Students’ ideas of contributing to sustainable development: a study of how ideas emerge, travel and expand through classroom microblogging and discussions

References

• Andersson, E, and J. Öhman. 2017. “Young People’s Conversations about Environmental and Sustainability Issues in Social Media.” Environmental Education Research 23 (4): 465–485. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1149551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 2004. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” (V. W. McGee, Trans.). In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breiting, S, and F. Mogensen. 1999. “Action Competence and Environmental Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 29 (3): 349–353. doi:10.1080/0305764990290305.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C.-K, and T.-Y. Lee. 2010. “Contributions of Moral Education Lectures and Moral Discussion in Hong Kong Secondary Schools.” Social Psychology of Education 13 (4): 575–591. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9127-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N. 2015. “The Right to Speak.” In Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, and S. N. Clarke, 167–180. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, S., J. Fien, J. Lee, H. Sykes, and D. Yencken. 1999. “If It Doesn’t Directly Affect You, You Don’t Think about It”: A Qualitative Study of Young People’s Environmental Attitudes in Two Australian Cities.” Environmental Education Research 5 (1): 95–113. doi:10.1080/1350462990050106.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, S., J. Fien, H. Sykes, and D. Yencken. 1998. “Young People and the Environment in Australia: Beliefs, Knowledge, Commitment and Educational Implications.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 14 (1): 39–48. doi:10.1017/S0814062600001555.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C. 2012. “The “Digital Native” in Context: Tensions Associated with Importing Web 2.0 Practices into the School Setting.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., R. D. Pea, B. Barron, R. A. Engle, F. Erickson, R. Goldman, R. Hall, et al. 2010. “Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (1): 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. 2014. “A History of Conceptual Change Research: Threads and Fault Lines.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer , 2nd ed., 88–108. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, C., M. Barker, and C. Scarff. 2018. “Priorities, Identity and the Environment: Negotiating the Early Teenage Years.” The Journal of Environmental Education 49 (3): 189–206. doi:10.1080/00958964.2017.1415195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, M., C. Lienhardt, M. Rohs, and I. Meyer. 2010. “Microblogs in Higher Education—A Chance to Facilitate Informal and Process-Oriented Learning.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 92–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frøytlog, J. I. J., I. Rasmussen, and S. R. Ludvigsen. 2022. “How Microblogging Affords Conditions for Realising Student Voices about the Body and Sexuality in a Science Education Lesson.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 17 (3): 661–682. doi:10.1007/s11422-022-10101-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furberg, A, and K. Silseth. 2022. “Invoking Student Resources in Whole-Class Conversations in Science Education: a Sociocultural Perspective.” Journal of the Learning Sciences31: 278–316. doi:10.1080/10508406.2021.1954521.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., T. Luo, and K. Zhang. 2012. “Tweeting for Learning: A Critical Analysis of Research on Microblogging in Education Published in 2008–2011.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 783–801. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. 2011. “Promoting Thinking, Problem-Solving and Reasoning during Small Group Discussions.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (1): 73–89. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.538498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. 2019. “Promoting Academically Productive Student Dialogue during Collaborative Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 97: 200–209. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R, and R. Stevens. 2015. “Interaction Analysis Approaches to Knowledge in Use.” In Knowledge and Interaction, edited by A.A. diSessa, M. Levin and N.J.S. Brown, 72–108. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedefalk, M., J. Almquist, and M. Lidar. 2014. “Teaching for Action Competence.” SAGE Open 1–8. doi:2158244014543785.
   Google Scholar
• Hestness, E., J. R. McGinnis, and W. Breslyn. 2019. “Examining the Relationship between Middle School Students’ Sociocultural Participation and Their Ideas about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 912–924. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1266303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., S. Hennessy, N. Mercer, M. Vrikki, and L. Wheatley. 2019. “Teacher–Student Dialogue during Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 28 (4–5): 462–512. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B, and K. Schnack. 1997. “The Action Competence Approach in Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 3 (2): 163–178. doi:10.1080/1350462970030205.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B, and A. Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1): 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerawalla, L. 2015. “Talk Factory Generic: Empowering Secondary School Pupils to Construct and Explore Dialogic Space during Pupil-Led Whole-Class Discussions.” International Journal of Educational Research 70: 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2014.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerawalla, L., M. Petrou, and E. Scanlon. 2013. “Talk Factory: Supporting “Exploratory Talk” around an Interactive Whiteboard in Primary School Science Plenaries.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 22 (1): 89–102. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2012.745049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2015. “Thinking Together and Alone.” Educational Researcher 44 (1): 46–53. doi:10.3102/0013189X15569530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2018. “A Role for Reasoning in a Dialogic Approach to Critical Thinking.” Topoi 37 (1): 121–128. doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9373-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2019. “Critical Thinking as Discourse.” Human Development 62 (3): 146–164. doi:10.1159/000500171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumler, L. M. 2010. “Students of Action? A Comparative Investigation of Secondary Science and Social Studies Students’ Action Repertoires in a Land Use Context.” The Journal of Environmental Education 42 (1): 14–29. doi:10.1080/00958960903479829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesnick, A. 2006. “Forms of Engagement: The Ethical Significance of Literacy Teaching.” Ethics and Education, 1 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1080/17449640600584953.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M, and B. S. Eylon. 2011. Science Learning and Instruction. Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge Integration. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K, and N. Mercer. 2013. Interthinking. Putting Talk to Work. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Looi, C.-K., W. Chen, and F.-K. Ng. 2010. “Collaborative Activities Enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): an Exploratory Study of Learning Effectiveness.” Computers & Education 54 (1): 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I, and P. -O. Wickman. 2007. “Conflicts of Interest: An Indispensable Element of Education for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 13 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/13504620601122566.
   Google Scholar
• Major, L., P. Warwick, I. Rasmussen, S. R. Ludvigsen, and V. Cook. 2018. “Classroom Dialogue and Digital Technologies: A Scoping Review.” Education and Information Technologies. Official Journal of the IFIP Technical Committee on Education 23 (5): 1995–2028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1996. “The Quality of Talk in Children’s Collaborative Activity in the Classroom.” Learning and Instruction 6 (4): 359–377. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words and Minds: How we Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2008. “The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 17 (1): 33–59. doi:10.1080/10508400701793182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., S. Hennessy, and P. Warwick. 2019. “Dialogue, Thinking Together and Digital Technology in the Classroom: Some Educational Implications of a Continuing Line of Inquiry.” International Journal of Educational Research 97: 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., R. Wegerif, and L. Dawes. 1999. “Children’s Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (1): 95–111. doi:10.1080/0141192990250107.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, E., J. Rattray, and J. Lavery. 2015. “Twitter in the Collaborative Classroom: Micro-Blogging for in-Class Collaborative Discussions.” International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments 3 (2): 83–99. doi:10.1504/IJSMILE.2015.070764.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2006. “Talk, Talk, Talk: Teaching and Learning in Whole Class Discourse.” Research Papers in Education 21 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/02671520500445425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research 2017. Core curriculum – Values and principles for primary and secondary education. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/?lang=eng
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997. Opening Dialogue. Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. 2022. “Prefiguring Sustainable Futures? Young People’s Strategies to Deal with Conflicts about Climate-Friendly Food Choices and Implications for Transformative Learning.” Environmental Education Research 28 (8): 1157–1174. doi:10.1080/13504622.2022.2036326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, D., N. Gericke, W. Sass, and J. Boeve-de Pauw. 2020. “Self-Perceived Action Competence for Sustainability: The Theoretical Grounding and Empirical Validation of a Novel Research Instrument.” Environmental Education Research 26 (5): 742–760. doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1736991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omland, M., S. Ludvigsen, and K. A. Rødnes. 2022. “The Role of Querying: Investigating Subject-Oriented Meaning-Making.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 33: 100599. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pifarré, M. 2019. “Using Interactive Technologies to Promote a Dialogic Space for Creating Collaboratively: A Study in Secondary Education.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 32: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pifarré, M, and L. Li. 2018. “Characterizing and Unpacking Learning to Learn Together Skills in a Wiki Project in Primary Education.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 29: 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I. 2012. “Trajectories of Participation: Temporality and Learning.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by N. M. Seel, 3334–3337. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Ingvill, and Crina I. Damşa. 2017. “Heterochrony through Moment-to-Moment Interaction: A Micro-Analytical Exploration of Learning as Sense Making with Multiple Resources.” International Journal of Educational Research 84: 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I, and Å M M. Hagen. 2015. “Facilitating Students’ Individual and Collective Knowledge Construction through Microblogs.” International Journal of Educational Research 72: 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., N. Mercer, and E. Dabrowski. 2001. “Collaboration, Scaffolding and the Promotion of Problem Solving Strategies in Mexican Pre-Schoolers.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 16 (2): 179–196. doi:10.1007/BF03173024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2013. “Analyzing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socioscientific Issues.” Science Education 97 (4): 594–620. doi:10.1002/sce.21065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rødnes, K. A., I. Rasmussen, M. Omland, and V. Cook. 2021. “Who Has Power? An Investigation of How One Teacher Led Her Class towards Understanding an Academic Concept through Talking and Microblogging.” Teaching and Teacher Education 98: 103229. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, W., A. Quintelier, J. Boeve-de Pauw, S. De Maeyer, N. Gericke, and P. Van Petegem. 2021. “Actions for Sustainable Development through Young Students’ Eyes.” Environmental Education Research 27 (2): 234–253. doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1842331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M, and C. Bereiter. 2014. “Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation: Theory, Pedagogy and Technology.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer, 2nd ed., 397–417. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139519526.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlacek, M, and K. Sedova. 2017. “How Many Are Talking? The Role of Collectivity in Dialogic Teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research 85: 99–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selboe, E, and E. Sæther. 2018. “Økologisk Medborgerskap: Norsk Ungdoms Syn på Ansvar og Løsninger [Ecologic Citizenship: Norwegian Youths’ Views on Responsibilities and Solutions].” In Grønn Omstilling: norske Veivalg [Green changes: Norwegian choices], edited by H. Haarstad and G. Rusten, 183–199. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Sezen-Barrie, A., A. Miller-Rushing, and E. Hufnagel. 2020. “It’s a Gassy World”: Starting with Students’ Wondering Questions to Inform Climate Change Education.” Environmental Education Research 26 (4): 555–576. doi:10.1080/13504622.2019.1610158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnes, A. 2020. Action, takk! Hva kan skolen laere av unge menneskers handlinger for baerekraftig utvikling? [Action, please! What can schools learn from young people’s actions for sustainable development?]. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Stoknes, P. E. 2014. “Rethinking Climate Communications and the “Psychological Climate Paradox.” Energy Research & Social Science 1: 161–170. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007.
   Google Scholar
• Tayne, K. 2022. “Buds Of Collectivity: student Collaborative and System-Oriented Action Towards Greater Socioenvironmental Sustainability.” Environmental Education Research 28 (2): 216–240. doi:10.1080/13504622.2021.2012129.
   Google Scholar
• Tayne, K., M. K. Littrell, C. Okochi, A. U. Gold, and E. Leckey. 2021. “Framing Action in a Youth Climate Change Filmmaking Program: hope, Agency, and Action Across Scales.” Environmental Education Research 27 (5): 706–726. doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1821870.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, P., S. Hennessy, and N. Mercer. 2011. “Promoting Teacher and School Development through co-Enquiry: Developing Interactive Whiteboard Use in a “Dialogic Classroom.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (3): 303–324. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.554704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J, and L. Sund. 2021. “A Didactic Model of Sustainability Commitment.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3083. doi:10.3390/su13063083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, J, and M. Öhman. 2013. “Participatory Approach in Practice: An Analysis of Student Discussions about Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 324–341. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.695012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar