Estimating the climate and health damages of Bitcoin mining in the US: Is Bitcoin underwater?

References

• BitInfocharts, C. (2022). Bitcoin Block Time Historical Chart. https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-confirmationtime.html#1y
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R., Hong Chen, Mieczysław Szyszkowicz, Neal Fann, Bryan Hubbell, C. Arden Pope Iii, Joshua S. Apte. 2018. ”Global Estimates of Mortality Associated with Long-Term Exposure to Outdoor Fine Particulate Matter.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (38): 9592–9597. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803222115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. 2022. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. https://ccaf.io/cbeci/mining_map/methodology
   Google Scholar
• Chohan, U. W. 2022. ”A History of Bitcoin.” Available as SSRN. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3047875.
   Google Scholar
• CoinMarketCap.com, (2022). Total Cryptocurrency Market Cap. https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, A. 2021. “Bitcoin Boom: What Rising Prices Mean for the Network’s Energy Consumption.” Joule 5 (3): 509–513. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, A., U. Gallersdörfer, L. Klaaßen, and C. Stoll. 2021. “The True Costs of Digital Currencies: Exploring Impact Beyond Energy Use.” One Earth 4 (6): 786–789. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.009.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, A., and C. Stoll. 2021. “Bitcoin’s Growing E-Waste Problem.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 175: 105901. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitri, N. 2017. “Bitcoin Mining as a Contest.” Ledger 2: 31–37. doi:10.5195/ledger.2017.96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodkind, A. L., B. A. Jones, and R. P. Berrens. 2020. “Cryptodamages: Monetary Value Estimates of the Air Pollution and Human Health Impacts of Cryptocurrency Mining.” Energy Research & Social Science 59: 101281. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodkind, A. L., C. W. Tessum, J. S. Coggins, J. D. Hill, and J. D. Marshall. 2019. “Fine-Scale Damage Estimates of Particulate Matter Air Pollution Reveal Opportunities for Location-Specific Mitigation of Emissions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (18): 8775–8780. doi:10.1073/pnas.1816102116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houy, N. 2016. “The Bitcoin Mining Game.” Ledger 1: 53–68. doi:10.5195/ledger.2016.13.
   Google Scholar
• Houy, N. 2019. “Rational Mining Limits Bitcoin Emissions.” Nature Climate Change 9: 655. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0533-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. A., A. L. Goodkind, and R. P. Berrens. 2022. “Economic Estimation of Bitcoin Mining’s Climate Damages Demonstrates Closer Resemblance to Digital Crude Than Digital Gold.” Scientific Reports 12 (1): 14512. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18686-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. J., and T. Tolaymat. 2018. “Quantification of Energy and Carbon Costs for Mining Cryptocurrencies.” Nature Sustainability 1 (11): 711–718. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masanet, E., A. Shehabi, N. Lei, H. Vranken, J. Koomey, and J. Malmodin. 2019. “Implausible Projections Overestimate Near-Term Bitcoin CO2 Emissions.” Nature Climate Change 9: 653–654. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0535-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, C., R. L. Rollins, K. Taladay, M. B. Kantar, M. K. Chock, M. Shimada, and E. C. Franklin. 2018. “Bitcoin Emissions Alone Could Push Global Warming Above 2 °C.” Nature Climate Change 8: 931–933. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0321-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Náñez Alonso, S. L., J. Jorge-Vázquez, M. Á. Echarte Fernández, and R. F. Reier Forradellas. 2021. “Cryptocurrency Mining from an Economic and Environmental Perspective. Analysis of the Most and Least Sustainable Countries.” Energies 14 (14): 4254. doi:10.3390/en14144254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindyck, R. S. 2019. “The Social Cost of Carbon Revisited.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 94: 140–160. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennert, K., Errickson, F., Prest, B.C., Rennels, L., Newell, R.G., Pizer, W., Kingdon, C., Wingenroth, J., Cooke, R., Parthum, B. and Smith, D. 2022. ”Comprehensive Evidence Implies a Higher Social Cost of CO2.” Nature. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suliman, A. (2021). “U.S. Overtakes China to Become World’s Largest Bitcoin Mining Hub, Report Finds.” The Washington Post. Accessed 9/22/22. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/10/14/us-leads-china-bitcoin-mining-largest/
   Google Scholar
• Truby, J. 2018. “Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and Policy Choices for Reducing the Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technologies and Digital Currencies.” Energy Research & Social Science 44: 399–410. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truby, J. 2022. ”Blockchain, Climate Damage, and Death: Policy Interventions to Reduce the Carbon Emissions, Mortality, and Net-Zero Implications of Non-Fungible Tokens and Bitcoin.” Energy Research & Social Science 88: 102499. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2010. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. National Center for Environmental Economics, Office of Policy. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/guidelines-preparing-economic-analyses.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. (2021). 2017 National Emissions Inventory: January 2021 Update Release, Technical Support Document. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, EPA-454/R-21-001. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei
   Google Scholar
• US EPA, 2022. The Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database, eGrid Technical Guide with Year 2020 Data. Washington, DC: Office of Atmospheric Programs. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-01/egrid2020_technical_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar