Advanced search
Publication Cover
Applied Economics Letters Volume 27, 2020 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
490
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Why do countries use temporary trade barriers?

Ufuk SelenDepartment of Public Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, TurkeyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-8294
ORCID Icon
Pages 437-440 | Published online: 14 Jun 2019

References

  • Abboushi, S. 2010. “Trade Protectionism: Reasons and Outcomes.” Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 20 (5): 384–394. doi:10.1108/10595421011080760.
  • Aggarwal, A. 2004. “Macroeconomic Determinants of Antidumping: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries.” World Development 32 (6): 1043–1057. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.01.003.
  • Baltagi, B. H. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd ed. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Bown, C. P. 2011. The Great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Bown, C. P., and M. A. Crowley. 2016. “The Empirical Landscape of Trade Policy.” In Handbook of Commercial Policy, edited by K. Bagwell and R. W. Staiger, Vol. 1, Part A, 3–108. doi:10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.015.
  • Choi, C. H., and J. Kim. 2014. “Determinants for Macroeconomic Factors of Antidumping: A Comparative Analysis of India and China.” The International Trade Journal 28 (3): 229–245. doi:10.1080/08853908.2014.913511.
  • Dobson, A. J. 1990. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Cornwall, UK: Chapman and Hall.
  • Feinberg, R. M. 2011. “Antidumping as a Development Issue.” Global Economy Journal 11 (3): 1–17. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/glecon/v11y2011i3n2.html
  • Irwin, D. A. 2005. “The Rise of U.S. Antidumping Activity in Historical per Spective.” IMF Working Paper WP/05/31. 1–26. https://www.nber.org/papers/w10582.pdf
  • Knetter, M. M., and T. J. Prusa. 2003. “Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries.” Journal of International Economics 61 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6.
  • Moore, M., and M. Zanardi. 2008. “Trade Liberalization and Antidumping: Is There a Substitution Effect?” Review of Development Economics 15 (4): 601–619. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x.
  • Prusa, T. J. 2005. “Antidumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade.” The World Economy 28 (5): 683–700. doi:10.1111/j.14679701.2005.00700.x.
  • Silberberger, M., A. Slany, and F. Stender. 2017. “The Aftermath of Antidumping: Are Temporary Trade Barriers Really Temporary?” doi:10.2139/ssrn.3054988.
  • Zhou, W., and L. Cuyvers. 2009. “Determinants of EU Antidumping Actions against East Asian Countries.” Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 8 (3): 291–305. doi:10.1108/14770020910990669.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.