276
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

A scale for assessing student understandings of marine resource conservation and sustainability: psychometric verification and the latent mean difference between genders

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1329-1342 | Received 30 Oct 2020, Accepted 25 Apr 2021, Published online: 03 Jun 2021

References

  • Bagozzi, R., and Y. Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327.
  • Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by K. A. Bollen, and J. S. Long, p. 136–162. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Byrne, B. M. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Author. (2019b)
  • Chang, C. C. 2019. “Development of Ocean Literacy Inventory for 16-to 18-Year-Old Students.” SAGE Open 9 (2): 1–15. doi:10.1177/2158244019844085.
  • Chen, C. L., and C. H. Tsai. 2016. “Marine Environmental Awareness among University Students in Taiwan: A Potential Signal for Sustainability of the Oceans.” Environmental Education Research 22 (7): 958–977. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1054266.
  • Chen, H., J. Dai, and Y. Gao. 2019. “Measurement Invariance and Latent Mean Differences of the Chinese Version Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale across Gender and Education Levels.” Journal of Sport and Health Science 8 (1): 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2017.01.004.
  • Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2002. “Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 9 (2): 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
  • Chiu, Y. L., C. C. Tsai, and J. C. Liang. 2015. “Testing Measurement Invariance and Latent Mean Differences across Gender Groups in College Students’ Internet-Specific Epistemic Beliefs.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31 (4): 486–499. doi:10.14742/ajet.1437.
  • Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
  • Corney, G. 2006. “Education for Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study of the Tensions and Challenges Faced by Geography Student Teachers.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 15 (3): 224–240. doi:10.2167/irgee194.0.
  • Chawla, L., and D. F. Cushing. 2007. “Education for Strategic Environmental Behavior.” Environmental Education Research 13 (4): 437–452. doi:10.1080/13504620701581539.
  • Fielding, K. S., and B. W. Head. 2012. “Determinants of Young Australians’ Environmental Actions: The Role of Responsibility Attributions.” Environmental Education Research 18 (2): 171–186. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.592936.
  • Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
  • Giddings, B., B. Hopwood, and G. O’Brien. 2002. “Environment, Economy and Society: Fitting Them Together into Sustainable Development.” Sustainable Development 10 (4): 187–196. doi:10.1002/sd.199.
  • Holt, D., and R. Barkemeyer. 2012. “Media Coverage of Sustainable Development Issues—Attention Cycles or Punctuated Equilibrium?” Sustainable Development 20 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1002/sd.460.
  • Hong, S., M. L. Malik, and M. K. Lee. 2003. “Testing Configural, Metric, Scalar, and Latent Mean Invariance across Genders in Sociotropy and Autonomy Using a Non-Western Sample.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 63 (4): 636–654. doi:10.1177/0013164403251332.
  • Hungerford, H.,. R. B. Peyton, and R. J. Wilke. 1980. “Goals for Curriculum Development in Environmental Education.” The Journal of Environmental Education 11 (3): 42–47. doi:10.1080/00958964.1980.9941381.
  • Jang, Y. J., J. Lee, A. Puig, and S. M. Lee. 2012. “Factorial Invariance and Latent Mean Differences for the Five Factor Wellness Inventory with Korean and American Counselors.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 45 (2): 71–83. doi:10.1177/0748175611427915.
  • Keller, G. 2017. Statistics for Management and Economics. Singapore: Cengage Learning.
  • Kember, D., and D. Y. P. Leung. 2011. “Disciplinary Differences in Student Ratings of Teaching Quality.” Research in Higher Education 52 (3): 278–299. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9194-z.
  • Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behaviour?” Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401.
  • Lee, E. B. 2008. “Environmental Attitudes and Information Sources among African American College Students.” The Journal of Environmental Education 40 (1): 29–42. doi:10.3200/JOEE.40.1.29-42.
  • Liu, S. C., H. S. Lin, and C. Y. Tsai. 2020. “Ninth Grade Students’ Mental Models of the Marine Environment and Their Implications for Environmental Science Education in Taiwan.” The Journal of Environmental Education 51 (1): 72–82. doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1633990.
  • Ministry of Education. 2017. Marine Education Policy White Paper. Ministry of Education, Taipei, Taiwan. https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/relfile/6315/55805/40f900df-a70b-4e1f-847f-e53ed94b4c77.pdf
  • Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998–2017. Mplus User’s Guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Rannikko, P. 1996. “Local Environmental Conflicts and the Change in Environmental Consciousness.” Acta Sociologica 39 (1): 57–72. doi:10.1177/000169939603900104.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., H. Moosbrugger, and H. Müller. 2003. “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures.” Methods of Psychological Research Online 8 (2): 23–74.
  • Schnabel, D. B. L., A. Kelava, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, and L. Seifert. 2015. “Examining Psychometric Properties, Measurement Invariance, and Construct Validity of a Short Version of the Test to Measure Intercultural Competence (TMIC-S) in Germany and Brazil.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 49: 137–155. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.08.002.
  • Steel, B., N. Lovrich, D. Lach, and V. Fomenko. 2005. “Correlates and Consequences of Public Knowledge concerning Ocean Fisheries Management.” Coastal Management 33 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1080/08920750590883105.
  • Stern, P. C. 2000. “Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3): 407–424. doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
  • Swim, J. K., A. J. Gillis, and K. J. Hamaty. 2020. “Gender Bending and Gender Conformity: The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors.” Sex Roles 82 (5–6): 363–385. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01061-9.
  • Tsai, L. T., and C. C. Chang. 2019. “Measuring Ocean Literacy of High School Students: Psychometric Properties of a Chinese Version of the Ocean Literacy Scale.” Environmental Education Research 25 (2): 264–279. doi:10.1080/13504622. 2018.1542487.
  • Tsai, L. T., Y. L. Lin, and C. C. Chang. 2019. “An Assessment of Factors Related to Ocean Literacy Based on Gender-Invariance Measurement.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (19): 3672. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193672.
  • Tsai, L. T., C. C. Yang, and Y. J. Chang. 2015. “Gender Differences in Factor Affecting Science Performance of Eight Grade Taiwan Students.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 24 (2): 445–456. doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0196-z.
  • UNESCO. 2017. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
  • Walshe, N. 2008. “Understanding Students’ Conceptions of Sustainability.” Environmental Education Research 14 (5): 537–558. doi:10.1080/13504620802345958.
  • Wen, W. C., and S. Y. Lu. 2013. “Marine Environmental Protection Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Curricular Involvement of Taiwanese Primary School Students in Senior Grades.” Environmental Education Research 19 (5): 600–619. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.717219.
  • Wong, K. K. 2001. “Taiwan’s Environment, Resource Sustainability and Green Consumerism: Perceptions of University Students.” Sustainable Development 9 (4): 222–233. doi:10.1002/sd.163.
  • Yeh, S. C. 2017. “Exploring the Developmental Discourse of Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development.” Journal of Environmental Education Research 13 (2): 67–109. doi:10.6555/JEER.13.2.67.
  • Yeung, S. P. M. 1998. “Environmental Consciousness among Students in Senior Secondary Schools: The Case of Hong Kong.” Environmental Education Research 4 (3): 251–268. doi:10.1080/1350462980040302.
  • Zhuang, Q. L., S. W. Y. Lee, C. H. Xiao, Y. Z. Zeng, and Y. X. Huang. 2018. “A Preliminary Study on the Views of Marine Sustainable Development with a Model-Based Curriculum.” Journal of Environmental Education Research 14 (1): 117–158. doi:10.6555/JEER.14.1.117.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.