An investigation of the goals for an environmental science course: teacher and student perspectives

References

• Agar, M. 2006. “Culture: Can You Take It Anywhere?” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (2). Accessed January 17, 2013. http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_2/pdf/agar.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. J. 2006. “Education for the Environment: Action Competence, Becoming, and Story.” Environmental Education Research 12 (3–4): 503–511.10.1080/13504620600799273
   Google Scholar
• Bayne, G. 2008. “Cogenerative Dialogues.” In World of Science Education: North America, edited by Wolff-Michael Roth and Kenneth Tobin. Rotterdam, NL: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, E. N. 2010. “An Ethnographic Investigation of the Process of Change in students’ Environmental Identity and pro-Environmental Behavior in the Environmental Science Course.” PhD diss., University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, E. N. 2013. “Exploring Environmental Identity and Behavioral Change in an Environmental Science Course.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 8: 467–488.10.1007/s11422-012-9459-2
   Google Scholar
• The Belgrade Charter: A Global Framework for Environmental Education. 1975. International Conference on Environmental Education. Belgrade, Yugoslavia.
   Google Scholar
• Bol, L., and A. Strage. 1996. “The Contradiction between Teachers’ Instructional Goals and Their Assessment Practices in High School Biology Courses.” Science Education 80 (2): 145–163.10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199604)80:2<>1.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• The College Board. 2010. College Board Advanced Placement Environmental Science Course Description. http://apcentral.collegeboard.com.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. J., and S. Begley. 2012. The Emotional Life of Your Brain: How Its Unique Patterns Affect the Way You Think, Feel, and Live – And How You Can Change Them. New York: Hudson Street Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. 2007. “Environmental Science for All? Considering Environmental Science for Inclusion in the High School Core Curriculum.” Science Educator 16 (1): 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Literacy Council. 2002. http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1489.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Mueller, J., and D. L. Zeidler. 2002. “A Case Study of Teacher Beliefs in Contemporary Science Education Goals and Classroom Practices.” Science Educator 11 (1): 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, J., F. Kaiser, and M. Wilson. 2004. “Environmental Knowledge and Conservation Behavior: Exploring Prevalence and Structure in a Representative Sample.” Personality and Individual Differences 37: 1597–1613.10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2011. Looking to the Future. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-472-0
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, W. A. 1996. “Developmental Origins of Environmental Ethics: The Life Experiences of Activists.” Ethics & Behavior 6 (1): 29–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., S. Kim, and J. Jeng. 2000. “Examining the Causal Relationships among Selected Antecedents of Responsible Environmental Behavior.” Journal of Environmental Education 31 (4): 19–25.10.1080/00958960009598647
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., and U. Fuhrer. 2003. “Ecological Behavior’s Dependency on Different Forms of Knowledge.” Applied Psychology: An International Review 52 (4): 598–613.10.1111/apps.2003.52.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kals, E., D. Schumacher, and L. Montada. 1999. “Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature.” Environment and Behavior 31 (2): 178–202.10.1177/00139169921972056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempton, W., and D. C. Holland. 2003. “Identity and Sustained Environmental Practice.” In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, edited by Susan Clayton and Susan Opotow, 317–341. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to pro-Environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–260.10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlemeier, H., H. Van Den Bergh, and N. Lagerweij. 1999. “Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior in Dutch Secondary Education.” Journal of Environmental Education 30 (2): 4–14.10.1080/00958969909601864
   Google Scholar
• Longbottom, J. E., and P. H. Butler. 1999. “Why Teach Science? Setting Rational Goals for Science Education.” Science Education 83 (4): 473–492.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. 2007. “Caring for the Environment: Challenges from Notions of Caring.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 23: 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhold, J. L., and A. J. Malkus. 2005. “Adolescent Environmental Behaviors: Can Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-efficacy make a Difference?” Environment and Behavior 37 (4): 511–532.10.1177/0013916504269665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• North American Association for Environmental Education. Revised 2004. Excellence in Environmental Education: Guidelines for Learning (Pre-K-12). Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Onosko, J. 1989. “Comparing Teachers’ Thinking about Promoting Students’ Thinking.” Theory and Research in Social Education 17 (3): 174–195.10.1080/00933104.1989.10505588
   Google Scholar
• Onosko, J. J., and F. M. Newmann. 1994. “Creating More Thoughtful Learning Environments.” In Creating Powerful Thinking in Teachers and Students: Diverse Perspectives, edited by J. N. Mangieri and C. Collins, 27–48. New York: Harcourt Brace College.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., V. Day, J. Dillon, and M. Grace. 2004. “Controversial Issues – Teachers’ Attitudes and Practices in the Context of Citizenship Education.” Oxford Review of Education 30 (4): 489–507.10.1080/0305498042000303973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2001. Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, J. A., and M. O’Connor. 2000. “Environmental Education and Attitudes: Emotions and Beliefs Are What is Needed.” Environment and Behavior 32 (5): 711–723.10.1177/00139160021972757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R. B. 2007. “Schooling and Environmental Education: Contradictions in Purpose and Practice.” Environmental Education Research 13 (2): 139–153.10.1080/13504620701295726
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W. 2001. “Transformative Learning Theory: A Neurobiological Perspective of the Role of Emotions and Unconscious Ways of Knowing.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 20 (3): 218–236.10.1080/02601370110036064
   Google Scholar
• Thomashow, M. 1995. Ecological Identity: Becoming a Reflective Environmentalist. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar