More of the same: A critical analysis of the formations of teacher students through education for sustainable development

References

• Ahmed, S. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham [NC]: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. 2000. Undomesticated Ground: Recasting Nature as Feminist Space. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S., and J. Kitzinger. 1999. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, K. 2009. Just Environments: Politicising Sustainable Urban Development. Stockholm: Skolan För Arkitektur Och Samhällsbyggnad, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge Classics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and I. Robottom. 2008. “What’s in a Name? Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development as Slogans.” In Environmental Education: Identity, Politics and Citizenship, edited by Edgar González-Haudiano and Michael A. Peters, 195–206. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Corney, G., and A. Reid. 2007. “Student Teachers’ Learning about Subject Matter and Pedagogy in Education for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 13(1): 33–54. doi:10.1080/13504620601122632.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlbeck, J. 2014. “Hope and Fear in Education for Sustainable Development.” Critical Studies in Education 55(2): 154–169. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.839460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N. (S. )., R. B. Stevenson, M. Lasen, J.-A. Ferreira, and J. Davis. 2017. “Approaches to Embedding Sustainability in Teacher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature.” Teaching and Teacher Education 63(April): 405–417. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. ‐A. 2009. “Unsettling Orthodoxies: Education for the Environment/for Sustainability.” Environmental Education Research 15(5): 607–620. doi:10.1080/13504620903326097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, S., and W. Scott. 2008. Higher Education and Sustainable Development: Paradox and Possibility. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., and G. Rose. 2000. “Taking Butler Elsewhere: Performativities, Spatialities and Subjectivities.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18(4): 433–452. doi:10.1068/d232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D. E. 2004. Subjectivity. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.1086/ahr/106.5.1847-a.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and C. Chatpinyakoop. 2019. “A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018.” Sustainability 11(8): 2401. doi:10.3390/su11082401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellberg, S., and B. Knutsson. 2018. “Sustaining the Life-Chance Divide? Education for Sustainable Development and the Global Biopolitical Regime.” Critical Studies in Education 59(1): 93–107. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1176064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holfelder, A.-K. 2019. “Towards a Sustainable Future with Education?” Sustainability Science 14(4): 943–952. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00682-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckle, J., and A. E. J. Wals. 2015. “The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Business as Usual in the End.” Environmental Education Research 21(3): 491–505. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1011084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideland, M. 2019. The Eco-Certified Child: Citizenship and Education for Sustainability and Environment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ideland, M., and C. Malmberg. 2014. “Our Common World” Belongs to “Us”: Constructions of Otherness in Education for Sustainable Development.” Critical Studies in Education 55(3): 369–386. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.936890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideland, M., and C. Malmberg. 2015. “Governing “Eco-Certified Children” through Pastoral Power: Critical Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 21(2): 173–182. 10.1080/13504622.2013.879696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., and A. E. J. Wals. 2008. “Globalization and Environmental Education: Looking beyond Sustainable Development.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 40(1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/00220270701684667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., and A. E. J. Wals. 2002. “Sustainability” in Higher Education: From Doublethink and Newspeak to Critical Thinking and Meaningful Learning.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 3(3): 221–232. doi:10.1108/14676370210434688.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., and G. Dimitriadis. 2013. Focus Groups: From Structured Interviews to Collective Conversations. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. 1995. “Qualitative Research: Introducing Focus Groups.” BMJ 311(7000): 299–302. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2014. “Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): Exploring Anthropocentric–Ecocentric Values in Children through Vignettes.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 41(June): 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2016. “Of Big Hegemonies and Little Tigers: Ecocentrism and Environmental Justice.” The Journal of Environmental Education 47(2): 139–150. 10.1080/00958964.2015.1048502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey. 2014. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lgr11. 2011. ‘Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Recreation Centre, 2011’. Stockholm, Sweden: Skolverket. http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/visa-enskild-publikation?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww5.skolverket.se%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FRecord%3Fk%3D2687.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, N., and J. Öhman. 2018. “A Posthuman Approach to Human-Animal Relationships: Advocating Critical Pluralism.” Environmental Education Research 0(0): 1–16. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1450848.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, T. 2018. Föränderlig Tillblivelse: Figurationen Av Det Posthumanistiska Förskolebarnet. Malmö: Malmö Universitet, Fakulteten För Lärande Och samhälle. http://hdl.handle.net/2043/26303.
   Google Scholar
• Poeck, K. V. 2018. “Environmental and Sustainability Education in a Post-Truth Era. An Exploration of Epistemology and Didactics beyond the Objectivism-Relativism Dualism.” Environmental Education Research 0(0): 1–20. 10.1080/13504622.2018.1496404.
   Google Scholar
• Poeck, K. V., G. Goeminne, and J. Vandenabeele. 2016. “Revisiting the Democratic Paradox of Environmental and Sustainability Education: Sustainability Issues as Matters of Concern.” Environmental Education Research 22(6): 806–826. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.966659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeck, K. V., and L. Östman. 2018. “Creating Space for “the Political” in Environmental and Sustainability Education Practice: A Political Move Analysis of Educators’ Actions.” Environmental Education Research 24(9): 1406–1423. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1306835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. 2002. “Discussing the Possibility of Education for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 8(1): 73–79. doi:10.1080/13504620120109673.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., and P. Petocz. 2006. “University Lecturers’ Understanding of Sustainability.” Higher Education 51(1): 105–123. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6379-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby, D. 2006. “The Firm and Shaky Ground of Education for Sustainable Development.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 30(2): 351–365. doi:10.1080/03098260600717471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS 1992:1434. Högskolelagen. Stockholm: Sveriges regering.
   Google Scholar
• SFS 1993:100. Högskoleförordningen. Stockholm: Sveriges regering.
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren, H. 2016. Sustainability for Whom?: the Politics of Imagining Environmental Change in Education. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-127393.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, S. 2004. “Higher Education, Sustainability, and the Role of Systemic Learning.” In Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability, edited by Peter Blaze Corcoran and Arjen E. J. Wals, 49–70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/0-306-48515-X_5.
   Google Scholar
• Sund, L., and J. Öhman. 2014. “On the Need to Repoliticise Environmental and Sustainability Education: Rethinking the Postpolitical Consensus.” Environmental Education Research 20(5): 639–659. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.833585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017. ‘Education for Sustainable Development Goals’. 2017. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444.
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V., M. Abrandt Dahlgren, and G. Öberg. 2007. “Learning in Focus Groups an Analytical Dimension for Enhancing Focus Group Research.” Qualitative Research 7(2): 249–267. doi:10.1177/1468794107076023.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2008. “Ecology as the New Opium for the Masses.” In Sustainabilities, edited by Paco Barragán, 42–47. New York City: Charta Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar