Using policy discourses to open up the conceptual space of farm education: inspiration from a Belgian farm education network

References

• Barbier, M., and B. Elzen, eds. 2012. System Innovations, Knowledge Regimes, and Design Practices towards Transitions for Sustainable Agriculture. INRA [ online], posted online November 20, 2012. http://www4.inra.fr/sad_eng/Publications2/Free-ebooks/
   Google Scholar
• Boerenbond. 2014. Inzetten Op Duurzame Groei: Toekomst Van De Vlaamse Land- En Tuinbouw in Europees En Mondiaal Perspectief [Going for Sustainable Growth: Future Of The Flemish Agriculture and Horticulture in European and Global Perspective], edited by P. Van Bossuyt and J. Turf.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, R., C. Kuczera, and G. Schwarz. 2008. “Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes.” Sociologia ruralis 48 (1): 16–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiman, C., and I. Lundegård. 2014. “Pre-school Children’s Agency in Learning for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 20 (4): 437–459.10.1080/13504622.2013.812722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspary, W. R. 2000. Dewey on Democracy. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crivits, M., M. P. M. M. de Krom, J. Dessein, and T. Block. 2014. “Why Innovation is Not Always Good: Innovation Discourses and Political Accountability.” Outlook on Agriculture 43 (3): 147–155.10.5367/oa.2014.0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivits, M., and E. Paredis. 2013. “Designing an Explanatory Framework: Local Food Systems as a Case.” Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (3): 306–336.10.1177/1469540513484321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I., J. Fairweather, and H. Moller. 2010. “Assessing a Farm’s Sustainability: Insights from Resilience Thinking.” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8 (3): 186–198.10.3763/ijas.2010.0480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Krom, M. P. M. M. 2015. “Governing Animal–Human Relations in Farming Practices: A Study of Group Housing of Sows in the EU.” Sociologia Ruralis 55 (4): 417–437.10.1111/soru.2015.55.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Krom, M. P. M. M., and J. Dessein. 2013. “Multifunctionality and Care Farming: Contested Discourses and Practices in Flanders.” NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 64–65: 17–24.10.1016/j.njas.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, K. 2009. The Politics of Belgium: Guiding a Divided Society. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938) 1998. Experience and Education. 181 p. Indiana, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think. Accessed https://archive.org/details/howwethink000838mbp10.1037/10903-000
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and Education. Accessed http://library.um.ac.id/images/stories/ebooks/Juni10/democracy%20and%20education%20-%20john%20dewey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dijstelbloem, H. O. 2007. “De Democratie Anders: Politieke Vernieuwing Volgens Dewey En Latour.” Dissertation, Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., M. Morris, A. Reid, M. Rickinson, and W. Scott. 2005. Outdoors – The Final Report of the Outdoor Classroom in a Rural Context Action Research Project. National Foundation for Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. 2005. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. 2010. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38 (3): 319–339.10.1177/0090591709359596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erjavec, K., and E. Erjavec. 2009. “Changing EU Agricultural Policy Discourses? The Discourse Analysis of Commissioner’s Speeches 2000–2007.” Food Policy 34: 218–226.10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, A., and F. Vanclay. 2009. “Discourses of Climate Change: Understanding Farmer Resistance.” In Climate Change Responses Across Regional Australia: Social Learning and Adaptation, edited by J. Martin, M. Rogers, and C. Winter. Ballarat: VURRN Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frouws, J. 1993. “Mest En Macht: Een Politiek-Sociologische Studie Naar Belangenbehartiging En Beleidsvorming Inzake De Mestproblematiek in Nederland Vanaf 1970 [Manure and power. A politico-sociological study of interest articulation and policy formation concerning the manure problem in the Netherlands since 1970].” Dissertation, Landbouwuniversiteit, Vakgroep Rurale Sociologie, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490934
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2006. “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, edited by M. Van den Brink and T. Metze. Utrecht: Koninglijk Nederlands Aadrijkskundig Genootschap.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2009. Authoritative governance: Policy making in the age of mediatization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauben, L., and R. Van Goolen. 2012. Analyse Van De Rendabiliteit En De Kritische Succesfactoren Van Plattelandseducatie Bij Professionele Bezoekboerderijen [Analysis Of Profitability And Critical Success Factors of Rural Education In professional Farms]. EFRO research report, INAGRO.
   Google Scholar
• Hohr, H. 2013. “The Concept of Experience by John Dewey Revisited: Conceiving, Feeling and ‘Enliving’.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (1): 25–38.10.1007/s11217-012-9330-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a Crossroads: The Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. Accessed http://apps.unep.org/publications/pmtdocuments/-Agriculture%20at%20a%20crossroads%20-%20Synthesis%20report-2009Agriculture_at_Crossroads_Synthesis_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W., and L. J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Sage.10.4135/9781849208871
   Google Scholar
• Kerselaers, E., E. Rogge, L. Lauwers, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2015. “Decision Support for Prioritising of Land to Be Preserved for Agriculture: Can Participatory Tool Development Help?” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 110: 208–220.10.1016/j.compag.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwis, C. (with contributions by A. Van den Ban). 2004. Communication for Rural Innovation. Rethinking Agricultural Extension. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470995235
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., ed. 1981. Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium: The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society. Berkely: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• López-i-Gelats, F., and J. D. Tàbara. 2009. “A Cultural Journey to the Agro-food Crisis: Policy Discourses in the EU.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4): 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I., and P. O. Wickman. 2012. “It Takes Two to Tango: Studying How Students Constitute Political Subjects in Discourses on Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 18 (2): 153–169.10.1080/13504622.2011.590895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, T. 2003. The Condition of Rural Sustainability. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2000. “The Power of Food.” Agriculture and Human Values 17 (1): 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. 2004. Decreet Inzake De Subsidiëring Van Meer Duurzame Landbouwproductiemethoden De Erkenning Van Centra Voor Meer Duurzame Landbouw, 3 maart 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mondelaers, K. 2010. “Performance and Optimization of Farm Certification Systems as Private Institutions of Sustainability.” dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 2010. “Education for Sustainable Development and Normativity: A Transactional Analysis of Moral Meaning-making and Companion Meanings in Classroom Communication.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 75–93.10.1080/13504620903504057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, C., and M. Tilzey. 2005. “Agricultural Policy Discourses in the European Post-Fordist Transition: Neoliberalism, Neomercantilism and Multifunctionality.” Progress in Human Geography 29 (5): 587–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyysiäinen, J. 2011. “Constructing and Negotiating Entrepreneurial Agency: A Social Psychological Approach to Entrepreneurship Discourse in the Farm Context.” Dissertation, Department of social research, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Quay, J., and J. Seaman, eds. 2013. John Dewey and Education Outdoors. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Renting, H., W. A. H. Rossing, J. C. J. Groot, J. D. Van der Ploeg, C. Laurent, D. Perraud, D. J. Stobbelaar, and M. K. Van Ittersum. 2009. “Exploring Multifunctional Agriculture. A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Prospects for an Integrative Transitional Framework.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2): S112–S123.10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risku-Norja, H., and E. Korpela. 2008. School Goes to the Farm: Conceptualisation of Rural-based Sustainability Education. Finland: MTT.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., and D.Hall. (Eds.). 2001. Rural tourism and recreation: Principles to practice. CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. G., and A. L. Ball. 2009. “Secondary Agricultural Science as Content and Context for Teaching.” Journal of Agricultural Education 50 (1): 81–91.10.5032/jae.2009.01081
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2010. “Pluralism in Practice – Experiences from Swedish Evaluation, School Development and Research.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 95–111.10.1080/13504620903504073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Eugenio-Vela, J. D., and M. Barniol-Carcasona. 2015. “The Relationship Between Rural Branding and Local Development. A Case Study in the Catalonia’s Countryside: Territoris Serens (El Lluçanés).” Journal of Rural Studies 37: 108–119.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25.10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. 1998. “Ideas, paradigms and institutions: agricultural exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States.” Governance 11 (4): 463–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, P., E. Jeronen, and S. Kurppa. 2015. “Farm Education and the Value of Learning in an Authentic Learning Environment.” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 10 (3): 381–404.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P. 2012. “Understanding the Social Dynamics of Energy Regions – The Importance of Discourse Analysis.” Sustainability 4 (12): 1256–1273.10.3390/su4061256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., and J. S. Dryzek. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance, 256. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. Central Book house.
   Google Scholar
• Swinnen, J., ed. 2015. The Political Economy of the 2014–2020 Common Agricultural Policy: An Imperfect Storm. Brussels; London: Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS); Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M. 2006. “Neo-liberalism, the WTO and New Modes of Agri-environmental Governance in the European Union, the USA and Australia.” International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 14: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M., and C. Potter. 2005. “Neo-liberalism, Neo-mercantilism and Multifunctionality: Contested Political Discourses in a European Post-Fordist Rural Transition.” Progress in Human Geography 29.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, H. 2008. “Introduction: Rural Sustainable Development in the Knowledge Society Era.” Sociologia Ruralis 48 (3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triste, L., F. Marchand, L. Debruyne, M. Meul, and L. Lauwers. 2014. “Reflection on the Development Process of a Sustainability Assessment Tool: Learning from a Flemish Case.” Ecology and Society 19 (3): 47.10.5751/ES-06789-190347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D., and D. Roep. 2003. “Multifunctionality and Rural Development: The Actual Situation in Europe.” In Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development, edited by G. Van Huylenbroeck and G. Durand, 37–54. Aldershot: Asgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., G. Goeminne, and J. Vandenabeele. 2014. “Revisiting the Democratic Paradox of Environmental and Sustainability Education: Sustainability Issues as Matters of Concern.” Environmental Education Research 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele, J., and D. Wildemeersch. 2012. “How Farmers Learn About Environmental Issues: Reflections on a Sociobiographical Approach.” Adult Education Quarterly 62 (1): 56–72.10.1177/0741713610392770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilt. 2012. Imagostudie. http://www.vilt.be/nl_BE/document/index/id/354.
   Google Scholar
• Waas, T., J. Hugé, A. Verbruggen, and T. Wright. 2011. “Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View.” Sustainability 3: 1637–1661.10.3390/su3101637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. A. 2008. “Global multifunctional agriculture: transitional convergence between North and South or zero-sum game?” International journal of agricultural sustainability 6 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselink, A., K. Buchanan, Y. Georgiadou, and E. Turnhout. 2013. “Technical Knowledge, Discursive Spaces and Politics at the Science-policy Interface.” Environmental Science and Policy 30 (1): 1–9.10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. 2005. Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar