175
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Carbon taxes, resources efficiency, and environmental sustainability in a developed country

&
Pages 421-430 | Received 02 Sep 2023, Accepted 13 Dec 2023, Published online: 21 Dec 2023

References

  • Ali M, Hashmi SH, Habib Y, Kirikkaleli D. 2023. The asymmetric impact of public–private partnership investment in energy on CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Energy Environ. 0958305X2211494. doi: 10.1177/0958305x221149483.
  • Ali M, Kirikkaleli D. 2022. The asymmetric effect of renewable energy and trade on consumption-based CO2 emissions: the case of Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 18(3):784–795. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4516.
  • Ali M, Kirikkaleli D, Sharma R, Altuntaş M. 2022. The nexus between remittances, natural resources, technological innovation, economic growth, and environmental sustainability in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(50):75822–75840. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21228-4.
  • Andersson JJ. 2019. Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 11(4):1–30. doi: 10.1257/pol.20170144.
  • Banerjee P, Arčabić V, Lee H. 2017. Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from crude oil market. Econ Model. 67:114–124. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.004.
  • Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S. 2000. A future for carbon taxes. Ecol Econ. 32(3):395–412. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00122-6.
  • Barker T, Baylis S, Madsen P. 1993. A UK carbon/energy tax. Ener Pol. 21(3):296–308. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(93)90251-a.
  • Borozan D. 2018. Efficiency of energy taxes and the validity of the residential electricity environmental kuznets curve in the European union. Sustainability. 10(7):2464. doi: 10.3390/su10072464.
  • Borozan D. 2019. Unveiling the heterogeneous effect of energy taxes and income on residential energy consumption. Ener Pol. 129:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.069.
  • Broock WA, Scheinkman JA, Dechert WD, LeBaron B. 1996. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econom Rev. 15(3):197–235. doi: 10.1080/07474939608800353.
  • Bruvoll A, Larsen BM. 2004. Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? Ener Pol. 32(4):493–505. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00151-4.
  • Callan T, Lyons S, Scott S, Tol RSJ, Verde S. 2009. The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Ener Pol. 37(2):407–412. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.034.
  • Deroubaix J-F, Lévèque F. 2006. The rise and fall of French ecological tax reform: social acceptability versus political feasibility in the energy tax implementation process. Ener Pol. 34(8):940–949. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.047.
  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc. 74(366):427. doi: 10.2307/2286348.
  • Dissou Y, Nafie Y. 2019. Sustainability of current account deficits: evidence from Egypt using an asymmetric ARDL model. J Econ Asymmetries. 20(e00126):e00126. doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00126.
  • Ekins P, Hughes N 2017. Resource efficiency: potential and economic implications. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Accessed on 30.08.2023. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/7585/G9Resourcereport%20LWRES-3.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#:~:text=The%20pressing%20need%20to%20invest,supported%20by%20well%2Ddesigned%20policies.&text=stabilise%20global%20resource%20use%20by%202050%20and%20boost%20incomes%20and%20economic%20growth.
  • Fan H, Hashmi SH, Habib Y, Ali M. 2020. How do urbanization and urban agglomeration affect CO2 emissions in South Asia? Testing non-linearity puzzle with dynamic STIRPAT model. Chin J Urban Environ Stud. 8(01):2050003. doi: 10.1142/s2345748120500037.
  • He P, Sun Y, Shen H, Jian J, Yu Z. 2019. Does environmental tax affect energy efficiency? An empirical study of energy efficiency in OECD countries based on DEA and logit model. Sustainability. 11(14):3792. doi: 10.3390/su11143792.
  • Hickel J, Kallis G. 2020. Is green growth possible? New Polit Econ. 25(4):469–486. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964.
  • Kirikkaleli D, Ali M, Altuntaş M. 2022. Environmental sustainability and public-private partnerships investment in energy in Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(37):56068–56078. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19771-1.
  • Lee CF, Lin SJ, Lewis C. 2008. Analysis of the impacts of combining carbon taxation and emission trading on different industry sectors. Ener Pol. 36(2):722–729. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.025.
  • Lin B, Li X. 2011. The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Ener Pol. 39(9):5137–5146. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.050.
  • Metcalf GE. 2021. Carbon taxes in theory and practice. Annu Rev Resour Economics. 13(1):245–265. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-102519-113630.
  • Morley B. 2012. Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes. Appl Econ Lett. 19(18):1817–1820. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2011.650324.
  • Pigou A. 2013. The economics of welfare. 2013th ed. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Plank B, Eisenmenger N, Schaffartzik A. 2021. Do material efficiency improvements backfire?: insights from an index decomposition analysis about the link between CO2 emissions and material use for Austria. J Ind Ecol. 25(2):511–522. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13076.
  • Qayyum M, Ali M, Nizamani MM, Li S, Yu Y, Jahanger A. 2021. Nexus between financial development, renewable energy consumption, technological innovations and CO2 emissions: the case of India. Energies. 14(15):4505. doi: 10.3390/en14154505.
  • Qayyum M, Yu Y, Nizamani MM, Raza S, Ali M, Li S. 2023. Financial instability and CO2 emissions in India: evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. Ener Environ. 34(4):808–829. doi: 10.1177/0958305x211065019.
  • References Agostini P, Botteon M, Carraro C. 1992. A carbon tax to reduce CO2 emissions in Europe. Ene Econ. 14(4):279–290. doi: 10.1016/0140-9883(92)90034-b.
  • Rhodes CJ. 2016. The 2015 Paris climate change conference: COP21. Sci Prog. 99(1):97–104. doi: 10.3184/003685016X14528569315192.
  • Ritchie H, Roser M, Rosado P 2020. CO₂ and greenhouse gas emissions. Our world in data. Accessed on 23.08.2023. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  • Sen S, Vollebergh H. 2018. The effectiveness of taxing the carbon content of energy consumption. J Environ Econ Manage. 92:74–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.017.
  • Shabir M, Ali M, Hashmi SH, Bakhsh S. 2022. Heterogeneous effects of economic policy uncertainty and foreign direct investment on environmental quality: cross-country evidence. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(2):2737–2752. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15715-3.
  • Shahzad U. 2020. Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: theoretical survey with policy implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(20):24848–24862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4.
  • Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M. 2014. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. New York, NY: Springer New York; pp. 281–314. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9.
  • Ulucak R, Danish KY, Kassouri Y. 2020. An assessment of the environmental sustainability corridor: Investigating the non-linear effects of environmental taxation on CO 2 emissions. Sustain Dev. 28(4):1010–1018. doi: 10.1002/sd.2057.
  • Vera S, Sauma E. 2015. Does a carbon tax make sense in countries with still a high potential for energy efficiency? Comparison between the reducing-emissions effects of carbon tax and energy efficiency measures in the Chilean case. Energy. 88:478–488. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.067.
  • Wang X, Khurshid A, Qayyum S, Calin AC. 2022. The role of green innovations, environmental policies and carbon taxes in achieving the sustainable development goals of carbon neutrality. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(6):8393–8407. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16208-z.
  • Wang H, Wei W. 2020. Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: the optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies. Energy Econ. 87(104510):104510. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104510.
  • World Bank. 2021. State and trends of carbon pricing 2021. Washington, DC. Accessed on 02.09.2023. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35620
  • Yang B, Ali M, Hashmi SH, Jahanger A. 2022. Do income inequality and institutional quality affect CO2 emissions in developing economies? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(28):42720–42741. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18278-5.
  • Yang B, Ali M, Hashmi SH, Shabir M. 2020b. Income inequality and CO2 emissions in developing countries: the moderating role of financial instability. Sustainability. 12(17):6810. doi: 10.3390/su12176810.
  • Yang B, Ali M, Nazir MR, Ullah W, Qayyum M. 2020a. Financial instability and CO2 emissions: cross-country evidence. Air Qual Atmos Health. 13(4):459–468. doi: 10.1007/s11869-020-00809-7.
  • Yuan R, Li C, Ahmed Memon J, Ali M, Nawaz MA. 2022. The nexus between fiscal decentralization and environmental sustainability in Japan. Front Environ Sci. 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.905461.
  • Zhang Z, Baranzini A. 2004. What do we know about carbon taxes? An inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income. Ener Pol. 32(4):507–518. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00152-6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.