Exploring the role of learning in sustainability transitions: a case study using a novel analytical approach

References

• Andersson, P. 2019. Transaktionella Analyser av Undervisning Och lärande - SMED-Studier 2006–2018 [Transactional Analyses of Teaching and Learning – SMED-Studies 2006–2018]. Rapporter i Pedagogik 22. Örebro: Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., B. van Mierlo, and A. C. Hoes. 2016. “Toward an Integrative Perspective on Social Learning in System Innovation Initiatives.” Ecology and Society 21 (1): 33. doi:10.5751/ES-08148-210133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. S., P. Vergragt, K. Green, and L. Berchicci. 2003. “Learning for Sustainability Transition through Bounded Socio-Technical Experiments in Personal Mobility.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (3): 291–315. doi:10.1080/09537320310001601496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collective Green. 2020. “Foodsharing and Foodsaving Worldwide – A Global and Distributed Grassroots Movement against Food Waste.” https://www.collectivegreen.de/foodsharing-and-foodsaving-worldwide/
   Google Scholar
• Corsini, F., R. Laurenti, F. Meinherz, F. P. Appio, and L. Mora. 2019. “The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field.” Sustainability 11 (2): 341. doi:10.3390/su11020341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivits, M., and E. Paredis. 2013. “Designing an Explanatory Practice Framework: Local Food Systems as a Case.” Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (3): 306–336. doi:10.1177/1469540513484321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1928. “Body and Mind: (Delivered before the New York Academy of Medicine, November 17, 1927).” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine IV (I): 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1929. Experience and Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938a. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938b. Logic. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., and A. Bentley. 1949. Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2004. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education (1915). Delhi: Aakar Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dreon, R. 2017. “Dewey on Language: Elements for a Non-Dualistic Approach.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy VI (2): 0–16.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2014. “Food Wastage Footprint & Climate Change.” http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/FWF_and_climate_change.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2018. “The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World: Building Climate Resilience for Food Security and Nutrition.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/i9553en/i9553en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. 1995. “Dramaturgical Analysis.” In: Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Foodsaving-Today. 2017a. “Foodsharing Gothenburg – Part One.” https://foodsaving.today/en/blog/2017/04/13/foodsharing-gothenburg-part1?fbclid=IwAR2XGCZjmetPen8egpgM0cEUWK5LjE12k8nV3Pvi3dhfUe5SIBIBGTrKNfc
   Google Scholar
• Foodsaving-Today. 2017b. “Foodsharing Gothenburg - Part Four.” https://foodsaving.today/en/blog/2017/06/27/foodsharing-gothenburg-part4?fbclid=IwAR3PK2SM8_Q7DU-lt7aiurw3331MuVSmr3su1nspwPG8ZtWi_JDMRG6nVs0
   Google Scholar
• Foodsaving-Today. 2017c. “Foodsharing Gothenburg - Part Three.” https://foodsaving.today/en/blog/2017/04/27/foodsharing-gothenburg-part3?fbclid=IwAR2bCNjsAs4k_s5kKUlizVpXwTOKA_jcYgLSBdQEA-lpjMss8lnnR50SHHE
   Google Scholar
• Foodsaving Worldwide. 2016. “Karrot: The Foodsaving Tool.” https://foodsaving.world/karrot
   Google Scholar
• Forum-Solikyl. 2019. “Organisatorisk struktur.” https://forum.solikyl.se/t/organisatorisk-struktur/159
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J., L. Östman, and J. Öhman, eds. 2021, forthcoming. Deweyan Transactionalism in Education: Beyond Self-Action and Inter-Action. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, J., C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. van Otterdijk, and A. Meybeck. 2011. Global Food Losses and Food Waste – Extent, Causes and Prevention. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Policy Sciences 36 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawken, P. 2017. Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hegnsholt, E., S. Unnikrishnan, M. Pollmann-Larsen, B. Askelsdottir, and M. Gerard. 2018. “Tackling the 1.6-Billion-Ton Food Loss and Waste Crisis.” The Boston Consulting Group. https://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG-Tackling-the-1.6-Billion-Ton-Food-Waste-Crisis-Aug-2018%20%281%29_tcm38-200324.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. 2018. “Agricultural Transition: Niche and Regime Knowledge Systems’ Boundary Dynamics.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 26: 117–135. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2018. Summary for Policymakers SPM. Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karrot. 2020. “Solikyl Göteborg.” https://karrot.world/#/groupPreview/10 (private access)
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 2015. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., F. W. Geels, F. Kern, J. Markard, E. Onsongo, A. Wieczorek, F. Alkemade, et al. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligozat, F., P. O. Wickman, and K. M. Hamza. 2011. “Using Practical Epistemology Analysis to Study the Teacher and Students’ Joint Actions in the Mathematics Classroom.” Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, University of Rzeszow, Poland, 2472–2481.
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, A., B. Van Mierlo, J. Grin, and C. Leeuwis. 2007. The practical value of theory: Conceptualising learning in the pursuit of a sustainable development. In Social Learning Towards A Sustainable World, edited by A.E.J. Wals. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Luntley, M. 2016. “What’s the Problem with Dewey?” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy VIII (1): 1–21. doi:10.4000/ejpap.444.
   Google Scholar
• Maivorsdotter, N., and M. Quennerstedt. 2012. “The Act of Running: A Practical Epistemology Analysis of Aesthetic Experience in Sport.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 4 (3): 362–381. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2012.693528.
   Google Scholar
• Maivorsdotter, N., and M. Quennerstedt. 2019. “Exploring Gender Habits: A Practical Epistemology Analysis of Exergaming in School.” European Physical Education Review 25 (4): 1176. doi:10.1177/1356336X18810023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maivorsdotter, N., and P. O. Wickman. 2011. “Skating in a Life Context: Examining the Significance of Aesthetic Experience in Sport Using Practical Epistemology Analysis.” Sport, Education and Society 16 (5): 613–628. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.601141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller, C. J. 2015. “Understanding Health through Social Practices: Performance and Materiality in Everyday Life.” Sociology of Health & Illness 37 (1): 52–66. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMeekin, A., and D. Southerton. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions and Final Consumption: Practices and Socio-Technical Systems.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (4): 345–361. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.663960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourad, M. 2016. “Recycling, Recovering and Preventing “Food Waste”: Competing Solutions for Food Systems Sustainability in the United States and France.” Journal of Cleaner Production 126: 461–477. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naturvårdsverket. 2020. “Matavfall i Sverige: Uppkomst och behandling 2018.” https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publ-filer/8800/978-91-620-8861-3.pdf?pid=26710
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L., and J. Öhman. 2010. A Transactional Approach to Learning. Paper Presented at John Dewey Society, AERA Annual Meeting in Denver, CO, April 30–May 4, 2010, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L., K. Van Poeck, and J. Öhman. 2019. “A Transactional Theory on Sustainability Learning.” In Sustainable Development Teaching: Ethical and Political Challenges, edited by K. Van Poeck, L. Östman, and J. Öhman, 127–139. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paredis, E. 2013. “Transition Management, Policy Change and the Search for Sustainable Development.” Doctoral thes., Ghent University. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4100031/file/4336518.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Puente-Rodriguez, D., J. A. A. Swart, M. Middag, and H. J. Van der Windt. 2015. “Identities, Communities, and Practices in the Transition towards Sustainable Mussel Fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea.” Human Ecology 43 (1): 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., M. Godmaire, P. Abernethy, and M.-A. Guertin. 2014. “Building a Community of Practice for Sustainability: Strengthening Learning and Collective Action of Canadian Biosphere Reserves through a National Partnership.” Journal of Environmental Management 145: 230–239. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rombach, M., and V. Bitsch. 2015. “Food Movements in Germany: Slow Food, Food Sharing, and Dumpster Diving.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 18 (3): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2013. “Analyzing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socioscientific Issues.” Science Education 97 (4): 594–620. doi:10.1002/sce.21065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, and E. von Savigny. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2011. “Where the Action Is (On Large Social Phenomena Such as Sociotechnical Regimes).” Sustainable Practices Research Group, Working Paper 1 (November), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Solikyl. 2018. “About.” https://solikyl.se/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Solikyl. 2019a. Solikyl Partner Pamphlet. Self-published.
   Google Scholar
• Solikyl. 2019b. Solikyl Volunteer Pamphlet. Self-published.
   Google Scholar
• Solikyl. 2019c. Guide för nya ambassadörer. Self-published.
   Google Scholar
• Solikyl. 2020. “Where.” https://solikyl.se/var-nar/.
   Google Scholar
• Suškevičs, M., T. Hahn, R. Rodela, B. Macura, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2018. “Learning for Social-Ecological Change: A Qualitative Review of Outcomes across Empirical Literature in Natural Resource Management.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (7): 1085–1112. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1339594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, B., and P. J. Beers. 2020. “Understanding and Governing Learning in Sustainability Transitions: A Review.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 255–269. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, B., J. Halbe, P. J. Beers, G. Scholz, and J. Vinke-de Kruijf. 2020. “Learning about Learning in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 251–254. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., L. Östman, and T. Block. 2018. “Opening up the Black Box of Learning-by-Doing in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 298–310.doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J., and B. Bornemann. 2011. “The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management.” Ecology and Society 16 (2): 9. doi:10.5751/ES-04051-160209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D., and L. Yates. 2018. “The Practices of Collective Action: Practice Theory, Sustainability Transitions and Social Change.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48 (3): 288–305. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. 2012. “A Comparison between Practical Epistemology Analysis and Some Schools in French Didactics.” Éducation et Didactique 6 (2): 145–159. doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.1456.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P. O., and L. Östman. 2001. “University Students during Practical Work: Can We Make the Learning Process Intelligible?” In Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future, edited by H. Behrendt, et al. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P. O., and L. Östman. 2002. “Learning as Discourse Change: A Sociocultural Mechanism.” Science Education 86 (5): 601–623. doi:10.1002/sce.10036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar