References
- Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2007) How much is too much? – an investigation of the effect of the number of choice sets, starting point and the choice bid vectors in choice experiments, Environmental and Resource Economics, 40, 165–76.
- Greene, W. H. (2003) Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Hole, A. R. (2007) Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood, Stata Journal, 7, 388–401.
- Ladenburg, J. and Olsen, S. B. (2008) Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: evidence from an empirical study, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56, 275–85.
- List, J. A. (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 41–71.
- List, J. A. (2004) Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: evidence from the Marketplace, Econometrica, 72, 615–25.
- Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Ryan, M. and Wordsworth, S. (2000) Sensitivity of willingness to pay estimates to level of attributes in discrete choice experiments, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47, 504–24.
- Swait, J. D. and Louviere, J. J. (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models, Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305–14.
- Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112446/MPU-L1EB.png"})