References
- Allen, F., J. Qian, and M. Qian. 2005. “Law, Finance and Economic Growth in China.” Journal of Financial Economics 7 (1): 57–116. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010.
- Boubakri, N., O. Guedhami, D. Mishra, and W. Saffar. 2012. “Political Connections and the Cost of Equity Capital.” Journal of Corporate Finance 18 (3): 541–559. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005.
- Chan, K. S., V. Q. T. Dang, and I. K. M. Yan. 2012. “Chinese Firms’ Political Connection, Ownership, and Financing Constraints.” Economics Letters 115 (2): 164–167. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.008.
- Chen, B., Y. Jian, X. Wang, and J. Lai. 2008. “Empirical Study on the Development of Private Listed Companies in China.” Securities Market General, 18 (4):42–47.
- Chen, C. M., M. Ariff, T. Hassan, and S. Mohamad. 2013. “Does a Firm’s Political Connection to Government Have Economic Value?” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 19 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13547860.2013.860761.
- Chen, Y., D. Luo, and W. Li. 2014. “Political Connections, Entry Barriers, and Firm Performance.” Chinese Management Studies 8 (3): 473–486. doi:10.1108/CMS-08-2013-0148.
- Faccio, M., R. W. Masulis, and J. J. McConnell. 2006. “Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts.” Journal of Finance 61 (6): 2597–2635. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x.
- Li, H., L. Meng, Q. Wang, and L. Zhou. 2008. “Political Connections, Financing and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms.” Journal of Development Economics 87 (2): 283–299. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001.
- Su, Z., and H. Fung. 2013. “Political Connections and Firm Performance in Chinese Companies.” Pacific Economic Review 18 (3): 283–317. doi:10.1111/paer.2013.18.issue-3.
- Sun, P., H. Xu, and J. Zhou. 2011. “The Value of Local Political Capital in Transition China.” Economics Letters 110 (3): 189–192. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.016.
- Wu, J., and M. L. Cheng. 2011. “The Impact of Managerial Political Connections and Quality on Government Subsidies: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms.” Chinese Management Studies 5 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1108/17506141111142834.