1,337
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reconfiguring urban environmental education with ‘shitgull’ and a ‘shop’

, , &
Pages 1379-1390 | Received 19 Mar 2016, Accepted 29 Oct 2016, Published online: 24 May 2017

References

  • Agamben, G. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.
  • Alach, H. 2003. “Furry, Feathered, Finned or Feral: Pets in Early Childhood Settings.” The First Years: Na Tau Tuatahi. New Zealand Journal of Infant and Toddler Education 5 (1): 25–27.
  • Atkinson, K. 2015. “Wasps-Bees-Mushrooms-Children: Reimagining Multispecies Relations in Early Childhood Pedagogies.” Journal of Childhood Studies 40 (2): 67–79.
  • Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
  • Bergson, H. (1903) 2007. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Edited by J. Mullarkey & M. Kolkman. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Brinkmann, S. 2014. “Doing without data.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 720–725.
  • Bruni, C. M., P. L. Winter, P. W. Schultz, A. M. Omoto, and J. J. Tabanico. 2017. “Getting to Know Nature: Evaluating the Effects of the Get to Know Program on Children’s Connectedness with Nature.” Environmental Education Research 23 (1): 43–62.10.1080/13504622.2015.1074659
  • Clarke, D., and J. Mcphie. 2014. “Becoming Animate in Education: Immanent Materiality and Outdoor Learning for Sustainability.” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning 14 (3): 198–216.10.1080/14729679.2014.919866
  • Cole, M., and K. Stewart. 2014. Our Children and Other Animals: The Cultural Construction of Human–Animal Relations in Childhood. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • DeMello, M. 2012. Human–Animal Studies: A Bibliography. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.
  • Denzin, N. K. 2001. Interpretive interactionism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Despret, V. 2004. “The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis.” Body & Society 10 (2–3): 111–134.10.1177/1357034X04042938
  • Despret, V. 2016. What Would Animals Say If We Asked the Right Questions?. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816692378.001.0001
  • Ernst, J., and S. Theimer. 2011. “Evaluating the Effects of Environmental Education Programming on Connectedness to Nature.” Environmental Education Research 17 (5): 577–598.10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
  • Fenwick, T., R. Edwards, and P. Sawchuck. 2011. Emerging Approaches to Educationalresearch: Tracing the Sociomaterial. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Friesen, L. 2010. “Exploring Animal-Assisted Programs with Children in School and Therapeutic Contexts.” Early Childhood Education Journal 37: 261–267.10.1007/s10643-009-0349-5
  • Gane, N. 2006. “Posthuman.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 431–434.10.1177/026327640602300279
  • Granjou, C. 2016. Environmental Changes. Elsevier: The Futures of Nature.
  • Halberstam, J., and I. Livingstone. 1995. Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto. Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
  • Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822373780
  • Kahn, P. H. 2002. “Children’s Affiliations with Nature: Structure, Development and the Problem of Environmental Developmental Amnesia.” In Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociological and Evolutionary Investigations p. 93–116, edited by P. H. Kahn and S. R. Kellert. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–260.10.1080/13504620220145401
  • Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Scientific Research. London: Routledge.
  • Lenz-Taguchi, H. 2010. Going beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-Active Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
  • Lewis, M. T. 2016. “Transcending the Student Skin Bag: The Educational Implications of Monsters, Animals and Machines.” In The Educational Significance of Human and Non-human Animal Interactions: Blurring the Species Line p. 51–67, edited by S. Rice and A. G. Rud. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Liefländer, A. K., G. Fröhlich, F. X. Bogner, and P. W. Schultz. 2013. “Promoting Connectedness with Nature through Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 370–384.10.1080/13504622.2012.697545
  • Livingston, J., and J. Puar. 2011. “Interspecies.” Social Text 29 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1215/01642472-1210237
  • Lloro-Bidart, T. 2015. “Neoliberal and Disciplinary Environmentality and ‘Sustainable Seafood’ Consumption: Storying Environmentally Responsible Action.” Environmental Education Research, 1–8. https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/vleRBAsNvRJ9sa?domain=dx.doi.org. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1105198.
  • Lloro-Bidart, T. 2016. “A Feminist Posthumanist Political Ecology of Education for Theorizing Human–Animal Relations/Relationships.” Environmental Education Research. 20(1): 111–130. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1135419.
  • Lorimer, J. 2012. “Multinatural Geographies for the Anthropocene.” Progress in Human Geography 36 (5): 593–612.10.1177/0309132511435352
  • Louv, R. 2005. The Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
  • Lupinacci, J., and A. Happel-Parkins. 2016. “(Un)learning Anthropocentrism: An EcoJustice Framework for Teaching to Resist Human-Supremacy in Schools.” In The Educational Significance of Human and Non-human Animal Interactions: Blurring the Species Line, edited by S. Rice and A. G. Rud, 13–30. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • MacLure, M. 2010. “The Offence of Theory.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (2): 277–286.10.1080/02680930903462316
  • MacLure, M. 2013. “Classification or Wonder? Coding as an Analytic Practice in Qualitative Research.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 164–183. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Malone, K. 2015a. “Theorizing a Child–Dog Encounter in the Slums of La Paz Using Post-humanistic Approaches in Order to Disrupt Universalisms in Current ‘child in nature’ Debates.” Children’s Geographies 14 (4): 390–407.
  • Malone, K. 2015b. “Posthumanist Approaches to Theorising Children’s Human–Nature Relations.” In Space, Place and Environment, edited by K. Nairn, P. Kraftl, and T. Skelton, Volume 3 of Geographies of Children and Young People, edited by T. Skelton, 1–22. Springer Reference.
  • Mason, J., and B. Tipper. 2008. “Being Related: How Children Define and Create Kinship.” Childhood 15 (4): 441–460.10.1177/0907568208097201
  • McCardle, P., S. McCune, J. A. Griffin, and V. Maholmes. 2011. How Animals Affect Us: Examining the Influence of Human–Animal Interaction on Child Development and Human Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/12301-000
  • McKay, R. 2005. “‘Identifying with the animals’: Language, Subjectivity and the Animal Politics of Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing.” In Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy and Popular Culture, edited by M. S. Pollock and C. Rainwater, 207–227. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.10.1007/978-1-137-09411-7
  • Melson, G. F. 2005. Why the Wild Things Are: Animals in the Lives of Children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Myers, O. E. 2013. “Children, Animals, and Social Neuroscience: Empathy, Conservation Education, and Activism.” In Ignoring Nature No More: The Case for Compassionate Conservation, edited by M. Bekoff, 271–286. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226925363.001.0001
  • Nelson, N. 2016. Vibrant Matter(S): Figuring Death within Early Childhood Practices. Common Worlding with Children. A Common Wolrds Research Collective Blog. March 20, 2016. https://commonworldingwithchildren.com/2016/03/20/vibrant-matters-figuring-death-within-early-childhood-practices/.
  • Nelson, N., E. Coon, and A. Chadwick. 2015. “Engaging with the Messiness of Place in Early Childhood Education and Art Therapy: Exploring Animal Relations, Traditional Hide, and Drum.” Journal of Childhood Studies 40 (2): 42–55.
  • Niccolini, A. D., and M. Pindyck. 2015. “Classroom Acts: New Materialisms and Haptic Encounters in an Urban Classroom.” Reconceptualising Educational Research Methodology 6 (2): 1–23.
  • Oliver, K. 2009. Animal Lessons: How They Teach Us to Be Human. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., and F. Nxumalo. 2015. “Unruly Raccoons and Troubled Educators: Nature/Culture Divides in a Childcare Centre.” Environmental Humanities 7: 151–168.
  • Pedersen, H. 2010. “Is ‘the posthuman’ Educable? On the Convergence of Educational Philosophy, Animal Studies and Posthumanist Theory.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 31 (2): 237–250.
  • Pedersen, H. 2015. “Parasitic Pedagogies and Materialities of Affect in Veterinary Education.” Emotion, Space and Society 14: 50–56.10.1016/j.emospa.2013.10.002
  • Pepperell, R. 2003. The Posthuman Condition. Bristol: Intellect.
  • Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001
  • Pickering, A. 2005. “Asian Eels and Global Warming: A Posthumanist Perspective on Society and the Environment.” Ethics & The Environment 10 (2): 29–43.10.2979/ete.2005.10.issue-2
  • Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446249383
  • Prokop, P., and S. D. Tunnicliffe. 2010. “Effects of Having Pets at Home on Children’s Attitudes Toward Popular and Unpopular Animals.” Anthrozoös 23 (1): 21–35.10.2752/175303710X12627079939107
  • Prout, A. 2005. The Future of Childhood: Towards the Interdisciplinary Study of Children. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Prout, A. 2011. “Taking a Step Away from Modernity: Reconsidering the New Sociology of Childhood.” Global Studies of Childhood 1 (1): 4–14.10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.4
  • Rautio, P. 2014. “Mingling and Imitating in Producing Spaces for Knowing and Being: Insights from a Finnish Study of Child–Matter Intra-Action.” Childhood 21 (4): 461–474.10.1177/0907568213496653
  • Rice, S., and A. G. Rud. 2016. The Educational Significance of Human and Non-human Animal Interactions: Blurring the Species Line. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9781137505255
  • Rocheleau, D. 2015. “A Situated View of Feminist Political Ecology from My Networks, Roots, and Territories.” In Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving beyond the ‘Green Economy’ p. 13–40, edited by W. Harcourt and I. L. Nelson. London: Zed Books.
  • Rotas, N. 2015. “Ecologies of Praxis: Teaching and Learning against the Obvious.” In Posthumanism and Educational Research, edited by N. Snaza and J. Weaver, 91–103. London: Routledge.
  • Rowe, B. 2016. “Challenging Anthropocentrism in Education: Posthumanist Intersectionality and Eating Animals as Gastro-aesthetic Pedagogy.” In The Educational Significance of Human and Non-human Animal Interactions: Blurring the Species Line, edited by S. Rice and A. G. Rud, 31–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Russell, C. L. 2005. “‘Whoever Does Not Write is Written’: The Role of ‘Nature’ in Postpost Approaches to Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 11 (4): 433–443.10.1080/13504620500169569
  • Russell, C. L., T. Sarick, and J. Kenelly. 2002. “Queering Environmental Education.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 7 (1): 54–66.
  • Schultz, P. W. 2002. “Inclusion with Nature: Understanding the Psychology of Human–Nature Interactions.” In The Psychology of Sustainable Development, edited by P. Schmuck and P. W. Schultz, 61–78. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0
  • Snaza, N., P. Appelbaum, S. Bayne, D. Carlson, M. Morris, N. Rotas, J. Sandlin, J. Wallin, and J. Weaver. 2014. “Toward a Posthumanist Education.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 30 (2): 39–55.
  • Snaza, J., and J. Weaver. 2014. Posthumanism and Educational Research. London: Routledge.
  • Sørensen, E. 2009. The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576362
  • Taylor, A., M. Blaise, and M. Giugni. 2013. “Haraway’s ‘bag lady story-telling’: Relocating Childhood and Learning within a ‘post-human landscape.’” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 34 (1): 48–62.
  • Taylor, A., and V. Pacini-Ketchabaw. 2015. “Learning with Children, Ants, and Worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a Common World Pedagogy of Multispecies Vulnerability.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 23 (4): 507–529.10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050
  • Taylor, A., and V. Pacini-Ketchabaw. 2016. “Kids, Raccoons, and Roos: Awkward Encounters and Mixed Affects.” Children’s Geographies 15 (2): 131–145.
  • Taylor, A., V. Pacini-Ketchabaw, and M. Blaise. 2013. “Editorial. Researching Naturecultures of Postcolonial Childhoods.” Global Studies of Childhood 3 (4): 350–354.
  • Thompson, K. L., and E. Gullone. 2003. “Promotion of Empathy and Prosocial Behaviour in Children through Humane Education.” Australian Psychologist 38 (3): 175–182.10.1080/00050060310001707187
  • Tipper, B. 2011. “‘A dog who I know quite well’ Everyday Relationships between Children and Animals.” Childen’s Geographies 9 (2): 145–165.10.1080/14733285.2011.562378
  • Tsing, A. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400873548
  • Vidović, V. V., V. V. Štetić, and D. Bratko. 1999. “Pet Ownership, Type of Pet and Socio-emotional Development of School Children.” Anthrozoös 12 (4): 211–217.10.2752/089279399787000129
  • Watson, G. 2006. “Wild Becomings: How the Everyday Experience of Common Wild Animals at Summer Camp Acts as an Entrance to the More-than-Human World.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 11: 127–142.
  • Weaver, J. 2010. Educating the Posthuman: Biosciences, Fiction, and Curriculum Studies. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
  • Weil, K. 2010. “A Report on the Animal Turn.” Differences – A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 21 (2): 1–23.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.