Optimizing cultivated land under non-grain expansion in rural China: unveiling the spatial dynamics of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services

References

• Bai Y, Chen Y, Alatalo J, Yang Z, Jiang B. 2020. Scale effects on the relationships between land characteristics and ecosystem services- a case study in Taihu Lake Basin, China. Sci. of the Tot. Env. 716:137083. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao Y, Li G, Tian Y, Fang X, Li Y, Tan Y. 2020. Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, bundles and hotspot identification with cropland management in the coastal Hangzhou Bay area of China. Land Use Policy. 97:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104689.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Li G, Wang J, Fang X, Sun K. 2022. Systematic review and research framework of “Non-grain” utilization of cultivated land: from a perspective of food security to multi-dimensional security. China L Sci. 36:1–12. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20220225.144317.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Liu J, Ma J, Yu H, Chen F. 2023. Spatial pattern and driving factors of non-grain conversion on cultivated land in arid and semi-arid regions. J Agric Resour Environ. 40:333–344. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2022.0151.
   Google Scholar
• Chen D, Duan Y, Jiang P, Li M. 2024. Spatial zoning to enhance ecosystem service co-benefits for sustainable land-use management in the Yangtze River economic belt, China. Ecol Indic. 159:111753. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111753.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Chi G, Li J. 2019. The spatial association of ecosystem services with land use and land cover change at the county level in China, 1995–2015. Sci Total Environ. 669:459–470. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng X, Tao Y, Huang C, Yi J, Yi D, Wang F, Tao Q, Xi H, Ou W. 2022. Unraveling the causal mechanisms for non-grain production of cultivated land: An analysis framework applied in liyang, China. Land. 11:1–21. doi: 10.3390/land11111888.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Constenla-Villoslada S, Liu Y, Wen J, Sun Y, Chonabayashi S. 2022. Large-scale land restoration improved drought resilience in Ethiopia’s degraded watersheds. Nat Sustain. 5(6):488–497. doi: 10.1038/s41893-022-00861-4.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv. 28:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai E, Wang X, Zhu J, Zhao D. 2016. Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs. Geogr Res. 35:1005–1016. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201606001.
   Google Scholar
• Dou H, Li X, Li S, Dang D, Li X, Lyu X, Li M, Liu S. 2020. Global methane emissions from coal mining to continue growing even with declining coal production. J Clean Prod. 256:120444. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120489.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte G, Santos P, Cornelissen T, Ribeiro M, Paglia A. 2018. The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: meta-analyses of landscape services. Landsc Ecol. 33(8):1247–1257. doi: 10.1007/s10980-018-0673-5.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Jin X, Chen T, Wu J. 2021. Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Land Use Policy. 106:105446. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105446.
   Google Scholar
• Gou M, Li L, Ouyang S, Wang N, La L, Liu C, Xiao W. 2021. Identifying and analyzing ecosystem service bundles and their socioecological drivers in the three Gorges Reservoir Area. J Clean Prod. 307:127208. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127208.
   Google Scholar
• He J, Shi X, Fu Y, Yuan Y. 2020. Evaluation and simulation of the impact of land use change on ecosystem services trade-offs in ecological restoration areas, China. Land Use Policy. 99:105020. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Su Y, Shahtahmassebi A, Huang L, Zhou M, Gan M, Deng J, Zhao G, Wang K. 2019. Assessing and mapping cultural ecosystem services supply, demand and flow of farmlands in the Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Sci Total Environ. 692:756–768. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu B, Kang F, Han H, Cheng X, Li Z. 2021. Exploring drivers of ecosystem services variation from a geospatial perspective: insights from China’s Shanxi Province. Ecol Indic. 131:108188. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108188.
