References
- Bergsten, P., S. Nicolin, A. Frisk, B. Rydgren, I. Poveda Björklund, and J. Stage. 2014. Miljöförbättrande Åtgärder i Mörrumsån och Ångermanälven, med Fokus på Havsvandrande Arter. Stockholm ÅF: Industry AB.
- Buchli, L., M. Filippini, and S. Banfi. 2003. “Estimating the Benefits of Low Flow Alleviation in Rivers: The Case of the Ticino River.” Applied Economics 35: 585–590. doi:10.1080/0003684032000056797.
- Håkansson, C. 2009. “Costs and Benefits of Improving Wild Salmon Passage in a Regulated River.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53: 345–363. doi:10.1080/09640560802703249.
- Johansson, P.-O., and B. Kriström, eds. 2011. Modern Cost–Benefit Analysis of Hydropower Conflicts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Paulrud, A., and T. Laitila. 2013. “A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Restoring the Em River in Sweden: Valuation of Angling Sites and Visitation Frequency.” Applied Economics 45: 2255–2266. doi:10.1080/00036846.2012.659348.
- Stage, J. 2013. “Habitat Banking in Swedish Rivers and Water Bodies: A Concept Paper on Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive.” European Water 42: 65–74.
- Suter, J. F., J. M. Spraggon, and G. L. Poe. 2013. “Thin and Lumpy: An Experimental Investigation of Water Quality Trading.” Water Resources and Economics 1: 36–60. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2013.03.004.
- Thangavelu, T., A. Paulrud, and J. Stage. 2017. “Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences for Angling Site Attributes: Application of a Choice Experiment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6: 324–340. doi:10.1080/21606544.2017.1310672.