Sustainability science and the university: pitfalls and bridges to interdisciplinarity

References

• Aboelela, S. W., E. Larson, S. Bakken, O. Carrasquillo, A. Formicola, S. A. Glied, J. Haas, and K. M. Gebbie. 2007. “Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature.” Health Services Research 42 (1): 329–346 . part 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adomssent, Maik, and Geri Michelsen. 2006. “German Academia Heading for Sustainability? Reflections on Policy and Practice in Teaching, Research and Institutional Innovations.” Environmental Education Research 12 (1): 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, M. B., and D. Rousseau. 2001. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, T. R., A. Rauch, H. Blau, G. Yudice, S. Van Den Berg, and L. S. Robinson. 1996. “Defining Interdisciplinarity.” PMLA 111 (2): 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bammer, G. 2005. “Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a New Specialization.” Ecology and Society 10 (2): 1–25. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Angela, Alpe, Yves, and Bader, Barbara. 2012. “Questions and Positions on Education for Sustainable Development at University in France: Example of Short Professional Cycles.” Environmental Education Research. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.690854.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholo, R. S. 2001. “Solidão e Liberdade: Notas Sobre a Contemporaneidade de Wilhelm Von Humboldt [Solitude And Liberty: Notes on the Contemporaneity of Wilhelm Von Humboldt].” In Ciência, Ética e Sustentabilidade – desafios ao novo século, edited by M. Bursztyn, 43–60. São Paulo: Cortez/UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholo, R. S., M. Bursztyn, and O. H. Leonardos. 2000. “Science and the Ethics of Sustainability.” In Transition to Global Sustainability: The Contributions of Brazilian Science, edited by C. E. Rocha-Miranda, 313–323. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, H. H. 1990. “Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS).” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (1): 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, E. 2001. “Disciplining the Interdisciplinary: Radicalism and the Academic Curriculum.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (4): 463–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronowski, J. 1972. Science and Human Values. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Bronowski, J. 1978. The Common Sense of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, M. 2004. “Meio Ambiente e Interdisciplinaridade: Desafios ao Mundo Acadêmico [Environment and Interdisciplinarity: Challenges to the Academic World].” Revista Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 10 (2): 67–76, UFPR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, M. 2007. “Institutionalization of Interdisciplinarity in the Brazilian University: The Case of Environmental Sciences.” Natures Sciences Sociétés 15 (1): 57–64 . Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. C. 2007. “Sustainability Science: A Room of its Own.” PNAS 104 (6): 1737–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. C., and N. M. Dickson. 2003. “Sustainability Science: The Emerging Research Program.” PNAS 100 (14): 8059–8061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. C., P. J. Crutzen, and H. J. Schellnhuber. 2004. “Science for Global Sustainability: Toward a New Paradigm.” In Earth Systems Analysis for Sustainability, edited by J. H. Schellnhuber, P. J. Crutzen, W. C. Clark, M. Claussen and H. Held, 1–28. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constanza, R., ed. 1991. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constanza, R., J. Cumberland, H. Daly, P. Goodland, and R. O. Norgaard. 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, M. M. 2006. “The University of the Future.” Issues in Science & Technology 22 (2): 5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, J. A. 2006. “A Primazia dos Cientistas Naturais na Construção da Agenda Ambiental Contemporânea [The Primacy of Natural Scientists in the Construction of the Contemporary Environmental Agenda].” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 21: 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York, NY: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. S. 1998. “Disciplining Feminism? The Future of Women’s Studies.” Feminist Studies 24 (2): 301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godemann, Jasmin. 2008. “Knowledge Integration: A Key Challenge for Transdisciplinary Cooperation.” Environmental Education Research 14 (6): 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., D. Bradley, C. Pohl, S. Rist, and U. Wiesmann. 2006. “Implications of Transdisciplinarity for Sustainability Research.” Ecological Economics 60 (1): 119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp, eds. 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoare, A., S. Cornell, C. Bertram, K. Gallagher, S. Heslop, N. Lieven, C. MacLeod, et al. 2008. “Teaching Against the Grain: Multi-Disciplinary Teamwork Effectively Delivers a Successful Undergraduate Unit in Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 14 (4): 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howse, R. 2002. “From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime.” The American Journal of International Law 96 (1): 94–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iltis, A. S. 2006. “Look Who’s Talking: The Interdisciplinarity of Bioethics and the Implications for Bioethics Education.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6): 629–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. M., M. Hammer, C. Folke, and R. Constanza, eds. 1994. Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. 1972. “Inter- and Transdisciplinary University: A Systems Approach to Education and Innovation.” Higher Education 1 (1): 7–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, R. W., W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, et al. 2001. “Sustainability Science.” Science 292 (5517): 641–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 2001. “Disciplining Interdisciplinarity.” Feminist Studies 27 (2): 519–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. A., R. W. Kates, and T. M. Parris. 2006. “Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends.” Annual Review Environmental Resources 31: 413–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lélé, S., and R. B. Norgaard. 2005. “Practicing Interdisciplinarity.” Bioscience 55 (11): 967–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubchenco, J. 1998. “Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social. Contract for Science.” Science 279 (5350): 491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMynowski, D. P. 2007. “Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science.” Ecology and Society 12 (1): 20. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/.
   Google Scholar
• Maniates, M. F., and J. Whissel. 2000. “Environmental Studies: The Sky is Not Falling.” BioScience 50 (6): 509–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. A. 2005. “Foundations of Transdisciplinarity.” Ecological Economics 53: 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, A. J., C. D. Butler, and C. Folke. 2003. “Visions for Addressing Sustainability.” Science 302 (5652): 1919–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 1999. “On Interdisciplinary Research: With Particular Reference to the Field of Environment and Development.” Higher Education Quarterly 53 (4): 312–332.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., and J. García-Godos. 2005. Doing Interdisciplinary Research on Development and the Environment: Critical Reflections on SUM’s Experience. SUM Report No. 11. University of Oslo, Centre for Development and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens III. 1972. Limits to Growth. London: Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1980. O Método – Vida da Vida [The Method – Life of Life]. Portugal, Europa-América: Cintra.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 2000. Les Sept Savoirs Necéssaires à l ´education du futur [Seven Complex Lessons in Education for the Future]. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 2004. La Méthode 6 – Éthique [The Method 6 – Ethics]. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, W. C., M. Nielsen-Pincus, J. Force, and J. Wulfhorst. 2007. “Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research.” Ecology and Society 12 (2): 8. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art8/.
   Google Scholar
• NAS. 2001. Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. National Academy of Sciences, National, 1–92. URL: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9975.html.
   Google Scholar
• NAS. 2004. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, 1–332. URL: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153.html.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. 1989. “The Case for Methodological Pluralism.” Ecological Economics 1 (1): 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, C. L. 1999. “Structures and Strategies of Interdisciplinary Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (3): 242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, Christian, and Hirsch Hadorn Gertrude. 2008. “Methodological Challenges of Transdisciplinary Research.” Natures Sciences Sociétés 16 (2): 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century – The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., F. W. Lancaster, and B. Allen. 1997. “Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 (10): 893–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway, D. 1999. “Disciplinarity, Corporatization, and the Crisis: A Dystopian Narrative.” The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 32 (2/3): 2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulé, M. E., and D. Press. 1998. “What is Environmental Studies?” BioScience 48 (5): 397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, Stephen, and Heather Witham. 2008. “Pushing the Boundaries: The Work of the Higher Education Academy’s ESD Project.” Environmental Education Research 14 (4): 339–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, Stephen, and William Scott. 2008. “Higher Education and ESD in England: A Critical Commentary on Recent Initiatives.” Environmental Education Research 14 (4): 386–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1998. Consilience – The Unity of Knowledge. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar