‘Amenity’ or ‘eyesore’? Negative willingness to pay for options to replace electricity transmission towers

Giles Atkinson Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK

Brett Day Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK

Susana Mourato Department of Environmental Science and Technology, Imperial College London, RSM Building, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, UK

Charles Palmer Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung (ZEF), Universität Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, D-53113 Bonn

References

Atkinson G Day B Mourato S Palmer C 2002 The impacts of distance and familiarity on preferences for the replacement of electricity transmission towers London School of Economics and Political Science
Google Scholar
Berrens , RP , Bohara , A and Kerkvliet , J . 1998 . A randomized response for dichotomous choice contingent valuation . Resource and Energy Economics , 19 : 117 – 38 .
Google Scholar
Bohara , AK , Kerkvliet , J and Berrens , RP . 2001 . Addressing negative willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation . Environmental and Resource Economics , 20 : 173 – 95 .
Google Scholar
Carson RT Groves T Machina MJ 2000 Incentive and informational properties of preference questions University of California San Diego
Google Scholar
Cesario , FJ . 1976 . Value of time in recreation benefit studies . Land Economics , 52 : 32 – 41 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Clinch , PJ and Murphy , A . 2001 . Modelling winners and losers in contingent valuation of public goods: appropriate welfare measures and econometric analysis . Economic Journal , 111 : 420 – 43 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lockwood , M , Loomis , J and DeLacy , T . 1994 . The relative unimportance of non-market willingness to pay for timber harvesting . Ecological Economics , 9 : 145 – 52 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

‘Amenity’ or ‘eyesore’? Negative willingness to pay for options to replace electricity transmission towers

References

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

‘Amenity’ or ‘eyesore’? Negative willingness to pay for options to replace electricity transmission towers

References

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date