929
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Testing the validity of PPP theory for African countries

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alberiko Gil-Alana, L., and L. Jiang. 2013. “The Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis in the US–China Relationship: Fractional Integration, Time Variation and Data Frequency.” International Journal of Finance & Economics 18 (1): 82–92. doi:10.1002/ijfe.461.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., T. Chang, and K. Hung. 2013. “Revisiting Purchasing Power Parity in Latin America: Sequential Panel Selection Method.” Applied Economics 45 (32): 4584–4590. doi:10.1080/00036846.2013.795279.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., T. Chang, and K.-C. Lee. 2016. “Panel Asymmetric Nonlinear Unit Root Test and PPP in Africa.” Applied Economics Letters 23 (8): 554–558. doi:10.1080/13504851.2015.1088132.
  • Basher, S. A., and M. Mohsin. 2004. “PPP Tests in Cointegrated Panels: Evidence from Asian Developing Countries.” Applied Economics Letters 11 (3): 163–166. doi:10.1080/1350485042000203788.
  • Becker, R., W. Enders, and J. Lee. 2006. “A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 27 (3): 381–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x.
  • Doğanlar, M., H. Bal, and M. Özmen. 2009. “Testing Long-Run Validity of Purchasing Power Parity for Selected Emerging Market Economies.” Applied Economics Letters 16 (14): 1443–1448. doi:10.1080/13504850701522817.
  • Dornbusch, R. 1985. “Purchasing Power Parity.” NBER Working Paper Series 1591.
  • Enders, W., and J. Lee. 2012. “A Unit Root Test Using a Fourier Series to Approximate Smooth Breaks.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 74 (4): 574–599. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00662.x.
  • Gallant, A. R. 1981. “On the Bias in Flexible Functional Forms and an Essentially Unbiased Form: The Fourier Flexible Form.” Journal of Econometrics 15 (2): 211–245. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90115-9.
  • Gallant, A. R., and G. Souza. 1991. “On the Asymptotic Normality of Fourier Flexible Form Estimates.” Journal of Econometrics 50 (3): 329–353. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(91)90024-8.
  • Jones, P. M., and W. Enders. 2014. “On the Use of the Flexible Fourier Form in Unit Root Tests, Endogenous Breaks, and Parameter Instability.” In Ma and Wohar (Eds.). In Recent Advances in Estimating Nonlinear Models, 59–83. New York: Springer.
  • Kim, Y. 1990. “Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run: A Cointegration Approach.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 22 (4): 491–503. doi:10.2307/1992433.
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Peter C.B.. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y Shin. 1992. “Testing The Null Hypothesis Of Stationarity Against The Alternative Of A Unit Root: How Sure Are We That Economic Time Series Have A Unit Root?.” 54: 1–3. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y.
  • Öge Güney, P., E. Telatar, and M. Hasanov. 2012. “Re-Examining Purchasing Power Parity for Selected Emerging Markets and African Countries.” Applied Economics Letters 19 (2): 139–144. doi:10.1080/13504851.2011.570698.
  • Pentecost, E. J. 1993. Exchange Rate Dynamics. Cambridge: Edward Elgar.
  • Pesaran, M. H., and A. Timmermann. 2004. “How Costly Is It to Ignore Breaks When Forecasting the Direction of a Time Series?” International Journal of Forecasting 20 (3): 411–425. doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(03)00068-2.
  • Prodan, R. 2008. “Potential Pitfalls in Determining Multiple Structural Changes with an Application to Purchasing Power Parity.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 26 (1): 50–65. doi:10.1198/073500107000000304.
  • Taylor, M. P. 1988. “An Empirical Examination of Long-Run Purchasing Power Parity Using Cointegration Techniques.” Applied Economics 20 (10): 1369–1381. doi:10.1080/00036848800000107.
  • Taylor, M. P., D. A. Peel, and L. Sarno. 2001. “Nonlinear Mean-Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Toward a Solution to the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzles.” International Economic Review 42 (4): 1015–1042. doi:10.1111/1468-2354.00144.
  • Tsong, -C.-C., C.-F. Lee, L.-J. Tsai, and T.-C. Hu. 2016. “The Fourier Approximation and Testing for the Null of Cointegration.” Empirical Economics 51 (3): 1085–1113. doi:10.1007/s00181-015-1028-6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.