The role of knowledge in participatory and pluralistic approaches to ESE

References

• Albe, V. 2007. “Students’ Positions and Considerations of Scientific Evidence about a Controversial Socioscientific Issue.” Science & Education 17 (8–9): 805–827.
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist, J., and L. Östman. 2006. “Privileging and Artefacts. On the Use of Information Technology in Science Education.” Interchange 37: 225–250.
   Google Scholar
• von Aufschnaiter, C., S. Erduran, J. Osborne, and S. Simon. 2008. “Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students’ Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (1): 101–131.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., and N. G. Lederman. 2003. “Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making on Science and Technology Based Issues.” Science & Education 87 (3): 352–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, M. W., and P. Simmons. 2003. “Integrating Science Education and Character Education: The Role of Peer Discussion.” In The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education, edited by D. L. Zeidler, 117–138. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and B. J. Reiser. 2009. “Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation.” Science & Education 93 (1): 26–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and B. J. Reiser. 2011. “Classroom Communities’ Adaption of the Practice of Scientific Argumentation.” Science & Education 95 (2): 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and N. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and Educational Research. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, C., N. Gericke, H.-O. Höglund, and E. Bergman. 2012. “The Barriers Encountered by Teachers Implementing Education for Sustainable Development: Discipline Bound Differences and Teaching Traditions.” Research in Science and Technological Education 30 (2): 185–207.10.1080/02635143.2012.699891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiting, S., and P. Wickenberg. 2010. “The Progressive Development of Environmental Education in Sweden and Denmark.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 9–37.10.1080/13504620903533221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N., S.-N. Chang Rundgren, and H.-O. Höglund. 2011. “Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyse Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (3): 342–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1929] 1958. Experience and Nature. New York: Dover publications.10.1037/13377-000
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1938] 1997. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. “TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science & Education 88: 915–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, M. M., and M. Ratcliffe. 2002. “The Science and Values That Young People Draw upon to Make Decisions about Biological Conservation Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (11): 1157–1169.10.1080/09500690210134848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckle, J. 2008. “An Analysis of New Labour’s Policy on Education for Sustainable Development with Particular Reference to Socially Critical Approaches.” Environmental Education Research 14 (1): 65–75.10.1080/13504620701843392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., A. Bugallo Rodríguez, and R. A. Duschl. 2000. “‘Doing the Lesson’ or ‘Doing Science’: Argument in High School Genetics.” Science & Education 84 (6): 757–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. 2001. “‘To Trust or Not to Trust’, … – Pupils’ Ways of Judging Information Encountered in a Socio-scientific Issue.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (9): 877–901.10.1080/09500690010016102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Læssøe, J. 2010. “Education for Sustainable Development, Participation and Socio‐cultural Change.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 39–57.10.1080/13504620903504016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and J. Leach. 2006. “Discussion of Socio‐scientific Issues: The Role of Science Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (11): 1267–1287.10.1080/09500690500439348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidar, M., E. Lundqvist, and L. Östman. 2006. “Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom. The Interplay between Teachers’ Epistemological Moves and Students’ Practical Epistemology.” Science & Education 90: 148–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M. G. 2009. “Ethics or Morals: Understanding Students’ Values Related to Genetic Tests on Humans.” Science & Education 18 (10): 1285–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. 2012a. “Science in Discussions: An Analysis of the Use of Science Content in Socioscientific Discussions.” Science & Education 96: 428–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. 2012b. “Co-opting Science: A Preliminary Study of How Students Invoke Science in Value-laden Discussions.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (2): 275–299.10.1080/09500693.2011.572305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. 2008. “Environmental Ethics and Democratic Responsibility: A Pluralistic Approach to ESD.” In Values and Democracy in Education for Sustainable Development: Contributions from Swedish Research, edited by J. Öhman, 17–32. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and M. Öhman. 2013. “Participatory Approach in Practice: An Analysis of Student Discussions about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 324–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Östman. 2007. “Continuity and Change in Moral Meaning-making – A Transactional Approach.” Journal of Moral Education 36 (2): 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlander Arvola, A., and I. Lundegård. 2012. “‘It’s Her Body’. When Students’ Argumentation Shows Displacement of Content in a Science Classroom.” Research in Science Education 42 (6): 1121–1145.10.1007/s11165-011-9237-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Erduran, and S. Simon. 2004. “Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10): 994–1020.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 1996. “Discourses, Discursive Meanings and Socialization in Chemistry Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 28 (1): 37–55.10.1080/0022027980280102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L., and J. Öhman. 2010. “A Transactional Approach to Learning.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO, April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L., and P.-O. Wickman. 2001. “Practical Epistemology, Learning and Socialization.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Quennerstedt, M., J. Öhman, and M. Öhman. 2011. “Investigating Learning in Physical Education – A Transactional Approach.” Sport Education and Society 16 (2): 159–177.10.1080/13573322.2011.540423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., and M. Grace. 2003. Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-scientific Issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1990. “Pragmatism as Anti-representationalism.” In Pragmatism. From Peirce to Davidson, edited by J. P. Murphy, 1–6. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and A. Barton. 2004. Rethinking Scientific Literacy. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203463918
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2010. “Pluralism in Practice. Experiences from Swedish Evaluation, School Development and Research.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2013. “Analysing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socio-scientific Issues.” Science & Education 97 (4): 594–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2004. “Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (5): 513–536.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., S. A. Barab, and B. Scott. 2007. “What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry?” Research in Science Education 37 (4): 371–391.10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and L. Donnelly. 2006. “Socioscientific Argumentation: The Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (12): 1463–1488.10.1080/09500690600708717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2003. “The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas.” Science & Education 88 (1): 4–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. “The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues.” Science & Education 89 (1): 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and D. Clark. 2008. “Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.” Science & Education 92 (3): 447–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W., and S. Gough. 2003. Sustainable Development and Learning: Framing the Issues. London: RoutledgeFalmer.10.4324/9780203464625
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. [1958] 2003. The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K., and D. L. Zeidler. 2007. “Promoting Discourse about Socioscientific Issues through Scaffolded Inquiry.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (11): 1387–1410.10.1080/09500690601068095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. 2004. “The Practical Epistemologies of the Classroom: A Study of Laboratory Work.” Science & Education 88: 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. 2006. Aesthetic Experience in Science Education: Learning and Meaning-making as Situated Talk and Action. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., and L. Östman. 2001. “University Students during Practical Work: Can We Make the Learning Process Intelligible?” In Research in Science Education – Past, Present, and Future, edited by H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, and P. Reiska, 319–324. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., and L. Östman. 2002a. “Learning as Discourse Change: A Sociocultural Mechanism.” Science & Education 86: 601–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., and L. Östman. 2002b. “Induction as an Empirical Problem: How Students Generalize during Practical Work.” International Journal of Science Education 24: 465–486.10.1080/09500690110074756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-T., and C.-C. Tsai. 2007. “High School Students’ Informal Reasoning on a Socio‐scientific Issue: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (9): 1163–1187.10.1080/09500690601083375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., and M. Keefer. 2003. “The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education: Philosophical, Psychological and Pedagogical Considerations.” In The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education, edited by D. L. Zeidler, 7–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.10.1007/1-4020-4996-X
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., J. Osborne, S. Erduran, S. Simon, and M. Monk. 2003. “The Role of Argument during Discourse about Socioscientific Issues.” In The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education, edited by D. L. Zeidler, 97–116. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.10.1007/1-4020-4996-X
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, M. L. Simmons, and E. V. Howes. 2005. “Beyond STS: A Research-based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education.” Science & Education 89: 357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar