Investigating political stability effect on the environment in the Netherlands by Fourier-based approaches

References

• Adebayo TS. 2022. Renewable energy consumption and environmental sustainability in Canada: does political stability make a difference? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(40):61307–61322. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20008-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Acheampong AO. 2022. Modelling the globalization-CO2 emission nexus in Australia: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(7):9867–9882. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16368-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Akadiri SS, Akanni EO, Sadiq-Bamgbopa Y. 2022. Does political risk drive environmental degradation in BRICS countries? evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(21):32287–32297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20002-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Kartal MT, Ağa M, Al-Faryan MAS. 2023. Role of country risks and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: evidence from MINT countries. J Environ Manage. 327:116884. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mulali U, Öztürk İ. 2015. The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy. 84:382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf J. 2022. Do political risk and globalization undermine environmental quality? empirical evidence from Belt And Road Initiative (BRI) countries. Manage Decis Econ. 43(8):3647–3664. doi: 10.1002/mde.3620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D, Altuntaş M. 2022. Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World. 29(7):593–610. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayhan F, Kartal MT, Kılıç Depren S, Depren Ö. 2023. Asymmetric effect of economic policy uncertainty, political stability, energy consumption, and economic growth on CO2 emissions: evidence from G-7 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 30(16):47422–47437. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25665-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee P, Arcabic V, Lee H. 2017. Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from crude oil market. Econ Model. 67:114–124. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera B, Behera P, Sethi N. 2023. Decoupling the role of renewable energy, green finance and political stability in achieving the sustainable development goal 13: empirical insight from emerging economies. Sustain Dev. doi: 10.1002/sd.2657.
   Google Scholar
• Benlemlih M, Assaf C, El Ouadghiri I. 2022. Do political and social factors affect carbon emissions? evidence from international data. Appl Econ. 54(52):6022–6035. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2056128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal A, Li X, Zhu N, Sharma R, Jahanger A. 2021. Green Technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability. 14(1):236. doi: 10.3390/su14010236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broock WA, Scheinkman JA, Dechert WD, LeBaron B. 1996. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Economet Rev. 15(3):197–235. doi: 10.1080/07474939608800353.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc. 74(366a):427–431. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531.
   Google Scholar
• Enders W, Lee J. 2012. The flexible Fourier form and dickey–fuller type unit root tests. Econ Lett. 117(1):196–199. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq U, Gillani S, Subhani BH, Shafiq MN. 2023. Economic policy uncertainty and environmental degradation: the moderating role of political stability. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 30(7):18785–18797. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23479-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaies B, Nakhli MS, Sahut JM. 2022. What are the effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions in MENA countries? Econ Model. 116:106022. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Data. 2022. Netherlands renewable energy policy handbook 2022. https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/netherlands-renewable-energy-government-regulation-policy-analysis/#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20renewable%20energy,the%20Netherlands%20sustainable%20by%202023.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan T, Song H, Kirikkaleli D. 2022. International trade and consumption-based carbon emissions: evaluating the role of composite risk for RCEP economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(3):3417–3437. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15617-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo C, Hameed J, Sharif A, Albasher G, Alamri O, Alsultan N, Baig NUA. 2022. Recent scenario and nexus of globalization to CO2 emissions: evidence from wavelet and quantile on quantile regression approach. Environ Res. 212:113067. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İ̇slam M, Khan MK, Tareque M, Jehan N, Dagar V. 2021. Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: does institutional quality matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(35):48851–48871. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Chishti MZ, Rjoub H, Rahim S. 2022. Environmental R&D and trade-adjusted carbon emissions: evaluating the role of international trade. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(42):63155–63170. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20003-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Ahmed Z, Pata UK, Kartal MT, Erdogan S. 2023. Do investments in green energy, energy efficiency, and nuclear energy R&D improve the load capacity factor? An augmented ARDL approach. Geosci Front. 101646. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101646.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson AK, Givens JE. 2014. Economic globalization and environmental concern: a multilevel analysis of individuals within 37 nations. Environ Behav. 46(7):848–871. doi: 10.1177/0013916513479796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT. 2022. The role of consumption of energy, fossil sources, nuclear energy, and renewable energy on environmental degradation in top-five carbon producing countries. Renew Energ. 184:871–880. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Ali U, Nurgazina Z. 2022. Asymmetric effect of electricity consumption on CO2 emissions in the USA: analysis of end-user electricity consumption by nonlinear quantile approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(55):83824–83838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21715-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Ghosh S, Adebayo TS. 2023a. Renewable energy effect on economy and environment: the case of G7 countries through novel bootstrap rolling window approach. Renew Energ. 216:119057. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Kılıç Depren S, Ayhan F. 2023c. Natural gas supply cuts and searching alternatives in Germany: a disaggregated level energy consumption analysis for environmental quality by time series approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 30(41):93546–93563. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28959-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Kılıç Depren S, Kirikkaleli D. 2022. Asymmetric effect of political stability on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK: long-run evidence from nonlinear ARDL and frequency domain causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 30(12):33886–33897. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24550-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Kılıç Depren S, Kirikkaleli D, Depren Ö, Khan U. 2022. Asymmetric and long-run impact of political stability on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in Finland: evidence from nonlinear and Fourier-based approaches. Journal Of Environmental Management. 321:116043. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Pata UK. 2023. Impacts of renewable energy, trade globalization, and technological innovation on environmental development in China: evidence from various environmental indicators and novel quantile methods. Environ Dev. 48:100923. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal MT, Pata UK, Kılıç Depren S, Depren Ö. 2023b. Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO2 emissions: evidence from France under Russia’s gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Appl Energ. 339:120983. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katrakilidis C, Kyritsis I, Patsika V. 2016. The dynamic linkages between economic growth, environmental quality and health in Greece. Appl Econ Lett. 23(3):217–221. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1066482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan Y, Oubaih H, Elgourrami FZ. 2022. The role of private investment in ICT on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) mitigation: do renewable energy and political risk matter in Morocco? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(35):52885–52899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19455-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıç Depren S, Kartal MT, Ertuğrul HM, Depren Ö. 2022. The role of data frequency and method selection in electricity price estimation: comparative evidence from Turkey in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Renewable Energy. 186:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıç Depren S, Kartal MT, Kirikkaleli D, Depren Ö. 2023. Effect of political stability on environmental quality: long-run and asymmetric evidence from Iceland by non-linear approaches. Air Qual Atmos Hlth. 16:1407–1417. doi: 10.1007/s11869-023-01351-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirikkaleli D, Güngör H, Adebayo TS. 2022. Consumption‐based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile. Bus Strateg Environ. 31(3):1123–1137. doi: 10.1002/bse.2945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirikkaleli D, Shah MI, Adebayo TS, Altuntaş M. 2022. Does political risk spur environmental issues in China? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(41):62637–62647. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19951-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KOF. 2023. KOF Globalisation Index. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kongkuah M, Yao H, Yılancı V. 2022. The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in China: the role of urbanisation and international trade. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(4):4684–4708. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01628-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei W, Öztürk İ, Muhammad H, Ullah S. 2022. On the asymmetric effects of financial deepening on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: insights from China. Econ Res-Ekon Istraz. 35(1):3961–3978. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.2007413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv Z, Xu T. 2018. Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? new evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc. 137:340–343. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood U. 2022. Examining the role of financial inclusion towards CO2 emissions: presenting the role of renewable energy and globalization in the context of EKC. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(11):15946–15954. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16898-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood U. 2023. Analyzing the role of political risk, GDP, and eco-innovations towards CO2 emissions in South Asian countries. J Knowl Econ. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01292-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrabet Z, Alsamara M, Mimouni K, Mnasri A. 2021. Can human development and political stability improve environmental quality? new evidence from the MENA region. Econ Model. 94:28–44. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad S, Long X. 2021. Rule of law and CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis across 65 belt and road initiative (BRI) countries. J Clean Prod. 279:123539. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazlıoğlu S, Görmüş NA, Soytaş U. 2016. Oil prices and Real Estate investment Trusts (REITs): gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energ Econ. 60:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurgazina Z, Ali U, Kartal MT, Ullah A, Khan ZA, Qingbin G. 2022. Retesting the influences on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from dynamic ARDL approach. Front Env Sci. 10:868740. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.868740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2023. Renewable energy consumption. https://data.oecd.org/energy/renewable-energy.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pata UK. 2021. Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective. Renew Energ. 173:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata UK, Kartal MT, Erdogan S, Sarkodie SA. 2023. The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes. Appl Energ. 342:121138. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata UK, Yılancı V, Hussain B, Naqvi SAA. 2022. Analyzing the role of income inequality and political stability in environmental degradation: evidence from South Asia. Gondwana Research. 107:13–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips PC, Hansen BE. 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud. 57(1):99–125. doi: 10.2307/2297545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRSG. 2023a. Data of Country Risk. Obtained from the PRS Group via e-mail on October 20, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• PRSG. 2023b. ICGR methodology. https://www.prsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/icrgmethodology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Purcel AA. 2019. Does political stability hinder pollution? evidence from developing states. Econ Res Guardian. 9(2):75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rizk R, Slimane MB. 2018. Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(31):31459–31473. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3051-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahuddin M, Gow J, Ali MI, Hossain MR, Al-Azami KS, Akbar D, Gedikli A. 2019. Urbanization-globalization-CO2 emissions nexus revisited: empirical evidence from South Africa. Heliyon. 5(6):e01974. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Balcılar M, Mahalik MK, Akadiri SS. 2023. Is causality between globalization and energy consumption bidirectional or unidirectional in top and bottom globalized economies? Int J Financ Econ. 28(2):1939–1964. doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK, Sadorsky P. 2018. How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? a country-specific time-series and panel analysis. Appl Econ. 50(13):1479–1494. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1366640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif A, Bhattacharya M, Afshan S, Shahbaz M. 2021. Disaggregated renewable energy sources in mitigating CO2 emissions: new evidence from the USA using quantile regressions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(41):57582–57601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13829-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif A, Kartal MT, Bekun FV, Pata UK, Foon CL, Kılıç Depren S. 2023. Role of green technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: insights from sovereign Nordic countries by CS-ARDL approach. Gondwana Research. 117:194–206. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohail MT, Majeed MT, Shaikh PA, Andlib Z. 2022. Environmental costs of political instability in Pakistan: policy options for clean energy consumption and environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(17):25184–25193. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17646-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su ZW, Umar M, Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS. 2021. Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: evidence from Brazil. J Environ Manage. 298:113463. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah S, Luo R, Adebayo TS, Kartal MT. 2023. Paving the ways toward sustainable development: the asymmetric effect of economic complexity, renewable electricity, and foreign direct investment on the environmental sustainability in BRICS-T. Environ Dev Sustain. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03085-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ulussever T, Kartal MT, Kılıç Depren S. 2023. Effect of income, energy consumption, energy prices, political stability, and geopolitical risk on the environment: evidence from GCC countries by novel quantile-based methods. Energ Environ. 0958305X231190351. doi: 10.1177/0958305X231190351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu TV, Huang DC. 2020. Economic development, globalization, political risk and CO2 emission: the case of Vietnam. J Asian Finance Econ Bus. 7(12):21–31. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WB. 2023. CO2 emissions and GDP (constant 2015 USD). https://data.worldbank.org.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li N, Mu H, Pang J, Zhao H, Ahmad M. 2021. Study on the long-term impact of economic globalization and population aging on CO2 emissions in OECD countries. Sci Total Environ. 787:147625. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılancı V, Bozoklu S, Görüş MS. 2020. Are BRICS countries pollution havens? evidence from a bootstrap ARDL bounds testing approach with a Fourier function. Sustain Cities Soc. 55:102035. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar MW, Saleem MM, Destek MA, Çağlar AE. 2022. The dynamic linkage between remittances, export diversification, education, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in top remittance‐receiving countries. Sustain Dev. 30(1):165–175. doi: 10.1002/sd.2236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan Z, Ali L, Sarwat S, Godil DI, Dinca G, Anser MK. 2021. A step towards environmental mitigation: do tourism, renewable energy and institutions really matter? a QARDL approach. Sci Total Environ. 778:146209. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Chiu YB. 2020. Do country risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? a nonlinear perspective. Energy. 206:118048. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar