229
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

In-group bias and social identification: a lab-in-the-field experiment

ORCID Icon

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., and R. E. Kranton. 2000. “Economics and Identity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–753. doi:10.1162/003355300554881.
  • Benjamin, D. J., J. J. Choi, and A. J. Strickland. 2010. “Social Identity and Preferences.” American Economic Review 100 (4): 1913–1928. doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1913.
  • Charness, G., and Y. Chen. 2020. “Social Identity, Group Behavior, and Teams.” Annual Review of Economics 12 (1): 691–713. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-091619-032800.
  • Goette, L., D. Huffman, and S. Meier. 2006. “The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence Using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 212–216. doi:10.1257/000282806777211658.
  • Goette, L., D. Huffman, and S. Meier. 2012. “The Impact of Social Ties on Group Interactions: Evidence from Minimal Groups and Randomly Assigned Real Groups.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (1): 101–115.
  • Hossain, T., and R. Okui. 2013. “The Binarized Scoring Rule.” Review of Economic Studies 80 (3): 984–1001. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt006.
  • Levine, M., A. Prosser, D. Evans, and S. Reicher. 2005. “Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (4): 443–453. doi:10.1177/0146167204271651.
  • Lowe, M. 2021. “Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration.” American Economic Review 111 (6): 1807–1844. doi:10.1257/aer.20191780.
  • Shayo, M. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 147–174. doi:10.1017/S0003055409090194.
  • Taniguchi, Y., and T. Ikegami. 2021. “Influence of Psychological Distance on People’s Willingness to Help Accident Victims: Discrepancies between Implicit and Explicit Inferences.” SAGE Open 11 (3): 21582440211033251. doi:10.1177/21582440211033251.
  • World Bank. 2014. Economics of South African Townships: Special Focus on Diepsloot. S. Mahajan edited by. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.