References
- Acharya, V. V., R. P. Baghai, and K. V. Subramanian. 2014. “Wrongful Discharge Laws and Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies 27: 301–346. doi:10.1093/rfs/hht009.
- Adhvaryu, A., A. V. Chari, and S. Sharma. 2013. “Firing Costs and Flexibility: Evidence from Firms’ Employment Responses to Shocks in India.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (3): 725–740. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00305.
- Aghion, P., J. Van Reenen, and L. Zingales. 2013. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership.” American Economic Review 103 (1): 277–304. doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.277.
- Arundel, A., and I. Kabla. 1998. “What Percentage of Innovations are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms.” Research Policy 27 (2): 127–141. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X.
- Bentolila, S., and G. Saint-Paul. 1992. “The Macroeconomic Impact of Flexible Labor Contracts with an Application to Spain.” European Economic Review 36 (5): 1013–1047. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(92)90043-V.
- Griliches, Z., A. Pakes, and B. H. Hall. 1987. “The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity.” In Economic Policy and Technological Performance, 97–124.
- Hall, B., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2001. “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools.” NBER Working Paper No. 8498.
- Holmstrom, B. 1979. “Moral Hazard and Observability.” Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74–91. doi:10.2307/3003320.
- Jackson, S. E., R. S. Schuler, and K. Jiang. 2014. “An Aspirational Framework for Strategic Human Resource Management.” The Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 1–56. doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.872335.
- Manso, G. 2011. “Motivating Innovation.” The Journal of Finance 66 (5): 1823–1860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x.
- Tian, X., and T. Y. Wang. 2014. “Tolerance for Failure and Corporate Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies 27 (1): 211–255. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr130.
- Trajtenberg, M., R. Henderson, and A. Jaffe. 1997. “University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5 (1): 19–50. doi:10.1080/10438599700000006.