Understanding Taiwanese adolescents’ connections with nature: rethinking conventional definitions and scales for environmental education

References

• Cagle, N. L. 2018. “Changes in Experiences with Nature through the Lives of Environmentally Committed University Faculty.” Environmental Education Research 24(6): 889–898. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1342116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. 1992. “Childhood Place Attachments.” In Place Attachment., Vol. 12, edited by Irwin Altman, & Setha M. Low, 63–86. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. 1998. “Significant Life Experiences Revisited: A Review of Research on Sources of Environmental Sensitivity.” Environmental Education Research 4(4): 369–382. doi:10.1080/1350462980040402.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. 2012. “The Development of Conservation Behavior in Childhood and Youth.” In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, edited by D. Susan Clayton, 527–555. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. C.-H., and M. C. Monroe. 2012. “Connection to Nature: Children’s Affective Attitude toward Nature.” Environment and Behavior 44(1): 31–49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. 2003. “Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition.” In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, edited by Susan Clayton & Susan Opotow, 45–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. 2012. “Environment and Identity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, edited by D. Susan Clayton, 164–180. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dutcher, D. D., J. C. Finley, A. E. Luloff, and J. B. Johnson. 2007. “Connectivity with Nature as a Measure of Environmental Values.” Environment and Behavior 39(4): 474–493. doi:10.1177/0013916506298794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., and S. Theimer. 2011. “Evaluating the Effects of Environmental Education Programming on Connectedness to Nature.” Environmental Education Research 17(5): 577–598. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.565119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fägerstam, E. 2012. “Children and Young People’s Experience of the Natural World: Teachers’ Perceptions and Observations.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 28(1): 1–16. doi:10.1017/aee.2012.2.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, J., and P. Sparks. 2008. “Engaging with the Natural Environment: The Role of Affective Connection and Identity.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(2): 109–120. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S.-J. 2005. “Significant Life Experiences Fostering Environmental Activists: A Focus on Rural-Urban and Intergenerational Differences.” Chinese Journal of Science Education 13(4): 441–463. doi:10.6173/cjse.2005.1304.04.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. ‐J. 2009. “Significant Life Experiences Affect Environmental Action: A Confirmation Study in Eastern Taiwan.” Environmental Education Research 15(4): 497–517. doi:10.1080/13504620903076973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S.-J. 2017. “Significant Life Experiences Affect Environmental Action: A Critical Review of Taiwanese Research.” Japanese Journal of Environmental Education 26(4): 51–56. doi:10.5647/jsoee.26.4_51.
   Google Scholar
• Kals, E., D. Schumacher, and L. Montada. 1999. “Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature.” Environment and Behavior 31(2): 178–202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. 2002. “Experiencing Nature: Affective, Cognitive, and Evaluative Development.” In Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations, edited by Peter Kahn & Stephen Kellert, 305–327. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. 2005. Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuss, D., and M. Griffiths. 2015. Internet Addiction in Psychotherapy. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. 2005. Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature- Deficit Disorder. New York: Algonquin.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., and C. M. Frantz. 2004. “The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A Measure of Individuals’ Feeling in Community with Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(4): 503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2013. Survey of Current Situation and Policy Planning for Outdoor Education. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., J. M. Zelenski, and S. A. Murphy. 2009. “The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection with Nature to Environmental Concern.” Environment and Behavior 41(5): 715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No Child Left Inside Coalition. 2019. “Updates: Spring/summer 2016.” No Child Left Inside, October 10. http://www.nclicoalition.org/
   Google Scholar
• Olivos, P., J. Aragones, and M. Amerigo. 2011. “The Connectedness to Nature Scale and Its Relationship with Environmental Beliefs and Identity.” International Journal of Hispanic Psychology 4: 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pasca, L., M. T. Coello, J. I. Aragonés, and C. M. Frantz. 2018. “The Equivalence of Measures on the Connectedness to Nature Scale: A Comparison between Ordinal Methods of DIF Detection.” Plos One 13(11): e0207739–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyle, R. M. 1993. The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. 2001. “The Structure of Environmental Concern: Concern for Self, Other People, and the Biosphere.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(4): 327–339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K.-P. 2013. “Concepts and Measures Related to Connection to Nature: Similarities and Differences.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 34: 64–78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, T. 1980. “Significant Life Experiences: A New Research Area in Environmental Education.” The Journal of Environmental Education 11(4): 20–24. doi:10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan. 2015. “Report on the Youth's Status Survey.” Taipei: Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan. http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2842.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y.-C., and S.-M. Wang. 2013. “Analysis of Development of Nature Experiences-Multiple Case Study of Three Urban Adolescents.” Journal of Environmental Education Research 10(1): 61–92. doi:10.6555/JEER.10.1.065.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. 1990. Researching Lived Experience. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, J., W. L. Linklater, and T. L. Milfont. 2018. “Exposure to Urban Nature and Tree Planting Are Related to Pro-Environmental Behavior via Connection to Nature, the Use of Nature for Psychological Restoration, and Environmental Attitudes.” Environment and Behavior 51(7): 1–24. doi:10.1177/0013916517751009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. P. 2012. “Enhancing the Experience of Connection with Nature: Participants’ Responses to the MAPIN Strategy.” Ecopsychology 4(4): 345–354. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0054.
   Google Scholar
• Zylstra, M. J., A. T. Knight, K. J. Esler, and L. L. L. Le Grange. 2014. “Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice.” Springer Science Reviews 2(1-2): 119–143. doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3.
   Google Scholar