   Google Scholar
• Kong X. 2014. China must protect high-quality arable land. Nature. 506(7486):7. doi: 10.1038/506007a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong X. 2020. Problems, causes and countermeasures of “non-grain production” within cultivated land. China L. 11:17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler J, Lewis D, Nelson E, Plantinga A, Polasky S, Withey J, Helmers D, Martinuzzi S, Penningtonh D, Radeloff V. 2014. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111(20):7492–7497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405557111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Hu D, Wang Y, Chu J, Yin H, Ma M. 2024. Study of identification and simulation of ecological zoning through integration of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value. Sustainable Cities Soc. 107:105442. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105442.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, An W, Zhang J, Gan M, Wang K, Ding L, Li W. 2023a. Optimizing limit lines in urban-rural transitional areas: unveiling the spatial dynamics of trade-offs and synergies among land use functions. Habitat Int. 140:102907. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102907.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Shao Y, Hong M, Zhu C, Dong B, Li Y, Lin Y, Wang K, Gan M, Zhu J, et al. 2023b. Impact mechanisms of urbanization processes on supply-demand matches of cultivated land multifunction in rapid urbanization areas. Habitat Int. 131:102726. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102726.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Jin X, Liu J, Yin Y, Gu Z, Zhang J, Zhou Y. 2023. Formation mechanism and sustainable productivity impacts of non-grain croplands: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China. Land Degrad Dev. 34(4):1120–1132. doi: 10.1002/ldr.4520.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Qiao J, Li M, Huang M. 2024. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their drivers at different spatial scales in the Yellow River Basin. Sci Total Environ. 908:168486. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu S, Li S, Liu Y, Xu X, Zhao N. 2021. Ecological benefit evaluation of the grain for green project in Beijing. 生态学报. 41(15):6170–6181. doi: 10.5846/stxb202004140883.
   Google Scholar
• Manjunatha AV, Anik AR, Speelman S, Nuppenau EA. 2013. Impact of land fragmentation, farm size, land ownership and crop diversity on profit and efficiency of irrigated farms in India. Land Use Policy. 31:397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Tan Y, Chen H, Xiong W. 2022. Spatial-temporal evolution patterns and influencing factors of “Non-grain” utilization of cultivated land in China. China L Sci. 36:97–106. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20211206.092159.
   Google Scholar
• Mu H, Li X, Wen Y, Huang J, Du P, Su W, Miao S, Geng M. 2022. A global record of annual terrestrial human footprint dataset from 2000 to 2018. Sci Data. 9(1):176. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01284-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller F, Burkhard B. 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 1:26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Yi X, Polasky S, Liu J, Xu W, Wang Q, Zhang L, Yang X, Rao E, et al. 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science. 352(6292):1455–1459. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Hu X, Qiu S, Hu Y, Meersmans J, Liu Y. 2019. Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area. Sci Total Environ. 660:765–775. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu L, Pan Y, Zhu J, Amable G, Xu B. 2019. Integrated analysis of urbanization-triggered land use change trajectory and implications for ecological land management: a case study in Fuyang, China. Sci Total Environ. 660:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Wu S. 2021. Trade-offs between economic benefits and environmental impacts of vegetable greenhouses expansion in East China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(40):56257–56268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14601-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rieb J, Bennett E. 2020. Landscape structure as a mediator of ecosystem service interactions. Landscape Ecol. 35(12):2863–2880. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01117-2.
   Google Scholar
• Shen J, Zhao M, Tan Z, Zhu L, Guo Y, Li Y, Wu C. 2024. Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies relationships and their driving factor analysis based on the Bayesian belief network: a case study of the Yellow River Basin. Ecol Indic. 163:112070. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112070.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha R, Di L, Yu E, Kang L, Shao Y, Bai Y. 2017. Regression model to estimate flood impact on corn yield using MODIS NDVI and USDA cropland data layer. J Integr Agric. 16:398–407. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61502-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su S, Zhou X, Wan C, Li Y, Kong W. 2016. Land use changes to cash crop plantations: Crop types, multilevel determinants and policy implications. Land Use Policy. 50:379–389. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, He S, Wang K, Shahtahmassebi A, Zhang L, Zhang J, Zhang M, Gan M. 2020. Quantifying the sustainability of three types of agricultural production in China: an emergy analysis with the integration of environmental pollution. J Clean Prod. 252:119650. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119650.
   Google Scholar
• Su Y, Li C, Wang K, Deng J, Shahtahmassebi A, Zhang L, Ao W, Guan T, Pan Y, Gan M. 2019. Quantifying the spatiotemporal dynamics and multi-aspect performance of non-grain production during 2000–2015 at a fine scale. Ecological Indicators. 101:410–419. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Qian K, Lin L, Wang K, Guan T, Gan M. 2020. Identifying the driving forces of non-grain production expansion in rural China and its implications for policies on cultivated land protection. Land Use Policy. 92:104435. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Su C, Xie Y, Li T, Li Y, Sun Y. 2022. Controlling non-grain production based on cultivated land multifunction assessment. Int J Environ Resear Public Health. 19(3):1027. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su Y, Wang X, Wang C, Zhu C, Jiang Q, Li Y. 2024.Trade‑ofs between economic benefits and environmental impacts in non‑grain expansion: a case study in the eastern plain of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 31(10):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31930-0.
   Google Scholar
• Tamburini G, Bommarco R, Wanger T, Kremen C, Liebman M, Hallin S, van der Heijden MGA. 2020. Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield. Sci Adv. 6(45):eaba1715. doi: 10.1126/SCIADV.ABA1715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teng H. 2017. Assimilating multi-source data to model and potential soil loss in China [dissertation]. Hangzhou (Zhejiang Province): Zhejiang University.
   Google Scholar
• Tran D, Pearson D, Palmer A, Lowry J, Gray D, Dominati E. 2022. Quantifying spatial non-stationarity in the relationship between landscape structure and the provision of ecosystem services: An example in the New Zealand hill country. Sci Total Environ. 808:152126. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Hu Y. 2012. Environmental health risk detection with GeogDetector. Environ Model & Soft. 33:114–115. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li X, Christakos G, Liao Y, Zhang T, Gu X, Zheng X. 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 24:107–127. doi: 10.1080/13658810802443457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Xia M, Zou W. 2024. Ecological conservation and restoration zoning of county-level agricultural spatial ecology coupled with ecological service supply and demand: A case study of Yixing. J Nat Resour. 39(4):858–877. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20240407.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wu J, Liu Y, Hai X, Shanguan Z, Deng L. 2022. Driving factors of ecosystem services and their spatiotemporal change assessment based on land use types in the Loess Plateau. J. of Env. Mgmt. 311:114835. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114835.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xia H, Yuan S, Prishchepov A. 2023. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their social-ecological drivers: implications for spatial planning and management. Resour Conserv Recycl. 189:106767. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106767.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Wang S, Xiao Y, Xie G, Wang Y, Zhang C, Li P, Lei G. 2021. Mapping the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service relationships and bundles in Ningxia, China. J Clean Prod. 294:126216. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126216.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X. 2017. China GDP spatial distribution kilometer grid dataset. Resource and Environ Sci Data Registration and Publ System. doi: 10.12078/2017121102.
   Google Scholar
• Xue C, Chen X, Xue L, Zhang H, Chen J, Li D. 2023. Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in bairin left banner, China. Sci Total Environ. 855:158834. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158834.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xue C, Zhang H, Wu S, Chen J, Chen X. 2022. Spatial-temporal evolution of ecosystem services and its potential drivers: a geospatial perspective from bairin left banner, China. Ecol Indic. 137:108760. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108760.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Zhang D. 2021. The influence of agricultural industrial policy on non-grain production of cultivated land: a case study of the “one village, one product” strategy implemented in Guanzhong Plain of China. Land Use Policy. 108:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Yang W, Kang D, Zhang H. 2023. Spatial-temporal characteristics and policy implication for non-grain production of cultivated land in Guanzhong Region. Land Use Policy. 125:106466. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106466.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Zhang S, Cao Q, Wang H, Li Y. 2022. The spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services bundles and the social-economic-ecological drivers in the Yellow River Delta region. Ecological Indicators. 135:108573. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108573.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. 2020. What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective? J Clean Prod. 257:120454. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Pan J. 2022. Ecosystem service trade-offs and spatial non-stationary responses to influencing factors in the Loess hilly-gully region: Lanzhou City, China. Sci Total Environ. 846:157422. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Xu Y, Pu J, Tao J, Chen Y, Huang P, Shi X, Ran Y, Gu Z. 2024. Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds. Land Use Policy. 139:107056. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107056.
   Google Scholar