References
- Babcock, L., and G. Loewenstein. 1997. “Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (1): 109–126. doi:10.1257/jep.11.1.109.
- Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe. 1995. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1): 122–142. doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027.
- Campbell, W. K., and C. Sedikides. 1999. “Self-threat Magnifies the Self-serving Bias: A Meta-analytic Integration.” Review of General Psychology 3 (1): 23–43. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23.
- Cappelen, A. W., A. D. Hole, E. Ø. Sørensen, and B. Tungodden. 2007. “The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach.” American Economic Review 97 (3): 818–827. doi:10.1257/aer.97.3.818.
- Cherry, T. L., P. Frykblom, and J. F. Shogren. 2002. “Hardnose the Dictator.” American Economic Review 92 (4): 1218–1221. doi:10.1257/00028280260344740.
- Frohlich, N., J. Oppenheimer, and A. Kurki. 2004. “Modeling Other-regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test.” Public Choice 119 (1–2): 91–117. doi:10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024169.08329.eb.
- Gill, D., and V. Prowse. 2012. “A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in A Real Effort Competition.” The American Economic Review 102 (1): 469–503. doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.469.
- Johnsen, Å. A., and O. Kvaløy. 2016. “Does Strategic Kindness Crowd Out Prosocial Behavior?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 132: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.09.016.
- Konow, J. 2000. “Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 1072–1091. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.1072.
- Messick, D. M., and K. P. Sentis. 1979. “Fairness and Preference.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15 (4): 418–434. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(79)90047-7.
- Oxoby, R. J., and J. Spraggon. 2008. “Mine and Yours: Property Rights in Dictator Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 65 (3): 703–713. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.006.
- Ubeda, P. 2014. “The Consistency of Fairness Rules: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Economic Psychology 41: 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.007.