Assessing resident’s perception towards ecosystem services of urban green spaces in Delhi, India

References

• Anand A, Bhattacharya P. 2023. Urbanites’ perceptions of green spaces and their roles in effective management: a survey-based study from Delhi, India. J Environ Stud Sci. 13(1):31–42. doi: 10.1007/s13412-022-00799-1.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson MFJ, Lepczyk CA, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS, Nilon CH, Vargo T. 2017. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front Ecol Environ. 15(4):189–196. doi: 10.1002/fee.1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AYH L, Jim CY. 2012. Citizen attitude and expectation towards greenspace provision in compact urban milieu. Land Use Policy. 29(3):577–586. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagne CS, Roche PK, Salles JM. 2018. Looking into Pandora’s box: ecosystem disservices assessment and correlations with ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 30:126–136. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariñanos P, Casares-Porcel M. 2011. Urban green zones and related pollen allergy: a review. Some guidelines for designing spaces with low allergy impact. Landsc Urban Plan. 101(3):205–214. doi: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2011.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M. 2013. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J Environ Manage. 129. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census of India. 2011. Census of India 2011 META DATA. India: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Chang J, Qu Z, Xu R, Pan K, Xu B, Min Y, Ren Y, Yang G, Ge Y. 2017. Assessing the ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces along urban center-edge gradients. Sci Rep. 7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11559-5.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Mitsch WJ, Day JW. 2006. A new vision for New Orleans and the Mississippi delta: applying ecological economics and ecological engineering. Front Ecol Environ. 4(9):465–472. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[465:ANVFNO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC. 2011. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan. 99(3–4):196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Zhen L, De Groot R, Du B, Yu X. 2017. Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosyst Serv. 24:79–90. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drillet Z, Fung TK, Leong RAT, Sachidhanandam U, Edwards P, Richards D. 2020. Urban vegetation types are not perceived equally in providing ecosystem services and disservices. Sustain. 12(5):2076. doi: 10.3390/su12052076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn RR. 2010. Global mapping of ecosystem disservices: the unspoken reality that nature sometimes kills us. Biotropica. 42(5):555–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00698.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta D, Rahman A, Paul SK, Kundu A. 2019. Changing pattern of urban landscape and its effect on land surface temperature in and around Delhi. Environ Monit Assess. 191(9). doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7645-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut. 159(8–9):2078–2087. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2011. Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Survey of India. 2021. The state of India’s forests 2021. Dehradun, India: Forest Survey of India.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler FJ, Cosenza C. 2009. The sage handbook of applied social research methods: design and evaluation of survey questions. place unknown.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs S, Kuhlicke C, Meyer V. 2011. Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration. Nat Hazard. 58(2):609–619. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9825-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena KR, Wells MJ, Kershaw T. 2017. Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity. Sci Total Environ. 584-585:1040–1055. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young R, Potschin-Young MB. 2018. Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5.1): a policy brief. One Ecosyst. 3:e27108. doi:10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108.
   Google Scholar
• Jim CY, Chen WY. 2006. Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environ Manage. 38(3):338–349. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0166-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko H, Son Y. 2018. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: a case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. Ecol Indic. 91. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewan L, Söderqvist T. 2002. Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern Sweden. Ecol Econ. 42(3):459–467. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00127-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Colson V, Lejeune P, Vanwambeke SO. 2016. On the distance travelled for woodland leisure via different transport modes in Wallonia, south Belgium. Urban For Urban Green. 15:123–132. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AY, Jim CY. 2010. Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban For Urban Green. 9(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsdorf EV, Nootenboom C, Janke B, Horgan BP. 2021. Assessing urban ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure: golf courses in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area. Landsc Urban Plan. 208:104022. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2020.104022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M. 2009. Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Green. 8(4):309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor SA, Malik A, Zubair M, Griffiths G, Lukac M. 2019. Linking social perception and provision of ecosystem services in a sprawling urban landscape: a case study of Multan, Pakistan. Sustain. 11(3):654. doi: 10.3390/su11030654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos P, Vieira J, Rocha B, Branquinho C, Pinho P. 2019. Modeling the provision of air-quality regulation ecosystem service provided by urban green spaces using lichens as ecological indicators. Sci Total Environ. 665. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: desertification synthesis. Washington (DC): Island Press. World Resour Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt L, Hotte N, Barron S, Cowan J, Sheppard SRJ. 2017. The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: a review and suggestions for future research. Urban For Urban Green. 25:103–111. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngulani T, Shackleton CM. 2019. Use of public urban green spaces for spiritual services in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Urban For Urban Green. 38:97–104. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Doyle M, McGovern M, Pasher J. 2018. Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban For Urban Green. 29:40–48. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Nagendra H. 2017. Factors influencing perceptions and use of urban nature: surveys of park visitors in Delhi. Land. 6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/land6020027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selmi W, Weber C, Rivière E, Blond N, Mehdi L, Nowak D. 2016. Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France. Urban For Urban Green. 17:192–201. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton CM, Ruwanza S, Sinasson Sanni GK, Bennett S, De Lacy P, Modipa R, Mtati N, Sachikonye M, Thondhlana G. 2016. Unpacking Pandora’s box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing. Ecosystems. 19(4). doi: 10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleghani M. 2018. Outdoor thermal comfort by different heat mitigation strategies- a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 81:2011–2018. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandogan O, Ilhan BS. 2016. Fear of crime in public spaces: from the view of women living in cities. Procedia Eng. 161:2011–2018. place unknown. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.795.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2011. The Economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, edited by Pushpam Kumar, 2010, London and Washington: Earthscan. Environ Dev Econ. 16(2):40.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Wu H, Zhang G, Wang L, Zheng D, Li S. 2020. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation. J Environ Manage. 260:260. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Town and Country Planning Organization. 2014. Urban greening guidelines. Ministry of urban development, government of India. New Delhi [accessed 2022 Nov 14]. https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/G%20G%202014(2).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan. 81(3):167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2015. Goals 11: make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. [accessed 2022 Dec 10]. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11.
   Google Scholar
• UNDESA. 2018. The World’s cities in 2018. World Urban Prospect 2018 Revis.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal DG, Fernandes CO, Viterbo LMF, Vilaça H, Barros N, Maia RL. 2021. Combining an evaluation grid application to assess ecosystem services of urban green spaces and a socioeconomic spatial analysis. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 28(4):291–302. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1808108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Li BV, Li S. 2021. Classifying ecosystem disservices and valuating their effects - a case study of Beijing, China. Ecol Indic. 129:129. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Zhang Y. 2018. Spatial variation of urban thermal environment and its relation to green space patterns: implication to sustainable landscape planning. Sustain. 10(7):2249. doi: 10.3390/su10072249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Muñoz Ramírez F. 2019. Assessing and mapping ecosystem services to support urban green infrastructure: the case of Barcelona, Spain. Cities. 92. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar