Probing into the sources of ignorance: science teachers’ practices of constructing arguments or rebuttals to denialism of climate change

References

• Aikens, K., M. McKenzie, and P. Vaughter. 2016. “Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy Research: A Systematic Review of Methodological and Thematic Trends.” Environmental Education Research 22 (3): 333–359.10.1080/13504622.2015.1135418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ault, C. R. 1998. “Criteria of Excellence for Geological Inquiry: The Necessity of Ambiguity.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 (2): 189–212.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. 2010. “Agnotology as a Teaching Tool: Learning Climate Science by Studying Misinformation.” Journal of Geography 109 (4): 159–165.10.1080/00221341.2010.498121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and K. L. McNeill. 2010. “A Learning Progression for Scientific Argumentation: Understanding Student Work and Designing Supportive Instructional Contexts.” Science Education 94 (5): 765–793.10.1002/sce.v94:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetina Knorr, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CLEAN (Climate Literacy & Energy Awareness Network). 2016. “How Does Melting Ice Affect Sea Level?” Accessed May 2, 2016 from http://cleanet.org/resources/42700.html
   Google Scholar
• Conway, E. M. (2010). Atmospheric Science at NASA: A History. JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., and P. Jacobs. 2014. Scientists are from Mars, Laypeople are from Venus: An Evidenced Based Rational for Communicating the Consensus on Climate. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 34 (6): 3.1–3.10.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., N. Oreskes, P. T. Doran, W. R. Anderegg, B. Verheggen, E. W. Maibach, and J S. Carlton, et al. 2016. “Consensus on Consensus: A Synthesis of Consensus Estimates on Human-caused Global Warming.” Environmental Research Letters 11 (4): 048002.10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippen, K. J. 2012. “Argument as Professional Development: Impacting Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs about Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 (8): 847–866.10.1007/s10972-012-9282-3
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., and K. Ruddle. 2010. “Constructing Confidence: Rational Skepticism and Systematic Enquiry in Local Ecological Knowledge Research.” Ecological Applications 20 (3): 880–894.10.1890/09-0422.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaware Department of Education. n.d. Accessed August 1, 2016 from http://www.doe.k12.de.us/domain/195
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., S. Maeng, and A. Sezen. 2011. “Learning Progressions and Teaching Sequences: A Review and Analysis.” Studies in Science Education 47 (2): 123–182.10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earth Science Communications Team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 2016). “What is Climate Change?” Accessed August 5, 2016 from http://climate.nasa.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, D. R., and M. F. Wehner. 2009. “Is the Climate Warming or Cooling?” Geophysical Research Letters 36 (8).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and M. Garcia-Mila. 2014. “Epistemic Practices and Thinking in Science: Fostering Teachers’ Development in Scientific Argumentation.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking, edited by R. Wegeriff, P. Kaufman, and L. Li, 388–401. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. “Tapping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88 (6): 915–933.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. M. 2009. Environmental Education Professional Development Needs and Priorities Study. Washington, DC: Environmental Education and Training Partnership, US Environmental Protection Agency, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fortner, R. W. 2001. “Climate Change in School: Where Does It Fit and How Ready Are We?” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 6 (1): 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Galaz, V., B. Crona, H. Österblom, P. Olsson, and C. Folke. 2012. “Polycentric Systems and Interacting Planetary Boundaries – Emerging Governance of Climate Change–Ocean Acidification–Marine Biodiversity.” Ecological Economics 81: 21–32.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Global Warming Petition Project. n.d. “Petition”. Accessed May 1, 2015 from http://www.petitionproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Hadorn, G. H., S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, H. Hoffmann-Riem, D. Joye, C. Pohl, Urs Wiesmann, and E. Zemp. 2008. “The Emergence of Transdisciplinarity as a Form of Research.” In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, 19–39. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., R. Ruedy, M. Sato, and K. Lo. 2010. “Global Surface Temperature Change.” Reviews of Geophysics 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollweg, K. S., J. R. Taylor, R. W. Bybee, T. J. Marcinkowski, W. C. McBeth, and P. Zoido. 2011. Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2009. Why we Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841200
   Google Scholar
• Inman, M. 2012. “Schools of Thought.” Nature Climate Change 2 (5): 303–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Adaptation and Vulnerability. Accessed September 10, 2016 from http://www.meteotrentino.it/clima/pdf/rapporti_meteo/IPCC_Impacts_Adaptation_and_Vulnerability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1993. “Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking.” Science Education 77 (3): 319–337.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Science as Argument.” Science Education 94 (5): 810–824.10.1002/sce.v94:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, and J. D. Hmielowski. 2012. Climate Change in the American Mind: Public Support for Climate & Energy Policies in March 2012. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., A. A. Leiserowitz, G. D. Feinberg, and E. W. Maibach. 2015. “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence.” PLoS One 10 (2): e0118489.10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., A. A. Leiserowitz, S. A. Rosenthal, G. D. Feinberg, and E. W. Maibach. (2017). “Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change.” Global Challenges.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., and G. M. Sinatra. 2012. “College Students’ Perceptions about the Plausibility of Human-induced Climate Change.” Research in Science Education 42 (2): 201–217.10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, M. 2007. “Students’ Beliefs in Pseudoscience.” Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Reston, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. E. 2002. “The Value of Multiple Proxies.” Science 297 (5586): 1481–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. 2014. “Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent from Scientific Activity.” Review of Educational Research 85 (4): 553–590. doi:10.3102/0034654314558490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkowski, T. J. 2009. “Contemporary Challenges and Opportunities in Environmental Education: Where are We Headed and What Deserves Our Attention?” The Journal of Environmental Education 41 (1): 34–54.10.1080/00958960903210015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryland State Department of Education. n.d. Accessed August 1, 2016 from http://mdk12.msde.maryland.gov/share/VSC/UpdatedNGSS_IT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. 2009. “Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena.” Science Education 93 (2): 233–268.10.1002/sce.v93:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and J. Krajcik. 2009. “Synergy between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-specific and Domain-general Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 18 (3): 416–460.10.1080/10508400903013488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., D. J. Lizotte, J. Krajcik, and R. W. Marx. 2006. “Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (2): 153–191.10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menne, M. J., C. N. Williams, and M. A. Palecki. 2010. “On the Reliability of the US Surface Temperature Record.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 115 (D11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, L., J. Chen, and C. W. Anderson. 2009. “Developing a Multi-year Learning Progression for Carbon Cycling in Socio-ecological Systems.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (6): 675–698.10.1002/tea.v46:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, H. A., A. Duraiappahb, and A. Larigauderiec. 2012. “Evolution of Natural and Social Science Interactions in Global Change Research Programs.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (1): 3665–3672.
   Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2005. “What’s the Difference between Weather and Climate?” Accessed October 17, 2016 from http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/noaa-n/climate/climate_weather.html
   Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2015. “GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP).” Accessed April 15, 2015 from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/
   Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2016. “Land Ice.” Accessed November 3, 2016 from http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/land-ice/
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2009. “Climate Literacy: Essential Principles of Climate Science.” Climate Program Office’s Education Site. Accessed August 10, 2016 from http://www.climate.noaa.gov/education/
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offermann, D., P. Hoffmann, P. Knieling, R. Koppmann, J. Oberheide, and W. Steinbrecht. 2010. “Long-term Trends and Solar Cycle Variations of Mesospheric Temperature and Dynamics.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 115 (D18).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. 2015. “Hope in the Face of Climate Change: Associations with Environmental Engagement and Student Perceptions of Teachers’ Emotion Communication Style and Future Orientation.” The Journal of Environmental Education 46 (3): 133–148.10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2010. “Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse.” Science 328 (5977): 463–466.10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharo, E. J., A. Davison, K. Warr, M. Nursey-Bray, K. Beswick, E. Wapstra, and C. Jones. 2012. “Can Teacher Collaboration Overcome Barriers to Interdisciplinary Learning in a Disciplinary University? A Case Study Using Climate Change.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (5): 497–507.10.1080/13562517.2012.658560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutzer, E., M. McCaffrey, A. L. Hannah, J. Rosenau, M. Berbeco, and A. H. Reid. 2016. “Climate Confusion among U.S. Teachers.” Science 351 (6274): 664–665.10.1126/science.aab3907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., A. Spence, L. Whitmarsh, S. Capstick, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2011. “Uncertain Climate: An Investigation into Public Scepticism about Anthropogenic Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 1015–1024.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmstorf, S. 2004. “The Climate Sceptics. Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.” Accessed January 15, 2017 from http://www.pikpotsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_climate_sceptics_2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rebich, S., and C. Gautier. 2005. “Concept Mapping to Reveal Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Change in a Mock Summit Course on Global Climate Change.” Journal of Geoscience Education 53 (4): 355–365.10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.355
   Google Scholar
• Román, D., and K. C. Busch. 2015. “Textbooks of Doubt: Using Systemic Functional Analysis to Explore the Framing of Climate Change in Middle-school Science Textbooks.” Environmental Education Research 22 (8): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., and W. A. Sandoval. 2012. “Improvements to Elementary Children’s Epistemic Understanding from Sustained Argumentation.” Science Education 96 (3): 488–526.10.1002/sce.21006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2006. “Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science Teacher Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17 (4): 323–346.10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, C. 1996. “The Marriage of Skepticism and Wonder.” In The Demon-haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, edited by C. Sagan, 293–306. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and M. R. Blanchard. 2012. “Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (9): 1122–1148.10.1002/tea.v49.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. A. Millwood. 2005. “The Quality of Students’ Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (1): 23–55.10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, N. A., C. Mouza, and A. Drewes. 2016. “Climate Change Professional Development: Design, Implementation, and Initial Outcomes on Teacher Learning, Practice, and Student Beliefs.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 27 (3): 235–258.10.1007/s10972-016-9456-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., D. Niyogi, A. Roychoudhury, and A. Hirsch. 2012. “Conceptualizing Climate Change in the Context of a Climate System: Implications for Climate and Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 18 (3): 323–352.10.1080/13504622.2011.622839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Erduran, and J. Osborne. 2006. “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 235–260.10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L. 2008. “Argumentation in Socio-Scientific Contexts.” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-based Research, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre, 179–199. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skeptical Science. 2013. “Explaining Climate Change Science & Rebutting Global Warming Misinformation.” Retrieved April 10, 2013 from http://www.skepticalscience.com
   Google Scholar
• Spence, A., W. Poortinga, and N. Pidgeon. 2012. “The Psychological Distance of Climate Change.” Risk Analysis 32 (6): 957–972.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. M. B., T. S. Ledley, S. E. Lynds, and A. U. Gold. 2014. “Navigating Climate Science in the Classroom: Teacher Preparation, Perceptions and Practices.” Journal of Geoscience Education 62 (4): 550–559.10.5408/12-304.1
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y., C. N. Lin, W. L. Shih, and P. L. Wu. 2015. “The Effect of Online Argumentation upon Students’ Pseudoscientific Beliefs.” Computers & Education 80: 187–197.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists. 2007. Smoke, Mirrors, and Hot Air. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, M. C. 2015. “Accelerating Extinction Risk from Climate Change.” Science 348 (6234): 571–573.10.1126/science.aaa4984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, W. 2015. “Climate Change Scepticism.” SAGE Open 5 (2). doi:10.1177/2158244015579723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., A. Leiserowitz, S. Rosenthal, and E. Maibach. 2017. “Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change.” Global Challenges 1 (2): 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. R., S. J. Hoekstra, and R. J. Vogl. 2002. “Science Education is No Guarantee of Skepticism.” Skeptic 9 (3): 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Weart, S. 2012. “Rise of Interdisciplinary Research on Climate.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (Supplement 1): 3657–3664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 1984. Case Study Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar