Teachers’ views on ‘food’ animals for sustainability education: an exploratory study

References

• Abid, Z., A. J. Cross, and R. Sinha. 2014. “Meat, Dairy, and Cancer 1–4.” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 100: 386–393. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.071597.386S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, C. 1990. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. 2003. The Pornography of Meat. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Algers, B., H. J. Blokhuis, A. Botner, D. M. Broom, P. Costa, M. Domingo, M. Greiner, et al. 2009. “Scientific Opinion on the Overall Effects of Farming Systems on Dairy cow - Adopted on 05 June 2009.” The EFSA Journal 1143: 1–38. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1143.
   Google Scholar
• Ayadi, K., and J. Bree. 2010. “An Ethnography of the Transfer of Food Learning within the Family.” Young Consumers 11 (1): 67–76. doi:10.1108/17473611011026028.
   Google Scholar
• Banschbach, V. S., and T. Lloro-Bidart. 2019. Animals in Environmental Education: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Curriculum and Pedagogy. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-98479-7.
   Google Scholar
• Banyte, A., I. V. Di Lauro, A. Mitova, C. Schauman, E. Simoniello, and F. J. A. Perez-Cueto. 2022. “Why Do Men Choose and Adhere to a Meatless Diet?” International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 27: 100446. doi:10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., S. Loughnan, N. Haslam, and H. R. M. Radke. 2012. “Don’t Mind Meat? the Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (2): 247–256. doi:10.1177/0146167211424291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, L., K. K. Goldewijk, K. W. Van Der Hoek, A. H. W. Beusen, D. P. Van Vuuren, J. Willems, M. C. Rufino, and E. Stehfest. 2013. “Exploring Global Changes in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles in Agriculture Induced by Livestock Production over the 1900–2050 Period.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (52): 20882–20887. doi:10.1073/PNAS.1012878108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, R. L., and C. M. Devine. 2011. “Watching a Person Who Knows How to Cook, You’ll Learn a Lot” Linked Lives, Cultural Transmission, and the Food Choices of Puerto Rican Girls.” Appetite 56 (2): 290–298. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A., and S. K. Abell. 1999. “Development of Professional Knowledge in Learning to Teach Elementary Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (2): 121–139. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2 < 121::AID-TEA2 > 3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, C., and H. Sanctorum. 2021. “Alternative Proteins, Evolving Attitudes: comparing Consumer Attitudes to Plant-Based and Cultured Meat in Belgium in Two Consecutive Years.” Appetite 161: 105161. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Câmara, A. C., A. Proença, F. Teixeira, H. Freitas, H. Gil, I. Vieira, J. Pinto, et al. 2018. “Referencial De Educação Ambiental Para a Sustentabilidade.” Direção Geral Da Educação 126. https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/ECidadania/Educacao_Ambiental/documentos/referencial_ambiente.pdf. Acedido em 6/7/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Castano Rodriguez, C. 2016. “Which Values regarding Nature and Other Species Are We Promoting in the Australian Science Curriculum?” Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (4): 999–1021. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9675-7.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., G. B. Stewart, L. A. Panzone, I. Kyriazakis, and L. J. Frewer. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Public Attitudes, Perceptions and Behaviours Towards Production Diseases Associated with Farm Animal Welfare.” In Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (3): 455–478. ( doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9615-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clonan, A., P. Wilson, J. A. Swift, D. G. Leibovici, and M. Holdsworth. 2015. “Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Purchasing Behaviours and Attitudes: Impacts for Human Health, Animal Welfare and Environmental Sustainability.” Public Health Nutrition 18 (13): 2446–2456. doi:10.1017/S1368980015000567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M., and K. Stewart. 2015. Our Children and Other Animals (The Cultural Construction of Human-Animal Relations in Childhood). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corrin, T., and A. Papadopoulos. 2017. “Understanding the Attitudes and Perceptions of Vegetarian and Plant-Based Diets to Shape Future Health Promotion Programs.” Appetite 109: 40–47. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2008. “Council Directive 2008/120/EC Laying down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Pigs.” Official Journal of the European Union 5: L47/5–13. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1487548100586&uri=CELEX:32008L0120.
   Google Scholar
• D’Eaubonne, F. 1974. Le Féminisme Ou La Mort. Édition Le Passager Clandestin: Champagne.
   Google Scholar
• D’Silva, J. 2006. “Adverse Impact of Industrial Animal Agriculture on the Health and Welfare of Farmed Animals.” Integrative Zoology 1 (1): 53–58. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4877.2006.00013.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer, C., S. Erreygers, C. De Cort, F. Vandermoere, A. Dhoest, J. Vrinten, and S. Van Bauwel. 2020. “Meat and Masculinities. Can Differences in Masculinity Predict Meat Consumption, Intentions to Reduce Meat and Attitudes towards Vegetarians?” Appetite 147: 104559. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinker, K. G., and H. Pedersen. 2016. “Critical Animal Pedagogies: re-Learning Our Relations with Animal Others.” In The Palgrave International Handbook of Alternative Education, edited by N. Lees, H. E., Noddings (Ed.), 415–430. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, M., G. Hodson, K. Dhont, and C. MacInnis. 2019. “Eating with Our Eyes (Closed): Effects of Visually Associating Animals with Meat on Antivegan/Vegetarian Attitudes and Meat Consumption Willingness.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 22 (6): 818–835. doi:10.1177/1368430219861848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Europe. 1979. “European Convention for the Protection of Animals for Farming Purposes.” European Treaty Series 10 (102): 1–8. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/european-convention-for-the-protection-of-animals-kept-for-farming-purposes.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fiddes, N. 1992. Meat: A Natural Symbol. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, R. P. 2022. “The Impacts of Animal Farming: A Critical Overview of Primary School Textbooks.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (3): 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10806-022-09887-2.
   Google Scholar
• Font-I-Furnols, M. C., A. Guerrero, L, and Dalmau, A. 2022. “Consumers’ Expectations about Meat from Surgical Castrated or Immunocastrated Male and Female Iberian Pigs.” Animals 12(: 468. doi:10.3390/ani12040468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. 2002. “Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay.” Frontiers 23 (2): 14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3347337.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G., and P. D. Murphy. (n.d.). Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P., Steinfeld, H. Henderson, B. Mottet, A. Opio, C. Dijkman, J. Falcucci, and A. T. G. 2013. Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Graça, J., M. M. Calheiros, and A. Oliveira. 2015. “Attached to Meat? (Un)Willingness and Intentions to Adopt a More Plant-Based Diet.” Appetite 95: 113–125. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, A. B. 2010. “Race as a “Feeble Matter” in Veganism: Interrogating Whiteness, Geopolitical Privilege, and Consumption Philosophy of Cruelty-Free Products.” Journal of Critical Animal Studies 8 (3): 5–27. https://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. B. 2013. “The Logic of Livestock in Amazonia Deforestation Macroeconomic Context, and Individual Economic Strategies.” Bioscience 43 (10): 687–695. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1312340. doi:10.2307/1312340.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. A., N. S. Betchart, and R. B. Pittman. 1991. “Gender, Sex Role Orientation, and Attitudes toward Animals.” Anthrozoös 4 (3): 184–191. doi:10.2752/089279391787057170.
   Google Scholar
• Houde, L. J., and C. Bullis. 1990. “Ecofeminist Pedagogy: An Exploratory Case.” Ethics and the Environment 4 (2): 143–174. doi:10.1016/S1085-6633(00)88417-X.
   Google Scholar
• Houde, L. 1999. “Ecofeminist Pedagogy: An Exploratory Case.” Ethics and the Environment 4 (2): 143–174. doi:10.1016/S1085-6633(00)88417-X.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2019. “Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems.” In Research Handbook on Climate Change and Agricultural Law, edited by P. R. Shukla, J. Skea ,E. Calvo Buendia, and V. Masson-Delmot, 423–448. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. 1998. “Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic.” Environmental Values 7 (1): 41–57. doi:10.3197/096327198129341465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., and P. Brocos. 2017. “Processes of Negotiation in Socio-Scientific Argumentation about Vegetarianism in Teacher Education.” In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, 117–139. New York NY: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4_6.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., and P. Brocos. 2021. “Emotional Tension as a Frame for Argumentation and Decision-Making: Vegetarian Vs. Omnivorous Diets.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., G. Schreer, and K. J. Bao. 2021. “Effect of Anthropomorphizing Food Animals on Intentions to Eat Meat.” Anthrozoos 34 (4): 563–578. doi:10.1080/08927936.2021.1914442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. B. 2016. “Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability.” Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment, AS 2016, 12–14. doi:10.1201/b20466-7. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kheel, M. 2008. Nature Ethics: An Ecofeminist Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., and L. Barnett. 2008. “Justifying Attitudes toward Animal Use: A Qualitative Study of People’s Views and Beliefs.” Anthrozoos 21 (1): 31–42. doi:10.2752/089279308X274047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koneswaran, G., and D. Nierenberg. 2008. “Global Farm Animal Production and Global Warming: Impacting and Mitigating Climate Change.” Environmental Health Perspectives 116 (5): 578–582. doi:10.1289/ehp.11034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2012. “Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): The Turn Away from “Environment” in Environmental Education?” Environmental Education Research 18 (5): 699–717. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.658028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2020. “Education for the Future? Critical Evaluation of Education for Sustainable Development Goals.” Journal of Environmental Education 51 (4): 280–291. doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, J. R., and S. M. Hohle. 2016. “Meat Eaters by Dissociation: How We Present, Prepare and Talk about Meat Increases Willingness to Eat Meat by Reducing Empathy and Disgust.” Appetite 105: 758–774. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, J. R., and C. A. Palacios Haugestad. 2018. “The Effects of Dissociation on Willingness to Eat Meat Are Moderated by Exposure to Unprocessed Meat: A Cross-Cultural Demonstration.” Appetite 120: 356–366. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupsala, S. 2018. “Contesting the Meat–Animal Link and the Visibility of Animals Killed for Food: A Focus Group Study in Finland.” Food, Culture and Society 21 (2): 196–213. doi:10.1080/15528014.2018.1427928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwasny, T., K. Dobernig, and P. Riefler. 2022. “Towards Reduced Meat Consumption : A Systematic Literature Review of Intervention Effectiveness, 2001–2019.” Appetite 168: 105739. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T., and V. Banschbach. 2019a. Animals in Environmental Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T., and V. S. Banschbach. 2019b. Animals in Environmental Education Interdisciplinary Approaches to Curriculum and Pedagogy. http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/15084.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T., and K. Semenko. 2017. “Toward a Feminist Ethic of Self-Care for Environmental Educators.” Journal of Environmental Education 48 (1): 18–25. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1249324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughnan, S., N. Haslam, and B. Bastian. 2010. “The Role of Meat Consumption in the Denial of Moral Status and Mind to Meat Animals.” Appetite 55 (1): 156–159. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, H. J., and D. Sulikowski. 2018. “Of Meat and Men: Sex Differences in Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward Meat.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupinacci, J., and A. Happel-Parkins. 2016. “(Un)Learning Anthropocentrism: An Ecojustice Framework for Teaching to Resist Human-Supremacy in Schools.” In The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions: Blurring the Species Line, 13–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137505255_2.
   Google Scholar
• Mbow, H., A. Reisinger, J. Canadell, and P. O. Ginevra, IPCC, undefined, & 2017, undefined. (n.d.). Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial. Ipcc.Ch. Geneve: IPCC - United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, J., and J. Wallace. 2005. “Growing the Tree of Teacher Knowledge: Ten Years of Learning to Teach Elementary Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (7): 767–790. doi:10.1002/tea.20073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, B., J. Schulze, D. Kreuer, A. Linstädter, and K. Frank. 2015. “How to Avoid Unsustainable Side Effects of Managing Climate Risk in Drylands — The Supplementary Feeding Controversy.” Agricultural Systems 139: 153–165. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noske, B, and other Animals: B. The Boundaries of Anthropology. P. P. 1989. Humans and Other Animals: Beyond the Boundaries of Anthropology. Las Vegas, NV: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palomo-Vélez, G., J. M. Tybur, and M. van Vugt. 2018. “Unsustainable, Unhealthy, or Disgusting? Comparing Different Persuasive Messages against Meat Consumption.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 58: 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. 2004. “Schools, Speciesism, and Hidden Curricula: The Role of Critical Pedagogy for Humane Education Futures Bringing the Human-Animal Relation into Education Research.” Journal of Futures Studies 8 (4): 1–14. https://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/84-A01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. 2010. Animals in Schools. Processes and Strategies in Human-Animal Education. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., N. McLatchie, and C. Olesen. 2018. “Are Baby Animals Less Appetizing? Tenderness toward Baby Animals and Appetite for Meat.” Anthrozoos 31 (3): 319–335. doi:10.1080/08927936.2018.1455456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluhar, E. B. 2010. “Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5): 455–468. doi:10.1007/s10806-009-9226-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pordata. 2020. “Qual a percentagem de mulheres entre os professores do ensino pré-escolar, básico ou secundário?” https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Docentes+do+sexo+feminino+em+percentagem+dos+docentes+em+exercício+nos+ensinos+pré+escolar++básico+e+secundário+total+e+por+nível+de+ensino-782-6226.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenberg, M. 2016. “Explaining Teachers’ Use of Textbooks.” Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society 8 (2): 145–159. doi:10.3167/jemms.2016.080208.
   Google Scholar
• Reipurth, M. F. S., L. Hørby, C. G. Gregersen, A. Bonke, and F. J. A. Perez Cueto. 2019. “Barriers and Facilitators towards Adopting a More Plant-Based Diet in a Sample of Danish Consumers.” Food Quality and Preference 73: 288–292. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, P., and C. Galvão. 2004. “The Impact of Socio-Scientific Controversies in Portuguese Natural Science Teachers’ Conceptions and Practices.” Research in Science Education 34 (2): 153–171. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000033760.04656.a1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisch, L., U. Eberle, and S. Lorek. 2013. “Sustainable Food Consumption: An Overview of Contemporary Issues and Policies.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 9 (2): 7–25. doi:10.1080/15487733.2013.11908111.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., and M. Roser. 2017. “Meat and dairy production.” Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, N. 2020. “Anthropocentric Tendencies in Environmental Education: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Nature-Based Learning.” Ethics and Education 15: 355–370. doi:10.1080/17449642.2020.1780550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. B., and S. J. Heine. 2011. “Meat, Morals, and Masculinity.” Appetite 56 (2): 447–450. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Sabate, R., and J. Sabaté. 2019. “Consumer Attitudes towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (7): 1220. doi:10.3390/ijerph16071220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spannring, R. 2017. “Animals in Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 23: 63–74. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1188058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll-Kleemann, S., and T. O’Riordan. 2015. “The Sustainability Challenges of Our Meat and Dairy Diets.” Environment 57 (3): 34–48. doi:10.1080/00139157.2015.1025644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawse, J. 2010. “Consumer Attitudes towards Farm Animals and Their Welfare: A Pig Production Case Study.” Bioscience Horizons 3 (2): 156–165. doi:10.1093/biohorizons/hzq020.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., and R. Twine. 2014. The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203797631.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. 1996. “Animal Rights and Human Needs.” Environmental Ethics 18 (3): 249–264. doi:10.5840/enviroethics199618316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. 2017. “Beyond Stewardship: common World Pedagogies for the Anthropocene.” Environmental Education Research 23 (10): 1448–1461. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Velde, H., N. Aarts, and C. Van Woerkum. 2002. “Dealing with Ambivalence: Farmers’ and Consumers’ Perceptions of Animal Welfare in Livestock Breeding.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (2): 203–219. doi:10.1023/A:1015012403331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. B. 1994. The Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasevic, I., I. Bahelka, M. Čandek-Potokar, J. Čítek, I. Djekić, I. Djurkin Kušec, A. Getya, et al. 2020. “Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers towards Piglet Castration and Meat from Castrated Pigs.” Meat Science 160: 107965. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracana, R. B. 2009. Educação Ambiental no Ensino Básico e Secundário: Concepções de Professores e Análise de Manuais Escolares 314. Minho: Universidade do Minho.
   Google Scholar
• Twine, R. 2010. Animals as Biotechnology. Ethics, Sustainability and Critical Animal Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.2752/j175174412X13190510222264.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, W. J. 2002. “Pain and Distress in Agricultural Animals.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 221 (2): 208–211. doi:10.2460/javma.2002.221.208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, T. 2013. “The Meat of the Global Food Crisis.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 65–85. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.752357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldemarian, K. 2017. “Challenging and Expanding the Notion of Sustainability within Early Childhood Education: perspectives from Post-Humanist and/or New Materialism.” In Ethical Literacies and Education for Sustainable Development, edited by O. Franck and C. Osbeck. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49010-6_7.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, N. M. 2008. “Affected Ignorance and Animal Suffering: Why Our Failure to Debate Factory Farming Puts Us at Moral Risk.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4): 371–384. doi:10.1007/s10806-008-9087-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. H., C. T. Ho, S. L. Nah, and C. F. Chau. 2014. “Global Hunger: A Challenge to Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Sciences.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 54 (2): 151–162. doi:10.1080/10408398.2011.578764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. 2010. “Does Organic Farming Offer a Solution.” In The Meat Crisis. Developing More Sustainable Production and Consumption, edited by J. D’Silva, and J. Webster, 80–96. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zickfeld, J. H., J. R. Kunst, and S. M. Hohle. 2018. “Too Sweet to Eat: Exploring the Effects of Cuteness on Meat Consumption.” Appetite 120: 181–195. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar