Sustainable food choices? A study of students’ actions in a home and consumer studies classroom

References

• Andersson, E., and J. Öhman. 2017. “Young Peoplés Conversation about Environmetal and Sustainability Issues in Social Media.” Environmental Education Research 23 (4): 465–485. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1149551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belasco, W. 2008. Food: The Key Concepts. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, G., H. Elmståhl, Y. Mattsson Sydner, and E. Lundqvist. 2019. “Aesthetic Judgments and Meaning-Making during Cooking in Home and Consumer Studies.” Educare - Vetenskapliga Skrifter 2: 30–57. doi:10.24834/educare.2019.2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Black, I., and H. Cherrier. 2010. “Anti-Consumption as Part of Living a Sustainable Lifestyle: Daily Practices, Contextual Motivations and Subjective Values.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 9 (6): 437–453. doi:10.1002/cb.337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, I., C. Lindblom, G. Åbacka, C. Bengs, and A. Hörnell. 2015. “He just has to like ham” - The centrality of meat in home and consumer studies.” Appetite 95 (12): 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohm, I., C. Lindblom, G. Åbacka, and A. Hörnell. 2016. “Don't Give us an Assignment Where we Have to Use Spinach!’: food Choice and Discourse in Home and Consumer Studies.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 40 (1): 57–65. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove, C. F., J. Sobal, and B. S. Rauschenbach. 2003. “Food Choices among Newly Married Couples: Convergence, Conflict, Individualism, and Projects.” Appetite 40 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(02)00147-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., and K. Wistoft. 2016. “Taste as a Didactic Approch: Enabling Students to Achive Learning Goals.” International Journal of Home Economics 9 (1): 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1922]1983. “ Human Nature and Conduct.” In John Dewey: The Middle Works, edited by J. A. Boydston, Vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1934]1980. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books, Berkely Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1938]1997. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Fjellström, C. 2009. “Food´s Cultural System of Knowledge - Meals as a Cultural and Social Arena.” In Food in Contemporary Society, edited by H. Janhonen Abruquah and P. Palojoki, 19–22. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. E., and T. Davis. 2015. “Adolescents´ Sustainability Concerns and Reasons for Not Consuming Sustainably.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 39 (1): 43–50. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisslevik, E., I. Wernersson, and C. Larsson. 2017. “Teaching Sustainable Food Consumption in Swedish Home Economics: A Case Study.” International Journal of Home Economics 10 (2): 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Grønhøj, A. 2007. “Green Girls and Bored Boys? Adolescents´ Environmental Consumer Socialization.” In Children, Media and Consumption: On the Front Edge, edited by K. M. Ekström and B. Tufte. Göteborg: The International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media, Nordicom, Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hedefalk, M., J. Almqvist, and M. Lidar. 2014. “Teaching for Action Competence.” SAGE Open 4 (3): 215824401454378. doi:10.1177/2158244014543785.
   Google Scholar
• Hjälmeskog, K. 2000. Democracy Begins at Home. Utbildning om och för hemmet som medborgarfostran. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hofverberg, H., and N. Maivorsdotter. 2017. “Recycling, Crafting and Learning - an Empirical Analysis of How Students Learn with Garments and Textile Refuse in a School Remake Project.” Environmental Education Research. 24(2):1–16. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1338672.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, B., and P.-O. Wickman. 2007. “Transformation Trough Language Use: Children’s Spontanious Metaohors in Elementary School Science.” Science & Education 16: 267–289. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9018-x.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, A.-M., and P.-O. Wickman. 2017. “The Use of Organising Purposes in Science Instruction as a Scaffolding Mechanism to Support Progression: A Study of Talk in Two Primary Science Classrooms.” Research in Science & Technological Education. 36(1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1318272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer, C. 2017. “Taste and Other Senses: Reconsidering the Foundations of Aesthetics.” The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 54: 20–34. doi:10.7146/nja.v26i54.103078.
   Google Scholar
• Kowasch, M., and D. F. Lippe. 2019. “Moral Impasses in Sustainability Education? Empirical Results from School Geography in Austria and Germany.” Environmental Education Research 25 (7): 1066. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1557112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leer, J., and K. Wistoft. 2018. “Taste in Food Education: A Critical Review Essay.” Food and Foodways 26 (4): 329–349. doi:10.1080/07409710.2018.1534047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidar, M., J. Almqvist, and L. Östman. 2010. “A Pragmatist Approach to Meaning Making in Children´s Discussions about Gravity and the Shape of the Earth.” Science Education 94 (4): 689–709. doi:10.1002/sce.20384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C., I. Erixon Arreman, I. Bohm, and A. Hörnell. 2016. “Group Work Interaction among Pupils in Home and Consumer Studies in Sweden.” International Journal of Home Economics 9 (1): 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lundby, E. 2011. Hur handlar unga? En studie om ungas konsumtion. Karlstad: Konsumentverket.
   Google Scholar
• Laessøe, J. 2010. “Education for Sustainable Development, Participation and Socio-Cultural Change.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maivorsdotter, N., and P.-O. Wickman. 2011. “Skating in a Life Context: Examining the Significance of Aesthetic Experience in Sport Using Practical Epistemology Analysis.” Sports, Education and Society 16 (5): 613–628. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.601141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloat, A., and M. Caraher. 2016. “Home Economics as a Food Education Intervention: Lessons from the Irish Secondary Education Context.” Education and Health 34 (4): 104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Moisander, J. 2007. “Motivational Complexity of Green Consumerism.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 37: 556–563. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00586.x.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. 2018. Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and School-Age Educare 2011, Revised 2018. Retrived from https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3984
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. 2011. Kommentarmaterial till kursplanen i Hem-och konsumentkunskap. Retrieved from http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2588
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen, P. J. 2014. “Intelligent Dispositions: Dewey, Habits and Inquiry in Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 6 (1): 86–97. doi:10.1177/0022487114535267.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. 2015. “Climate Change Skepticism among Adolescents.” Journal of Youth Studies 18 (9): 1135. doi:10.1080/13676261.2015.1020927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, D., and N. Gericke. 2016. “The Adolescent Dip in Students´ Sustainability consciousness - Implications for Education for Sustainable Development.” The Journal of Environmental Education 47 (1): 35–51. doi:10.1080/00958964.2015.1075464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parinder, A. 2012. Ungdomars matval. Erfarenheter, visioner och miljöargument i eget hushåll. Göteborgs Universitet, acta uneversitatis gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, L. 2010. A Definition of Sustainable Food Consumption. Wien Austria: Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, L., U. Eberle, and S. Lorek. 2013. “Sustainable Food Consumption: An Overview of Contemporary Issues and Policies.” Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy 9 (2): 7–25. doi:10.1080/15487733.2013.11908111.
   Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2010. “Pluralism in Practice - Experiences from Swedish Evaluation, School Development and Research.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 95–111. doi:10.1080/13504620903504073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., and J. Öhman. 2015. “The Role of Knowledge in Participatory and Pluralistic Approaches to ESE.” Environmental Education Research 21 (7): 955–974. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.971717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, R. V. 2006. Home Economics Science and Arts. Managing Sustainable Everyday Life. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. 2018. “Generalizability in Qualitative Research: Misunderstandings, Opportunities and Recommendations for the Sport and Exercise Science.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10 (1): 137–149. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. 2017. Good research practice. Stockholm. https://www.vr.se/analys-och-uppdrag/vi-analyserar-och-utvarderar/alla-publikationer/publikationer/2017-08-29-god-forskningssed.html
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent”. Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2014. Roadmap for Implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. Paris, France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017. UNESCO Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. United Nations: Information folder.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K. 2019. “Environmental and Sustainability Education in a Post-Truth Era. An Exploration of Epistemology and Didactics beyond the Objectivism-Relativism Dualism.” Environmental Education Research 25 (4): 472–491. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1496404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., G. Goeminne, and J. Vandenabeele. 2016. “Revisiting the Democratic Paradox of Environmental and Sustainability Education: Sustainability Issues as Matters of Concern.” Environmental Education Research 22 (6): 806–826. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.966659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., and J. Vandenabeele. 2012. “Learning from Sustainable Development: Education in the Light of Public Issues.” Environmental Education Research 18 (4): 541–552. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.633162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vare, P., & Scott, W. 2007. “Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 1 (2): 191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. 2009. Learning for a Sustainable World: Review of Contexts and Structures for Education for Sustainable Development. Recived from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001849/184944e.pdf 20181121
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. 2011. “Learning Our Way to Sustainability.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 5 (2): 177–186. doi:10.1177/097340821100500208.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. 2006. Aesthetic Experience in Science Education. Learning and Meaning-Making as Situated in Talk and Action. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., and L. Östman. 2002. “Learning as Discourse Change: A Sociocultural Mechanism.” Science Education 86 (5): 601. doi:10.1002/sce.10036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. 2008. “Environmental Ethics and Democratic Responsibility: A Pluralistic Approach to ESD.” In Values and Democracy in Education for Sustainable Development, edited by J. Öhman. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and M. Öhman. 2013. “Participatory Approach in Practice: An Analysis of Student Discussions about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 324–341. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.695012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, M., and J. Öhman. 2012. “Harmoni eller konflikt? – en fallstudie av meningsinnehållet i utbildning för hållbar utveckling.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 8 (1): 59–72. doi:10.5617/nordina.359.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 2010. “Education for Sustainable Development and Normativity: A Transactional Analysis of Moral Meaning-Making and Companion Meanings in Classroom Communication.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 75–93. doi:10.1080/13504620903504057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar