221
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Asking meaningful questions in digital outdoor learning tool - a way to support conceptual change

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 775-793 | Received 18 Jul 2022, Accepted 08 May 2023, Published online: 24 May 2023

References

  • Allen, M. 2017. “Intercoder Reliability Techniques: Krippendorff’s Alpha.” In The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, Vol. 1–4. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Benedict-Chambers, A., S. M. Kademian, E. A. Davis, and A. S. Palincsar. 2017. “Guiding Students towards Sensemaking: Teacher Questions Focused on Integrating Scientific Practices with Science Content.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (15): 1977–2001. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674.
  • Bjork, R. A., J. Dunlosky, and N. Kornell. 2013. “Self-Regulated Learning: beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions.” Annual Review of Psychology 64: 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.23020639.
  • Bolliger, D. U., and C. E. Shepherd. 2017. “An Investigation of Mobile Technologies and Web 2.0 Tools Use in Outdoor Education Programs.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership 9 (2): 181–196. doi:10.18666/JOREL-2017-V9-I2-8228.
  • Chang, C. H., L. Pascua, and F. Ess. 2018. “Closing the “Hole in the Sky”: The Use of Refutation-Oriented Instruction to Correct Students’ Climate Change Misconceptions.” Journal of Geography 117 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1080/00221341.2017.1287768.
  • Chawla, L. 2015. “Benefits of Nature Contact for Children.” Journal of Planning Literature 30 (4): 433–452. doi:10.1177/0885412215595441.
  • Chen, Y. C., B. Hand, and L. Norton-Meier. 2017. “Teacher Roles of Questioning in Early Elementary Science Classrooms: A Framework Promoting Student Cognitive Complexities in Argumentation.” Research in Science Education 47 (2): 373–405. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9506-6.
  • Chi, M. T. 2008. “Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift.” In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by Vosniadou, 61-82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Chin, C. 2006. Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11): 1315–1346.
  • Chin, C. 2007. “Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches That Stimulate Productive Thinking.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (6): 815–843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171.
  • Chi, M. T., and R. Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49 (4): 219–243. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
  • Cumulus Consulting. 2012a. Mitteformaalse Keskkonnahariduse Spetsialistide Täiendkoolituste Vajadus Ning Õppevahendistega Varustatus. (In Estonian). Tallinn: Environmental Board of Estonian.
  • Cumulus Consulting. 2012b. Keskkonnahariduse Koostöövõrgustik. (In Estonian). Tallinn: Environmental Board of Estonian.
  • Dawson, V., and K. Carson. 2013. “Australian Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Climate Change.” Teaching Science 59 (3): 9–14.
  • Demirbas, C. O. 2017. “The Effect of out-of-School Activities on Conceptual Change in Environmental Education.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 5 (2): 232–242. doi:10.11114/jets.v5i2.2077.
  • Dillenbourg, P., and P. Jermann. 2007. “Designing Integrative Scripts.” In Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning – Cognitive, Computational, and Educational Perspectives, edited by F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, and I. Kollar, 275–301. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Series, New York: Springer.
  • Duit, R. H., and D. F. Treagust. 2012. “Conceptual Change: Still a Powerful Framework for Improving the Practice of Science Instruction.” In Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research, edited by K. C. D. Tan and M. Kim, 43–54. New York: Springer.
  • FAO. 2015. “Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) - Main Report.” Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • Gorodetsky, M., and S. Keiny. 1995. “Conceptual Change and Environmental Cognition.” International Journal of Science Education 17 (2): 207–217. doi:10.1080/0950069950170205.
  • Hatano, G., and K. Inagaki. 2012. Young Children’s Thinking about Biological World. London: Psychology Press.
  • Hills, D., and G. Thomas. 2020. “Digital Technology and Outdoor Experiential Learning.” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning 20 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1080/14729679.2019.1604244.
  • Hollweg, K. S., J. R. Taylor, R. W. Bybee, T. J. Marcinkowski, W. C. McBeth, and P. Zoido. 2011. Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
  • IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, edited by E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo, 1148. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat.
  • IPCC. 2018. Global warming of 1.5 C (SR1.5) Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, edited by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield, 32. World Meteorological Organization.
  • Jaakkola, T., S. Nurmi, and E. Lehtinen. 2010. “Conceptual Change in Learning Electricity: Using Virtual and Concrete External Representations Simultaneously.” In Use of Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving, 143–162. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jacobson, M. J., L. Markauskaite, A. Portolese, M. Kapur, P. K. Lai, and G. Roberts. 2017. “Designs for Learning about Climate Change as a Complex System.” Learning and Instruction 52: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.007.
  • Kapur, M. 2008. “Productive Failure.” Cognition and Instruction 26 (3): 379–424. doi:10.1080/07370000802212669.
  • Knaving, K., and S. Björk. 2013. “Designing for Fun and Play: Exploring Possibilities in Design for Gamification.” Gamification’13: Proceedings of the First International Conference on.” Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada, 131–134. doi:10.1145/2583008.2583032.
  • Kobayashi, K. 2022. “The Retrieval Practice Hypothesis in Research on Learning by Teaching: Current Status and Challenges.” Frontiers in Psychology 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842668.
  • Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
  • Kuckartz, U. 2014. “Basic Concepts and the Process of Qualitative Text Analysis.” In Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software, edited by U. Kuckartz, 37–64. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781446288719.
  • Lucariello, J., and D. Naff. 2013. “How Do I Get my Students over Their Alternative Conceptions (Misconceptions) for Learning.” American Psychological Association. Retrieved May 17, 2023, from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/misconceptions.
  • Mareschal, Denis. 2016. “The Neuroscience of Conceptual Learning in Science and Mathematics.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 10: 114–118. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.001.
  • Mason, L., and M. Santi. 1998. “Discussing the Greenhouse Effect: Children’s Collaborative Discourse Reasoning and Conceptual Change.” Environmental Education Research 4 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1080/1350462980040105.
  • Mayring, P. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures.” In Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education, edited by A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, and N. Presmeg. New York: Springer.
  • Mettis, K., and T. Väljataga. 2021. “Designing Learning Experiences for Outdoor Hybrid Learning Spaces.” British Journal of Educational Technology 52 (1): 498–513. doi:10.1111/bjet.13034.
  • Morris, J., and M. T. Chi. 2020. “Improving Teacher Questioning in Science Using ICAP Theory.” The Journal of Educational Research 113 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/00220671.2019.1709401.
  • Mullenbach, L. E., R. G. Andrejewski, and A. J. Mowen. 2019. “Connecting Children to Nature through Residential Outdoor Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 25 (3): 365–374. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1458215.
  • Parrique, T., J. Barth, F. Briens, C. Kerschner, A. Kraus-Polk, A. Kuokkanen, and J. H. Spangenberg. 2019. Decoupling Debunked Evidence and Arguments against Green Growth as a Sole Strategy for Sustainability. Brussels: A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  • Pishtari, G., M. J. Rodríguez-Triana, E. M. Sarmiento-Márquez, J. Terasmaa, K. Kori, M. Kangur, O. Cherednychenko, T. Väljataga, and L. Puusepp. 2019. “An Overview of Learning Design and Analytics in Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning.” In Herzog, Z. Kubincová, P. Han, & M. Temperini (Eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2019, 11841 (pp. 312–319). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_30
  • Pishtari, G., M. J. Rodríguez-Triana, and T. Väljataga. 2019. “September). Multi-Stakeholder Analytics for Learning Design: A Case Study of Location-Based Tools.”In World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 94–101). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/210606/
  • Porter, D., A. J. Weaver, and H. Raptis. 2012. “Assessing Students’ Learning about Fundamental Concepts of Climate Change under Two Different Conditions.” Environmental Education Research 18 (5): 665–686. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.640750.
  • Pyc, M. A., and K. A. Rawson. 2009. “Testing the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis: Does Greater Difficulty Correctly Recalling Information Lead to Higher Levels of Memory?” Journal of Memory and Language 60 (4): 437–447. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004.
  • Rates, C. A., B. K. Mulvey, and D. F. Feldon. 2016. “Promoting Conceptual Change for Complex Systems Understanding: Outcomes of an Agent-Based Participatory Simulation.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (4): 610–627. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9616-6.
  • Rawson, K. A., and A. Zamary. 2019. “Why is Free Recall Practice More Effective than Recognition Practice for Enhancing Memory? Evaluating the Relational Processing Hypothesis.” Journal of Memory and Language 105: 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.01.002.
  • Resbiantoro, G, and R. Setiani. 2022. “A Review of Misconception in Physics: The Diagnosis, Causes, and Remediation.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 19 (2): 403–427. doi:10.36681/tused.2022.128
  • Robottom, I. 2004. “Constructivism in Environmental Education: Beyond Conceptual Change Theory.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 20 (2): 93–101. doi:10.1017/S0814062600002238.
  • Schneider, J., and S. Schaal. 2018. “Location-Based Smartphone Games in the Context of Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development: Fostering Connectedness to Nature with Geogames.” Environmental Education Research 24 (11): 1597–1610. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1383360.
  • Sinha, T., and M. Kapur. 2021. “When Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Works: Evidence for Productive Failure.” Review of Educational Research 91 (5): 761–798. doi:10.3102/00346543211019105.
  • Thomas, G. J., and B. Munge. 2017. “Innovative Outdoor Fieldwork Pedagogies in the Higher Education Sector: Optimising the Use of Technology.” Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 20 (1): 7–13. doi:10.1007/BF03400998.
  • Väljataga, T., U. Moks, A. Tiits, T. Ley, M. Kangur, and J. Terasmaa. 2017. “Designing Learning Experiences outside of Classrooms with a Location-Based Game Avastusrada.” In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, 614–617. Cham: Springer.
  • Van Boekel, Martin, Karla A Lassonde, Edward J O’Brien, and Panayiota Kendeou. 2017. “Source Credibility and the Processing of Refutation Texts.” Memory & Cognition 45 (1): 168–181. 10.3758/s13421-016-0649-0.27585919
  • van Kraalingen, I. 2021. “A Systematized Review of the Use of Mobile Technology in Outdoor Learning.” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning: 1–19. doi:10.1080/14729679.2021.1984963.
  • Vosniadou, S. 1994. “Capturing and Modeling the Process of Conceptual Change.” Learning and Instruction, 4 (1): 45–69. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3.
  • Vosniadou, S. 2002. “On the Nature of Naive Physics.” In Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by M. Limón and L. Mason, 61–76. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Vosniadou, S, and C. Ioannides. 1998. “From Conceptual Development to Science Education: A Psychological Point of View.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (10): 1213–1230. 10.1080/0950069980201004.
  • Vosniadou, S., C. Ioannides, A. Dimitrakopoulou, and E. Papademetriou. 2001. “Designing Learning Environments to Promote Conceptual Change in Science.” Learning and Instruction 11 (4–5): 381–419. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4.
  • Vosniadou, S., and I. Skopeliti. 2014. “Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence.” Science & Education 23 (7): 1427–1445. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9640-3.
  • Willis, J., B. Weiser, and D. Kirkwood. 2014. “Bridging the Gap: Meeting the Needs of Early Childhood Students by Integrating Technology and Environmental Education.” International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education 2 (1): 140–155.
  • WWAP (UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme). 2019. “The United Nations World Water Development Report 2019: Leaving No One Behind.” Paris: UNESCO.
  • Yip, Y. D. 2004. “Questioning Skills for Conceptual Change in Science Instruction.” Journal of Biological Education 38 (2): 76–83. doi:10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.