Young people’s conversations about environmental and sustainability issues in social media

References

• Andersson, E. 2012. “The Political Voice of Young Citizens: Educational Conditions for Political Conversation – School and Social Media.” Education & Democracy 21 (1): 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E. 2013. “Det politiska rummet. Villkor för situationspolitisk socialisation i en nätgemenskap av och för ungdomar.” [The Political Space. Conditions for Situational Political Socialization in a Net Community by and for Young People]. PhD diss., Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., and M. Olson. 2014. “Political Participation and Social Media as Public Pedagogy: Young People, Political Conversations and Education.” Journal of Social Science Education 13 (4): 110–121. doi:10.2390/jsse-v13-i4-1366.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A. 2009. “Asynchronous Discussion Forums: Success Factors, Outcomes, Assessments, and Limitations.” Technology & Society 12 (1): 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., C. Clark, and E. Kelsey. 2013. “An Exploration of Future Trends in Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 19 (4): 499–520.10.1080/13504622.2012.709823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. 2012. “Becoming Public: Public Pedagogy, Citizenship and the Public Sphere.” Social & Cultural Geography 13 (7): 683–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and N. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and Educational Research. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and R. Lawy. 2006. “Citizenship-as-Practice: The Educational Implications of an Inclusive and Relational Understanding of Citizenship.” British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (1): 34–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blewitt, J. 2011. “Critical Practice and the Public Pedagogy of Environmental and Conservation Media.” Environmental Education Research 17 (6): 719–734.10.1080/13504622.2011.618625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 2005. Democratic Dialogue in Education. Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Boyles, D. R. 2006. “Dewey’s Epistemology: An Argument for Warranted Assertions, Knowing, and Meaningful Classroom Practice.” Educational Policy Studies Faculty Publications. Paper: 7. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/eps_facpub/7.
   Google Scholar
• Breiting, S., and P. Wickenberg. 2010. “The Progressive Development of Environmental Education in Sweden and Denmark.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 9–37.10.1080/13504620903533221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D., ed. 2008. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P., ed. 2007. Young Citizens and New Media. Learning for Democratic Participation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, I., L. Bennett, B. Loader, S. Mellor, A. Wromen, S. Coleman, and M. Xenos. 2012. “Four Questions about the Educational Potential of Social Media for Promoting Civic Engagement.” Citizenship Teaching & Learning 7 (3): 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. (2003) 2008. Community. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1929) 1958. Experience and Nature. New York: Dover.10.1037/13377-000
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1929) 1984. “The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation Of Knowledge and Action.” In The Later Works Vol. 4: 1925–1953, edited by J. A. Boydston, 1–297. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938) 1997. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., and A. F. Bentley. (1949) 1991. “Knowing and the Known.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953 Vol. 16, edited by J. A. Boydston, 1–294. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D. 2002. “What is Special about the Ethical Issues in Online Research?” Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 195–203.10.1023/A:1021320510186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ess, C., and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. 2002. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. 2003. “Public Pedagogy and the Politics of Resistance: Notes on a Critical Theory of Educational Struggle.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (1): 5–16.10.1111/1469-5812.00002
   Google Scholar
• Guiller, J., A. Durndell, and A. Ross. 2008. “Peer Interaction and Critical Thinking: Face-to-Face or Online Discussion?” Learning and Instruction 18 (2): 187–200.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasslöf, H., and C. Malmberg. 2015. “Critical Thinking as Room for Subjectification in Education for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 21 (2): 239–255.10.1080/13504622.2014.940854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, C. S. 2004. “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, edited by S. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805080
   Google Scholar
• Herring, C. S. 2008. “Virtual Community.” In Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. M. Given, 920–921. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, C. S. 2010a. “Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language@Internet, 7. http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Herring.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, C. S. 2010b. “Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm.” In The International Handbook of Internet Research, edited by J. Husinger and L. Klastrup, 233–249. Berlin:Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. 2009. Controversy in the Classroom. The Democratic Power of Discussion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I. 2011. “Civil Society and Online Political Discourse: The Network Structure of Unrestricted Discussions.” Communication Research 38 (5): 634–659.10.1177/0093650210384853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckle, J. 2008. “An Analysis of New Labour’s Policy on Education for Sustainable Development with particular reference to socially critical approaches.” Environmental Education Research 14 (1): 65–75.10.1080/13504620701843392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1907) 1982. “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth.” In Pragmatism. The Classic Writings, edited by H. S. Thayer, 227–244. Cambridge: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2005. “Talking Cure: The Desire for Dialogue.” In Democratic Dialogue in Education. Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence, edited by M. Boler, 57–67. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., S. McDonald, and P.-O. Wickman. 2012. “Science Learning and Epistemology.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, Springer International Handbooks of Education, edited by B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie, 281–291. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I.-H., R. C. Anderson, K. Nguyen-Jahiel, and A. Archodidou. 2007. “Discourse Patterns During Children’s Collaborative Online Discussions.” The Journal of the Learning Science 16 (3): 333–370.10.1080/10508400701413419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaar, S., and J. Öhman. 2014. “Doing, Knowing, Caring and Feeling: Exploring Relations between Nature-Oriented Teaching and Preschool Children’s Learning.” International Journal of Early Years Education 22 (1): 37–58.10.1080/09669760.2013.809655
   Google Scholar
• Klein, P. D. (1998) 2005. “Epistemology.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Craig. London: Routledge. Accessed April 25, 2015. http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/P059
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. 1996. “Paradigm Shifts and Instructional Technology: An Introduction.” In CSL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, edited by T. Koschmann, 1–23. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Læssøe, J. 2010. “Education for Sustainable Development, Participation and Socio-cultural Change.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 39–57.10.1080/13504620903504016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidar, M., E. Lundqvist, and L. Östman. 2006. “Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom. The Interplay between Teachers’ Epistemological Moves and Students’ Practical Epistemology.” Science Education 90 (1): 148–163.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D., ed. 2007. Young Citizens in the Digital Age. Political Engagement, Young People and New Media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, E., J. Almqvist, and L. Östman. 2009. “Epistemological Norms and Companion Meanings in Science Classroom Communication.” Science Education 93 (5): 859–874.10.1002/sce.v93:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and M. H. Vaughn. 2010. “Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions Around Climate Change.” Research in science education 42 (2): 373–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. 2013. “Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 371–393.10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, M., and J. Öhman. 2012. “Harmoni eller konflikt? En fallstudie av meningsinnehållet i utbildning för hållbar utveckling.” [Harmony or Conflict? A Case Study on the Meaningful Content of Education for Sustainable Development]. NorDiNa 8 (1): 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and M. Öhman. 2013. “Participatory Approach in Practice: An Analysis of Student Discussions about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 324–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Östman. 2007. “Continuity and Change in Moral Meaning-Making – A Transactional Approach.” Journal of Moral Education 36 (2): 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlander Arvola, A., and I. Lundegård. 2012. “‘It’s Her Body’. When Students’ Argumentation Shows Displacement of Content in a Science Classroom.” Research in Science Education 42 (6): 1121–1145.10.1007/s11165-011-9237-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quennerstedt, M., J. Öhman, and M. Öhman. 2011. “Investigating Learning in Physical Education – A Transactional Approach.” Sport, Education and Society 16 (2): 159–177.10.1080/13573322.2011.540423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1993) 2000. The Virtual Community. Homesteading on the Electronic frontier. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robelia, B. A., C. Greenhow, and L. Burton. 2011. “Environmental Learning in Online Social Networks: Adopting Environmentally Responsible Behaviors.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 553–575.10.1080/13504622.2011.565118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1991. “Pragmatism and Philosophy.” In After Philosophy. End or Transformation, edited by K. Baynes, J. Bohman, and T. McCarthy, 26–66. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, J. A. 2006. “The Dialogue of Democracy.” The Social Studies 97 (3): 112–120.10.3200/TSSS.97.3.112-120
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2010. “Pluralism in Practice – Experiences from Swedish Evaluation, School Development and Research.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2015. “The Role of Knowledge in Participatory and Pluralistic Approaches to ESE.” Environmental Education Research 21 (7): 955–974. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.971717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2013. “Analyzing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socioscientific Issues.” Science Education 97 (4): 594–620.10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., S. A. Barab, and B. Scott. 2007. “What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry?” Research in Science Education 37 (4): 371–391.10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, K., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2005. Education for Sustainable Development. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Sandlin, J. A., M. P. O’Malley, and J. Burdick. 2011. “Mapping the Complexity of Public Pedagogy Scholarship: 1894–2010.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 338–375.10.3102/0034654311413395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallert, D. L., V. Y-h, Y. Chiang, M. E. Park, H. Lee Jordan, A.-C. J. Cheng, H.-N. R. Chu, S. A. Lee, T. Kim, and K. Song. 2009. “Being Polite while Fulfilling Different Discourse Functions in Online Classroom Discussions.” Computers & Education 53 (3): 713–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., J. Ainley, J. Fraillon, D. Kerr, and B. Losito. 2010. ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement among Lower Secondary School Students in 38 Countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W., and S. Gough. 2003. Sustainable Development and Learning: Framing the Issues. London: Routledge Falmer.10.4324/9780203464625
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, H. W. 2014. “Research on Student Learning in Science: A Wittgensteinian Perspective.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, edited by M. R. Matthews, 1381–1410. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrod, L., J. Torney-Purta, and C. Flanagan, eds. 2010. Handbook on Civic Engagement in Youth. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sund, L., and J. Öhman. 2014. “On the Need to Repoliticise Environmental and Sustainability Education: Rethinking the Postpolitical Consensus.” Environmental Education Research 20 (5): 639–659.10.1080/13504622.2013.833585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, S. 2009. Toward an Imperfect Education: Facing Humanity, Rethinking Cosmopolitanism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, S., and C. A. Säfström. 2008. “Democracy, Education and Conflict: Rethinking Respect and the Place of the Ethical.” Journal of Educational Controversy 3 (1). http://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol3/iss1/12.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen. Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., and J. Vandenabeele. 2012. “Learning from Sustainable Development: Education in the Light of Public Issues.” Environmental Education Research 18 (4): 541–552.10.1080/13504622.2011.633162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., and H. L. Woo. 2007. “Comparing Asynchronous Online Discussions and Face-to-Face Discussions in a Classroom Setting.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (2): 272–286.10.1111/bjet.2007.38.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953) 1997. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1969) 1997. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. 2010. “‘Don’t talk to me’. Effects of Ideologically Homogeneous Online Groups and Politically Dissimilar Offline Ties on Extremism.” New Media & Society 12 (4): 637–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., and D. C. Mutz. 2009. “Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 40–56.10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. 2008. “When Hybrid Learning Meets Blended Teaching: Online Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Discourse and Classroom Face-to-face (FTF) Discourse Analysis.” In ICHL 2008. LNCS, edited by J. Fong, R. Kwan, and F. L. Wang, 157–167. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar