References
- Bateman, I., B. Day, G. Loomes, and R. Sugden. 2007. “Can Ranking Techniques Elicit Robust Values?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 34 (1): 49–66. doi:10.1007/s11166-006-9003-4.
- Drolet, A. 2002. “Inherent Rule Variability in Consumer Choice: Changing Rules for Change’s Sake.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (3): 293–305. doi:10.1086/344433.
- Fischer, G. W., M. F. Luce, and J. Jia. 2000. “Attribute Conflict and Preference Un- Certainty: Effects on Judgment Time and Error.” Management Science 46 (1): 88–103. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.1.88.15131.
- Heath, T. B., and S. Chatterjee. 1995. “Asymmetric Decoy Effects on Lower-Quality versus Higher-Quality Brands: Meta-Analytic and Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (3): 268–284. doi:10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-3.
- Huber, J., J. W. Payne, and C. Puto. 1982. “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alter-Natives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (1): 90–98. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-1.
- Kim, W., and M. Kim. 2015. "Reference Quality-based Competitive Market Structure For Innovation Driven Markets." 32 (3): 284-296. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.10.003.
- Simonson, I. 1989. “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (2): 158–174. doi:10.1086/jcr.1989.16.issue-2.
- Simonson, I., and A. Tversky. 1992. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research 29 (3): 281. doi:10.2307/3172740.
- Tversky, A., and R. H. Thaler. 1990. “Anomalies: Preference Reversals.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (2): 201–211. doi:10.1257/jep.4.2.201.