conflict: lessons from Bardia and Chitwan National Parks, Nepal. Eur J Wildl Res. 65(3):1–12. doi:10.1007/s10344-019-1270-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah MM, Rahman M, Abedin J, Akter H. 2021. Land cover change and its impact on human–elephant conflict: a case from Fashiakhali forest reserve in Bangladesh. SN Appl Sci. 3(6):1–17. doi:10.1007/s42452-021-04625-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boitani L, Ciucci P, Raganella-Pelliccioni E. 2010. Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation? Wildl Res. 37.722–730. doi:10.1071/WR10029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks JS. 2013. Avoiding the limits to growth: gross National Happiness in Bhutan as a model for sustainable development. Sustainability. 5(9):3640–3664. doi:10.3390/su5093640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R, Conway G. 1992. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. (UK): Institute of development studies.
   Google Scholar
• Choden K, Keenan RJ, Nitschke CR. 2020. An approach for assessing adaptive capacity to climate change in resource dependent communities in the nikachu watershed, Bhutan. Ecol Indic. 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury AN, Brahma A, Mondal R, Biswas MK. 2016. Stigma of tiger attack. Study of tiger-widows from Sundarban Delta, India. Indian J Psychiatry. 58(1):12. http://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.174355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. los angeles: Sage publications inc.
   Google Scholar
• Daramola AY, Oni OT, Ogundele O, Adesanya A. 2016. Adaptive capacity and coping response strategies to natural disasters: a study in nigeria. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 15:132–147. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Campos CI, Pitombo CS, Delhomme P, Quintanilha JA. 2020. Comparative analysis of data reduction techniques for questionnaire validation using self-reported driver behaviors. J Safety Res. 73:133–142. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman AJ. 2010. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. null. 135:458–466. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x.
   Google Scholar
• Digun-Aweto O, Van Der Merwe P. 2020. Coping strategies for human–wildlife conflicts: a case study of adjacent communities to Nigeria’s Cross River National Park. J Int Wildl Law Policy. 23(2):109–126. doi:10.1080/13880292.2020.1808391.
   Google Scholar
• DoFPS. 2016. State of the parks. Department of forests and park services. Thimphu, Bhutan: Ministry of Aagriculture and Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Doubleday KF, Adams PC. 2020. Women’s risk and well-being at the intersection of dowry, patriarchy, and conservation: the gendering of human–wildlife conflict. Environ Plan E Nat Space. 3(4):976–998. doi:10.1177/2514848619875664.
   Google Scholar
• Enarson E, Morrow BH. 1998. Why gender? Why women? An introduction to women and disaster. In:Enarson E, Morrow BH editors. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Westpost, CT: Praeger; pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 5(10):1–4. http://doi.org/10.11648/j/ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Giménez ME, Batkhishig B, Batbuyan B, Ulambayar T 2015. Lessons from the dzud: community-based rangeland management increases the adaptive capacity of Mongolian herders to winter disasters. World Development, 68: 48–65.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank B, Glikman JA. 2019. Human-wildlife conflicts and the need to include coexistence. In:Frank B, Glikman JA, Marchini S, editors. Hum-Wildl Interact: Turning Conflict into Coexistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• FRMD. 2017. Land use and land cover of Bhutan 2016, maps and statistics. Thimphu, Bhutan: Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• FRMD. 2020. Forest facts and figures-2019. Forest resource management division. Thimphu, bhutan: Department of Forest and Park Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gebresenbet F, Bauer H, Vadjunec JM, Papeş M 2018. Beyond the numbers: human attitudes and conflict with lions (Panthera leo) in and around Gambella National Park, Ethiopia. PLoS One, 139: 1–17.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204320
   Google Scholar
• Gemeda DO, Meles SK. 2018. Impacts of human-wildlife conflict in developing countries. J Appl SCI Environ Manag. 22(8):1233–1238. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jasem.
   Google Scholar
• Gore ML, Kahler JS. 2012. Gendered risk perceptions associated with human-wildlife conflict: implications for participatory conservation. PLoS one. 7(3):e32901. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross E, Jayasinghe N, Brooks A, Polet G, Wadhwa R, Hilderink-Koopmans F. 2021. A future for All: the need for human-wildlife coexistence. Vol. 3. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.
   Google Scholar
• Hua X, Yan J, Li H, He W, Li X. 2016. Wildlife damage and cultivated land abandonment: findings from the mountainous areas of Chongqing, China. Crop Prot. 84:141–149. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inskip C, Zimmermann A 2009. Human-felid conflict: a review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx, 431: 18–34.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003060530899030X
   Google Scholar
• Jamtsho Y, Katel O. 2019. Livestock depredation by snow leopard and Tibetan wolf: implications for herders’ livelihoods in Wangchuck Centennial National Park, Bhutan. Pastoralism. 9(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s13570-018-0136-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kansky R, Knight AT 201. Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans. Biological Conservation, 179: 93–105.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanth KK, Kudalkar S. 2017. History, location, and species matter: insights for human–wildlife conflict mitigation from India. Hum Dimens Wildl. 22(4):331–346. doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1334106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karst HE, Nepal SK. 2019. Conservation, development and stakeholder relations in Bhutanese protected area management. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26(4):290–301. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1580628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katel ON, Pradhan S, Schmidt-Vogt D. 2014. A survey of livestock losses caused by Asiatic wild dogs, leopards and tigers, and of the impact of predation on the livelihood of farmers in Bhutan. Wildl Res. 41(4):300–310. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR14013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khumalo KE, Yung LA. 2015. Women, human-wildlife conflict, and CBNRM: hidden impacts and Vulnerabilities in Kwandu Conservancy, Namibia. Conserv Soc. 13(3):232–243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26393202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion AK, Ramirez JM, Carter NH. 2021. Human adaptation strategies are key to cobenefits in human–wildlife systems. Conserv Lett. 14(2):e12769. doi:10.1111/conl.12769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Blanc D 2015. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development. 233: 176–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
   Google Scholar
• Lederman LC. 1990. Assessing educational effectiveness: The focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Communication edication. 39(2):117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie AC, Ahabyona P 2012. Elephants in the garden: financial and social costs of crop raiding. Ecological Economics. 75:72–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden F. 2004. Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Hum Dimens Wildl. 9(4):247–257. doi:10.1080/10871200490505675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Sathyakumar S. 2019. Snow leopard stewardship in mitigating human–wildlife conflict in Hemis National Park, Ladakh, India. Hum Dimens Wildl. 24(4):395–399. doi:10.1080/10871209.2019.1610815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulies JD, Karanth KK 2018. The production of human-wildlife conflict: a political animal geography of encounter. Geoforum, 95: 153–164.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino A, Braschi C, Ricci S, Salvatori V, Ciucci P. 2016. Ex post and insurance-based compensation fail to increase tolerance for wolves in semi-agricultural landscapes of central Italy. Eur J Wildl Res. 62:227–240. doi:10.1007/s10344-016-1001-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Rice J. 2014. Sustainable development pathways: determining socially constructed visions for cities. Sustain Dev. 22(6):391–403. doi:10.1002/sd.1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt JW, Stein AB, McNutt LB, Jordan NR. 2017. Living on the edge: characteristics of human–wildlife conflict in a traditional livestock community in Botswana. Wildl Res. 44(7):546–557. doi:10.1071/WR16160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mmbaga NE, Munishi LK, Treydte AC. 2017. Balancing African elephant conservation with human well-being in rombo area, Tanzania. Adv Ecol. 2017:1–9. doi:10.1155/2017/4184261.
   Google Scholar
• MoAF. 2014. Biodiversity action plan for Bhutan. Thimphu: Ministry of Agriculture and Forests.
   Google Scholar
• MoAF. 2016. Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. The endowment fund for crop and livestock conservation in Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Muyoma PJ 2016. The hidden costs of Human-Wildlife conflict in Mukungule Game Management Area, Mpika District, Zambia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Zambia).
   Google Scholar
• Mwangi DK, Akinyi M, Maloba F, Ngotho M, Kagira J, Ndeereh D, Kivai S 2016. Socioeconomic and health implications of human-wildlife interactions in Nthongoni, Eastern Kenya. African Journal of Wildlife Research, 462: 87–102.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3957/056.046.0087
   Google Scholar
• NCD. 2008. Bhutan national human wildlife conflict management strategy, nature conservation division. Thimphu, Bhutan: Department of Forests, Ministry of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Ngawang C, Lalit K 2018. Climate change and potential impacts on agriculture in Bhutan: a discussion of pertinent issues. Agriculture & Food Security, 71: 1–13.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0229-6
   Google Scholar
• NPPC and WWF-Bhutan. 2016. Human wildlife conflict strategy: Nine Gewogs of Bhutan. Thimphu, Bhutan and WWF Bhutan, Thimphu: National Plant Protection centre (NPPC).
   Google Scholar
• NSB. 2020. Bhutan statistical yearbook 2020. National Statistics Bureau, Royal Government of Bhutan; https://www.Nsb.Gov.Bt/publications/statistical-yearbook/.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhus PJ. 2016. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual review of environment and resources. 41.143–171. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085634.
   Google Scholar
• Nyirenda VR, Nkhata BA, Tembo O, Siamundele S. 2018. Elephant crop damage: subsistence farmers’ social vulnerability, livelihood sustainability and elephant conservation. Sustainability. 10(10):3572. doi:10.3390/su10103572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogra MV. 2008. Human-wildlife conflict and gender in the protected area borderlands: a case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerability from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum. 39(3):1408–1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Combs JP. 2011. Data analysis in mixed research: a primer. Int J Educ. 3(1):E13. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2950.
   Google Scholar
• PAR. 2017. Bhutan poverty analysis report, national statistics bureau, royal government of Bhutan, Post box no 338, Thimphu, Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzey J. 1992. Sustainable development concepts : an economic analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Population and Housing Census of Bhutan. 2017. National Report. National Statistics Bureau of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Qassemian A, Koushkie Jahromi M, Salesi M, Namavar Jahromi B 2019. Swimming modifies the effect of noise stress on the hpg axis of male rats. Hormones: International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 184: 417.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42000-019-00129-1
   Google Scholar
• Ravenelle J, Nyhus PJ. 2017. Global patterns and trends in human–wildlife conflict compensation. Conserv Biol. 31(6):1247–1256. doi:10.1111/cobi.12948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath SM, Bhatia S, Young J. 2015. Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx. 49(2):222–225. doi:10.1017/S0030605314000799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MG, Scott A, Natcher D, Johnston M. 2014. Linking gender, climate change, adaptive capacity, and forest-based communities in Canada. Can J for Res. 44(9):995–1004. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0174.
   Google Scholar
• Rinzin P. 2020. Bridging gender gap in Bhutan: cSOs’ response to gender disparity. In: Momen Md N Baikady R, Li CS, Basavaraj M, editors. Building Sustainable Communities. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; pp. 701–716.
   Google Scholar
• Rinzin C, Vermeulen WJV, Wassen MJ, Glasbergen P. 2009. Nature conservation and human well-being in Bhutan: an assessment of local community perceptions. J Environ Dev. 18(2):177–202. doi:10.1177/1070496509334294.
   Google Scholar
• Salerno J, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Grote MN, Ghiselli M, Packer C 2016. Household livelihoods and conflict with wildlife in community-based conservation areas across Northern Tanzania. Oryx, 504: 702–712.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315000393
   Google Scholar
• Sangay T, Vernes K. 2008. Human–wildlife conflict in the Kingdom of Bhutan: patterns of livestock predation by large mammalian carnivores. Biol Conserv. 141(5):1272–1282. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab K, Samans R, Zahidi S, Leopold TA, Ratcheva V, Hausmann R, Tyson LD 2017. The global gender gap report 2017. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Seoraj-Pillai N, Pillay N 2016 A meta-analysis of human–wildlife conflict: south African and global perspectives. Sustainability. 9(1):34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9010034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah KU, Dulal HB, Johnson C, Baptiste A. 2013. Understanding livelihood vulnerability to climate change: applying the livelihood vulnerability index in Trinidad and Tobago. Geoforum. 47:125–137. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie N, Stigson B, Shrivastava P, Leach M, O’Connel D. 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustainability science. 126:911–919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
   Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 3476223. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
   Google Scholar
• Thinley P, Lassoie JP. 2013. Human-wildlife conflicts in Bhutan: promoting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods in Bhutan. Conservation Bridge. Case Study No. 02. Retrieved from http://www.conservationbridge.org/casestudy/human-wildlife-conflicts-in-bhutan/Herring J (Producer). (2007). Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Bhutan, Video No. 02.Conservation Brodge.
   Google Scholar
• Tobgay S, Wangyel S, Dorji K, Wangdi T. 2019. Impacts of crop raiding by wildlife on communities in buffer zone of sakteng wildlife sanctuary, Bhutan. Int j sci res manag. 7(4):129–135. doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v7i4.fe01.
   Google Scholar
• Tomislav K. 2018. The concept of sustainable development: from its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb int rev econ bus. 21(1):67–94. doi:10.2478/zireb-2018-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Niu H, Fan L. 2016. Willingness of farmers to transform vacant rural residential land into cultivated land in a major grain-producing area of central China. Sustainability. 8(11):1192.doi. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su8111192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tshering K, Thinley P. 2017. Assessing livestock herding practices of agro-pastoralists in western Bhutan: livestock vulnerability to predation and implications for livestock management policy. Pastoralism. 7(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s13570-017-0077-1.
   Google Scholar
• Tshewang U, Tobias M, Morrison J. 2021. Non-Violent Techniques for Human-Wildlife Conflict Resolution. In: Tshewang U, Tobias MC, Morrison JG, editors. Bhutan: conservation and environmental protection in the Himalayas. Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Gewerbestrasse 11,6330 Cham, Switzerland; pp. 71–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57824-4
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeden LM, Crowther MS, Dickman CR, Macdonald DW, Ripple WJ, Ritchie EG, Newsome TM. 2018. Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock. Conserv Biol. 32(1):26–34. doi:10.1111/cobi.12959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma R. 2017. Sdgs: value-added for GNH? Challenges and innovations of a development alternative from a socio-cultural lens. Druk J. 3(1):36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Verma R, Ura K 2022. Gender differences in gross national happiness: analysis of the first nationwide wellbeing survey in Bhutan. World Development, 150, 105714.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangchuk N, Pipatwattanakul D, Onprom S, Chimchome V. 2018. Pattern and economic losses of human-wildlife conflict in the buffer zone of Jigme khesar Strict nature Reserve (JKSNR), haa, Bhutan. J Trop for Res. 2(1):30–48.
   Google Scholar
• Williams S, Trewartha G, Cross MJ, Kemp S, Stokes KA. 2017. Monitoring what matters: a systematic process for selecting training-load measures. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 12:S2.101–2.106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yangka D, Newman P, Rauland V, Devereux P 2018. Sustainability in an emerging nation: the Bhutan case study. Sustainability, 10(5), 1622.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10051622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaw BA, Silvia B. 2019. Farmers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of strategies for managing wildlife crop depredation in Ghana. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 11(6):165–174. doi:10.5897/IJBC2019.1284.
   Google Scholar
• Yeshey F, M R, Keenan RJ, Nitschke CR. 2022. Subsistence farmers’ understanding of the effects of indirect impacts of human wildlife conflict on their psychosocial well-being in Bhutan. Sustain(Switzerland) (Switzerland). 1421:14050. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su142114050.
   Google Scholar
• Zakour MJ, Gillespie DF. 2013. Vulnerability theory. In: Zakour MJ, Gillespie DF, editors. Community disaster vulnerability, Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Springer; pp. 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, Yoshino K. 2017. Environmental vulnerability evaluation using a spatial principal components approach in the Daxing’anling region, China. Ecol Indic. 78:405–415. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar