Balancing the urgency and wickedness of sustainability challenges: three maxims for post-normal education

References

• Andersen, K. N. 2017. “Evaluation of School Tasks in the Light of Sustainability Education: Textbook Research in Science Education in Luxembourgish Primary Schools.” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1384798.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, M. 2000. “Science: An Unreliable Friend to Environmental Education?” Environmental Education Research 6 (3): 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, M. 2005. “Tensions Between Indoctrination and the Development of Judgement: The Case Against Early Closure.” Environmental Education Research 11 (2): 187–197.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., B. Van Mierlo, and A.-C, Hoes. 2016. “Toward an Integrative Perspective on Social Learning in System Innovation Initiatives.” Ecology & Society 21 (1): 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2009. “Good Education in an Age of Measurement: On the Need to Reconnect with the Question of Purpose in Education.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeve-de Pauw, J, and P. Van Petegem. 2017. “Eco-School Evaluation Beyond Labels: The Impact of Environmental Policy, Didactics and Nature at School on Student Outcomes.” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1307327.
   Google Scholar
• Breiting, S. 2009. “Issues for Environmental Education and ESD Research Development: Looking Ahead from WEEC 2007 in Durban.” Environmental Education Research 15 (2): 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. C. 2007. “Sustainability Science: A Room of its Own.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 1737–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivits, M., M. P. M. M. de Krom, T. Block, and J. Dessein. 2017. “Using Policy Discourses to Open up the Conceptual Space of Farm Education: Inspiration from a Belgian Farm Education Network.” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1301384.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916/1997. Democracy and Education. An Introduction into the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938/2015. Experience and Education. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, M., J. de Kraker, A. van Zeijl-Rozema, H. van Lente, C. Beumer, S. Beemsterboer, and P. Valkering. 2017. “Sustainability Assessment as Problem Structuring: Three Typical Ways.” Sustainability Science 12 (2): 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1992. “Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 251–273. Westport CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 2 (7): 739–755.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1994. “Uncertainty, Complexity and Post-Normal Science.” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13 (12): 1881–1885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, J., L. Östman, and M. Håkansson. 2015. “The Creative Use of Companion Values in Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development: Exploring the Educative Moment.” Environmental Education Research 21 (2): 1737–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G. 2011. “Has Science Ever Been Normal?: On the Need and Impossibility of a Sustainability Science.” Futures 43 (6): 627–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G., and K. François. 2010. “The Thing Called Environment: What It Is and How to Be Concerned With It.” The Oxford Literary Review 32 (1): 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., and H. van Lente. 2008. “Rethinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 37: 740–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisschemöller, M., and R. Hoppe. 2001. “Coping with Intractable Controversies: The Case for Problem Structuring in Policy Design and Analysis.” In Knowledge, Power and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis, edited by R. Hoppe, M. Hisschemoller, W. N. Dunn, J. R. Ravetz, 47–72. London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hugé, J., T. Block, T. Waas, T. Wright, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2016. “How to Walk the Talk? Developing Actions for Sustainability in Academic Research.” Journal of Cleaner Production 137: 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, D., and J. Toye. 2006. “The Case for Cross-Disciplinary Social Science Research on Poverty, Inequality and Well-Being.” Journal of Development Studies 42: 1085–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. G. 2011. “The Real Challenge of ESD.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 5 (1): 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge. The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, R. W., W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, et al. 2001. “Environment and Development. Sustainability Science.” Science 292: 641–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and P. Martens. 2007. “Sustainable Development: How to Manage Something That Is Subjective and Never can be Achieved.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 3 (2): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2012. “Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): The Turnaway from ‘Environment’ in Environmental Education?” Environmental Education Research 18 (5): 699–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2017. “Teaching Sustainable Development Goals in The Netherlands: A Critical Approach.” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1303819.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrechts, W., L. Van Liedekerke, and P. Van Petegem. 2017. “Higher Education for Sustainable Development in Flanders: Balancing Between Normative and Transformative Approaches.” Environmental Education Research, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1378622.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1986. Science in Action. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2010. “An Attempt at a Compositionist Manifesto.” New Literary History 41(3): 471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönngren, J., Å. Ingerman, and M. Svanström. 2016. Avoid, Control, Succumb, or Balance: Engineering Students’ Approaches to a Wicked Sustainability Problem. Research in Science Education 47 (4): 805–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and J. Rotmans. (2006). “Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development.” In Understanding Industrial Transformation: VIEWS from Different Disciplines, edited by X. Olsthoorn and A. J. Wieczorek, Vol. 44, 187–206. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I., and P.-O. Wickman. 2007. “Conflicts of Interest: An Indispensable Element of Education for Sustainability.” Environmental Education Research 13 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I., and P. O. Wickman. 2012. “It Takes Two to Tango: Studying How Students Constitute Political Subjects in Discourses on Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 18 (2): 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laessøe, J. 2007. “Participation and Sustainable Development: The Post-Ecologist Transformation of Citizen Involvement in Denmark.” Environmental Politics 16 (2): 231–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mélard, F., and P. M. Stassart. 2017. “The Diplomacy of Practitioners: For an Ecology of Practices about the Problem of the Coexistence of Wind Farms and Red Kites.” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1301386.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. “Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in An Age of Uncertainty.” Contemporary Sociology 32. doi:10.2307/3089636..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. “Introduction: ‘Mode 2 Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge’.” Minerva 41: 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and M. Öhman. 2013. “Participatory Approach in Practice: An Analysis of Student Discussions about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 324–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 1996. “Discourses, Discursive Meanings and Socialisation in Chemistry Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 28 (1): 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 2010. “Education for Sustainable Development and Normativity: A Transactional Analysis of Moral Meaning-Making and Companion Meanings in Classroom Communication.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2009. “Social-Ecological Systems: A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Science 325: 419–423. doi:10.1126/science.1172133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, F., M. Guillermin, and T. Dedeurwaerdere. 2015. “A Pragmatist Approach to Transdisciplinarity in Sustainability Research: From Complex Systems Theory to Reflexive Science. Futures 65: 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R. P. J. M., E. Heiskanen, R. Lovio, and B. Brohmann. 2008. “The Contribution of Local Experiments and Negotiation Processes to Field-Level Learning in Emerging (niche) Technologies: Meta-analysis of 27 New Energy projects in Europe.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 28 (6): 464–477.
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. R. 1986. “Usable Knowledge, Usable Ignorance: Incomplete Science with Policy Implications. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, edited by W. C. Clark and R. C. Munn, 415–432. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. R. 2006. “Post-Normal Science and the Complexity of Transitions Towards Sustainability. Ecological Complexity 3 (4): 275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. R. (2018). “Post-Script: Heuristics for Sustainability Science.” In Sustainability Science: Key Issues, edited by A. König and J. R. Ravetz. 337-344. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D., and L. Östman, eds. 1998. Problems of Meaning In Science Curriculum. London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2010. “Pluralism in Practice – Experiences from Swedish Evaluation, School Development and Research.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W. 2001. “The Mutual Learning Sessions.” In Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity, edited by J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, et al., 117–129. Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1950/1999. “The Stranger.” In Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, edited by G. Lemert, 184–189. Westview Press: Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M., and J. Masschelein. 2011. “Un-Contemporary Mastery. The Ordinary Teacher as Philosopher.” In Lehr-Performances. Filmische Inszenierungen des Lehrens, edited by M. Zahn and K. Pazzini, 17–35. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sol, J., M. M. van der Wal, P. J. Beers, and A. E. J. Wals. 2017. “Reframing The Future: The Role of Reflexivity in Governance Networks in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1402171.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnleitner, P., A. König, and T. Sikharulidze. 2017. “Learning to Confront Complexity: What Roles Can a Computer-Based Problem-Solving Scenario Play?” Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1378623
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2006. Les Scientifiques Dans la Tourmente. Paris: Les empêcheurs de penser en rond.
   Google Scholar
• Sund, L., and J. Öhman. 2014. “On the Need to Repoliticise Environmental and Sustainability Education: Rethinking the Postpolitical Consensus.” Environmental Education Research 20 (5): 639–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., M. Jones, and I. Lorenzoni. 2011. “Where Now for Post-Normal Science? A Critical Review of Its Development, Definitions, and Uses.” Science, Technology & Human Values 36 (3): 287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., and L. Östman. 2017. “Creating Space for ‘The Political’ in Environmental and Sustainability Education Practice: A Political Move Analysis of Educators’ Actions.” Environmental Education Research, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1306835.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., and J. Lysgaard. 2016. “The Roots and Routes of Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy Research. Environmental Education Research 22 (3): 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., G. Goeminne, and J. Vandenabeele. 2016. “Revisiting the Democratic Paradox of Environmental and Sustainability Education: Sustainability Issues as Matters of Concern. Environmental Education Research 22 (6): 806–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., and J. Vandenabeele. 2012. “Learning from Sustainable Development: Education in the Light of Public Issues. Environmental Education Research 18 (4): 541–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vare, P., and W. Scott. 2007. “Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 1 (2): 191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J. 2010. “Between Knowing What is Right and Knowing That Is it Wrong to Tell Others What Is Right: On Relativism, Uncertainty and Democracy in E(E)SD. Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J., and M. A. Peters. 2018. “Flowers of Resistance: Citizen Science, Ecological Democracy and the Transgressive Education Paradigm. In Sustainability Science: Key Issues, edited by A. König and J. R. Ravetz, 29–52. London: Routledge. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.9781315620329_3.
   Google Scholar
• Wildemeersch, D. 2017. “Silence – A Matter of Public Concern: Reconsidering Critical Environmental and Sustainability Education. Environmental Education Research, doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1301385.
   Google Scholar