Environmental and sustainability education in a post-truth era. An exploration of epistemology and didactics beyond the objectivism-relativism dualism

References

• Ashley, M. 2000. “Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education?” Environmental Education Research 6 (3): 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, R. 2002. Topik, Phaenomenologica 162. Den Haag: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L., and Galison, P. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., M. Simons, and J. Masschelein. 2011 “‘Perform, measure accurately, optimise’: on the constitution of (evidence based) education policy.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 21 (2): 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916) 1997. Democracy and Education. An Introduction into the Philosophy of Education. The Free Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1934) 1980. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938) 1997. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., and A. F. Bentley. (1949) 1991. Knowing and the Known. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijstelbloem, H. 2007. De democratie anders: politieke vernieuwing volgens Dewey en Latour. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J., L. Östman, and M. Håkansson. 2015. “The creative use of companion values in environmental education and education for sustainable development: exploring the educative moment.” Environmental Education Research 21 (2): 183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G. 2011. “Has science ever been normal? On the need and impossibility of a sustainability science.” Futures 43 (6): 627–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G. 2012. “Lost in translation: Climate denial and the return of the political.” Global Environmental Politics 12 (2): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G., and K. François. 2010. “The Thing Called Environment: What It Is and How to Be Concerned With It.” The Oxford Literary Review 32 (1): 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, S., and B. Sriraman. 2012. “Revisiting the didactic triangle: from the particular to the general.” ZDM Mathematics Education 44: 581–585.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, K. 2016. “Post-truth: a guide for the perplexed.” Nature 540 (9). Published online: http://www.nature.com/news/post-truth-a-guide-for-the-perplexed-1.21054, DOI: 10.1038/540009a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. and M.A. Meyer, eds. 2011. Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning and Teaching in Europe. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1907. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking Lect. 6, Pragmatism's Conception of Truth.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1975. Pragmatism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge. The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by S. Jasanoff and S.H. Kim, 1–33. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.H. Kim, eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (Jim Johnson) 1988. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer.” Social Problems 35 (3): 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004a. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004b. “On Using ANT for Studying Information Systems: A (Somewhat) Socratic Dialogue.” In The Social Study of Information and Communication Study, edited by C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra, and F.F. Land, 62–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public.” In Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour and P. Weibel, 4–31. Karlsruhe: ZKM and Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2010. “An Attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’”. New Literary History 41 (3): 471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. (1979) 1986. Laboratory life; the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidar, M., E. Lundquist, and L. Östman. 2006. “Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom.” Science Education 90 (1): 148–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysgaard, J. and K. Fjeldsted. 2015. “Education between discourse and matter.” In Nature in Education, edited by P. Kemp P. LIT Verlag Dr. Wilhelm Hopf, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2005. No issue, no public. Democratic deficits after the displacement of politics, PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2010. “Frontstaging Nonhumans: Publicity as a Constraint on the Political Activity of Things.” In Political Matter Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life edited by B. Braun and S.J. Whatmore, 177–210. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2011. “The costs of public involvement: everyday devices of carbon accounting and the materialization of participation.” Economy and Society 40 (4): 510–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. 2008. Values and Democracy in Education for Sustainable Development – Contributions from Swedish Research. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Östman. 2007. “Continuity and change in moral meaning-making—a transactional approach.” Journal of Moral Education 36 (2): 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Östman. 2008. “Clarifying the Ethical Tendency in Education for Sustainable Development Practice: A Wittgenstein-Inspired Approach.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 13 (1): 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 1996. “Discourses, discursive meanings and socialisation in chemistry education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 28 (1): 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 2010. “Education for sustainable development and normativity: a transactional analysis of moral meaning-making and companion meanings in classroom communication.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L. and J. Öhman. 2010. “A Transactional Approach to Learning”, Paper presented at John Dewey Society, AERA Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, April 30 - May 4 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. and P.O. Wickman. 2014. “A pragmatic approach on epistemology, teaching and learning.” Science Education 98 (3): 375–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, F. 2013. “Admit it: we can’t measure our ecological footprint.” New Scientist. Available at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029445-000-admit-it-we-cant-measure-our-ecological-footprint/ (accessed 14 April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. and L. Östman, eds. 1998. Problems of meaning in science curriculum. London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1982. “Introduction: Pragmatism and philosophy.” In Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., Öhman, J. and Östman L. 2013. Analysing students’ learning in classroom discussions about socio-scientific issues. Science Education 97(4): 594–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, F.X. 2011. Seeing Together. Mind, Matter, and the Experimental Outlook of John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley. Great Barrington, MA: American Institute for Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sandell, K., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2005. Education for Sustainable Development: Nature, School and Democracy. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How science makes environmental controversies worse.” Environmental Science & Policy 7: 385–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. 2017. “Post-truth?” Social Studies of Science 47 (1): 3–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund, L., and J. Öhman. 2014. “On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: rethinking the postpolitical consensus.” Environmental Education Research 20 (5): 639–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K. 2013. Education as a response to sustainability issues. Practices of environmental education in the context of the UN Decade of education for sustainable development, PhD diss., University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., G. Goeminne, and J. Vandenabeele. 2016. “Revisiting the democratic paradox of environmental and sustainability education: sustainability issues as matters of concern.” Environmental Education Research 22 (6): 806–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K. and J. Lysgaard. 2016. “The roots and routes of environmental and sustainability education policy research.” Environmental Education Research 22 (3): 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K. and L. Östman. 2017. “Creating space for ‘the political’ in environmental and sustainability education practice: A Political Move Analysis of educators’ actions.” Environmental Education Research. Epub ahead of print 22 March 2017. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1306835.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K. and J. Vandenabeele. 2014. “Education as a response to sustainability issues.” European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 5 (2): 221–236.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.O. and L. Östman. 2002. “Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism.” Science Education 86: 601–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar