857
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teachers’ uptake of problematic assumptions of climate change in the NGSS

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1177-1192 | Received 02 Aug 2019, Accepted 11 Mar 2020, Published online: 07 May 2020

References

  • Arslan, H. O., C. Cigdemoglu, and C. Moseley. 2012. “A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (11): 1667–1686. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.680618.
  • Ball, S. 2012. The Micro-Politics of the School: Towards a Theory of School Organization. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ball, S., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2012. How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bang, M., and A. Marin. 2015. “Nature-Culture Constructs in Science Learning: Human/Non-Human Agency and Intentionality.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (4): 530–544. doi:10.1002/tea.21204.
  • Biesta, G. J. J. 2004. “Education, Accountability, and the Ethical Demand: Can the Democratic Potential of Accountability Be Regained?” Educational Theory 54 (3): 233–250. doi:10.1111/j.0013-2004.2004.00017.x.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitiative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71. Washington, DC: APA.
  • Breslyn, W., A. Drewes, J. R. McGinnis, E. Hestness, and C. Mouza. 2017. “Development of an Empirically-Based Conditional Learning Progression for Climate Change.” Science Education International 28 (3): 214–223.
  • Busch, K. C., J. A. Henderson, and K. T. Stevenson. 2019. “Broadening Epistemologies and Methodologies in Climate Change Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 955–971. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1514588.
  • Busch, K. C., and D. Román. 2017. “Fundamental Climate Literacy and the Promise of the Next Generation Science Standards.” In Teaching and Learning about Climate Change: A Framework for Educators, edited by D. P. Shepardson, A. Roychoudhury, and A. S. Hirsch, 120–134. London: Routledge.
  • Colston, N. M., and T. A. Ivey. 2015. “(Un)Doing the Next Generation Science Standards: Climate Change Education Actor-Networks in Oklahoma.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (6): 773–795. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1011711.
  • Design Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 5–8.
  • Drewes, A., J. Henderson, and C. Mouza. 2018. “Professional Development Design Considerations in Climate Change Education: Teacher Enactment and Student Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (1): 67–89. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1397798.
  • Feinstein, N., and K. L. Kirchgasler. 2015. “Sustainability in Science Education? How the Next Generation Science Standards Approach Sustainability, and Why It Matters.” Science Education 99 (1): 121–144. doi:10.1002/sce.21137.
  • Francis, P. 2015. Laudato si: On care for our common home (Papal Encylical Letter). Retrieved from http://goo.gl/PMUO43.
  • Gallup. 2017. “Global Warming Concern at Three-Decade High in US.” https://www.gallup.com/poll/206030/global-warming-concern-three-decade-high.aspx?g_source=CATEGORY_CLIMATE_CHANGE&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles
  • Gruenewald, D. A. 2003. “Foundations of Place: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Place-Conscious Education.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 619–654. doi:10.3102/00028312040003619.
  • Gunckel, K. L., and S. Tolbert. 2018. “The Imperative to Move toward a Dimension of Care in Engineering Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (7): 938–961. doi:10.1002/tea.21458.
  • Hayes, K. N., M. Wheaton, and D. Tucker. 2019. “Understanding Teacher Instructional Change: The Case of Integrating NGSS and Stewardship in Professional Development.” Environmental Education Research 25 (1): 115–134. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1396289.
  • Henderson, J., D. Long, P. Berger, C. Russell, and A. Drewes. 2017. “Expanding the Foundation: Climate Change and Opportunities for Educational Research.” Educational Studies 53 (4): 412–425. doi:10.1080/00131946.2017.1335640.
  • Hestness, E., C. McDonald, W. Breslyn, J. R. McGinnis, and C. Mouza. 2014. “Science Teacher Professional Development in Climate Change Education Informed by the Next Generation Science Standards.” Journal of Geoscience Education 62 (3): 319–329. doi:10.5408/13-049.1.
  • Hestness, E., J. R. McGinnis, and W. Breslyn. 2019. “Examining the Relationship between Middle School Students’ Sociocultural Participation and Their Ideas about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 912–913. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1266303.
  • Hoeg, D. G., and J. L. Bencze. 2017. “Values Underpinning STEM Education in the USA: An Analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards.” Science Education 101 (2): 278–301. doi:10.1002/sce.21260.
  • Hufnagel, E., G. J. Kelly, and J. A. Henderson. 2018. “How the Environment is Positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Environmental Education Research 24 (5): 731–753. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1334876.
  • Hursh, D. 2005. “Neo-Liberalism, Markets and Accountability: Transforming Education and Undermining Democracy in the United States and England.” Policy Futures in Education 3 (1): 3–15. doi:10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.6.
  • Hursh, D. 2007. “Assessing No Child Left behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Education Policies.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (3): 493–518. doi:10.3102/0002831207306764.
  • Kahan, D. M. 2012. “Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk.” In Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, edited by S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, and M. Peterson, 725–759. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Kahan, D. M., E. Peters, M. Wittlin, P. Slovic, L. L. Ouellette, D. Braman, and G. Mandel. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547.
  • Kelly, G. J. 2014. “The Social Bases of Disciplinary Knowledge and Practice in Productive Disciplinary Engagement.” International Journal of Educational Research 64: 211–214. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.008.
  • Lee, O., H. Quinn, and G. Valdés. 2013. “Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics.” Educational Researcher 42 (4): 223–233. doi:10.3102/0013189X13480524.
  • Levine, P. 2007. The Future of Democracy: Developing the Next Generation of American Citizens. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
  • Loper, S., K. L. McNeill, M. González-Howard, L. M. Marco-Bujosa, and L. M. O’Dwyer. 2019. “The Impact of Multimedia Educative Curriculum Materials (MECMs) on Teachers’ Beliefs about Scientific Argumentation.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 28 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2019.1583121.
  • McKenzie, M., and A. Bieler. 2015. Critical Education and Sociomaterial Practice: Narration, Place and the Social. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • McNeill, K. L., D. Lizotte, J. S. Krajcik, and R. W. Marx. 2006. “Fading Scaffolds for Argumentation and Explanation.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (2): 153–191. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1.
  • Medin, D. L., and M. Bang. 2014. “The Cultural Side of Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (Suppl_4): 13621–13626. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317510111.
  • Monroe, M. C., R. R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. A. Chaves. 2019. “Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 791–812. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.
  • Morales-Doyle, D. 2017. “Justice-Centered Science Pedagogy: A Catalyst for Academic Achievement and Social Transformation.” Science Education 101 (6): 1034–1060. doi:10.1002/sce.21305.
  • Morales-Doyle, D., T. Childress Price, and M. J. Chappell. 2019. “Chemicals Are Contaminants Too: Teaching Appreciation and Critique of Science in the Era of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).” Science Education 103 (6): 1347–1388. doi:10.1002/sce.21546.
  • NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States (Vol. 1: The Standards). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
  • NRC. 2012. “A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas.” Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k-12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts
  • O’Connor, K., and A. Allen. 2010. “Learning as the Organzing for Social Futures.” In Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, edited by W. R. Penuel and K. O’Connor, 160–175. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25 (2): 177–196. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1.
  • Philip, T. M., and F. S. Azevedo. 2017. “Everyday Science Learning and Equity: Mapping the Contested Terrain.” Science Education 101 (4): 526–532. doi:10.1002/sce.21286.
  • Plutzer, E., M. McCaffrey, A. L. Hannah, J. Rosenau, M. Berbeco, and A. H. Reid. 2016. “Climate Confusion among U.S. teachers.” Science 351 (6274): 664–665. doi:10.1126/science.aab3907.
  • Reiser, B. J., S. Michaels, J. Moon, T. Bell, E. Dyer, K. D. Edwards, T. A. W. McGill, M. Novak, and A. Park. 2017. “Scaling Up Three-Dimensional Science Learning through Teacher-Led Study Groups across a State.” Journal of Teacher Education 68 (3): 280–298. doi:10.1177/0022487117699598.
  • Roberts, J. T., and B. Parks. 2006. A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Rodriguez, A. J. 2015. “What about a Dimension of Engagement, Equity, and Diversity Practices? A Critique of the Next Generation Science Standards.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 1031–1051. doi:10.1002/tea.21232.
  • Román, D., and K. C. Busch. 2016. “Textbooks of Doubt: Using Systemic Functional Analysis to Explore the Framing of Climate Change in Middle-School Science Textbooks.” Environmental Education Research 22 (8): 1158–1180. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1091878.
  • Rudolph, J. L., and S. Horibe. 2016. “What Do We Mean by Science Education for Civic Engagement?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (6): 805–820. doi:10.1002/tea.21303.
  • Sadler, T. D. 2009. “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio‐Scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice.” Studies in Science Education 45 (1): 1–42. doi:10.1080/03057260802681839.
  • Sandoval, W. A., J. Kawasaki, N. Cournoyer, and L. Rodriguez. 2016. “Secondary Teachers’ Emergent Understanding of Teaching Science Practices.” In Proceedings of the Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016, edited by C. K. Looi, J. L. Polman, U. Cress, and P. Reimann, Vol. 2, 737–744. Singapore: ISLS.
  • Shea, N., C. Mouza, and A. Drewes. 2016. “Climate Change Professional Development: Design, Implementation, and Initial Outcomes on Teacher Learning, Practice, and Student Beliefs.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 27 (3): 235–258. doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9456-5.
  • Smith, G. A. 2007. “Place‐Based Education: Breaking through the Constraining Regularities of Public School.” Environmental Education Research 13 (2): 189–207. doi:10.1080/13504620701285180.
  • Spillane, J. P. 1999. “External Reform Initiatives and Teachers’ Efforts to Reconstruct Their Practice: The Mediating Role of Teachers’ Zones of Enactment.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (2): 143–175. doi:10.1080/002202799183205.
  • Stapleton, S. R. 2019. “A Case for Climate Justice Education: American Youth Connecting to Intragenerational Climate Injustice in Bangladesh.” Environmental Education Research 25 (5): 732–750. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1472220.
  • Tabak, I. 2004. “Reconstructing Context: Negotiating the Tension between Exogenous and Endogenous Educational Design.” Educational Psychologist 39 (4): 225–233. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_4.
  • UNESCO and UNFCCC. 2016. Action for Climate Empowerment: Guidelines for Accelerating Solutions through Education, Training and Public Awareness. France: United Nations.
  • USGCRP. 2009. “Climate Literacy: The Essentail Principels of Climate Science, A Guide for Individuals and Communities.” http://www.globalchange.gov/resources/educators/climate-literacy
  • Waldron, F., B. Ruane, R. Oberman, and S. Morris. 2019. “Geographical Process or Global Injustice? Contrasting Educational Perspectives on Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 895–911. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1255876.
  • Walsh, E. M., and B. K. Tsurusaki. 2018. “Thank You for Being Republican: Negotiating Science and Political Identities in Climate Change Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 27 (1): 8–48. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1362563.
  • Wise, S. B. 2010. “Climate Change in the Classroom: Patterns, Motivations, and Barriers to Instruction among Colorado Science Teachers.” Journal of Geoscience Education 58 (5): 297–309. doi:10.5408/1.3559695.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.