Scoping reviews: Their development and application in environmental and sustainability education research

References

• Aikens, K., M. McKenzie, and P. Vaughter. 2016. “Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy Research: A Systematic Review of Methodological and Thematic Trends.” Environmental Education Research 22 (3): 333–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1135418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., and A. W. Bowers. 2020. “Early Childhood Environmental Education: A Systematic Review of the Research Literature.” Educational Research Review 31: 100353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., A. W. Bowers, and E. Gaillard. 2020. “Environmental Education Outcomes for Conservation: A Systematic Review.” Biological Conservation 241: 108224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., C. Clark, and E. Kelsey. 2013. “An Exploration of Future Trends in Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 19 (4): 499–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.709823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris, E., and Z. Munn. 2020. “Chapter 1: JBI Systematic Reviews.” In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, edited by E. Aromataris and Z. Munn. JBI. doi:https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-02.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page, E., and J. Thomas. 2009. “Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: A Critical Review.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 9 (1): 59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M., and M. Rieckmann. 2016. “State of the Art in Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development.” In Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, edited by M. Barth, G. Michelsen, M. Rieckmann, and I. Thomas, 100–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M., and I. Thomas. 2012. “Synthesising Case-Study Research – Ready for the Next Step?” Environmental Education Research 18 (6): 751–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.665849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., C. D. Smith, A. Carbone, S. Slade, C. Baik, M. Hughes-Warrington, and D. L. Neumann. 2012. “Systematic Review Methodology in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 625–640. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchin, I. I., A. R. Aguiar Dutra, and J. B. S. O. d Guerra. 2021. “How Do Higher Education Institutions Promote Sustainable Development? A Literature Review.” Sustainable Development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) 29 (6): 1204–1222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2020. Educational Research: An Unorthodox Introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Boaz, A., D. Ashby, and K. Young. 2002. Systematic Reviews: what Have They Got to Offer Evidence Based Policy and Practice? London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice London.
   Google Scholar
• Boote, D. N., and P. Beile. 2005. “Scholars before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation.” Educational Researcher 34 (6): 3–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L., N. M. Trautmann, and C. Fournier. 2018. “Environmental Education in Latin American and the Caribbean: The Challenges and Limitations of Conducting a Systematic Review of Evaluation and Research.” Environmental Education Research 24 (12): 1631–1654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1499015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, G., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2020. “Innovations in Framework Synthesis as a Systematic Review Method.” Research Synthesis Methods 11 (3): 316–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, M., D. Coghlan, Á. Carroll, D. Stokes, K. Roberts, and G. Hynes. 2021. “Application of Action Research in the Field of Healthcare: A Scoping Review Protocol.” HRB Open Research 4: 46. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13276.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalmers, I. 2005. “If Evidence-Informed Policy Works in Practice, Does It Matter If It Doesn’t Work in Theory? Evidence & Policy: A.” Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 1 (2): 227–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/1744264053730806.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. R., J. E. Heimlich, N. M. Ardoin, and J. Braus. 2020. “Using a Delphi Study to Clarify the Landscape and Core Outcomes in Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 26 (3): 381–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1727859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete, E. L. 2011. “Going to the Bush: Language, Power and the Conserved Environment in Southern Africa.” Environmental Education Research 17 (1): 35–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504621003625248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, H. L., D. Levac, K. K. O’Brien, S. Straus, A. C. Tricco, L. Perrier, M. Kastner, and D. Moher. 2014. “Scoping Reviews: Time for Clarity in Definition, Methods, and Reporting.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67 (12): 1291–1294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C. N., S. J. Nichols, J. A. Webb, R. A. Fuller, and R. M. Richards. 2017. “Simplifying the Selection of Evidence Synthesis Methods to Inform Environmental Decisions: A Guide for Decision Makers and Scientists.” Biological Conservation 213: 135–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. 1998. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daudt, H. M., C. Van Mossel, and S. J. Scott. 2013. “Enhancing the Scoping Study Methodology: A Large, Inter-Professional Team’s Experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s Framework.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 13 (1): 48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derr, V., and J. Simons. 2020. “A Review of Photovoice Applications in Environment, Sustainability, and Conservation Contexts: Is the Method Maintaining Its Emancipatory Intents?” Environmental Education Research 26 (3): 359–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1693511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkin, M. J. 1996. “Types of Errors in Synthesizing Research in Education.” Review of Educational Research 66 (2): 87–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eales, J., N. R. Haddaway, and J. A. Webb. 2017. “Much at Stake: The Importance of Training and Capacity Building for Stakeholder Engagement in Evidence Synthesis.” Environmental Evidence 6 (1): 22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017-0101-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evald, M. R. 2018. “The Palette of Literature Reviews Available for Critical Realists.” In Collaborative Research Design: Working with Business for Meaningful Findings, edited by P. V. Freytag and L. Young, 93–120. Singapore: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5008-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and P. Benefield. 2001. “Systematic Reviews of Educational Research: Does the Medical Model Fit?” British Educational Research Journal 27 (5): 527–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., J. Laessøe, N. Blum, and D. Chambers. 2013. “Challenging the Premises of International Policy Reviews: An Introduction to the Review Symposium.” Environmental Education Research 19 (2): 198–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.768603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Olmedo, A. M., C. Valor, and I. Carrero. 2020. “Mindfulness in Education for Sustainable Development to Nurture Socioemotional Competencies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Environmental Education Research 26 (11): 1527–1555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1777264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D. 2007. “Weight of Evidence: A Framework for the Appraisal of the Quality and Relevance of Evidence.” Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 213–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2017. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., and J. Thomas. 2016. “Systematic Reviews of Research in Education: Aims, Myths and Multiple Methods.” Review of Education 4 (1): 84–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D., J. Thomas, and S. Oliver. 2012. “Clarifying Differences between Review Designs and Methods.” Systematic Reviews 1 (1): 28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant, M. J., and A. Booth. 2009. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information and Libraries Journal 26 (2): 91–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., and R. Peacock. 2005. “Effectiveness and Efficiency of Search Methods in Systematic Reviews of Complex Evidence: Audit of Primary Sources.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 331 (7524): 1064–1065. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güler Yıldız, T., N. Öztürk, T. İlhan İyi, N. Aşkar, Ç. Banko Bal, S. Karabekmez, and Ş. Höl. 2021. “Education for Sustainability in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review.” Environmental Education Research 27 (6): 796–820. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1896680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Bucheli, L., G. Kidman, and A. Reid. 2022. “Sustainability in Engineering Education: A Review of Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 330: 129734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2020. “Reflections on the Methodological Approach of Systematic Reviews.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins, 23–39. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_2.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and R. Deakin Crick. 2004. “Opportunities and Challenges of Using Systematic Reviews of Research for Evidence-Based Policy in Education.” Evaluation & Research in Education 18 (1–2): 54–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790408668308.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. 2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. 2nd ed. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. 2000. “Requisite Variety: The Problem with Generic Guidelines for Diverse Genres of Inquiry.” Environmental Education Research 6 (1): 37–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/135046200110476.
   Google Scholar
• Heimlich, J. E., and N. M. Ardoin. 2008. “Understanding Behavior to Understand Behavior Change: A Literature Review.” Environmental Education Research 14 (3): 215–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802148881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J., S. Green, and C. Cochrane. 2008. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Q. N., P. Pluye, M. Bujold, and M. Wassef. 2017. “Convergent and Sequential Synthesis Designs: Implications for Conducting and Reporting Systematic Reviews of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence.” Systematic Reviews 6 (1). article number: 61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. 1994. “The Dance of Qualitative Research Design: Metaphor, Methodolatry, and Meaning.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 209–219. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kugley, S., A. Wade, J. Thomas, Q. Mahood, A. M. K. Jørgensen, K. Hammerstrøm, and N. Sathe. 2017. “Searching for Studies: A Guide to Information Retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 13 (1): 1–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.4073/cmg.2016.1.
   Google Scholar
• Leenaars, C., K. Tsaioun, F. Stafleu, K. Rooney, F. Meijboom, M. Ritskes-Hoitinga, and A. Bleich. 2021. “Reviewing the Animal Literature: How to Describe and Choose between Different Types of Literature Reviews.” Laboratory Animals 55 (2): 129–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677220968599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., H. Colquhoun, and K. K. O’Brien. 2010. “Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology.” Implementation Science 5 (1): 69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gotzsche, J. P. A. Ioannidis, M. Clarke, P. J. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, and D. Moher. 2009. “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 339: b2700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2021. “The Changing and Complex Entanglements of Research and Policy Making in Education: Issues for Environmental and Sustainability Education.” Environmental Education Research 27 (4): 498–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1752625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, J. H., J. Corcoran, and V. K. Pillai. 2008. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, C., K. Porrit, Z. Munn, L. Rittenmeyer, S. Salmond, M. Bjerrum, H. Loveday, J. Carrier, and D. Stannard. 2020. “Chapter 2: Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Evidence.” In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, edited by E. Aromataris and Z. Munn. JBI. doi:https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-03.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz-Sisitka, H. 2009. “Why Ontology Matters to Reviewing Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 15 (2): 165–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902807550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahood, Q., D. Van Eerd, and E. Irvin. 2014. “Searching for Grey Literature for Systematic Reviews: Challenges and benefits.” Research Synthesis Methods 5 (3): 221–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, C. H., and M. Savin-Baden. 2012. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis: Managing the Information Explosion in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkowski, T., and A. Reid. 2019. “Reviews of Research on the Attitude–Behavior Relationship and Their Implications for Future Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (4): 459–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2006. “Literature Reviews of, and for, Educational Research: A Commentary on Boote and Beile’s “Scholars before Researchers.” Educational Researcher 35 (9): 28–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035009028.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, P., and D. A. McFarland. 2021. “Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation.” American Sociological Review 86 (2): 341–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122421996323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, E. G., M. Stern, R. B. Powell, and T. Frensley. 2022. “A Systematic Literature Review to Identify Evidence-Based Principles to Improve Online Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research28: 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2032610.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. C., S. Kumar, K. L. Pearce, and K. L. Baldock. 2021. “The Outcomes of Nature-Based Learning for Primary School Aged Children: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Research.” Environmental Education Research 27 (8): 1115–1140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1921117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, M. C., R. R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. A. Chaves. 2019. “Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 791–812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, G. 2013. “Research, Policy and Knowledge Flows in Education: What Counts in Knowledge Mobilisation?” Contemporary Social Science 8 (3): 237–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.767466.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., S. Moola, K. Lisy, D. Riitano, and C. Tufanaru. 2020. “Chapter 5: Systematic Reviews of Prevalence and Incidence.” In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, edited by E. Aromataris and Z. Munn. JBI. doi:https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-06.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., M. D. J. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, and E. Aromataris. 2018. “Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 18 (1). article number 143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. 2008. “High Quality Randomized Experimental Research Evidence: Necessary but Not Sufficient for Effective Education Policy.” Psychology of Education Review 32 (2): 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M., and D. Gough. 2020. “Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins, 3–22. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M., D. Kilburn, and R. Luff. 2015. “The Teaching and Learning of Social Research Methods: Developments in Pedagogical Knowledge.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (5): 455–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1062631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., and M. Liddy. 2018. “The Impact of Development Education and Education for Sustainable Development Interventions: A Synthesis of the Research.” Environmental Education Research 24 (7): 1031–1049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampaka, M., J. Williams, and M. Homer. 2016. “Is the Educational ‘What Works’ Agenda Working? Critical Methodological Developments.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 39 (3): 231–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1170476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2006. “Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9 (2): 127–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595314.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., C. M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, D. Parker, and C. B. Soares. 2015. “Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews.” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 13 (3): 141–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., C. M. Godfrey, P. Mclnerney, Z. Munn, A. C. Tricco, and H. Khalil. 2020. “Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews.” In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, edited by E. Aromataris and Z. Munn. South Australia: JBI doi:https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., C. Marnie, A. C. Tricco, D. Pollock, Z. Munn, L. Alexander, P. McInerney, C. M. Godfrey, and H. Khalil. 2020. “Updated Methodological Guidance for the Conduct of Scoping Reviews.” JBI Evidence Synthesis 18 (10): 2119–2126. doi:https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2005. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, D., E. L. Davies, M. D. J. Peters, A. C. Tricco, L. Alexander, P. McInerney, C. M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, and Z. Munn. 2021. “Undertaking a Scoping Review: A Practical Guide for Nursing and Midwifery Students, Clinicians, Researchers, and Academics.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 77 (4): 2102–2113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, G. 2006. “Methodological Reflexivity: Towards Evolving Methodological Frameworks through Critical and Reflexive Deliberations.” Environmental Education Research 12 (3–4): 559–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600799323.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. 2016. “Researchers Are Experienced Readers’: On Recognition, Aspiration and Obligation.” Environmental Education Research 22 (3): 422–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1162982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. 2019. “Blank, Blind, Bald and Bright Spots in Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (2): 157–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1615735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmen, K. B., and E. Iversen. 2022. “A Scoping Review of Research on School-Based Outdoor Education in the Nordic Countries.” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning22: 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2027796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, R. P., C. M. Martha, F. Claire, W. B. Alison, and A. C. Willandia. 2020. “Recommendations for Early Phases of Engaging Communities in Climate Change Adaptation.” Journal of Human Sciences and Extension 8 (2). https://www.jhseonline.com/article/view/1057.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. 2001. “Learners and Learning in Environmental Education: A Critical Review of the Evidence.” Environmental Education Research 7 (3): 207–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120065230.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. 2003. “Reviewing Research Evidence in Environmental Education: Some Methodological Reflections and Challenges.” Environmental Education Research 9 (2): 257–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303473.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. 2006. “Researching and Understanding Environmental Learning: Hopes for the Next 10 Years.” Environmental Education Research 12 (3–4): 445–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600799182.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., C. Cirkony, L. Walsh, J. Gleeson, M. Salisbury, and A. Boaz. 2021. “Insights from a Cross-Sector Review on How to Conceptualise the Quality of Use of Research Evidence.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (1): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00821-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rickinson, M., and A. Edwards. 2021. “The Relational Features of Evidence Use.” Cambridge Journal of Education 51 (4): 509–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1865877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., M. Hall, and A. Reid. 2016. “Sustainable Schools Programmes: What Influence on Schools and How Do we Know?” Environmental Education Research 22 (3): 360–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1077505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., and A. Reid. 2015. “Synthesis of Research in Higher Education for Sustainable Development.” In Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, edited by M. Barth, G. Michelsen, M. Rieckmann, and I. Thomas, 142–160. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saran, A., and H. White. 2018. “Evidence and Gap Maps: A Comparison of Different Approaches.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 14 (1): 1–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2018.2.
   Google Scholar
• Shaxson, L., and A. Boaz. 2021. “Understanding Policymakers’ Perspectives on Evidence Use as a Mechanism for Improving Research-Policy Relationships.” Environmental Education Research 27 (4): 518–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1764505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 1986. “Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews.” Educational Researcher 15 (9): 5–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015009005.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R., J.-A. Ferreira, and S. Emery. 2016. “Environmental and Sustainability Education Research, Past and Future: Three Perspectives from Late, Mid, and Early Career Researchers.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 32 (1): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2013. “Epistemological Pluralism in Research Synthesis Methods.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (7): 889–911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.691565.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2014. Towards Methodologically Inclusive Research Syntheses: expanding Possibilities. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2017. “Meta-Analysis, Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses.” In Research Methods in Education, edited by L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, 427–439. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2020. “Ethical Considerations of Conducting Systematic Reviews in Educational Research.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins, 41–54. Fachmedien Wiesbaden: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_3.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H., and J. Hattie. 2013. “Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis in Education.” In Oxford Bibliographies Education, 1. (online resource). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., A. Harden, and M. Newman. 2012. “Synthesis: Combining Results Systematically and Appropriately.” In An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, edited by D. Gough, S. Oliver, and J. Thomas, 179–226. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. E. W., T. Teel, B. Bruyere, and S. Laurence. 2019. “Metrics and Outcomes of Conservation Education: A Quarter Century of Lessons Learned.” Environmental Education Research 25 (2): 172–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1450849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafilova, S., and B. P. McCullough. 2018. “Environmental Sustainability Scholarship and the Efforts of the Sport Sector: A Rapid Review of Literature.” Cogent Social Sciences 4 (1): 1467256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1467256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K. K. O’Brien, H. Colquhoun, D. Levac, D. Moher, et al. 2018. “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.” Annals of Internal Medicine 169 (7): 467–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Hoven, J. 2019. “Ethics and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: The Case for Comprehensive Engineering: Commentary on "Using Student Engagement to Relocate Ethics to the Core of the Engineering Curriculum".” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (6): 1789–1797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9862-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollscheid, S., and J. Tripney. 2021. “Rapid Reviews as an Emerging Approach to Evidence Synthesis in Education.” London Review of Education 19 (1): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., T. Greenhalgh, G. Westhorp, J. Buckingham, and R. Pawson. 2013. “RAMESES Publication Standards: Realist Syntheses.” BMC Medicine 11 (1): 21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar