Being nature: interspecies articulation as a species-specific practice of relating to environment

References

• Abram, D. 1997. The spell of the sensuous. Perception and language in the more than a human world. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Abram, D. 2010. Becoming animal: An earthly cosmology. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Acampora, R. R. 2006. Corporal compassion: Animal ethics and philosophy of body. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, H., D. Elza, P. Kovacs, and S. Romanycia. 2010. “Re-searching and re-storying the complex and complicated relationship of biophilia and bibliophilia.” Environmental Education Research 16(3): 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2008. “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” In Material Feminisms, edited by S. Alaimo and S. Hekman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basso, K. 1996. Wisdom sits in places. Landscape and language among the western apache. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 1994. Thoreau's nature: Ethics, politics, and the wild. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke.
   Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. 2011. Sensibility and sense: The aesthetic transformation of the human world. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M. 2004. Retrieving nature. Education for a post-humanist age. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M. 2006. “Education for sustainability as a frame of mind.” Journal of Environmental Education Research 12: 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, L. 2005. The future of environmental criticism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., M. Grace, and P. Hanley. 2009. “Children's anthropomorphic and anthropocentric ideas about micro-organisms.” Journal of Biological education 44: 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caras, R. 1996. Perfect harmony: The intertwining lives of animals and humans throughout history. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, S. 2000. “Excursus on Wittgenstein's vision of language.” In The New Wittgenstein, edited by A. Crary and R. Read, 21–37. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, S. 2010. Philosophy and animal life. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. Trans P. Patton. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1980. A thousand plateaus. Vol 2 of capitalism and schizofrenia. London: Continuum . 1987.
   Google Scholar
• DesJardins, J. R. 2006. Environmental ethics: An introduction to environmental philosophy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, C. 2010. “The difficulty of reality and the difficulty of philosophy.” In Philosophy and animal life, edited by S. Cavell, 43–90. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrin, S. I. 2010. “Through green eyes: Complex visual culture and post-literacy.” Environmental Education Research 16(3): 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., A. Waytz, S. Akalis, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2008. “When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism.” Social Cognition 26: 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrard, G. 2010. “Problems and prospects in ecocritical pedagogy.” Environmental Education Research 16(2): 233–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, U., B. Nevers, and E. Billman-Mahecha. 2003. “Moralizing trees: Anthropomorphism and identity in children's relationships to nature.” In Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, edited by S. Clayton and S. Opotow, 91–111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, J. 2010. “Critical geography II: Articulating race and radical politics.” Progress in Human Geography 34(4): 506–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. 2008. “The best of both worlds. A critical pedagogy of place.” Environmental Education Research 14(3): 308–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2003. Inventing nature. Oxford: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud, P. 1975. Semiology. Trans. George Gross. London: Routledg & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2003. The companion species manifesto – Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly paradigm press.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. L. Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research.” Qualitative Studies in Education 23(5): 525–542.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 1994. “From trust to domination. An alternative history of human-animal relations.” In Animals and human society, edited by A. Manning and J. Serpell, 1–22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2005. “Epilogue: Towards a politics of dwelling.” Conservative Society 3: 501–508.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. 2008. “Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography.” Progress in Human Geography 32: 633–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. 1949. A sand county almanac: And sketches here and there. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littledyke, M. 2004. Converging paradigms: Bridging science and environmental educationthrough drama. In International perspectives in environmental education, ed. Filho. NewYork, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, D. 2008. “Anthropocentrism as a social phenomenon: Semiotic and ethical implications.” Social Semiotics 18: 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. 2011. “Nature identification: The power of pointing and naming.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 5(1): 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. 1989. Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C., and C. Wilbert. 2000. “Animal spaces, beastly places: An introduction.” In Animal spaces, beastly places, edited by C. Philo and C. Wilbert, 1–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierpont, E. I., S. Weismer, A. E. Roberts, E. Tworog-Dube, M. Pierpont, N. J. Mendelsohn, and M. S. Seidenberg. 2010. “The language phenotype of children and adolescents with Noonan syndrome.” Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 53(4): 917–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. 2009. “On hanging laundry. The place of beauty in managing everyday life.” Contemporary Aesthetics 7(9).
   Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. 2010a. Writing about everyday beauty in a northern village. An argument fordiversity of habitable places. PhD diss., Oulu: Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, E 109.
   Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. 2010b. “Beauty in the context of particular lives.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 44(4): 38–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. 2011. “Writing about everyday beauty. Anthropomorphism and distancing in relating to environment.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 5(1): 104–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. 2013. “Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life.” Children's Geographies 10(3).
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. 2007. “Literacy and environmental communications: Towards ‘pedagogy of responsibility'.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 30(2): 118–133.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. L. 2005. “‘Whoever does not write is written': the role of ‘nature' in post-post approaches to environmental education research.” Environmental Education Research 11(4): 433–443.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, Y. 2007. Everyday aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scollo Sawyer, M. 2004. Nonverbal ways of communicating with nature: A cross-case study. The environmental communication yearbook 1.
   Google Scholar
• Serpell, J. A. 2003. “Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection – Beyond the ‘cute response’.” Society and Animals 11: 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, J. 2001. “Why Eco-poetics?” Ecopoetics 1(Winter): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 2010. Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. P. 2010. “Janus and the siren's call: Kava and the articulation of gender and modernity in Vanuatu.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16(2): 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J. 2010. “Between knowing what is right and knowing that is it wrong to tell others what is right: On relativism, uncertainty and democracy in environmental and sustainability education.” Environmental Education Research 16(1): 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. 2009. “Articulation and re-articulation: Development of a model for providing quality feedback to pre-service teachers on practicum.” Journal of Education for Teaching 35(2): 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell . 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., and J. Emel. 1995. “Bringing the animals back in.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13: 632–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. 2003. Animal rites: American culture, the discourse of species and posthumanist theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. 2010. What is posthumanism?. London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, D. L. C. 2004. “The perils of anthropomorphism.” Nature 482: 606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar