Youth, place, and educator practices: designing program elements to support relational processes and naturalist identity development

References

• Azevedo, F. S. 2013. “The Tailored Practice of Hobbies and Its Implication for the Design of Interest-Driven Learning Environments.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 22 (3): 462–510. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.730082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, F. S. 2015. “Sustaining Interest-Based Participation in Science.” In Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, edited by K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi, 281–296. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, F. S. 2018. “An Inquiry into the Structure of Situational Interests.” Science Education 102 (1): 108–127. doi:10.1002/sce.21319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., L. Curley, A. Kessel, A. Marin, E. S. Suzukovich, and G. Strack. 2014. “Muskrat Theories, Tobacco in the Streets, and Living Chicago as Indigenous Land.” Environmental Education Research 20 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.865113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., and A. Marin. 2015. “Nature-Culture Constructs in Science Learning: Human/Nature Agency and Intentionality.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (4): 530–544. doi:10.1002/tea.21204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., and S. Vossoughi. 2016. “Participatory Design Research and Educational Justice: Studying Learning and Relations within Social Change Making.” Cognition and Instruction 34 (3): 173–193. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., B. Warren, A. S. Rosebery, and D. Medin. 2012. “Desettling Expectations in Science Education.” Human Development 55 (5–6): 302–318. doi:10.1159/000345322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. 2006. “Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective.” Human Development 49 (4): 193–224. doi:10.1159/000094368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., and E. Tan. 2010. “We Be Burnin’! Agency, Identity, and Science Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (2): 187–229. doi:10.1080/10508400903530044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B. 2017. “Disciplinary Identity as Analytic Construct and Design Goal: Making Learning Sciences Matter.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 26 (3): 525–531. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1336026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., L. D. Huffling, T. Tomasek, T. A. Hegedus, C. E. Matthews, M. H. Allen, and M. C. Ash. 2015. “Unthinkable” Selves: Identity Boundary Work in a Summer Field Ecology Enrichment Program for Diverse Youth.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (10): 1524–1546. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1033776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, D., R. Santo, C. Hoadley, and K. Peppler. 2016. “Not Just a Blip in Someone’s Life: Integrating Brokering Practices into out-of-School Programming as a Means of Supporting and Expanding Youth Futures.” On the Horizon 24 (3): 296–312. doi:10.1108/OTH-05-2016-0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., and W. R. Penuel. 2016. “Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions.” Educational Researcher 45 (1): 48–54. doi:10.3102/0013189X16631750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., B. Barron, K. Knutson, and C. K. Martin. 2015. “Interest and the Development of Pathways to Science.” In Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, edited by K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, and S. Hidi, 297–314. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. 2000. Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, 2nd ed.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2019). New Materialism. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, & R.A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE Research Methods Foundations. doi:10.4135/9781526421036768465.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. M. 2020. “Animal Geographies I: Hearing the Cry and Extending beyond.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 769–777. doi:10.1177/0309132519863483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A., J. Rahm, and A. Carvalho. 2013. “We Could Think of Things That Could Be Science”: Girls’ Re-Figuring of Science in an out-of-School-Time Club.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (9): 1068–1097. doi:10.1002/tea.21105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström, M. 2019. “Lived Experiences of Being-in-the-Forest as Experiential Sharing with the More-than-Human World.” Environmental Education Research 25 (9): 1334–1346. doi:10.1080/13504622.2019.1633275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., and K. Crowley. 2020. “Unpacking the Learning Ecosystems Framework: Lessons from the Adaptive Management of Biological Ecosystems.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 29 (2): 264–284. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1693381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., K. Knutson, and K. Crowley. 2019. “Becoming a Naturalist: Interest Development across the Learning Ecology.” Science Education 103 (3): 691–713. doi:10.1002/sce.21503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrick, E. C., P. Cobb, W. R. Penuel, K. Jackson, and T. Clark. 2017. “Assessing Research-Practice Partnerships: Five Dimensions of Effectiveness.” William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and K. A. Renninger. 2006. “The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., W. J. Lachicotte, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, Z. 2019. “The Trans-Scalar Challenge of Ecology.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 26 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1093/isle/isy079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. 2017. “Animal Geographies I: Globalizing and Decolonizing.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (3): 382–394. doi:10.1177/0309132516646291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. 2019. “Animal Geographies III: Species Relations of Power.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (4): 749–757. doi:10.1177/0309132518775837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. L. Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5): 525–542. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., C. Ruff, and J. W. Osborne. 2015. “Fostering Students’ Identification with Mathematics and Science.” In Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, edited by K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi, 331–352. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kawagley, O. 2006. A Yupiaq Worldview: A Pathway to Ecology and Spirit, 2nd ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., and J. A. Harsh. 2015. “Students’ Pathways of Entry into STEM.” In Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, edited by K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi, 203–224. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A., and M. Bang. 2018. “Look It, This is How You Know:” Family Forest Walks as a Context for Knowledge-Building about the Natural World.” Cognition and Instruction 36 (2): 89–118. doi:10.1080/07370008.2018.1429443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., B. Ojalehto, A. Marin, and M. Bang. 2014. “Culture and Epistemologies: Putting Culture Back into the Ecosystem.” In M. Gelfand, C. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in Culture and Psychology ( 177–217. Oxford University Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., and J. Cooks. 2009. “Becoming a Hurdler: How Learning Settings Afford Identities.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 40 (1): 41–61. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2015. Identifying and Supporting Productive STEM Programs in out-of-School Settings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21740.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., A. Taylor, and M. Blaise. 2016. “Decentring the Human in Multispecies Ethnographies.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes, Chapter 10, 149–167. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, L. 2015. Decolonizing Educational Research: From Ownership to Accountability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R. 2017. “Research-Practice Partnerships as a Strategy for Promoting Equitable Science Teaching and Learning through Leveraging Everyday Science.” Science Education 101 (4): 520–525. doi:10.1002/sce.21285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkard, N., S. Erete, C. K. Martin, and M. McKinney de Royston. 2017. “Digital Youth Divas: Exploring Narrative-Driven Curriculum to Spark Middle School Girls’ Interest in Computational Activities.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 26 (3): 477–516. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, J. L., and J. M. G. Hope. 2014. “Science News Stories as Boundary Objects Affecting Engagement with Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (3): 315–341. doi:10.1002/tea.21144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahm, J., and J. C. Moore. 2016. “A Case Study of Long-Term Engagement and Identity-in-Practice: Insights into the STEM Pathways of Four Underrepresented Youths.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (5): 768–801. doi:10.1002/tea.21268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosiek, J. L., J. Snyder, and S. L. Pratt. 2020. “The New Materialisms and Indigenous Theories of Non-Human Agency: Making the Case for Respectful anti-Colonial Engagement.” Qualitative Inquiry 26 (3–4): 331–346. doi:10.1177/1077800419830135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skov, M., M. Lykke, and C. Jantzen. 2018. “Introducing Walk-Alongs in Visitor Studies: A Mobile Method Approach to Studying User Experience.” Visitor Studies 21 (2): 189–210. doi:10.1080/10645578.2018.1549396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G., Weenink, D., & Lamers, M. (Eds.). 2016. Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. 1980. Participant Observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, J. J., J. G. T. Anderson, J. D. Bakker, T. J. Billo, P. W. Dunwiddie, M. J. Groom, S. E. Hampton, et al. 2014. “Natural History’s Place in Science and Society.” BioScience 64 (4): 300–310. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and M. McKenzie. 2015. Place in Research: Theory, Methodology, and Methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vicsek, L., G. Király, and H. Kónya. 2016. “Networks in the Social Sciences.” Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 7 (2): 77–102. doi:10.14267/CJSSP.2016.02.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar