Multiple forms of engagement and motivation in ecological citizen science

References

• Alender, B. 2016 “Understanding Volunteer Motivations to Participate in Citizen Science Projects: A Deeper Look at Water Quality Monitoring.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (03): A04. doi:10.22323/2.15030204.
   Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., A. W. Bowers, and E. Gaillard. 2020. “Environmental Education Outcomes for Conservation: A Systematic Review.” Biological Conservation 241: 108224 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestra, M., L. Zalmanson, C. Cheshire, O. Arazy, and O. Nov. 2017. “It Was Fun, but Did It Last?.” Proceedings of the ACM ON Human-Computer Interaction 1 (CSCW): 1–13. doi:10.1145/3134656.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, H. L., C. G. Dixon, and E. M. Harris. 2017. “Youth-Focused Citizen Science: Examining the Role of Environmental Science Learning and Agency for Conservation.” Biological Conservation 208: 65–75. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J., J. Falk, R. Hughes, G. Hunt, J. Parrish, M. Ruffin, and G. Troxel. 2016. “Informal STEM Education: Resources for Outreach, Engagement and Broader Impacts.” Science Education (CAISE). 1–28.‏
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., H. Ballard, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, T. Phillips, J. Shirk, and C. C. Wilderman. 2009b. “Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education.” A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Online Submission.‏
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009a. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977–984. ‏ doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., T. B. Phillips, H. L. Ballard, and J. W. Enck. 2016. “Can Citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science?” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 25 (1): 2–16. ‏ doi:10.1177/0963662515607406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L.,C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K Pedersen. 2013. “Coding in-Depth Semistructured Interviews.” Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3): 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London, Great Britain: Sage.‏
   Google Scholar
• Clary, E. G, and M. Snyder. 1999. “The Motivations to Volunteer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 8 (5): 156–159. ‏ doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Joe., Eun Young Oh, Brooke Simmons, Gary Graham, Anita Greenhill, Chris Lintott, Karen Masters, and Jamie Woodcock. 2018. “Doing Good Online: The Changing Relationships between Motivations, Activity, and Retention among Online Volunteers.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47 (5): 1031–1056. ‏ doi:10.1177/0899764018783066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. 2005. “Free-Choice Environmental Learning: Framing the Discussion.” Environmental Education Research 11 (3): 265–280. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, H., H. Cho, and M. Storksdieck. 2021. “Going beyond Hooked Participants: The Nibble-and-Drop Framework for Classifying Citizen Science Participation.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1): 1–12. ‏ doi:10.5334/cstp.350.
   Google Scholar
• Golumbic, Y., A. Baram-Tsabari, and B. Fishbain. 2020a. “Engagement Styles in an Environmental Citizen Science Project.” Journal of Science Communication 19 (6): A03. ‏ doi:10.22323/2.19060203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golumbic, Y. N., A. Baram-Tsabari, and B. Koichu. 2020b. “Engagement and Communication Features of Scientifically Successful Citizen Science Projects.” Environmental Communication 14 (4): 465–480. ‏ doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1687101.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. 2018. “Participatory Citizen Science.” In Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, edited by S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, and A. Bonn, 52–62. UCL Press: London, UK.‏
   Google Scholar
• Henckel, L., U. Bradter, M. Jönsson, N.J. B Isaac, and T. Snäll. 2020. “Assessing the Usefulness of Citizen Science Data for Habitat Suitability Modelling: Opportunistic Reporting versus Sampling Based on a Systematic Protocol.” Diversity and Distributions 26 (10): 1276–1290. doi:10.1111/ddi.13128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B, and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26. ‏ doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2019. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, C. 2021. “Motives for Citizen Science Program Participation and the Role of the Organization: Lessons from Water Quality Monitors in Texas.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1): 3. ‏ doi:10.5334/cstp.341.
   Google Scholar
• Margaret P., D.. Mustakova‐Possardt, and A. Reid. 2010. “A Whole‐person Approach to Educating for Sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 11 (4): 339–352. doi:10.1108/14676371011077568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maund, P. R., K. N. Irvine, B. Lawson, J. Steadman, K. Risely, A. A. Cunningham, and Z. G. Davies. 2020. “What Motivates the Masses: Understanding Why People Contribute to Conservation Citizen Science Projects.” Biological Conservation 246: 108587. ‏ doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, K, and T. Tal. 2014. “Sustainability in Higher Education Courses: Multiple Learning Outcomes.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 41: 113–123. ‏ doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 2007. “Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 48–76. doi:10.1177/2345678906292462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nov, O., O. Arazy, and D. Anderson. 2014. “Scientists@ Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation?” PLoS One 9 (4): e90375. ‏ doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nov, O., O. Arazy, K. Lotts, and T. Naberhaus. 2013. “Motivation-Targeted Personalized UI Design: A Novel Approach to Enhancing Citizen Science Participation,” Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’2013), Paphos, Cyprus, Sept. 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nov, O., D. Anderson, and O. Arazy. 2010. “Volunteer Computing: A Model of the Factors Determining Contribution to Community-Based Scientific Research.” Proceedings of 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2010), Raleigh, NC, April 26–30, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nov, O., O. Arazy, and D. Anderson. 2011. “Dusting for Science: Motivation and Participation of Digital Citizen Science Volunteers.” Proceedings of iConference 2011, February 8–11, 2011, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, T. B., H. L. Ballard, B. V. Lewenstein, and R. Bonney. 2019. “Engagement in Science through Citizen Science: Moving beyond Data Collection.” Science Education 103 (3): 665–690. ‏ doi:10.1002/sce.21501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2018. Understanding Motivation and Emotion. 7th ed. Wiley Custom. Hoboken, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., J. Dillon, N. Ardoin, and J. A. Ferreira. 2021. “Scientists’ Warnings and the Need to Reimagine, Recreate, and Restore Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 27 (6): 783–795. ‏ doi:10.1080/13504622.2021.1937577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L, and S. L. Christenson. 2012. “Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 3–19. Springer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Rotman, D., J. Preece, J. Hammock, K. Procita, D. Hansen, C. Parr, and D. Jacobs. 2012. “Dynamic Changes in Motivation in Collaborative Citizen-Science Projects.” In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February, pp. 217–226.‏‏ doi:10.1145/2145204.2145238.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. L.,R. Kaplan, and R. E. Grese. 2001. “Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programmes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 (5): 629–648. doi:10.1080/09640560120079948.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M, and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. ‏ doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagy, O., Y. N. Golumbic, H. B. H. Abramsky, M. Benichou, O. Atias, H. M. Braham, and D. Angel. 2019. “Citizen Science: An Opportunity for Learning in the Networked Society.” In Learning in a Networked Society, 97–115. Springer, Cham.‏
   Google Scholar
• Sbrocchi, C., G. Pecl, I. van Putten, and P. Roetman. 2022. “A Citizen Science Community of Practice: Relational Patterns Contributing to Shared Practice.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 7 (1): 3. ‏ doi:10.5334/cstp.358.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, V., and, A. Tham. 2019. “Engaging Tourists as Citizen Scientists in Marine Tourism.” Tourism Review 75 (2): 333–346. doi:10.1108/TR-10-2018-0151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroer, J., and, G. Hertel. 2009. “Voluntary Engagement in an Open Web-Based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians and Why They Do It.” Media Psychology 12 (1): 96–120. doi:10.1080/15213260802669466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, A., Y. A. Gal, R. J. Simpson, V. Victoria Homsy, M. Hartswood, K. R. Page, and M. Jirotka. 2015. “Improving Productivity in Citizen Science through Controlled Intervention.” In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 331–337.‏ doi:10.1145/2740908.2743051.
   Google Scholar
• Sipos, Y., B. Battisti, and K. Grimm. 2008. “Achieving Transformative Sustainability Learning: engaging Head, Hands and Heart.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 9 (1): 68–86. doi:10.1108/14676370810842193.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, A, and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, T. 2012. “Out-of-School: Learning Experiences, Teaching and Students’ Learning.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Fraser, 1109–1122. Springer, Dordrecht.‏
   Google Scholar
• Tiago, P., M. J. Gouveia, C. Capinha, M. Santos-Reis, and H. M. Pereira. 2017. “The Influence of Motivational Factors on the Frequency of Participation in Citizen Science Activities.” Nature Conservation 18: 61–78. ‏ doi:10.3897/natureconservation.18.13429.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1977. “The Tbilisi Declaration” in Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. UNESCO, UNEP, Tbilisi, USSR, 14–26. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/EE-Tbilisi_1977.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E., M. Brody, J. Dillon, and R. B. Stevenson. 2014. “Convergence between Science and Environmental Education.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 344 (6184): 583–584. ‏ doi:10.1126/science.1250515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2010. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: The Career of a Concept.” In: Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, edited by C. Blackmore, 179–198. Springer, London.
   Google Scholar
• West, S., A. Dyke, and R. Pateman, 2021. “Variations in the Motivations of Environmental Citizen Scientists.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1):14. doi:10.5334/cstp.370
   Google Scholar
• West, S. E, and R. M. Pateman. 2016. “Recruiting and Retaining Participants in Citizen Science: What Can Be Learned from the Volunteering Literature?” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1 (2): 15. doi:10.5334/cstp.8.
   Google Scholar