3,129
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Textbooks of doubt: using systemic functional analysis to explore the framing of climate change in middle-school science textbooks

&
Pages 1158-1180 | Received 19 Mar 2015, Accepted 18 Aug 2015, Published online: 28 Sep 2015

References

  • Artstein, R., and M. Poesio. 2008. “Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics.” Computational Linguistics 34 (4): 555–596.10.1162/coli.07-034-R2
  • Bamberg, S., and G. Möser. 2007. “Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-Analysis of Psycho-Social Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (1): 14–25.10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  • Bianchini, J. A., and G. J. Kelly. 2003. “Challenges of Standards-Based Reform: The Example of California’s Science Content Standards and Textbook Adoption Process.” Science Education 87 (3): 378–389.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Boyes, E., D. Chuckran, and M. Stanisstreet. 1993. “How Do High School Students Perceive Global Climatic Change: What Are Its Manifestations? What Are Its Origins? What Corrective Action Can Be Taken?” Journal of Science Education and Technology 2 (4): 541–557.
  • Boyes, E. D., M. Stanisstreet. 1992. “Students’ Perceptions of Global Warming.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 42 (4): 287–300.
  • Boykoff, M. T. 2007. “From Convergence to Contention: United States Mass Media Representations of Anthropogenic Climate Change Science.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (4): 477–489. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.
  • Boykoff, M. T., and M. J. Boykoff. 2007. “Climate Change and Journalistic Norms: A Case-Study of US Mass-Media Coverage.” Geoforum 38 (6): 1190–1204. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008.
  • Bryce, N. 2011. “Meeting the Reading Challenges of Science Textbooks in the Primary Grades.” The Reading Teacher 64 (7): 474–485.10.1598/RT.64.7.1
  • Budescu, D. V., H. Por, S. Broomell, and M. Smithson. 2014. “The Interpretation of IPCC Probabilistic Statements around the World.” Nature Climate Change 4 (6): 508–512.10.1038/nclimate2194
  • Busch, K. C. 2015. “Polar Bears or People? Exploring Ways in Which Teachers Frame Climate Change in the Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B: 1–29. doi:10.1080/21548455.2015.1027320
  • Butler, F., C. Lord, R. Stevens, M. Borrego, and A. Bailey. 2004. An Approach to Operationalizing Academic Language for Language Test Development Purposes: Evidence from Fifth-Grade Science and Math ( CSE Technical Report No. 626). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research in Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
  • California State Board of Education. 1998. Science Content Standards for California Public Schools. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/sciencestnd.pdf.
  • Chenhansa, S., and M. Schleppegrell. 1998. “Linguistic Features of Middle School Environmental Education Texts.” Environmental Education Research 4 (1): 53–66.10.1080/1350462980040104
  • Choi, Soyoung, D. Niyogi, D. P. Shepardson, and U. Charusombat. 2010. “Do Earth and Environmental Science Textbooks Promote Middle and High School Students’ Conceptual Development about Climate Change? Textbooks’ Consideration of Students’ Misconceptions.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 91 (7): 889–898.10.1175/2009BAMS2625.1
  • Cook, J., D. Nuccitelli, S. A. Green, M. Richardson, B. Winkler, R. Painting, R. Way, P. Jacobs, and A. Skuce. 2013. “Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Scientific Literature.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (2): 024024. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
  • CPO Science. 2007. Focus on Earth Science. California ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Physics Outlet.
  • DiGiuseppe, M. 2014. “Representing Nature of Science in a Science Textbook: Exploring Author–Editor–Publisher Interactions.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (7): 1061–1082.10.1080/09500693.2013.840405
  • Ding, D., E. W. Maibach, X. Zhao, C. Roser-Renouf, and A. Leiserowitz. 2011. “Support for Climate Policy and Societal Action Are Linked to Perceptions about Scientific Agreement.” Nature Climate Change 1 (9): 462–466.10.1038/nclimate1295
  • Drew, D. E. 2011. STEM the Tide: Reforming Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Education in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Dryzek, J. S. 2013. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dupigny-Giroux, L.-A. L. 2010. “Exploring the Challenges of Climate Science Literacy: Lessons from Students, Teachers and Lifelong Learners.” Geography Compass 4 (9): 1203–1217. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00368.x.
  • Eggins, S. 2007. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd ed. New York: Continuum.
  • Fang, Z., and M. J. Schleppegrell. 2008. Reading in Secondary Content Areas: A Language-Based Pedagogy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Fang, Z., and M. J. Schleppegrell. 2010. “Disciplinary Literacies across Content Areas: Supporting Secondary Reading through Functional Language Analysis.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53 (7): 587–597.
  • Fang, Z., M. J. Schleppegrell, and B. Cox. 2006. “Understanding the Language Demands of Schooling: Nouns in Academic Registers.” Journal of Literacy Research 38 (3): 247–273.10.1207/s15548430jlr3803_1
  • Feldman, Lauren, Edward W. Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf, and Anthony Leiserowitz. 2012. “Climate on Cable: The Nature and Impact of Global Warming Coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1177/1940161211425410.
  • Fortner, R. W., J. Y. Lee, J. R. Corney, S. Romanello, J. Bonnell, B. Luthy, C. Figuerido, and N. Ntsiko. 2000. “Public Understanding of Climate Change: Certainty and Willingness to Act.” Environmental Education Research 6 (2): 127–141. doi:10.1080/713664673.
  • Gamson, D., X. Lu, and S. Eckert. 2013. “Challenging the Research Base of the Common Core State Standards: A Historical Reanalysis of Text Complexity.” Educational Researcher 42 (7): 381–391. doi:10.30102/0013189X13505684.
  • Gibbs, A., and A. Lawson. 1992. “The Nature of Scientific Thinking as Reflected by the Work of Biologists & by Biology Textbooks.” The American Biology Teacher 54 (3): 137–152.
  • Glencoe-McGraw-Hill. 2007. Focus on Earth Science. California ed. Columbus, OH: Glencoe-McGraw-Hill.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., and J. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Hayden, M. 2011. “Pedagogies of Empowerment in the Face of Climate Change Uncertainty.” Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education 3 (1): 118–130.
  • Hines, J. M., H. R. Hungerford, and A. N. Tomera. 1986. “Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Environmental Education 18 (2): 1–8.
  • Hoffman, M., and D. Barstow. 2007. Revolutionizing Earth System Science Education for the 21st Century: Report and Recommendations from a 50-State Analysis of Earth Science Education Standards. Cambridge, MA: TERC.
  • Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc. 2007. Earth Science. California ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
  • IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jeffries, H., M. Stanisstreet, and E. Boyes. 2011. “Knowledge about the “greenhouse effect”: Have college students improved?.” Research in Science & Technological Education 19 (2): 205–221. http://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087731
  • Kahan, D. M., H. Jenkins-Smith, and D. Braman. 2011. “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–174.10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
  • Kesidou, S., and J. E. Roseman. 2002. “How Well Do Middle School Science Programs Measure Up? Findings from Project 2061’s Curriculum Review.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 522–549.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Kloser, M. 2013. “Exploring High School Biology Students’ Engagement with More and Less Epistemologically Considerate Texts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (10): 1232–1257.10.1002/tea.v50.10
  • de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., E. van Dijk, A. Wit, D. De Cremer, and M. de Rooij. 2007. “Justifying Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Justification Pressures and Tacit Coordination under Environmental Uncertainty.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (12): 1648–1660.
  • Lederman, N. G., and M. O’Malley. 1990. “Students’ Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change.” Science Education 74 (2): 225–239. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740207.
  • Lee, Tien Ming, Ezra M. Markowitz, Peter D. Howe, Chia-Ying Ko, and Anthony A. Leiserowitz. 2015. “Predictors of Public Climate Change Awareness and Risk Perception around the World.” Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/nclimate2728.
  • Lee, O., H. Quinn, and G. Valdés. 2013. “Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics.” Educational Researcher 42 (4): 223–233.10.3102/0013189X13480524
  • Leiserowitz, A., N. Smith, and J. Marlon. 2010. Americans’ Knowledge of Climate Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Knowledge. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/ClimateChangeKnowledge2010.pdf.
  • Leiserowitz, A., N. Smith, and J. Marlon. 2011. American Teens’ Knowledge of Climate Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Knowledge.
  • Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language Learning, and Values. New York: Ablex.
  • Malka, A., J. Krosnick, M. Debell, J. Pasek, and D. Schneider. 2009. “Featuring Skeptics in News Media Stories about Global Warming Reduces Public Beliefs in the Seriousness of Global Warming.” (Technical Paper). Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University. http://woods.stanford.edu/research/global-warming-skeptics.
  • Malka, A., J. Krosnick, and G. Langer. 2009. “The Association of Knowledge with Concern about Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking.” Risk Analysis 29 (5): 633–647. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x.
  • McCright, A. M., R. E. Dunlap, and C. Xiao. 2013. “Perceived Scientific Agreement and Support for Government Action on Climate Change in the USA.” Climatic Change 119 (2): 511–518.10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
  • Moje, E. 2008. “Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (2): 96–107.
  • Montgomery, S. 1995. The Scientific Voice. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Möser, S. C. 2010. “Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1: 31–53. doi:10.1002/wcc.011.
  • Möser, S., and L. Dilling. 2011. “Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science-Action Gap.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, edited by J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, and D. D. Schlosberg, 161–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moss, G. 2006. “Textbook Language, Teacher Mediation, Classroom Interaction and Learning Processes: The Case of Natural and Social Science Textbooks in Barranquilla, Colombia.” Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress, Sao Paulo.
  • National Research Council. 1990. Fulfilling the Promise: Biology Education in the Nation’s Schools. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Nisbet, M. C., and D. Scheufele. 2009. “What’s Next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions.” American Journal of Botany 96 (10): 1767–1778. http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/doi/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
  • Norris, S., and L. Phillips. 2003. “How Literacy in Its Fundamental Sense is Central to Scientific Literacy.” Science Education 87 (2): 224–240.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2011. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Osborne, J. F., S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, R. Millar, and R. A. Duschl. 2003. “What ‘ideas-about-science’ Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.
  • Pew Research Center. 2015. Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public/.
  • Prentice Hall. 2008. Focus on Earth Science. California ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Scheufele, D. A. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122.10.1111/jcom.1999.49.issue-1
  • Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Shanahan, T., and C. Shanahan. 2008. “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content-Area Literacy.” Harvard Educational Review 78 (1): 40–59.10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
  • Shepardson, D. P., D. Niyogi, and U. Charusombat. 2011. “Students’ Conceptions about the Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming, and Climate Change.” Climatic Change 104 (3–4): 481–507. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9786-9.
  • Skamp, K., E. Boyes, and M. Stanisstreet. 2013. “Beliefs and Willingness to Act about Global Warming: Where to Focus Science Pedagogy?” Science Education 97: 191–217. doi:10.1002/sce.21050.
  • Slough, S. W., and E. M. McTigue. 2010. “Introduction to the Integration of Verbal and Visual Information in Science Texts.” Reading Psychology 31 (3): 206–212.10.1080/02702710903241397
  • Slough, S. W., E. M. McTigue, S. Kim, and S. K. Jennings. 2010. “Science Textbooks’ Use of Graphical Representation: A Descriptive Analysis of Four Sixth Grade Science Texts.” Reading Psychology 31 (3): 301–325.10.1080/02702710903256502
  • Smolkin, L., E. M. McTigue, and Y. Yeh. 2011. “Searching for Explanations in Science Trade Books: What Can We Learn from Coh-Metrix?” International Journal of Science Education 35 (8): 1367–1384.
  • Snow, C. 2008. “What is the Vocabulary of Science?” In Teaching Science to English Language Learners, edited by A. Rosebery and B. Warren, 71–83. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Stanisstreet, M., and E. Boyes. 1996. “Young People’s Ideas about Global Environmental Issues.” In Environmental Issues in Education, edited by G. Harris and C. Blackwell, 37–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weiss, I. R., J. D. Pasley, P. S. Smith, E. R. Banilower, and D. J. Heck. 2003. Looking inside the Classroom: A Study of K-12 Mathematics and Science Education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
  • Wellington, J., and J. Osborne. 2001. Language and Literacy in Science Education. Glasgow: Open University Press.
  • Yore, L. D. 2012. “Science Literacy for All: More than a Slogan, Logo, or Rally Flag!” In Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research, edited by K. Tan and M. Kim, 5–23. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.