Understanding firm-level intangible investment: a resource-based view on Korean firms

References

• Amore, M. D., and S. Murtinu. 2019. “Tobit Models in Strategy Research: Critical Issues and Applications.” Global Strategy Journal 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighetti, A., F. Landini, and A. Lasagni. 2014. “Intangible Assets and Firm Heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy.” Research Policy 43 (1): 202–213. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighetti, A., F. Landini, and A. Lasagni. 2015. “Intangible Asset Dynamics and Firm Behaviour.” Industry and Innovation 22 (5): 402–422. doi:10.1080/13662716.2015.1064256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aw, B. Y., and B. Song. 2013. “Firm’s Choice between Export and R&D and Its Effect on the Firm’s Productivity and Survival.” Global Economic Review 42 (3): 291–310. doi:10.1080/1226508X.2013.833848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneito, P., M. E. Rochina-Barrachina, and A. Sanchis. 2016. “Foreign Capital, Credit Constraints and Continuity of Firms’ R&D.” Applied Economics Letters 23 (3): 157–161. doi:10.1080/13504851.2015.1061635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneito, P., M. E. Rochina-Barrachina, and A. Sanchis-Llopis. 2015. “Ownership and the Cyclicality of Firms’ R&D Investment.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 11 (2): 343–359. doi:10.1007/s11365-014-0320-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempi, M. E., and J. Mairesse. 2015. “Intangible Capital and Productivity at the Firm Level: A Panel Data Assessment.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology: Productivity, Networks and Knowledge Flows 24 (1–2): 22–51. doi:10.1080/10438599.2014.897859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. 2006. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado, C., J. Haskel, C. Jona-Lasinio, and M. Iommi. 2013. “Innovation and Intangible Investment in Europe, Japan, and the United States.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 29 (2): 261–286. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grt017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado, C., J. Haskel, C. Jona-Lasinio, and M. Iommi. 2018. “Intangible Investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and Its Contribution to Productivity Growth.” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 2 (1): 11. doi:10.24294/jipd.v2i1.205.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, C., C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. 2005. “Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework.” In Measuring Capital in the New Economy. Chicago, Illionois: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226116174.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, C., C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. 2009. “Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth.” Review of Income and Wealth 55 (3): 661–685. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and H. Hottenrott. 2011. “Financial Constraints: Routine versus Cutting Edge R&D Investment.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20 (1): 121–157. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00285.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed., internat ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Haskel, J., and S. Westlake. 2017. Capitalism without Capital. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulten, C. R., and J. X. Hao. 2008. What Is a Company Really Worth? Intangible Capital and the “Market to Book Value” Puzzle. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w14548.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, S., and R. Tang. 2008. “Factors Affecting the Choice of Technology Acquisition Mode: An Empirical Analysis of the Electronic Firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan.” Technovation 28 (9): 551–563. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Máñez, J. A., M. E. Rochina-Barrachina, A. Sanchis-Llopis, and J. A. Sanchis-Llopis. 2014. “The Determinants of R&D Persistence in SMEs.” Small Business Economics 44 (3): 505–528. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9611-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, S., and A. Vezzani. 2016. “Intangible Investments and Innovation Propensity: Evidence from the Innobarometer 2013.” Industry and Innovation 23 (4): 331–352. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1151770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., and M. F. Martins. 2011. “Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level.” Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 14 (1): 110.
   Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., and J. M. Wooldridge. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics (Chichester, England) 11 (6): 619–632. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:63.0.CO;2-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. 2007. “Persistence of Innovation: Stylised Facts and Panel Data Evidence.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (2): 226–243. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandner, P. G., and J. Block. 2011. “The Market Value of R&D, Patents, and Trademarks.” Research Policy 40 (7): 969–985. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2005. “Simple Solutions to the Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1002/jae.770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar