Publication Cover
Social Identities
Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture
Volume 23, 2017 - Issue 5
13,215
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How critical is the event? Multicultural Norway after 22 July 2011

Pages 518-532 | Received 16 Dec 2015, Accepted 26 Nov 2016, Published online: 02 Jan 2017

References

  • Aarli, R. (2014). Reform of the insanity defense. Norwegian Reflections post 22 July 2011. Retrieved from http://www.robinainstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/9_Aarli.pdf
  • Andersson, M. (2012). The debate about multicultural Norway before and after 22 July 2011. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 19(4), 418–427. doi: 10.1080/1070289X.2012.684442
  • Bachmann, V., Bialasiewicz, L., Sidaway, J. D., Feldman, M., Holgersen, S., Malm, A., … Simonsen, K. (2012). Bloodlands: Critical geographical responses to the 22 July 2011 events in Norway. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 191–206. doi:10.1068/d303
  • Bangstad, S. (2012). Terror in Norway. American Anthropologist, 114(2), 351–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01430.x
  • Bangstad, S. (2013). Eurabia comes to Norway. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 24(3), 369–391. doi: 10.1080/09596410.2013.783969
  • Bangstad, S. (2014). Anders Breivik and the rise of Islamophobia. London: Zed Books.
  • Berntzen, L. E., & Sandberg, S. (2014). The collective nature of lone wolf terrorism: Anders Behring Breivik and the anti-Islamic social movement. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(5), 759–779. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2013.767245
  • Bhabha, H. K. (1990). Introduction: Narrating the nation. In H. K. Bhabha (Ed.), Nation and narration (pp. 291–322). London: Routledge.
  • Bial, H. (2004). The performance studies reader. London: Routledge.
  • Buuren, van J. (2013). Spur to violence? Anders Behring Breivik and the Eurabia conspiracy. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3(4), 205–215. doi: 10.2478/njmr-2013-0013
  • Carle, R. (2013). Anders Breivik and the death of free speech in Norway. Society, 50(4), 395–401. doi: 10.1007/s12115-013-9677-6
  • Das, V. (1995). Critical events. An anthropological perspective on contemporary India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Das, V. (2007). Life and words. Violence and the descent into the ordinary. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • De Graaf, B., van der Heide, L., Wanmaker, S., & Weggemans, D. (2013). The Anders Behring Breivik trial: Performing justice, defending democracy. ICCT Research Paper June 2013. The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. Retrieved from http://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-De-Graaf-et-al-The-Anders-Behring-Breivik-Trial-August-2013.pdf
  • Eide, E. (2012). The terror in Norway and the multiculturalist scapegoat. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 20(3), 273–284. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2012.711153
  • Eide, E., Kjølstad, M., & Naper, A. (2013). After the 22 July terror in Norway: Media debates on freedom of expression and multiculturalism. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3(4). Retrieved from https://oda.hio.no/jspui/bitstream/10642/1874/1/1071777.pdf doi: 10.2478/njmr-2013-0011
  • Ezzati, R. T., & Erdal, M. B. (2017). Do we have to agree? Accommodating unity in diversity in post-terror Norway. Ethnicities. doi:10.1177/1468796816684145
  • Falkheimer, J., & Olsson, E.-K. (2015). Depoliticizing terror: The news framing of the terrorist attacks in Norway, 22 July 2011. Media, War & Conflict, 8(1), 70–85. doi:10.1177/1750635214531109
  • Fekete, L. (2012). The Muslim conspiracy theory and the Oslo massacre. Race & Class, 53(3), 30–47. doi: 10.1177/0306396811425984
  • Ferree, M. M. (2008). Framing equality. The politics of race, class, and gender in the US, Germany, and the expanding European union. In S. Roth (Ed.), Gender politics in the expanding European Union: Mobilization, inclusion, exclusion (pp. 237–257). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • Figenschou, T. U., & Beyer, A. (2014, July 29). The limits of the debate. How the Oslo terror shook the Norwegian immigration debate. The International Journal of Press/Politics. doi:10.1177/1940161214542954
  • Fimreite, A. L., Lango, P., Lægereid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2013). After Oslo and Utøya: A shift in the balance between security and liberty in Norway? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 36(10), 839–856. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2013.823754
  • Frey, E. (2013). Norway’s media coverage: The salute of a man who does not regret. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(1), 59–61. doi: 10.1080/08900523.2013.755078
  • Friedman, U. (2011, July 27). Comparing how Norway and the U.S. respond to terror. The Wire. Retrieved from http://www.thewire.com/global/2011/07/comparing-how-norway-and-us-respond-terror/40467/
  • Gardell, M. (2014). Crusader dreams: Oslo 22/7, Islamophobia, and the quest for a monocultural Europe. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(1), 129–155. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2014.849930
  • Henkel, H. (2012). The political anthropology of Scandinavia after July 22, 2011. American Anthropologist, 114(2), 353–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01431.x
  • Hervik, P., & Meret, S. (2013). Erostratus unbound: Norway’s 22/7 converging frames of war. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3(4), 179–186.
  • Jakobsson, N., & Blom, S. (2014, January 9). Did the 2011 terror attacks in Norway change citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants? International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt036
  • Kolås, Å. (2010). The 2008 Mumbai terror attacks: (Re-)constructing Indian (counter-)terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3(1), 83–98. doi: 10.1080/17539151003594244
  • Leer-Salvesen, P. (2013). Theology after the Massacre in Norway. Dialog, 52(2), 110–120. doi: 10.1111/dial.12025
  • Lied, S. & Bakke, Undseth S. (2013). Canon and archive in messages from Oslo cathedral square in the aftermath of July 22nd 2011. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 2013(1), 34–56.
  • Myrdahl, E. M. (2014). Recuperating whiteness in the injured nation: Norwegian identity in the response to 22 July. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 20(6), 486–500. doi: 10.1080/13504630.2015.1004997
  • NOU. (2012). Rapport fra 22. juli-kommisjonen [Report from the 22 July Commission].Oppnevnt ved kongelig resolusjon 12. august 2011 for å gjennomgå og trekke lærdom fra angrepene på regjeringskvartalet og Utøya 22. juli 2011. Avgitt til statsministeren 13. august 2012. Norges Offentlige Utredninger, NOU 2012: 14.
  • NOU. (2014). Skyldevne, sakkyndighet og samfunnsvern. [Liability, expert knowledge and social protection]. Utredning fra utvalg oppnevnt ved kongelig resolusjon 25. januar 2013. Avgitt til Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet 28. oktober 2014. Norges Offentlige Utredninger, NOU 2014: 10.
  • Office of the Prime Minister. (2011a). Sjokkerende og feigt. Tale av statsminister Jens Stoltenberg fredag kveld [Shocking and cowardly. Speech by Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg Friday night] [News] published 22 July 2011. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/nb/aktuelt/sjokkerende-og-feigt/id651774/
  • Office of the Prime Minister. (2011b). Statsminister Jens Stoltenbergs tale på Rådshusplassen i Oslo [Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s speech at Rådhusplassen in Oslo] [Speech/article] published 25 July 2011. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/statsminister-jens-stoltenbergs-tale-pa-/id651840/
  • Office of the Prime Minister. (2012a). Stoltenberg: Facts that require action [Press release No: 94/12] published 13 August 2012. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/stoltenberg-facts-that-require-action/id697507/
  • Office of the Prime Minister. (2012b). The prime minister’s address to the Storting on the government’s follow-up of the 22 July commission’s report [Speech/article] published 28 August 2012. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/the-prime-ministers-address-to-the-stort/id698071/
  • PRIO (n.d.). Negotiating the nation: Implications of ethnic and religious diversity for national identity (NATION), Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). Retrieved from https://www.prio.org/NATION
  • Putnam, R. D. (2002, February 11). Bowling together. American Prospect, pp. 20–23.
  • Roth, W. T., & Dager, S. R. (2014). Psychiatry on trial: The Norway 2011 massacre. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202(3), 181–185. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000109
  • Rykkja, H. L., Lægreid, P., & Fimreite, L. A. (2011). Attitudes towards anti-terror measures: The role of trust, political orientation and civil liberties support. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4(2), 219–237. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2011.586206
  • Sheperd, L. J. (2008). Visualising violence: Legitimacy and authority in the ‘War on Terror’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(2), 213–226. doi: 10.1080/17539150802184611
  • Skarvøy, J., Johnsen, A. B., & Solberg, T. (2016, July 11). 22. juli – fem år etter. Ernas oppgjør [22 July– five years later. Erna takes stock]. Verdens Gang, pp. 6–8.
  • Solheim, B. Ø. (2012). 22. juli 2011. En diskursanalyse. STV 4104B: Tekstanalyse [22 July 2011. A Discourse Analysis. STV 4104B: Textual Analysis] [Term Paper submitted to the University of Oslo, Course STV 4104B in Textual Analysis]. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/oyvinbso/Diskursanalyse.pdf
  • Solheim, T., & Kvaal, S. I. (2013). Profile of a terrorist, Anders Behring Breivik. Effect on the Norwegian society and the police force. Journal of Forensic Odontostomatology, 31(1), 4–5.
  • Stenerud, A. (2011, July 27). De er våre helter [They are our heroes]. Dagbladet. http://www.dagbladet.no/2011/07/27/nyheter/utoya/politiet/beredskapstroppen/storberget/17468386/
  • Von Brömssen, K. (2013). 2083 – a European declaration of independence. An analysis of discourses from the extreme. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 2013(1), 12–33.
  • Wiggen, M. (2013). Rethinking anti-immigration rhetoric after the Oslo and Utøya Terror attacks. New Political Science, 34(4), 585–604. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2012.729744
  • Wollebæk, D., Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Ødegård, G. (2012). After Utøya: How a high-trust society reacts to terror – trust and civic engagement in the aftermath of July 22. Political Science & Politics, 45, 32–37. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001806